‘We have evidence’ to prosecute Obama

[Marener]

every person that was put in jail because of the report.

Who was put in jail because of what report?

 

[Billiejeens]

SCOTUS said that power exercises under the president’s exclusive authority is totally immune from prosecution. Bring commander in chief is the president’s exclusive authority. Along with foreign policy and law enforcement.

It’s a dumb ******* decision. You’ve provided no argument against it.

 

[jc456]

Who was put in jail because of what report?

george popalopagus
Roger Stone
General Flynn

 

[Couchpotato]

SCOTUS said that power exercises under the president’s exclusive authority is totally immune from prosecution. Bring commander in chief is the president’s exclusive authority. Along with foreign policy and law enforcement.

It’s a dumb ******* decision. You’ve provided no argument against it.

A, That's not what the decision said.

B. It doesn't allow the Executive branch to use its enumerated powers within the Constitution to violate other parts of the Constitution. If it did the President could bomb Congress and the SCOTUS and then just assume total power of the Government.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

I think that Obama is going to like prison sex.

Obama has been having sex for years with men, including "Mike"

 

[ColonelAngus]

Anyone who has sense knew this was the case. Obama assembled all of his intel leaders and told them to prepare an assessment for him…after it had been concluded Russia did not hack vote tallies.

But Obama was not satisfied.

Amazing!

 

[Marener]

george popalopagus
Roger Stone
General Flynn

What report caused them to go to jail? They all went to jail because they lied to the government.

 

[Marener]

A, That's not what the decision said.

B. It doesn't allow the Executive branch to use its enumerated powers within the Constitution to violate other parts of the Constitution. If it did the President could bomb Congress and the SCOTUS and then just assume total power of the Government.

It said the country would be in grave danger if the president ever had to consider legal repercussions for the decisions they make as president.

So if the president decides to bomb someone, they shouldn’t have to worry about being in trouble for bombing them.

 

[irosie91]

It said the country would be in grave danger if the president ever had to consider legal repercussions for the decisions they make as president.

So if the president decides to bomb someone, they shouldn’t have to worry about being in trouble for bombing them.

your response is glib----I knda, sorta agree----Leave Obama alone---he is harmless---
even if he diid a little something wrong he is now completely defanged

 

[Couchpotato]

your response is glib----I knda, sorta agree----Leave Obama alone---he is harmless---
even if he diid a little something wrong he is now completely defanged

He's arguing that the Executive can do anything and is immune. That the President could order the firebombing of NYC and because he's the CiC he would be immune to prosecution. It's a stupid argument.

 

[irosie91]

He's arguing that the Executive can do anything and is immune. That the President could order the firebombing of NYC and because he's the CiC he would be immune to prosecution. It's a stupid argument.

Fortunately, nobody uses that argument, Fortunately even Nixon who actually did
some good things----did not really 'get away with it" I see no value in GOING AFTER
Obama

 

[iamwhatiseem]

MSN

Story by Annabella Rosciglione, Washington Examiner

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed there was evidence to prosecute former President Barack Obama for his administration's intelligence assessment of Russia’s 2016 election interference.

Gabbard declassified documents last week that she claimed provided evidence that the Obama administration’s intelligence officials “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork” for the FBI’s later investigation into Russian ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Gabbard said she was referring documents from Obama administration officials to the Justice Department in a “criminal matter."

“We’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” Gabbard said on Fox News.

Comment:
The American people need to see some justice served to Obama and the Democrats for the crimes that the have committed against our country.
The Democrats have a very strange idea of " democracy".
They believe that politicizing and weaponizing our own government agencies is "democracy".
The Progressives think that stuffing ballot boxes, counting ballots behind locked doors, blocking voter ID laws, raiding the president's home, ludicrous lawsuits against opponents, kangaroo court convictions against opponents, removing opponents from the ballot... is "democracy"

​

As much of an elitist/globalist wolf in sheeps clothing Obama was - I doubt very much he, himself, had anything to do with it. Much more likely the Clinton's OBVIOUSLY had their hands in it.

 

[imawhosure]

MSN

Story by Annabella Rosciglione, Washington Examiner

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed there was evidence to prosecute former President Barack Obama for his administration's intelligence assessment of Russia’s 2016 election interference.

Gabbard declassified documents last week that she claimed provided evidence that the Obama administration’s intelligence officials “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork” for the FBI’s later investigation into Russian ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Gabbard said she was referring documents from Obama administration officials to the Justice Department in a “criminal matter."

“We’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” Gabbard said on Fox News.

Comment:
The American people need to see some justice served to Obama and the Democrats for the crimes that the have committed against our country.
The Democrats have a very strange idea of " democracy".
They believe that politicizing and weaponizing our own government agencies is "democracy".
The Progressives think that stuffing ballot boxes, counting ballots behind locked doors, blocking voter ID laws, raiding the president's home, ludicrous lawsuits against opponents, kangaroo court convictions against opponents, removing opponents from the ballot... is "democracy"

​

You know what? I am coming here a day after you posted this thread, and am LAUGHING like hell.

I do not care if your scenario is accurate or not!

What is FASCINATING is---------> All the LEFTISTS need to post their protection of their Messiah, hahahahahahaahaha!

For whatever reason, you attack OBYSMAL, and the LEFT loses their stuff.

They will tell you, that YOU believe in some sort of Orange God that they made up, lol. And yet, when you question the authenticity of their LEADER, known as OBYSMAL..............it is like a tidal wave of protection from LEFTISTS, hahahahahahahahaha!

Have any of you EVER had a bare nerve ending on a tooth? Well you just found the LEFTISTS, and it is called, BHO! They no lika it being out there, and BHO being laughed at.

They should come here to USMB, and see their paid posters being laughed at too-)

 

[irosie91]

You know what? I am coming here a day after you posted this thread, and am LAUGHING like hell.

I do not care if your scenario is accurate or not!

What is FASCINATING is---------> All the LEFTISTS need to post their protection of their Messiah, hahahahahahaahaha!

For whatever reason, you attack OBYSMAL, and the LEFT loses their stuff.

They will tell you, that YOU believe in some sort of Orange God that they made up, lol. And yet, when you question the authenticity of their LEADER, known as OBYSMAL..............it is like a tidal wave of protection from LEFTISTS, hahahahahahahahaha!

Have any of you EVER had a bare nerve ending on a tooth? Well you just found the LEFTISTS, and it is called, BHO! They no lika it being out there, and BHO being laughed at.

They should come here to USMB, and see their paid posters being laughed at too-)

Can I get paid for posting----you have some PULL ?

 

[DonGlock26]

 

[irosie91]

not nice-----you should take it down

 

[DonGlock26]

not nice-----you should take it down

No.

 

[Care4all]

MSN

Story by Annabella Rosciglione, Washington Examiner

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard claimed there was evidence to prosecute former President Barack Obama for his administration's intelligence assessment of Russia’s 2016 election interference.

Gabbard declassified documents last week that she claimed provided evidence that the Obama administration’s intelligence officials “manufactured and politicized intelligence to lay the groundwork” for the FBI’s later investigation into Russian ties to President Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

Gabbard said she was referring documents from Obama administration officials to the Justice Department in a “criminal matter."

“We’re going to provide everything that we have, everything that we will continue to gather to the Department of Justice for that direct intent and that direct purpose,” Gabbard said on Fox News.

Comment:
The American people need to see some justice served to Obama and the Democrats for the crimes that the have committed against our country.
The Democrats have a very strange idea of " democracy".
They believe that politicizing and weaponizing our own government agencies is "democracy".
The Progressives think that stuffing ballot boxes, counting ballots behind locked doors, blocking voter ID laws, raiding the president's home, ludicrous lawsuits against opponents, kangaroo court convictions against opponents, removing opponents from the ballot... is "democracy"

​

So what is the statute or statutes for the laws she claims president Obama broke? Did she list them somewhere or go on Fox News to announce them? Be nice to know what laws on the books she believes he broke and what her actual evidence is that he broke them?

So far, everything I've read, even your cut and paste, is very vague and unspecific?

 

[Calypso Jones]

Except the corrupt conservatives on SCOTUS said the president is above the law.

Whoops!

 

[DonGlock26]

"All of us agree the original Russiagate conspiracy continues even today. The Russia hoax was created by Hillary Clinton aide Jake Sullivan, who carries on with his lies today as President Joe Biden’s national security advisor. Christopher Steele, the British spy hired by Clinton to create the dodgy dossier, and his Fusion GPS co-conspirator Glenn Simpson are still doing the same work for similar clients. Andrew Weissmann, Peter Strzok, John Brennan, and more still peddle their lies. Elements of the original conspiracy were woven into Ukrainian meddling in the 2016 American election, then bogus Trump impeachments, January 6th prosecutions, anti-Trump lawfare, and Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Mar-a-lago raid.

FBI Director Patel can prove the original 2016 conspiracy continues today. Much of the evidence remains in federal and public databases. Preemptive pardons aside, that means Sullivan, Weissmann, Mary McCord, Steele, Simpson, Victoria Nuland, Alexander Vindman, Eric Ciaramella, Smith, and others may still be in the jackpot. We agree with attorney Mike Davis: these perpetrators potentially violated 18 U.S.C. § 241 and 242, federal civil rights statutes that prohibit conspiracies to violate the rights of others."

Russiagate Remnants

It would be a crime to abandon investigations into Russiagate, both because it's ongoing and because of the cost to those of us who were victims of it

www.racket.news