We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI

[Doc7505]

We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI​

If Republicans were doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they’d be right.

We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI

If the FBI under Republican control was doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they'd be right.

thefederalist.com

9 Aug 2022 ~~ By David Harsanyi

The day before Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton in the presidential election of 2016, The New York Times’ Paul Krugman claimed that the FBI—along with “Russian intelligence”—had “rigged the election.” Election denialism is perfectly acceptable behavior on the left. Krugman blamed the “rigged election” on “people within the F.B.I.” who, he asserted, “clearly felt that under Mr. Comey they had a free hand to indulge their political preferences,” by which he meant the investigation into Clinton’s email server. One can imagine the tenor of Krugman’s rhetoric if the investigation had been launched by the administration of Mitt Romney or George W. Bush or signed off on by AG Robert Bork.
Is it still the case that investigating a candidate for wrongdoing is “rigging” an election? Yesterday, Merrick Garland’s DOJ raided the home of a former president, and likely future presidential candidate, in a case regarding “potential mishandling of classified documents,” according to The Washington Post. Is that really it? We have long been told that “mishandling of classified documents” isn’t a serious crime.


When Clinton set up a secret private server to circumvent transparency, likely to hide favor-trading related to her now-obsolete corrupt foundation, it was a potential felony. In that illegal server, the FBI would find 100 emails containing classified information, 65 marked “Secret,” 22 marked “Top Secret,” and over 2,000 emails that would be retroactively marked classified. Many felonies. Unlike Trump, who had the power to declassify any document he wished, Hillary could not. And as numerous experts pointed out, the chances that those documents were intercepted by foreign powers were quite high. No one’s home was raided by the FBI.
~Snip~
All of this is an effort to cobble together disparate events and statements to create the perception that Republicans led a concerted “coup” against the government. It seems to me, and perhaps I’ll be proven wrong, this raid is part of that partisan effort. We’ll soon find out. But you don’t have to be a fan of Trump — and I’m not; he acted recklessly and unpresidential on Jan. 6, to say the least — to see how these precedents are dangerous or how they corrode trust in institutions. Either you uphold the law for all politicians, as you would the rest of us, or you don’t.
Of course, if Republicans were doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they’d be right.

Commentary:
The FBI lost ALL credibility over their misuse of FISA laws. The entire organization needs to go, along with the other 17 agencies.
The FBI under Comey and Wray have become an embarrassment to all Americans.

 

[B. Kidd]

They've become a Neo-Marxist goon squad, soon to be supplanted with 80,000+ gun toting IRS agents.

Unless this totalitarian trend turns around, our Republic is finished!!

 

[Uncensored2008]

They've become a Neo-Marxist goon squad, soon to be supplanted with 80,000+ gun toting IRS agents.

Unless this totalitarian trend turns around, our Republic is finished!!

The republic is gone. The question is can we restore it without massive bloodshed? Do we have the courage to take up arms against the Nazis who have seized the nation?

 

[B. Kidd]

The republic is gone. The question is can we restore it without massive bloodshed? Do we have the courage to take up arms against the Nazis who have seized the nation?

Not unless a segment of true Patriots in our military revolt.

 

[Marener]

A single bad FISA warrant isn’t a reason to abolish the FBI anymore than the death of George Floyd is a reason to abolish the Minneapolis police department.

 

[Zincwarrior]

I started to argue then realized, YES we should always have a healthy suspicion of the government. So

 

[B. Kidd]

A single bad FISA warrant isn’t a reason to abolish the FBI anymore than the death of George Floyd is a reason to abolish the Minneapolis police department.

Don't mix federal with local.

You also left out the Hillary fake produced dossier on Trump including the goon FBI initially declaring Hunter's laptop as Russian disinformation.

You and Garland have something in common: you're both unhinged Dimm obedient lunatics!!

 

[bodecea]

We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI​

If Republicans were doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they’d be right.

We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI

If the FBI under Republican control was doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they'd be right.

thefederalist.com

9 Aug 2022 ~~ By David Harsanyi

The day before Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton in the presidential election of 2016, The New York Times’ Paul Krugman claimed that the FBI—along with “Russian intelligence”—had “rigged the election.” Election denialism is perfectly acceptable behavior on the left. Krugman blamed the “rigged election” on “people within the F.B.I.” who, he asserted, “clearly felt that under Mr. Comey they had a free hand to indulge their political preferences,” by which he meant the investigation into Clinton’s email server. One can imagine the tenor of Krugman’s rhetoric if the investigation had been launched by the administration of Mitt Romney or George W. Bush or signed off on by AG Robert Bork.
Is it still the case that investigating a candidate for wrongdoing is “rigging” an election? Yesterday, Merrick Garland’s DOJ raided the home of a former president, and likely future presidential candidate, in a case regarding “potential mishandling of classified documents,” according to The Washington Post. Is that really it? We have long been told that “mishandling of classified documents” isn’t a serious crime.


When Clinton set up a secret private server to circumvent transparency, likely to hide favor-trading related to her now-obsolete corrupt foundation, it was a potential felony. In that illegal server, the FBI would find 100 emails containing classified information, 65 marked “Secret,” 22 marked “Top Secret,” and over 2,000 emails that would be retroactively marked classified. Many felonies. Unlike Trump, who had the power to declassify any document he wished, Hillary could not. And as numerous experts pointed out, the chances that those documents were intercepted by foreign powers were quite high. No one’s home was raided by the FBI.
~Snip~
All of this is an effort to cobble together disparate events and statements to create the perception that Republicans led a concerted “coup” against the government. It seems to me, and perhaps I’ll be proven wrong, this raid is part of that partisan effort. We’ll soon find out. But you don’t have to be a fan of Trump — and I’m not; he acted recklessly and unpresidential on Jan. 6, to say the least — to see how these precedents are dangerous or how they corrode trust in institutions. Either you uphold the law for all politicians, as you would the rest of us, or you don’t.
Of course, if Republicans were doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they’d be right.

Commentary:
The FBI lost ALL credibility over their misuse of FISA laws. The entire organization needs to go, along with the other 17 agencies.
The FBI under Comey and Wray have become an embarrassment to all Americans.

Well groomed by the MAGA-cult.

 

[Slade3200]

We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI​

If Republicans were doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they’d be right.

We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI

If the FBI under Republican control was doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they'd be right.

thefederalist.com

9 Aug 2022 ~~ By David Harsanyi

The day before Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton in the presidential election of 2016, The New York Times’ Paul Krugman claimed that the FBI—along with “Russian intelligence”—had “rigged the election.” Election denialism is perfectly acceptable behavior on the left. Krugman blamed the “rigged election” on “people within the F.B.I.” who, he asserted, “clearly felt that under Mr. Comey they had a free hand to indulge their political preferences,” by which he meant the investigation into Clinton’s email server. One can imagine the tenor of Krugman’s rhetoric if the investigation had been launched by the administration of Mitt Romney or George W. Bush or signed off on by AG Robert Bork.
Is it still the case that investigating a candidate for wrongdoing is “rigging” an election? Yesterday, Merrick Garland’s DOJ raided the home of a former president, and likely future presidential candidate, in a case regarding “potential mishandling of classified documents,” according to The Washington Post. Is that really it? We have long been told that “mishandling of classified documents” isn’t a serious crime.


When Clinton set up a secret private server to circumvent transparency, likely to hide favor-trading related to her now-obsolete corrupt foundation, it was a potential felony. In that illegal server, the FBI would find 100 emails containing classified information, 65 marked “Secret,” 22 marked “Top Secret,” and over 2,000 emails that would be retroactively marked classified. Many felonies. Unlike Trump, who had the power to declassify any document he wished, Hillary could not. And as numerous experts pointed out, the chances that those documents were intercepted by foreign powers were quite high. No one’s home was raided by the FBI.
~Snip~
All of this is an effort to cobble together disparate events and statements to create the perception that Republicans led a concerted “coup” against the government. It seems to me, and perhaps I’ll be proven wrong, this raid is part of that partisan effort. We’ll soon find out. But you don’t have to be a fan of Trump — and I’m not; he acted recklessly and unpresidential on Jan. 6, to say the least — to see how these precedents are dangerous or how they corrode trust in institutions. Either you uphold the law for all politicians, as you would the rest of us, or you don’t.
Of course, if Republicans were doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they’d be right.

Commentary:
The FBI lost ALL credibility over their misuse of FISA laws. The entire organization needs to go, along with the other 17 agencies.
The FBI under Comey and Wray have become an embarrassment to all Americans.

Are you on the defund the police/fbi train now?!

 

[Zincwarrior]

Well groomed by the MAGA-cult.

In their defense, the FBI has had a very long history of shady targeting. Historically they went after minorities, and lefties.

 

[MarcATL]

What's the OP planning on doing about it?

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not unless a segment of true Patriots in our military revolt.

Thankfully that isn't what our forefathers did.

No, the first act is to exert political power.

The Nazis are not legitimate and cannot be treated as legitimate.

The little Goebbels of the DNC press is already setting up for a cheat in November. Despite everyone on every side knowing that the Nazis are going to get slaughtered in November, AP and Reuters are lying daily that they, the democrats, are actually ahead. Why would the press tell such absurd lies? Because they intend MASSIVE election fraud. The little Goebbels are setting it up to say "see, it wasn't fraud, the Reich was always going to win."

So don't let them.

Expose them. Organize watching parties - keep every dropbox and polling place under surveillance. The biggest fraud in 2020 was institutional fraud - that is the states themselves engaging in fraud. So much was done to expose them that 17 states instituted new voting integrity laws. Pennsylvania though still has the "fraud is groovy" law in place - raise a stink.

Zuckerberg is again trying to buy the election in Georgia, ask why he is not bound by campaign finance laws?

Be LOUD, be aggressive, get in their FACE. Because if we fail to take back the nation from the Nazis through political means, then it's going to get real ugly, real fast.

 

[Marener]

Don't mix federal with local.

You also left out the Hillary fake produced dossier on Trump including the goon FBI initially declaring Hunter's laptop as Russian disinformation.

You and Garland have something in common: you're both unhinged Dimm obedient lunatics!!

The dossier was the FISA warrant issued they’re the same.

The FBI never initially declared Hunter’s laptop as disinformation.

You’re a bit confused. Too much ring wing media.

 

[Uncensored2008]

A single bad FISA warrant isn’t a reason to abolish the FBI anymore than the death of George Floyd is a reason to abolish the Minneapolis police department.

A lot more than a "single" bad FISA warrant. A couple dozen in the coup attempt against Trump alone.

Peter Strzok is guilty of treason - period. We have proof the he and Lisa Page attempted to overthrow the executive branch of the United States Government.

Why has he not been executed? Or even arrested?

Oh, because there is no law in America.

The FBI, Gestapo really, is utterly corrupt. A criminal gang promoting the agenda of the Nazi democrat party.

 

[B. Kidd]

Thankfully that isn't what our forefathers did.

No, the first act is to exert political power.

The Nazis are not legitimate and cannot be treated as legitimate.

The little Goebbels of the DNC press is already setting up for a cheat in November. Despite everyone on every side knowing that the Nazis are going to get slaughtered in November, AP and Reuters are lying daily that they, the democrats, are actually ahead. Why would the press tell such absurd lies? Because they intend MASSIVE election fraud. The little Goebbels are setting it up to say "see, it wasn't fraud, the Reich was always going to win."

So don't let them.

Expose them. Organize watching parties - keep every dropbox and polling place under surveillance. The biggest fraud in 2020 was institutional fraud - that is the states themselves engaging in fraud. So much was done to expose them that 17 states instituted new voting integrity laws. Pennsylvania though still has the "fraud is groovy" law in place - raise a stink.

Zuckerberg is again trying to buy the election in Georgia, ask why he is not bound by campaign finance laws?

Be LOUD, be aggressive, get in their FACE. Because if we fail to take back the nation from the Nazis through political means, then it's going to get real ugly, real fast.

So you still believe in political solutions.

I don't.

 

[mudwhistle]

We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI​

If Republicans were doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they’d be right.

We Have No Reason To Trust The FBI

If the FBI under Republican control was doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they'd be right.

thefederalist.com

9 Aug 2022 ~~ By David Harsanyi

The day before Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton in the presidential election of 2016, The New York Times’ Paul Krugman claimed that the FBI—along with “Russian intelligence”—had “rigged the election.” Election denialism is perfectly acceptable behavior on the left. Krugman blamed the “rigged election” on “people within the F.B.I.” who, he asserted, “clearly felt that under Mr. Comey they had a free hand to indulge their political preferences,” by which he meant the investigation into Clinton’s email server. One can imagine the tenor of Krugman’s rhetoric if the investigation had been launched by the administration of Mitt Romney or George W. Bush or signed off on by AG Robert Bork.
Is it still the case that investigating a candidate for wrongdoing is “rigging” an election? Yesterday, Merrick Garland’s DOJ raided the home of a former president, and likely future presidential candidate, in a case regarding “potential mishandling of classified documents,” according to The Washington Post. Is that really it? We have long been told that “mishandling of classified documents” isn’t a serious crime.


When Clinton set up a secret private server to circumvent transparency, likely to hide favor-trading related to her now-obsolete corrupt foundation, it was a potential felony. In that illegal server, the FBI would find 100 emails containing classified information, 65 marked “Secret,” 22 marked “Top Secret,” and over 2,000 emails that would be retroactively marked classified. Many felonies. Unlike Trump, who had the power to declassify any document he wished, Hillary could not. And as numerous experts pointed out, the chances that those documents were intercepted by foreign powers were quite high. No one’s home was raided by the FBI.
~Snip~
All of this is an effort to cobble together disparate events and statements to create the perception that Republicans led a concerted “coup” against the government. It seems to me, and perhaps I’ll be proven wrong, this raid is part of that partisan effort. We’ll soon find out. But you don’t have to be a fan of Trump — and I’m not; he acted recklessly and unpresidential on Jan. 6, to say the least — to see how these precedents are dangerous or how they corrode trust in institutions. Either you uphold the law for all politicians, as you would the rest of us, or you don’t.
Of course, if Republicans were doing any of this, Democrats would be calling it authoritarian. And they’d be right.

Commentary:
The FBI lost ALL credibility over their misuse of FISA laws. The entire organization needs to go, along with the other 17 agencies.
The FBI under Comey and Wray have become an embarrassment to all Americans.

 

[1srelluc]

What's the OP planning on doing about it?

Glowie much?

 

[Marener]

A lot more than a "single" bad FISA warrant. A couple dozen in the coup attempt against Trump alone.

Peter Strzok is guilty of treason - period. We have proof the he and Lisa Page attempted to overthrow the executive branch of the United States Government.

Why has he not been executed? Or even arrested?

Oh, because there is no law in America.

The FBI, Gestapo really, is utterly corrupt. A criminal gang promoting the agenda of the Nazi democrat party.

You need to take a break from the internet.

 

[Zincwarrior]

So you still believe in political solutions.

I don't.

You're cute.

 

[B. Kidd]

You need to take a break from the internet.

Take your own advice, know nothing.