We don't care about no stinking ASBESTOS

[EvilCat Breath]

STFU, you're an ignorant hack. Didn't you read the post that related to the asbestos mitigation that went on in the WH in 2019? You chose to ignore that one too.

Democrats are completely ignoring that. It's actually astounding that they can muddle on as if they were never told the truth.

 

[Concerned American]

Democrats are completely ignoring that. It's actually astounding that they can muddle on as if they were never told the truth.

Common with democrats--they just ignore whatever disproves their narrative to GET TRUMP. LMAO,

 

[TimFitz]

Trump had it removed in 2019

Prove it.

 

[TimFitz]

Would you like to admit that you're lying before I prove it? Naw, didn't think so.

The debris from the East Wing of the White House was disposed of at Hains Point in D.C. and the East Potomac Golf Course, where it is reportedly being used to create terrain for the course. Quartz the-independent.com

Disposal Locations for East Wing Debris​

The debris from the East Wing of the White House was disposed of in two main locations:

Hains Point, D.C.​

• Location: East Potomac Park, across from The Wharf in Southwest D.C.
• Details: The dirt and some debris were placed here, managed by the National Park Service.

East Potomac Golf Course​

• Location: A public golf course in Washington, D.C.
• Details: Dump trucks were seen depositing rubble on the course. Reports indicate that some of this debris will be used to create mounds on the golf course terrain.

These disposal sites were chosen as part of the demolition process for the construction of a new ballroom at the White House.
wjla.com Quartz

You just confirmed my claim!

 

[jknowgood]

Of course you defend trump ignoring environmental rules and exposing everyone in the White House to asbestos. You cult members are amazing

Lol, I'm sure a contractor that is big enough to handle the job of tearing down and rebuilding something of this magnitude. Would cut corners on the asbestos removal. You're really that stupid? Wow!

 

[theHawk]

Of course you defend trump ignoring environmental rules and exposing everyone in the White House to asbestos. You cult members are amazing

Except you have zero proof of that. These outside “environmental” groups have no jurisdiction over it, and their “requests” are meaningless and purely political.

 

[jknowgood]

Again, no indication that a normally required inspection was even done.

Trump owns you, you do realize that?

 

[theHawk]

I understand. Your cult brainwashing requires you to ignore all his unethical actions.

You’re the brainwashed ones. Just because the White House doesn’t jump through your hoops to disprove your conspiracy theories, doesn’t mean your conspiracy theory is true. It just means they aren’t interested in wasting time trying to appease your unhinged nonsense.

 

[TimFitz]

You’re the brainwashed ones. Just because the White House doesn’t jump through your hoops to disprove your conspiracy theories, doesn’t mean your conspiracy theory is true. It just means they aren’t interested in wasting time trying to appease your unhinged nonsense.

“Jumping through your hoops?”

You mean, obeying the law.

 

[theHawk]

“Jumping through your hoops?”

You mean, obeying the law.

Again, you have no proof they are violating any laws. Just conspiracy theories.

You need to prove they are breaking “the law”.

 

[ReinyDays]

History that deserves to be remembered:

 

[TimFitz]

Democrats are completely ignoring that. It's actually astounding that they can muddle on as if they were never told the truth.

And even more astounding, but astoundingly typical, thst Trump losers latch on to dubious talking points without bothering to fact check them (especially since they are routinely false or misleading),

Trump’s apologists are now hiding behind a misleading claim that a full asbestos abatement project took place in 2019.

Of course, this is not true.

Exposed asbestos was discovered in Melania Trump’s offices in the WEST WING1.

This resulted in a $250,000 asbestos remediation project.

To do the entire building, or even the entir wing, would have cost tens to hundreds of millions and displayed everyone in the building for months

Which did not happen.

 

[struth]

Prove it.

I did in post 49, silly dembot

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-21/white-house-relocates-top-aides-for-asbestos-abatement-project

 

[TimFitz]

Again, you have no proof they are violating any laws. Just conspiracy theories.

You need to prove they are breaking “the law”.

They did the work without any review or a single permit.

There is a lot of evidence that no such regulations were complied with.

The building were never tented for asbestos and lead remediation, no demolition plans exist, and no documents exist to confirm that the law was obeyed.

When asked, the White House just stonewalls, in its typical lawless way.

 

[TimFitz]

I did in post 49, silly dembot

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-08-21/white-house-relocates-top-aides-for-asbestos-abatement-project

Had you actually read the article you posted, you would know that an asbestos removal project was undertaken in the offices of Melania Trump, in the WEST WING in 2019.

It was a $250,000 job; chump change compared to what would be required to do the whole wing, any other wing, or the entire White House.

You’re falsely trying to misrepresent a small project in another part of the White House as ‘evidence” thst your beloved fuhrer obeyed the law.

 

[TimFitz]

Except you have zero proof of that. These outside “environmental” groups have no jurisdiction over it, and their “requests” are meaningless and purely political.

No, but the agencies that DO have jurisdiction were never consulted.

 

[OODA_Loop]

White House is not subject to local bldg codes.

The available materials show no single definitive public authority explicitly charged with enforcing municipal building codes inside the White House complex; federal custodial and executive-branch processes largely govern changes to the President’s residence, while local District of Columbia code enforcement applies broadly to DC buildings. A Congressional Research Service report and contemporary news summaries indicate federal control over White House alterations but do not document routine application of DC permitting and inspection procedures to the White House.

Fact Check: Who is responsible for enforcing building codes at the...

Executive Summary The available materials show no single definitive public authority explicitly charged with enforcing municipal building codes inside the...

factually.co

 

[theHawk]

They did the work without any review or a single permit.

There is a lot of evidence that no such regulations were complied with.

The building were never tented for asbestos and lead remediation, no demolition plans exist, and no documents exist to confirm that the law was obeyed.

When asked, the White House just stonewalls, in its typical lawless way.

They didn’t “stonewall.”

They answered the question:

but told ABC News that "a very extensive abatement and remediation assessment was followed, complying with all applicable federal standards."

The official said that "any hazardous material abatement was done in September," prior to the demolition earlier this month.

But nothing is ever good enough for you lunatics.

 

[theHawk]

No, but the agencies that DO have jurisdiction were never consulted.

What agency? Name it.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

And even more astounding, but astoundingly typical, thst Trump losers latch on to dubious talking points without bothering to fact check them (especially since they are routinely false or misleading),

Trump’s apologists are now hiding behind a misleading claim that a full asbestos abatement project took place in 2019.

Of course, this is not true.

Exposed asbestos was discovered in Melania Trump’s offices in the WEST WING1.

This resulted in a $250,000 asbestos remediation project.

To do the entire building, or even the entir wing, would have cost tens to hundreds of millions and displayed everyone in the building for months

Which did not happen.

The first lady's office has always been in the east wing. Always. Whenever a democrat lie is exposed, they will come right back around and lie again.

The East Wing of the White House is gone. Here’s a look at some of the history made there

WASHINGTON (AP) — Betty Ford reportedly said that if the White House West Wing is the “mind” of the nation, then the East Wing — the traditional power center for first ladies — is the “heart.” That “heart” beat for more than 100 years as first ladies and their teams worked from their East Wing […]

www.lockhaven.com