We Must Preserve Our Heritage

odanny

Diamond Member
May 7, 2017
16,935
13,478
2,290
Midwest - Trumplandia
Oh wait...

220209571_2312225632241480_3234985435589365508_n.jpg
 
The Democratic party of slavery and Jim Crow desperately wants to erase their history in order to hide the truth from younger generations.

It's the Democratic party that should be erased, and their abhorrent history should never be forgotten.
 
What part of the theory do you disagree with the most? Specifically.
Depends on whos telling it, really. CRT fluctuates with the teacher, but im sure you know all about that :rolleyes:
I guess, if you want to ignore that crucial piece of information, it would be its marxist roots.
Critical theory sets out to destroy society.
Which is what this shit usually tries to do.
 
The Democratic party of slavery and Jim Crow desperately wants to erase their history in order to hide the truth from younger generations.

It's the Democratic party that should be erased, and their abhorrent history should never be forgotten.

Quite true. The DemoKKKrat party is the most racist organization in American history, then and now.
 
The Democratic party of slavery and Jim Crow desperately wants to erase their history in order to hide the truth from younger generations.

It's the Democratic party that should be erased, and their abhorrent history should never be forgotten.

Both the party of slavery and the party of Jim Crow are history now. Hopefully, the Trumpy_error will soon be history too.
 
Leftists get on here and act like they know what CRT is, and its proponents do not, but then that same jackoff asks a question that cant even really be answered, specifically.
:lol:
Hahaha I know next to nothing specific about CRT, apparently neither do you.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2

A false dilemma, also referred to as false dichotomy, is an informal fallacy based on a premise that erroneously limits what options are available. This premise has the form of a disjunctive claim: it asserts that one among a number of alternatives must be true.
 
Hahaha I know next to nothing specific about CRT, apparently neither do you.
That shows, by your ignorant question.
Its too malleable.
Trying to get "specific" is impossible.
In order to get "specific", you would need to supply a CRT lecture or something, and i give you "specifics" on that.
 
E3qVsv3XIA04vFn.png

Look at the kind of crap these critical race theory people write about.....

E3qgpvoXoAIN_Py.jpg


WTF?? Of course you are calling all white people racists if you are going to assert that our founding was based on racism and white supremacy....

E3qXA9MWUAENeOV.png


So now they are saying that our textbooks indoctrinated children with white supremacy? WTF?

The fact is, they want to use our textbooks to teach children to hate whites!!

E3qYIs1XIAAla33.png

WTF?? Now this guy is attacking the church?? How does this guy call himself a Reverend while talking about churches this way??

Conservatives were right with what they said about MLK...he was an America-hating critical race theory Commie...
 
Depends on whos telling it, really. CRT fluctuates with the teacher, but im sure you know all about that :rolleyes:
I guess, if you want to ignore that crucial piece of information, it would be its marxist roots.
Critical theory sets out to destroy society.
Which is what this shit usually tries to do.

Leftists get on here and act like they know what CRT is, and its proponents do not, but then that same jackoff asks a question that cant even really be answered, specifically.
:lol:


Hahaha I know next to nothing specific about CRT, apparently neither do you.

"Common themes


Common themes that are characteristic of work in critical race theory, as documented by such scholars as Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, include:
  • Critique of liberalism: Critical race theory scholars question foundational liberal concepts such as Enlightenment rationalism, legal equality, and Constitutional neutrality, and challenge the incrementalist approach of traditional civil-rights discourse.[25] They favor a race-conscious approach to social transformation, critiquing liberal ideas such as affirmative action, color blindness, role modeling, or the merit principle[42] with an approach that relies more on political organizing, in contrast to liberalism's reliance on rights-based remedies.
  • Storytelling, counter-storytelling, and "naming one's own reality": The use of narrative (storytelling) to illuminate and explore lived experiences of racial oppression.[43] Bryan Brayboy has emphasized the epistemic importance of storytelling in Indigenous-American communities as superseding that of theory, and has proposed a Tribal Critical Race Theory (TribCrit).[44]
  • Revisionist interpretations of American civil rights law and progress: Criticism of civil-rights scholarship and anti-discrimination law, such as Brown v. Board of Education. Derrick Bell, one of CRT's founders, argues that civil-rights advances for black people coincided with the self-interest of white elitists. Likewise, Mary L. Dudziak performed extensive archival research in the U.S. Department of State and Department of Justice and concluded that U.S. government support for civil-rights legislation "was motivated in part by the concern that racial discrimination harmed the United States' foreign relations".[45]
  • Intersectional theory: The examination of race, sex, class, national origin, and sexual orientation, and how their combination (i.e., their intersections) plays out in various settings, e.g., how the needs of a Latina female are different from those of a black male and whose needs are the ones promoted.[46]
  • Standpoint epistemology: The view that a member of a minority has an authority and ability to speak about racism that members of other racial groups do not have, and that this can expose the racial neutrality of law as false.[1]
  • Essentialism vs. anti-essentialism: Delgado and Stefancic write, "Scholars who write about these issues are concerned with the appropriate unit for analysis: Is the black community one, or many, communities? Do middle- and working-class African-Americans have different interests and needs? Do all oppressed peoples have something in common?" This is a look at the ways that oppressed groups may share in their oppression but also have different needs and values that need to be looked at differently. It is a question of how groups can be essentialized or are unable to be essentialized.[47]
  • Structural determinism: Exploration of how "the structure of legal thought or culture influences its content", whereby a particular mode of thought or widely shared practice determines significant social outcomes, usually occurring without conscious knowledge. As such, theorists posit that our system cannot redress certain kinds of wrongs.[48]
  • Empathetic fallacy: Believing that one can change a narrative by offering an alternative narrative in hopes that the listener's empathy will quickly and reliably take over. Empathy is not enough to change racism as most people are not exposed to many people different from themselves and people mostly seek out information about their own culture and group.[49]
  • Non-white cultural nationalism/separatism: The exploration of more radical views that argue for separation and reparations as a form of foreign aid (including black nationalism).[43]. . ."

If you are interested? Primary source right here;

CRITICAL RACE THEORY: AN INTRODUCTION
Richard Delgado Jean Stefancic

 
"Common themes

Common themes that are characteristic of work in critical race theory, as documented by such scholars as Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, include:
  • Critique of liberalism: Critical race theory scholars question foundational liberal concepts such as Enlightenment rationalism, legal equality, and Constitutional neutrality, and challenge the incrementalist approach of traditional civil-rights discourse.[25] They favor a race-conscious approach to social transformation, critiquing liberal ideas such as affirmative action, color blindness, role modeling, or the merit principle[42] with an approach that relies more on political organizing, in contrast to liberalism's reliance on rights-based remedies.
  • Storytelling, counter-storytelling, and "naming one's own reality": The use of narrative (storytelling) to illuminate and explore lived experiences of racial oppression.[43] Bryan Brayboy has emphasized the epistemic importance of storytelling in Indigenous-American communities as superseding that of theory, and has proposed a Tribal Critical Race Theory (TribCrit).[44]
  • Revisionist interpretations of American civil rights law and progress: Criticism of civil-rights scholarship and anti-discrimination law, such as Brown v. Board of Education. Derrick Bell, one of CRT's founders, argues that civil-rights advances for black people coincided with the self-interest of white elitists. Likewise, Mary L. Dudziak performed extensive archival research in the U.S. Department of State and Department of Justice and concluded that U.S. government support for civil-rights legislation "was motivated in part by the concern that racial discrimination harmed the United States' foreign relations".[45]
  • Intersectional theory: The examination of race, sex, class, national origin, and sexual orientation, and how their combination (i.e., their intersections) plays out in various settings, e.g., how the needs of a Latina female are different from those of a black male and whose needs are the ones promoted.[46]
  • Standpoint epistemology: The view that a member of a minority has an authority and ability to speak about racism that members of other racial groups do not have, and that this can expose the racial neutrality of law as false.[1]
  • Essentialism vs. anti-essentialism: Delgado and Stefancic write, "Scholars who write about these issues are concerned with the appropriate unit for analysis: Is the black community one, or many, communities? Do middle- and working-class African-Americans have different interests and needs? Do all oppressed peoples have something in common?" This is a look at the ways that oppressed groups may share in their oppression but also have different needs and values that need to be looked at differently. It is a question of how groups can be essentialized or are unable to be essentialized.[47]
  • Structural determinism: Exploration of how "the structure of legal thought or culture influences its content", whereby a particular mode of thought or widely shared practice determines significant social outcomes, usually occurring without conscious knowledge. As such, theorists posit that our system cannot redress certain kinds of wrongs.[48]
  • Empathetic fallacy: Believing that one can change a narrative by offering an alternative narrative in hopes that the listener's empathy will quickly and reliably take over. Empathy is not enough to change racism as most people are not exposed to many people different from themselves and people mostly seek out information about their own culture and group.[49]
  • Non-white cultural nationalism/separatism: The exploration of more radical views that argue for separation and reparations as a form of foreign aid (including black nationalism).[43]. . ."

If you are interested? Primary source right here;

CRITICAL RACE THEORY: AN INTRODUCTION
Richard Delgado Jean Stefancic
"common"
I have seen CRT activists ARGUE over liberalism.
All CRT is, is marxism for race, instead of class. Everything else is up to the individual teaching it; as this is isnt an actual curriculum.
I saw an activist for LatCrit that said CRT was racist against other races and went to blame blacks for latino suppression. :lol:
The whole thing is a bunch of extremist opinion. Thats why i call it malleable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top