Warren Commission was correct........Oswald acted alone

That is not even about JFK and it proves nothing.



PANIC at MOSSAD HQ.....


It is 100% about JFK. Israel was bugging JFK for weapons. JFK said no, in part because the CIA at the time said the ISRAELIS were LYING about the "threats" they faced.

Once again, we got a "false flag" LIE from ISRAEL and ZIONIST TRAITORS in America about FASCIST ISRAELI WARMONGERING, just as EINSTEIN warned us....


Einstein Letter Warning Of
Zionist Fascism In Israel
Letter That Albert Einstein Sent to the New York Times
1948, Protesting the Visit of Menachem Begin

11-1-4
1036081927.jpeg

Letters to the Editor
New York Times
December 4, 1948
TO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:
Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.
einstein.jpg
The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughoutthe world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.
Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement. The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.
Attack on Arab Village
A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants ? 240men, women, and children - and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin. The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.
Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model. During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.
The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.
Discrepancies Seen
The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.
The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.
ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ
HANNAH ARENDT
ABRAHAM BRICK
RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO
ALBERT EINSTEIN
HERMAN EISEN, M.D.
HAYIM FINEMAN
M. GALLEN, M.D.
H.H. HARRIS
ZELIG S. HARRIS
SIDNEY HOOK
FRED KARUSH
BRURIA KAUFMAN
IRMA L. LINDHEIM
NACHMAN MAISEL
SEYMOUR MELMAN
MYER D. MENDELSON
M.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKY
SAMUEL PITLICK
FRITZ ROHRLICH
LOUIS P. ROCKER
RUTH SAGIS
ITZHAK SANKOWSKY
I.J. SHOENBERG
SAMUEL SHUMAN
M. SINGER
IRMA WOLFE
STEFAN WOLF.
New York, Dec. 2, 1948
 
That is not even about JFK and it proves nothing.



PANIC at MOSSAD HQ.....


It is 100% about JFK. Israel was bugging JFK for weapons. JFK said no, in part because the CIA at the time said the ISRAELIS were LYING about the "threats" they faced.

Once again, we got a "false flag" LIE from ISRAEL and ZIONIST TRAITORS in America about FASCIST ISRAELI WARMONGERING, just as EINSTEIN warned us....


Einstein Letter Warning Of
Zionist Fascism In Israel
Letter That Albert Einstein Sent to the New York Times
1948, Protesting the Visit of Menachem Begin

11-1-4
1036081927.jpeg

Letters to the Editor
New York Times
December 4, 1948
TO THE EDITORS OF THE NEW YORK TIMES:
Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the "Freedom Party" (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.
einstein.jpg
The current visit of Menachem Begin, leader of this party, to the United States is obviously calculated to give the impression of American support for his party in the coming Israeli elections, and to cement political ties with conservative Zionist elements in the United States. Several Americans of national repute have lent their names to welcome his visit. It is inconceivable that those who oppose fascism throughoutthe world, if correctly informed as to Mr. Begin's political record and perspectives, could add their names and support to the movement he represents.
Before irreparable damage is done by way of financial contributions, public manifestations in Begin's behalf, and the creation in Palestine of the impression that a large segment of America supports Fascist elements in Israel, the American public must be informed as to the record and objectives of Mr. Begin and his movement. The public avowals of Begin's party are no guide whatever to its actual character. Today they speak of freedom, democracy and anti-imperialism, whereas until recently they openly preached the doctrine of the Fascist state. It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future.
Attack on Arab Village
A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9 (THE NEW YORK TIMES), terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants ? 240men, women, and children - and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin. The Deir Yassin incident exemplifies the character and actions of the Freedom Party.
Within the Jewish community they have preached an admixture of ultranationalism, religious mysticism, and racial superiority. Like other Fascist parties they have been used to break strikes, and have themselves pressed for the destruction of free trade unions. In their stead they have proposed corporate unions on the Italian Fascist model. During the last years of sporadic anti-British violence, the IZL and Stern groups inaugurated a reign of terror in the Palestine Jewish community. Teachers were beaten up for speaking against them, adults were shot for not letting their children join them. By gangster methods, beatings, window-smashing, and wide-spread robberies, the terrorists intimidated the population and exacted a heavy tribute.
The people of the Freedom Party have had no part in the constructive achievements in Palestine. They have reclaimed no land, built no settlements, and only detracted from the Jewish defense activity. Their much-publicized immigration endeavors were minute, and devoted mainly to bringing in Fascist compatriots.
Discrepancies Seen
The discrepancies between the bold claims now being made by Begin and his party, and their record of past performance in Palestine bear the imprint of no ordinary political party. This is the unmistakable stamp of a Fascist party for whom terrorism (against Jews, Arabs, and British alike), and misrepresentation are means, and a "Leader State" is the goal.
In the light of the foregoing considerations, it is imperative that the truth about Mr. Begin and his movement be made known in this country. It is all the more tragic that the top leadership of American Zionism has refused to campaign against Begin's efforts, or even to expose to its own constituents the dangers to Israel from support to Begin.
The undersigned therefore take this means of publicly presenting a few salient facts concerning Begin and his party; and of urging all concerned not to support this latest manifestation of fascism.
ISIDORE ABRAMOWITZ
HANNAH ARENDT
ABRAHAM BRICK
RABBI JESSURUN CARDOZO
ALBERT EINSTEIN
HERMAN EISEN, M.D.
HAYIM FINEMAN
M. GALLEN, M.D.
H.H. HARRIS
ZELIG S. HARRIS
SIDNEY HOOK
FRED KARUSH
BRURIA KAUFMAN
IRMA L. LINDHEIM
NACHMAN MAISEL
SEYMOUR MELMAN
MYER D. MENDELSON
M.D., HARRY M. OSLINSKY
SAMUEL PITLICK
FRITZ ROHRLICH
LOUIS P. ROCKER
RUTH SAGIS
ITZHAK SANKOWSKY
I.J. SHOENBERG
SAMUEL SHUMAN
M. SINGER
IRMA WOLFE
STEFAN WOLF.
New York, Dec. 2, 1948
No you dumbfuck it is not about JFK.

Your crap is not even true it is merely propaganda and is not even about JFK.

If even part of your post were correct it would not be any evidence of any kind about involvement in the JFK murder.

You are a proven liar and fool and can post no evidence and you never have.

Before the other dishonest turd gets in here you have just gotten an ass beating and are debunked as a fool and liar.

Post some evidence boy
 
39 pages and still no proof that Oswald had any help


Here is all the PROOF anyone needs to clearly see that it was the cause of ZIONISM that offed JFK....


CIA Analysis of the 1967 Arab-Israeli War — Central Intelligence Agency



"Helms was awakened at 3:00 in the morning on 5 June by a call from the CIA Operations Center. The Foreign Broadcast Information Service had picked up reports that Israel had launched its attack. (OCI soon concluded that the Israelis— contrary to their claims—had fired first.) President Johnson was gratified that because of CIA analyses and Helms's tip, he could inform congressional leaders later in the day that he had been expecting Israel's move."



and then Zionist Traitor LBJ lied to the American people about all of that....
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?
 
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?


It is the motive. Indeed, LBJ starts warmongering for Israel immediately, and does it his whole tenure.

He escalates the Vietnam war solely to engage US war factories and ship those new arms free of charge to Israel, leaving our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons that failed a lot.

He then "expected" Israel to launch the attack in '67, with US arms of course.

He lied about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in the same way he lied about whether Israel started the '67 war, letting Israel get away with the murder of US military personnel, a direct act of treason.

He is now identified as the principle suspect in all three murders, JFK, RFK, and MLK, by the family members.

LBJ was a total ZIONIST TRAITOR.

That is what "changed" when he replaced JFK - only ISRAEL mattered.
 
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?


It is the motive. Indeed, LBJ starts warmongering for Israel immediately, and does it his whole tenure.

He escalates the Vietnam war solely to engage US war factories and ship those new arms free of charge to Israel, leaving our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons that failed a lot.

He then "expected" Israel to launch the attack in '67, with US arms of course.

He lied about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in the same way he lied about whether Israel started the '67 war, letting Israel get away with the murder of US military personnel, a direct act of treason.

He is now identified as the principle suspect in all three murders, JFK, RFK, and MLK, by the family members.

LBJ was a total ZIONIST TRAITOR.

That is what "changed" when he replaced JFK - only ISRAEL mattered.
You are full of shit and reciting revisionist history.

Motive comes last, evidence comes first and you have presented no evidence.

Literally millions of individuals has motive to kill Kennedy just as millions have motive to kill every president, hence the secret service.

You have no evidence and since your take on history is fictional spin you have nothing period.
 
Literally millions of individuals has motive to kill Kennedy


ZIONIST spin for "cover."



You have no evidence


Au contraire....

We have LBJ lying his ass off about the 67 war. LBJ "was expecting" Israel to start that war. Why?

Why did LBJ lie about whether Israel started the 67 since LBJ "was expecting" them to do just that with US weapons???


Einstein is totally validated by the entire LBK/JFK issue....



ZIONISM is the problem

WE WERE WARNED....


Jackie Kennedy believed LBJ had JFK killed
 
Literally millions of individuals has motive to kill Kennedy


ZIONIST spin for "cover."



You have no evidence


Au contraire....

We have LBJ lying his ass off about the 67 war. LBJ "was expecting" Israel to start that war. Why?

Why did LBJ lie about whether Israel started the 67 since LBJ "was expecting" them to do just that with US weapons???


Einstein is totally validated by the entire LBK/JFK issue....



ZIONISM is the problem

WE WERE WARNED....


Jackie Kennedy believed LBJ had JFK killed
Wrong you ******* idiot Oswald had motive as did millions of others.

But unlike anyone you name we have evidence he did it.

You have only revisionist spin. The fact is LBJ lies about things like many politicians but your specific accusations are speculation and nothing more.

Even if they were true they do not prove or suggest involvement in a conspiracy to kill Kennedy.

Stop preaching anti semetic crap and provide some evidence fool
 
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?


It is the motive. Indeed, LBJ starts warmongering for Israel immediately, and does it his whole tenure.

He escalates the Vietnam war solely to engage US war factories and ship those new arms free of charge to Israel, leaving our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons that failed a lot.

He then "expected" Israel to launch the attack in '67, with US arms of course.

He lied about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in the same way he lied about whether Israel started the '67 war, letting Israel get away with the murder of US military personnel, a direct act of treason.

He is now identified as the principle suspect in all three murders, JFK, RFK, and MLK, by the family members.

LBJ was a total ZIONIST TRAITOR.

That is what "changed" when he replaced JFK - only ISRAEL mattered.
Too freak’n goofy

Not even worth discussing. We are talking about Oswald acting alone
Nobody has provided any EVIDENCE of conspiracy
 
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?


It is the motive. Indeed, LBJ starts warmongering for Israel immediately, and does it his whole tenure.

He escalates the Vietnam war solely to engage US war factories and ship those new arms free of charge to Israel, leaving our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons that failed a lot.

He then "expected" Israel to launch the attack in '67, with US arms of course.

He lied about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in the same way he lied about whether Israel started the '67 war, letting Israel get away with the murder of US military personnel, a direct act of treason.

He is now identified as the principle suspect in all three murders, JFK, RFK, and MLK, by the family members.

LBJ was a total ZIONIST TRAITOR.

That is what "changed" when he replaced JFK - only ISRAEL mattered.
Too freak’n goofy

Not even worth discussing. We are talking about Oswald acting alone
Nobody has provided any EVIDENCE of conspiracy
Correct – no evidence or proof of a conspiracy, no evidence that Oswald was a member of a team or of an organization tasked to kill Kennedy, and every conspiracy theory that Oswald did not act alone comes off as desperate, ridiculous, and full of holes.

But the notion that Oswald acted alone seems just as ridiculous and unbelievable.
 
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?


It is the motive. Indeed, LBJ starts warmongering for Israel immediately, and does it his whole tenure.

He escalates the Vietnam war solely to engage US war factories and ship those new arms free of charge to Israel, leaving our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons that failed a lot.

He then "expected" Israel to launch the attack in '67, with US arms of course.

He lied about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in the same way he lied about whether Israel started the '67 war, letting Israel get away with the murder of US military personnel, a direct act of treason.

He is now identified as the principle suspect in all three murders, JFK, RFK, and MLK, by the family members.

LBJ was a total ZIONIST TRAITOR.

That is what "changed" when he replaced JFK - only ISRAEL mattered.
Too freak’n goofy

Not even worth discussing. We are talking about Oswald acting alone
Nobody has provided any EVIDENCE of conspiracy






Thew fact that the investigation was run so incredibly badly, and evidence disappeared from supposedly unreachable storage facilities is prima facie evidence of a conspiracy.
 
On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is
Yeah, it's normal for a bullet to hit someone from the rear and force his head backwards.

Absolutely it is, for this reason:

The bullet exiting the skull released a lot of energy forward, pushing his head back. The film shows JFK's head first go forward, then back. Think about it, the bullet enters the skull through a small hole, then exits through a very large one, carrying a lot of tissue and blood with it. A bullet leaves the gun because the expanding pressure of the burning gun powder pushes on it and the breech. Since the bullet can move, out it goes. The same thing happened inside JFK's head. The bullet brought a lot of energy with it, and when the front of his skull blew apart, that's where the energy went, and Newton tells us that his head will go backwards.

Now if the bullet had remained in his head, it would have gone forward and stayed that way.
 
On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is
Yeah, it's normal for a bullet to hit someone from the rear and force his head backwards.

Absolutely it is, for this reason:

The bullet exiting the skull released a lot of energy forward, pushing his head back. The film shows JFK's head first go forward, then back. Think about it, the bullet enters the skull through a small hole, then exits through a very large one, carrying a lot of tissue and blood with it. A bullet leaves the gun because the expanding pressure of the burning gun powder pushes on it and the breech. Since the bullet can move, out it goes. The same thing happened inside JFK's head. The bullet brought a lot of energy with it, and when the front of his skull blew apart, that's where the energy went, and Newton tells us that his head will go backwards.

Now if the bullet had remained in his head, it would have gone forward and stayed that way.








JFK's head is not a jet engine. There is not enough energy to do anything that you claim. The same amount of energy that hits you in the shoulder when you fire a rifle, is the maximum amount of energy that can be deposited in the target. Now, take that energy and focus it in a small cross section and these claims of energy from the bullet makers are simply ridiculous.

The only reason why i think the killing shot was from the front is not from his head moving backward but because you can see a section of his skull shoot off at a 90 degree angle. That would not happen if it were breaking apart from a projectile penetrating from the rear to the front. Instead that fragment would take off at a 50 degree angle at most. That's how physics, and wound trauma, work.
 
On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is
Yeah, it's normal for a bullet to hit someone from the rear and force his head backwards.

Absolutely it is, for this reason:

The bullet exiting the skull released a lot of energy forward, pushing his head back. The film shows JFK's head first go forward, then back. Think about it, the bullet enters the skull through a small hole, then exits through a very large one, carrying a lot of tissue and blood with it. A bullet leaves the gun because the expanding pressure of the burning gun powder pushes on it and the breech. Since the bullet can move, out it goes. The same thing happened inside JFK's head. The bullet brought a lot of energy with it, and when the front of his skull blew apart, that's where the energy went, and Newton tells us that his head will go backwards.

Now if the bullet had remained in his head, it would have gone forward and stayed that way.








JFK's head is not a jet engine. There is not enough energy to do anything that you claim. The same amount of energy that hits you in the shoulder when you fire a rifle, is the maximum amount of energy that can be deposited in the target. Now, take that energy and focus it in a small cross section and these claims of energy from the bullet makers are simply ridiculous.

The only reason why i think the killing shot was from the front is not from his head moving backward but because you can see a section of his skull shoot off at a 90 degree angle. That would not happen if it were breaking apart from a projectile penetrating from the rear to the front. Instead that fragment would take off at a 50 degree angle at most. That's how physics, and wound trauma, work.

why people argue with these langley shills WRONGwinger and had it with the truth and the evil NAZI soupnazi is beyond me.
 
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?


It is the motive. Indeed, LBJ starts warmongering for Israel immediately, and does it his whole tenure.

He escalates the Vietnam war solely to engage US war factories and ship those new arms free of charge to Israel, leaving our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons that failed a lot.

He then "expected" Israel to launch the attack in '67, with US arms of course.

He lied about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in the same way he lied about whether Israel started the '67 war, letting Israel get away with the murder of US military personnel, a direct act of treason.

He is now identified as the principle suspect in all three murders, JFK, RFK, and MLK, by the family members.

LBJ was a total ZIONIST TRAITOR.

That is what "changed" when he replaced JFK - only ISRAEL mattered.
Too freak’n goofy

Not even worth discussing. We are talking about Oswald acting alone
Nobody has provided any EVIDENCE of conspiracy
Correct – no evidence or proof of a conspiracy, no evidence that Oswald was a member of a team or of an organization tasked to kill Kennedy, and every conspiracy theory that Oswald did not act alone comes off as desperate, ridiculous, and full of holes.

But the notion that Oswald acted alone seems just as ridiculous and unbelievable.

If Oswald had assistance, why did he have to take a bus after the assassination?

Some assistance.......a $19.95 bolt action rifle and bus fare?
 
On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is
Yeah, it's normal for a bullet to hit someone from the rear and force his head backwards.

Absolutely it is, for this reason:

The bullet exiting the skull released a lot of energy forward, pushing his head back. The film shows JFK's head first go forward, then back. Think about it, the bullet enters the skull through a small hole, then exits through a very large one, carrying a lot of tissue and blood with it. A bullet leaves the gun because the expanding pressure of the burning gun powder pushes on it and the breech. Since the bullet can move, out it goes. The same thing happened inside JFK's head. The bullet brought a lot of energy with it, and when the front of his skull blew apart, that's where the energy went, and Newton tells us that his head will go backwards.

Now if the bullet had remained in his head, it would have gone forward and stayed that way.








JFK's head is not a jet engine. There is not enough energy to do anything that you claim. The same amount of energy that hits you in the shoulder when you fire a rifle, is the maximum amount of energy that can be deposited in the target. Now, take that energy and focus it in a small cross section and these claims of energy from the bullet makers are simply ridiculous.

The only reason why i think the killing shot was from the front is not from his head moving backward but because you can see a section of his skull shoot off at a 90 degree angle. That would not happen if it were breaking apart from a projectile penetrating from the rear to the front. Instead that fragment would take off at a 50 degree angle at most. That's how physics, and wound trauma, work.

Oswald shot from the sixth floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository
 
Last edited:
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?


It is the motive. Indeed, LBJ starts warmongering for Israel immediately, and does it his whole tenure.

He escalates the Vietnam war solely to engage US war factories and ship those new arms free of charge to Israel, leaving our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons that failed a lot.

He then "expected" Israel to launch the attack in '67, with US arms of course.

He lied about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in the same way he lied about whether Israel started the '67 war, letting Israel get away with the murder of US military personnel, a direct act of treason.

He is now identified as the principle suspect in all three murders, JFK, RFK, and MLK, by the family members.

LBJ was a total ZIONIST TRAITOR.

That is what "changed" when he replaced JFK - only ISRAEL mattered.
Too freak’n goofy

Not even worth discussing. We are talking about Oswald acting alone
Nobody has provided any EVIDENCE of conspiracy






Thew fact that the investigation was run so incredibly badly, and evidence disappeared from supposedly unreachable storage facilities is prima facie evidence of a conspiracy.
There was no such evidence which disappeared as you claim.

The investigation was run well or perhaps you could cite specific examples of how it was run badly.
 
15th post
How does a 1967 war prove anything about a 1963 assasination?


It is the motive. Indeed, LBJ starts warmongering for Israel immediately, and does it his whole tenure.

He escalates the Vietnam war solely to engage US war factories and ship those new arms free of charge to Israel, leaving our troops in 'nam with outdated older weapons that failed a lot.

He then "expected" Israel to launch the attack in '67, with US arms of course.

He lied about the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in the same way he lied about whether Israel started the '67 war, letting Israel get away with the murder of US military personnel, a direct act of treason.

He is now identified as the principle suspect in all three murders, JFK, RFK, and MLK, by the family members.

LBJ was a total ZIONIST TRAITOR.

That is what "changed" when he replaced JFK - only ISRAEL mattered.
Too freak’n goofy

Not even worth discussing. We are talking about Oswald acting alone
Nobody has provided any EVIDENCE of conspiracy
Correct – no evidence or proof of a conspiracy, no evidence that Oswald was a member of a team or of an organization tasked to kill Kennedy, and every conspiracy theory that Oswald did not act alone comes off as desperate, ridiculous, and full of holes.

But the notion that Oswald acted alone seems just as ridiculous and unbelievable.
The notion Oswald acted alone is very reasonable and sensible.

As much as any other murder.
 
On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is
Yeah, it's normal for a bullet to hit someone from the rear and force his head backwards.

Absolutely it is, for this reason:

The bullet exiting the skull released a lot of energy forward, pushing his head back. The film shows JFK's head first go forward, then back. Think about it, the bullet enters the skull through a small hole, then exits through a very large one, carrying a lot of tissue and blood with it. A bullet leaves the gun because the expanding pressure of the burning gun powder pushes on it and the breech. Since the bullet can move, out it goes. The same thing happened inside JFK's head. The bullet brought a lot of energy with it, and when the front of his skull blew apart, that's where the energy went, and Newton tells us that his head will go backwards.

Now if the bullet had remained in his head, it would have gone forward and stayed that way.








JFK's head is not a jet engine. There is not enough energy to do anything that you claim. The same amount of energy that hits you in the shoulder when you fire a rifle, is the maximum amount of energy that can be deposited in the target. Now, take that energy and focus it in a small cross section and these claims of energy from the bullet makers are simply ridiculous.

The only reason why i think the killing shot was from the front is not from his head moving backward but because you can see a section of his skull shoot off at a 90 degree angle. That would not happen if it were breaking apart from a projectile penetrating from the rear to the front. Instead that fragment would take off at a 50 degree angle at most. That's how physics, and wound trauma, work.

Oswald was shot from the sixth floor of the Texas Schoolbook Depository
He shot from the sixth floor he was not shot there
 
On November 21, 1963 Oswald learned the JFK motorcade would be passing by his window at work the next day. So he went home, brought his rifle to work the next morning and fired three shots at the President. One of which blew his brains out

That is all there is
Yeah, it's normal for a bullet to hit someone from the rear and force his head backwards.

Absolutely it is, for this reason:

The bullet exiting the skull released a lot of energy forward, pushing his head back. The film shows JFK's head first go forward, then back. Think about it, the bullet enters the skull through a small hole, then exits through a very large one, carrying a lot of tissue and blood with it. A bullet leaves the gun because the expanding pressure of the burning gun powder pushes on it and the breech. Since the bullet can move, out it goes. The same thing happened inside JFK's head. The bullet brought a lot of energy with it, and when the front of his skull blew apart, that's where the energy went, and Newton tells us that his head will go backwards.

Now if the bullet had remained in his head, it would have gone forward and stayed that way.








JFK's head is not a jet engine. There is not enough energy to do anything that you claim. The same amount of energy that hits you in the shoulder when you fire a rifle, is the maximum amount of energy that can be deposited in the target. Now, take that energy and focus it in a small cross section and these claims of energy from the bullet makers are simply ridiculous.

The only reason why i think the killing shot was from the front is not from his head moving backward but because you can see a section of his skull shoot off at a 90 degree angle. That would not happen if it were breaking apart from a projectile penetrating from the rear to the front. Instead that fragment would take off at a 50 degree angle at most. That's how physics, and wound trauma, work.
Wrong.

The jet EFFECT does not make it a jet engine.

There is more than enough energy to push the head back as the film shown and that is perfectly consistent with the laws of physics.

You are quite wrong in comparing the energy of recoil to the energy of impact.

If your comparison were true no one could fire a rifle without shattering their bones.

The jet EFFECT explanation is logical and scientifically sound and even tested.

The wound trauma is consistent with a shot from Oswald's position and contradicts a shot from the front.

Furthermore the only entrance wounds were in JFK's back, the back of his head and Connelly's back.
 
The notion Oswald acted alone is very reasonable and sensible



at least that is what ZIONIST TRAITORS want Americans to believe....


JFK files show Hoover wanted the public convinced Oswald acted alone


"Referring to Nicholas Katzenbach, the deputy attorney general at the time, Hoover dictated: "The thing I am concerned about, and so is Mr. Katzenbach, is having something issued so we can convince the public that Oswald is the real assassin.""



Yeah, and Katzenbach.... oh, no.... another ZIONIST....


WHY is it necessary to convince the American people? Why can't the "facts" do that without a load of shit from another ZIONIST???
 
Back
Top Bottom