Warren says that the Supreme Court is on the ballot

[lafayette]

Wrong!

The only way democracy can work now is to have the DNC control all aspects of government, at least, that is what the Founders envisioned, which is America ruled by lunatic Marxists dictators.

Votto, is it not the MAGA that wants a dictator?

 

[toobfreak]

Awww...tell us where the old man hurt you by dropping out.

No hurt, Jack. His dropping out means the democrats have really forfeited the race as there isn't time for 14 million people to actually vote again for another candidate at this late date after Joe telling everyone for months on end he was in like Flint and good to go till the very end, and the DNC hasn't the legal authority to just name their own person, and who Joe or Obumma or Al Gore "endorses" don't mean shit in a democracy.

Your choice isn't looking so hot now, huh?

Good enough. Your candidate is still behind a twice impeached convicted felon insurrectionist dictator. That does not bode well for Harris. In fact, the ONLY thing which goes in Harris' favor is if this country really DOES have millions and millions of really STUPID, uneducated young people now who think picking a good candidate means just picking one that simply LOOKS like them.

Guessing that's the real reason you're complaining.

Yet, the only person I see really complaining here is YOU.



The rest of us are simply reporting on the facts.

 

[lafayette]

Sorry but the SC is a co-equal branch of the government and not subject to the whims of the democrat party to suddenly want to change it now to ensure that it too votes their way on every issue. The POINT of the three branches of government was to BALANCE power by assuring no one group had absolute power. Democrats want to seize power and put it all in one centralized hand--- theirs.

The Congress created SCOTUS iaw the Constitution. It has oversight of the judicial branch. A massive blue sweep will result in SCOTUS reform that it cannot change.

 

[lafayette]

You, yes, you, toobfreek, are being told what is to be, and you can't stop it.

 

[toobfreak]

In fact, SCOTUS ruled that Biden could not forgive student loans, and he didn't care and did it anyway.

That should have been an impeachable offense.

 

[lafayette]

That should have been an impeachable offense.

Why?

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Shut up Jack. You don't even have an answer as to why she is right. The point to the three branches was to balance power so that no one person or group had absolute autocratic authority, and now here comes the democrats trying to do EXACTLY that. Democrats want three branches which all rule in THEIR favor on everything, in effect making them all one.

They say it all the time--- anything not going THEIR way is a "threat to democracy," THEY being the democracy.

And what hasn't gone their way?

• The SC ruling that the Fed really DOESN'T have the constitutional authority to set a national control over abortion and that this decision should remain with the STATES (which are still free to agree with RvW if they want to).
• That all presidents including Trump always have had some limited immunity to their actionds in office, thus thwarting some of the left's attempts to DESTROY him.

View attachment 986279

And nobody gives a hoot about your cloaking your "constitutional, states rights" BS argument in the overturning of precedent. The states have zip to say about it. Just a slanted court forcing God's will on the majority. Don't be on that lasting long.

And Trump? I couldn't give a rat's ass about him. He made his own problems. Everything he's dealing with (including the fallout from his shooting) are his fault.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Sorry but the SC is a co-equal branch of the government and not subject to the whims of the democrat party to suddenly want to change it now to ensure that it too votes their way on every issue. The POINT of the three branches of government was to BALANCE power by assuring no one group had absolute power. Democrats want to seize power and put it all in one centralized hand--- theirs.

The crazy Democrats keep saying that they are saving "democracy".
They are lying to everyone again.
They are attempting to create a one-party country.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

No hurt, Jack. His dropping out means the democrats have really forfeited the race as there isn't time for 14 million people to actually vote again for another candidate at this late date after Joe telling everyone for months on end he was in like Flint and good to go till the very end, and the DNC hasn't the legal authority to just name their own person, and who Joe or Obumma or Al Gore "endorses" don't mean shit in a democracy.


Good enough. Your candidate is still behind a twice impeached convicted felon insurrectionist dictator. That does not bode well for Harris. In fact, the ONLY thing which goes in Harris' favor is if this country really DOES have millions and millions of really STUPID, uneducated young people now who think picking a good candidate means just picking one that simply LOOKS like them.


Yet, the only person I see really complaining here is YOU.



The rest of us are simply reporting on the facts.

You still haven't told me where the old man hurt you.
All above board. Just like the 2020 election. Stop whining.

Let's talk after the DNC. Harris is already gaining ground in the polls and Trump will be too ***** to debate her.
Because he knows she'll shred him.

 

[toobfreak]

If Biden is competent to propose changes in the Supreme Court or anything else, why isn't he continuing to run for reelection?

Great question. When Joe gave his pre-taped address to the nation to announce that, surprise! He wasn't running after all, he never actually said WHY. If we are to believe that he just isn't well enough to campaign, then, he isn't well enough to hold the office neither and should be removed. And if he is well enough to promote PROFOUND, TECTONIC changes in the distribution of power within the federal government, then he is well enough to run.

Joe bowed out, so he forfeits the election. It is now between Trump and RFK. Harris has never received a SINGLE VOTE for her from any constituent, and who Al Gore endorses ain't worth shit. When your candidate bows out 10 feet from the finish line, you lose, you don't get to start the race over from the beginning with a whole new faster bunny and a whole new set of rules.

 

[toobfreak]

Votto, is it not the MAGA that wants a dictator?

Yet it is the democrats who are actually trying to create one.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Great question. When Joe gave his pre-taped address to the nation to announce that, surprise! He wasn't running after all, he never actually said WHY. If we are to believe that he just isn't well enough to campaign, then, he isn't well enough to hold the office neither and should be removed. And if he is well enough to promote PROFOUND, TECTONIC changes in the distribution of power within the federal government, then he is well enough to run.

Joe bowed out, so he forfeits the election. It is now between Trump and RFK. Harris has never received a SINGLE VOTE for her from any constituent, and who Al Gore endorses ain't worth shit. When your candidate bows out 10 feet from the finish line, you lose, you don't get to start the race over from the beginning with a whole new faster bunny and a whole new set of rules.

Sorry, Freaky. Doesn't work that way. He hadn't accepted the nomination at the DNC..which is where the delegates are counted and the nomination conferred. Those delegates have committed their support to Harris...and she's gaining ground on Trump. All above board.

I think what you're really afraid of is that she has a good chance of beating Trump and you're stuck with him and Dan Quayle Lite for a ticket.

 

[toobfreak]

And nobody gives a hoot

Now you think you speak for everyone?

about your cloaking your "constitutional, states rights" BS argument in the overturning of precedent.

So when folks ruled to end the precedent of segregation, Jim Crow, blacks in the back of the bus, etc., you argued against that as well. Rules are rules Jack and if you don't believe in following the law for elections, then you certainly don't believe in democracy.

The states have zip to say about it.

The states have final say in EVERYTHING that is not otherwise delineated a FEDERAL responsibility in the Constitution Jack. If you want to live in this country and pretend to be an American, you should at least learn our laws. Apparently you flunked blocks and dropped out of preschool before learning about the Tenth Amendment:

The Rutherford Institute

Dedicated to the Defense of Civil Liberties and Human Rights

www.rutherford.org

Just a slanted court forcing God's will on the majority. Don't be on that lasting long.

Just not slanted YOUR way, eh? And the majority of what? Dimwitted cocksuckers and traitorous heathens who type computer code at some uppity New England software firm? PS: You didn't count on Trump still being in the race, being nominated, nor leading in the polls neither, huh Jack?

And Trump? I couldn't give a rat's ass about him.

That must be why you lay awake worried about him.

He made his own problems.

Crossing communist socialist Marxist democrats.

Everything he's dealing with (including the fallout from his shooting) are his fault.

Fallout from his shooting, too?! Wow Jack, you must have just bought a baloney company.

 

[toobfreak]

The crazy Democrats keep saying that they are saving "democracy".

You just heard wrong, Trog--- They said they are trying to save threats to their Democrat City.

They are lying to everyone again.

Wrong again--- like Jack, they never STOP lying.

They are attempting to create a one-party country.

Or a NO PARTY country. Just them, the Elite Ruling Class, and the rest of us.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Now you think you speak for everyone?


So when folks ruled to end the precedent of segregation, Jim Crow, blacks in the back of the bus, etc., you argued against that as well. Rules are rules Jack and if you don't believe in following the law for elections, then you certainly don't believe in democracy.


The states have final say in EVERYTHING that is not otherwise delineated a FEDERAL responsibility in the Constitution Jack. If you want to live in this country and pretend to be an American, you should at least learn our laws. Apparently you flunked blocks and dropped out of preschool before learning about the Tenth Amendment:

The Rutherford Institute

Dedicated to the Defense of Civil Liberties and Human Rights

www.rutherford.org

Just not slanted YOUR way, eh? And the majority of what? Dimwitted cocksuckers and traitorous heathens who type computer code at some uppity New England software firm? PS: You didn't count on Trump still being in the race, being nominated, nor leading in the polls neither, huh Jack?


That must be why you lay awake worried about him.


Crossing communist socialist Marxist democrats.


Fallout from his shooting, too?! Wow Jack, you must have just bought a baloney company.

Zero idea what spew you're trying to lob out of your keyboard here. Consolidate your response please and make your response concise. I can't tell what point you are desperately trying to make. Splitting the responses up here is just flooding the zone and a distraction. It makes you look like you have no argument.

Bottom line here is you have a flawed, weak nominee with a purely created running mate.
Not as cocky as you were a few weeks ago, huh?

 

[toobfreak]

Harris is already gaining ground in the polls and Trump will be too ***** to debate her.

Oh Jack, even YOU can't possibly believe that. And Harris is only gaining ground long lost by Joe Biden. Harris' popularity is only a reflection on just HOW BAD folks hated Joe Biden. And Harris was the least popular and supported candidate in the 2020 primaries. She hated Biden. Joe only picked her for the dumb young black ***** vote by your stupid base, but just wait until the national spotlight is put on her in critical examination--- something Trump has endured for NINE YEARS yet Harris has not yet gone through even once. Do you really think her circular, vacuous, nonsensical double-talk gibberish is going to cut it for very long under the national heat lamp???

Because he knows she'll shred him.

Only to voters as dumb as you. Remember, Trump takes all questions from all people at all times. Biden and Harris are used to only taking prearranged questions from prearranged questioners from supporters with prearranged answers. Trump will be like Wolverine of the X-Men. But then, we both know you already knew that.

Trump just faced an assassin's bullet, got up, shook his fist at the sky and is going right back to the same place for another rally. Harris' idea of a bad day is if her limousine ride to the Le Diplomate for her weekly helping of Dover Sole Meunière with some Escargots à la Bourguignonne is 5 minutes late.

 

[toobfreak]

Sorry, Freaky. Doesn't work that way. He hadn't accepted the nomination at the DNC..which is where the delegates are counted and the nomination conferred. Those delegates have committed their support to Harris...and she's gaining ground on Trump. All above board.

I think what you're really afraid of is that she has a good chance of beating Trump and you're stuck with him and Dan Quayle Lite for a ticket.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Oh Jack, even YOU can't possibly believe that. And Harris is only gaining ground long lost by Joe Biden. Harris' popularity is only a reflection on just HOW BAD folks hated Joe Biden. And Harris was the least popular and supported candidate in the 2020 primaries. She hated Biden. Joe only picked her for the dumb young black ***** vote by your stupid base, but just wait until the national spotlight is put on her in critical examination--- something Trump has endured for NINE YEARS yet Harris has not yet gone through even once. Do you really think her circular, vacuous, nonsensical double-talk gibberish is going to cut it for very long under the national heat lamp???


Only to voters as dumb as you. Remember, Trump takes all questions from all people at all times. Biden and Harris are used to only taking prearranged questions from prearranged questioners from supporters with prearranged answers. Trump will be like Wolverine of the X-Men. But then, we both know you already knew that.

View attachment 986302

Trump just faced an assassin's bullet, got up, shook his fist at the sky and is going right back to the same place for another rally. Harris' idea of a bad day is if her limousine ride to the Le Diplomate for her weekly helping of Dover Sole Meunière with some Escargots à la Bourguignonne is 5 minutes late.

What fever dream world do you live? Are there unicorns there. Trump is none of these things. And he's never set foot in a gym in his life. He'd burst into flames or have a coronary. The environment he helped create led to his shooting. Hoist on his own petard.

Who cares if Harris didn't like Biden (no evidence to support that, just like your four year claim of a stolen election). Bush Sr didn't like Reagan. Look how that turned out.

You're stuck with Dumb and Dumbest (hard to tell which is which). That makes you nervous.

 

[toobfreak]

Those delegates have committed their support to Harris...

Those delegates were selected by 14 million people to vote for Biden. There has been no vote BY THE PEOPLE whether THEY want the skank Harris, making her an illegal candidate.

and she's gaining ground on Trump.

Gaining ground? She was only declared the official unofficial replacement for Biden a week ago. She hasn't actually DONE anything yet other than speak before a few small groups of 'Anyone But Joe' supporters. Wait till the spotlight is really on her and start asking her the TOUGH questions.

All above board.

You mean done with thumbing your nose at the law. But then, you never did believe in DEMOCRACY. Harris, just another SELECTED candidate.

I think what you're really afraid of is that she has a good chance of beating Trump

Anyone has a chance of winning when all you do is cheat and rig the system. But then, what does it say that Trump has been leading in the polls, and that Harris only "has a chance" of beating a twice impeached convicted felon insurrectionist dictator?

NOT MUCH.

 

[toobfreak]

Zero idea what spew you're trying to lob out of your keyboard here.

I guess it is easy to kick ass with someone who failed blocks.

Consolidate your response please and make your response concise. I can't tell what point you are desperately trying to make. Splitting the responses up here is just flooding the zone and a distraction.

TRANSLATION: Jack has no answers so feigns stupidity.

Bottom line here is you have a flawed, weak nominee

Who has been kicking your asses.

with a purely created running mate.

At least he HAS a running mate. Chosen for his stance on issues, not selected hoping it'll win him a swing state. Thanks Jack, it never fails to amuse stomping you a new mudhole.