I'm sorry, but if you don't know what cut& paste means by now then I'm talking to an idiot.
Your reply is idiotic indeed - I do not need to copy&paste nor cut&paste the posts that I write - since I am educated enough to know as to what I write about - and as such being INDIVIDUAL responses to others posts.
And when it comes to history, the victor controls what goes in the history books.
The victor does
NOT control history - but tries to take INFLUENCE onto it, via his own history books - as such when the Monotheistic believers of Canaan - took control of Canaanite territory, they erased and manipulated previous historic records - and replaced them with their self-written Bible - calling themselves Hebrews and additionally trying to paint their storybook as being the only true record of History. - emphasizing their claim via telling people, and suppressing them towards their belief, that the Bible contains God's words. Same goes for all these desert religions.
The entire purpose of archeology is to not to prove your assumptions about ancient history but to discover anything that we don't already know about it.
Nonsense - archeology is based on historic records&legends, and existing/known or accidentally discovered ancient sites. E.g. caves. Nobody simply starts digging blindly in random places. Archeological evidence then either confirms or disapproves known historic records.
Therefore my "assumptions" are based on FACTUAL archeological EVIDENCE - and not on some self-written book and it's non-proven propagated content.
E.g. the "claimed" discovery of Homer's Troy via archeological excavations - was simply based onto Schliemann having read the epic poem of the Iliad&Odyssey by Homer - and thought that it might not just be a simple kiddo story or legend. Hence he chose the known site of Hisarlik in Turkey to dig, and ended up unearthing a civilization that had flourished long before the time of Troy itself, as well as the Greek Mycenaean sites of Mycenae and Tiryns.
The Bible is history, but as Jesus once said, many of the stories contained in the Bible are "parables" not actual events. Also, the Bible doesn't include the entirety of human history but instead focuses on the tribe of Israel, meaning Abraham's descendants.
The self-written Bible is claimed as being History, "solely" by Hebrews and their desert religion offspring's. And beholds known myth's and legends that were for millennia, already in existence by other KNOWN and proven civilizations, before that story-book was ever written.
I'm sure there were other tribes that were in existence after the days of the Babylonian Empire.
Great!! Every learned person in regards to history and archeology
knows that - and it has absolutely nothing to do with those invented Hebrew stories, nor as to what you "personally" are sure about. You might just as well write "I am sure about night follows the day" or if you prefer "I am sure day follows upon night".
Feel free to, stick to your kiddo-believes based onto a self-written and
totally unsubstantiated Hebrew book. Even if one would find those e.g. Moses/commandment slabs - it would only prove that some Hebrew scholar/follower scribbled them.
If they find the tablet's,
If they find the Garden of Eden,
If they find those Egyptian chariots in the Red-Sea, keep on
Iffing. However according to YOUR Bible - human mankind starts with Adam&Eve around 4000 B.C. on day 6, not even to mention the ludicrous claim, that the same God created an inhabitable earth in 7 days, plus stars and the moon.
Since you furthermore even "ludicrously" claim that the Germanic tribes, fiefs and kingdoms were of Hebrew origin - I do not see any reason as to why I should engage in any further discussion/debate with you. Nor with anyone else that simply and only recites the content of a self-written, kiddo-like Hebrew storybook.
