Want ONE simple law to help curb mass-shootings?

NOT classified as an assault weapon.

Well, my "apologies"......I'm sure that will be of great comfort to those parents at Sandy Hook.........".....Dear parents, sure you may have your 7 year old in 14 pieces on that casket,,,but, HEY, the weapon used was not a "classified assault weapon"......Feel better?
Good....
Have a nice day.
 
Last edited:
So it's fucked up to blame the killer?

What plane of reality are you from?


Idiot, the other half brain like you is implying that a progressive takes the side of the killer and not the victims....and if you can't understand how fucked up that is.....try an enema.

Nah, don't need an enema. You're the living epitome of one, with as much bullshit as you spew on a routine basis.

You spend all of your time blaming the gun and not the killer, the gun manufacturer and not the killer, lax gun laws and not the killer, the NRA and not the killer, George Bush and not the killer.

You do everything but blame the killer.

So, I understand where Rustic is coming from.
 
NOT classified as an assault weapon.

Well, my "apologies"......I'm sure that will be of great comfort to those parents at Sandy Hook.........".....Dear parents, sure you may have your 7 year old in 14 pieces on that casket,,,but, HEY, it was not from a "classified assault weapon"......Have a nice day.


When you get a clue, continue your rant.

But you obviously don't know squat about weapons, and your childish solution won't end anything.

And that Bushmaster didn't bust in the doors and start shooting people by itself.

It was a kid that killed his mother to get his hands on that Bushmaster so he could go on his killing spree.
 
Nah, don't need an enema. You're the living epitome of one, with as much bullshit as you spew on a routine basis.

You spend all of your time blaming the gun and not the killer, the gun manufacturer and not the killer, lax gun laws and not the killer, the NRA and not the killer, George Bush and not the killer.

You do everything but blame the killer.

So, I understand where Rustic is coming from.


Brilliant...........So, I'm "protecting" the killers....and you're protecting the gun manufacturers and dealers.....Excellent conclusion...from a moron like you,
 
You want to sue Craftsman if someone beats you silly with one of their hammers?

Again with that moronic comparison?

it's a perfect comparison actually. You want to go after the manufacturer of the instrument of death. You ignore the fact that millions of Americans use guns daily and no one dies. Millions use knives, bats and hammers daily... and no one dies. Yet, many Americans are killed each year by bats, knives and other inanimate objects.
 
Nah, don't need an enema. You're the living epitome of one, with as much bullshit as you spew on a routine basis.

You spend all of your time blaming the gun and not the killer, the gun manufacturer and not the killer, lax gun laws and not the killer, the NRA and not the killer, George Bush and not the killer.

You do everything but blame the killer.

So, I understand where Rustic is coming from.


Brilliant...........So, I'm "protecting" the killers....and you're protecting the gun manufacturers and dealers.....Excellent conclusion...from a moron like you,

No. I'm blaming the killer. What are you doing? Blaming the gun manufacturers.

Sure, that's a paragon of brilliance.
 
Nah, don't need an enema. You're the living epitome of one, with as much bullshit as you spew on a routine basis.

You spend all of your time blaming the gun and not the killer, the gun manufacturer and not the killer, lax gun laws and not the killer, the NRA and not the killer, George Bush and not the killer.

You do everything but blame the killer.

So, I understand where Rustic is coming from.


Brilliant...........So, I'm "protecting" the killers....and you're protecting the gun manufacturers and dealers.....Excellent conclusion...from a moron like you,

So, I'm "protecting" the killers

Arent' you?

You don't give 2 shits about Lanza, you dont' give 2 shits about Loughner, you don't give 2 shits about Roof.

Your rants are about the weapons, and the people that manufacture them.

drunk driver decides to drive down the sidewalk, takes out 15 pedestrians..

Your type wants to blame the booze, the car, whatever.

Not the drunk behind the wheel.
 
Because they would be tied up in court endlessly by assholes looking to make a buck because a product performed as designed. How about we put the same onus on auto manufactures and dealers to ensure drivers are responsible or face law suits for their misuse? What do you think a car would cost? After all the 14th requires equal treatment under the law.


Autos are not built to kill, hunt or for target shooting.......They are built to get you from one location to another...Whereas guns, assault rifles , etc., are built for........????

(and please don't go for the protect my family bullshit, since other countries BUT some middle eastern hell holes don't have the same carnage that goes on here in our schools, movies, malls.}

Yet cars and trucks are used to commit murder, they are driven though buildings for smash and grabs, drunk and distracted drivers kill thousands every year, their used as a means of transportation to get away form a crime scene, so using your logic the manufactures and dealers must have liability for allowing them to fall into the hands that use them wrongly, it doesn't matter that the product operates as designed. You can't put that responsibility on one industry and not all of them, then of course you have to give them access to all the information required to make a reasonable decision on who they sell to. Do you really want your information in the hands of companies like that?
 
Actually, we should always follow what lobbyists push (aka, BRIBE) congress to do (and in some instance, NOT to do) when searching for legislation to curb an abuse of the common welfare and good.

Regarding mass murders, we know that gun manufacturers (and their bought puppet, the NRA) fought and won the right to NOT be sued for the misuse of their deadly products.

If we wanted to make a substantial dent with mass shootings (almost impossible to eliminate without reversing the Constitution's 2nd amendment) pass a law that gun manufacturers AND gun vendors can be sued when their product is sold WITHOUT a thorough background and psychological clean bill of health.
You know what would be a good law to pass? It's actually an old one but since you hate religion you probably won't like it. It's been around a long time like since some guy named Moses presented them. It's a brutal law, several pages long...actually it's just a few words. Thou shalt not kill. It's not Thou shalt not bear arms, it's not Thou shalt not defend thyself. Thou shalt not kill. Pretty straight forward. If only we had laws like that.
 
Actually, we should always follow what lobbyists push (aka, BRIBE) congress to do (and in some instance, NOT to do) when searching for legislation to curb an abuse of the common welfare and good.

Regarding mass murders, we know that gun manufacturers (and their bought puppet, the NRA) fought and won the right to NOT be sued for the misuse of their deadly products.

If we wanted to make a substantial dent with mass shootings (almost impossible to eliminate without reversing the Constitution's 2nd amendment) pass a law that gun manufacturers AND gun vendors can be sued when their product is sold WITHOUT a thorough background and psychological clean bill of health.
You have to be too stupid to breath... How are you still alive???

Good lord! the best part of you I am guessing ran down your mommys leg.
Normally, I'm not this crude but, this is beyond the pail.
Forrest Gump had to be talking about you when he said "stupid is as stupid does"
No wonder half-wits like Obama get elected leader of the so called "free" world... TWICE!!!

Embrace the suck

Forrests' mom said "Stupid is a stupid does" Forrest learned from a really wise woman and quoted her often, I applaud that you recognize that wisdom, kudos to you. H.L. Mencken prophesied many years ago:

"On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
H. L. Mencken

we have had the misfortune to live to see that prophesy become fact.
 
Actually, we should always follow what lobbyists push (aka, BRIBE) congress to do (and in some instance, NOT to do) when searching for legislation to curb an abuse of the common welfare and good.

Regarding mass murders, we know that gun manufacturers (and their bought puppet, the NRA) fought and won the right to NOT be sued for the misuse of their deadly products.

If we wanted to make a substantial dent with mass shootings (almost impossible to eliminate without reversing the Constitution's 2nd amendment) pass a law that gun manufacturers AND gun vendors can be sued when their product is sold WITHOUT a thorough background and psychological clean bill of health.
What a wonderful idea make the manufacturer/seller responsible for the failure of government. Damn your IQ must be orders of magnitude greater than Einsteins'.
 
Last edited:
Actually, we should always follow what lobbyists push (aka, BRIBE) congress to do (and in some instance, NOT to do) when searching for legislation to curb an abuse of the common welfare and good.

Regarding mass murders, we know that gun manufacturers (and their bought puppet, the NRA) fought and won the right to NOT be sued for the misuse of their deadly products.

If we wanted to make a substantial dent with mass shootings (almost impossible to eliminate without reversing the Constitution's 2nd amendment) pass a law that gun manufacturers AND gun vendors can be sued when their product is sold WITHOUT a thorough background and psychological clean bill of health.
What a wonderful idea make the manufacturer/seller responsible for the failure of government. Damn your IQ must be orders of magnitude greater Einsteins'.
Like I said all of his ancestors were brothers and sisters...
 
12074687_10153777635607625_4412088608076157681_n.jpg
 
Yes, but the progressives refuse to blame the killers...


Above, an example of how truly FUCKED UP right wingers are.....Thank you Rustic for rising to the occasion of being a scum bucket.
Hey, I have an idea...

I remember a thread where you said you couldn't vote because you couldn't take a picture for an ID...
Wisconsin's anti-democracy voter I.D. law to stand | Page 9 | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Let's just eliminate anybody that can't get an ID from getting a gun...

BAM... The murder rate in Democrat-controlled areas drops!!
 
y manufacturer cam be sued for defects... if a gun blows up in your face, you have recourse. A gun manufacturer is no more responsible for misuse of a gun than Ford is responsible for drunk or negligent drivers. That's just dumb.

Again a STUPID and trite typical response from right wingers......FORD is building a car....not an assault rifle.

And, I suppose, Lanza in New Town....were he still alive COULD sue the gun manufacturer since it DID jam and did not allow him to slaughter even MORE children.
Shame isn't it?

Again, how is anyone else stupid because you can't understand an accurate analogy?
 
Bleeding heart liberals talk about how we are all responsible for "the carnage" in a handful of shootings. I am going to do something way out there and suggest it was the shooters that were responsible. It was not the guns that the shooter used nor any lack of legislation against murder already on the books.


".......and FOX news will be right back after these commercials..."

I wouldn't know. I haven't seen a FOX News broadcast in several years. I get my input from watching the actual news and avoid infotainment. Most of the :news" I get from research on the internets. That way a person can get several viewpoints on the same subject.

If you or anyone has a "favorite" source for "news" you are not thinking for yourself. You are just agreeing with the owner of your favorite news entertainment channel.

The worst kind of reporting and reporters are the ones that interview like a mother that just lost a child. Expecting a human being lost in grief is disgusting journalism. What the hell do you expect a subject like THAT to say? Will that mother or father have a reasonable perspective? Not in a million years. Yet we see THAT kind of heart wrenching journalism constantly from several main media outlets. THAT is not news. The grieving parent IS NOT NEWS. If you make your opinions from the desperate outcry from those pitiful people's grief you are not being objective. They are not being objective. How on earth could they be?

My favorite input comes from Mothers Against Drunk Drivers and the ever so present people in PINK believing that running for dollars will discover a cure for cancer. What a hoot! Those organizations don't do anything to solve their problems. They just make a handful of people at the top of these agencies very wealthy.

As for any supposed cure for cancer...if and when cancer cures occur you can bet the finders will charge a thousand dollars a pill and bleed dry anyone unfortunate enough to get that disease.

We as a nation don't have the sense to see these scams unfolding. If and when cancer is cured we had better hope that the research IS funded by the government or only a very few very wealthy Americans will ever see it's benefits.

Some problems are too big to be funded privately. Roads, highways, dams etc and probably this elusive cure for cancer has to be a group effort funded by all of us. Otherwise we will be held hostage to the few holding the rights to our ability survive. What is the chance you or I will get cancer? 1 in 10? 1 in 5? I know it is very high. With THAT much risk we as a nation have to find the cure before some company beats us to it and takes ALL of the wealth of many millions of people and lets many MORE millions die that cannot pay the toll. The transfer of wealth will be STAGGERING.

Can you imagine what our roads and travel by automobile would be like if private companies owned all of our freeways. It's already starting in Washington state. They are starting to toll the busiest freeways. Yet the REPAIR of these roadways is still the government's problem. This scam is outrageous. Our legislatures are being bought by these pirates under the guise of saving us money. AND TWO things are happening. One THEY know who is going where meaning you are giving up your privacy and secondly we are being told the money is for OUR benefit. THAT is a LIE. WE are still on the hook for new roads and the repair of the old roads. A HUGE portion of what USED to get paid in taxes to repair and build is now siphoned off to pay for your surveillance. There is little to no benefit by these tolls on our roads. How on earth did we get by without these scum in the past? You fools are electing thieves that can afford to get elected because the same people that steal your money at the toll booth elect them.

Some problems are too big to leave up to private enterprise. Lowering taxes CAN be a fool's game. There is NO free lunch. In this constant quest to pass a new law to solve the problem of the day you are being distracted by shiny objects and all the while these same knee jerk legislatures have THEIR hands in the cookie jar.

We already have laws against murder. One more law will not stop crazy people from killing. Some problems are just too big.
 
Well, right wingers.....You should be proud of your contributions to this thread..

You've admitted that you have NO ideas on how to stop the carnage which is UNIQUE to this country (American "exceptional-ism", right?)

You have shown your abject stupidity when you state that if one is against the very loose practices that anyone can own a gun......then one must be "defending" the murderers.

...and you have shown that you rather protect gun manufacturers (who fund more than 50% of the NRA budget) than defending those babies in Newtown (and, according, to the illustrious Ben Carson, those 7 year old should "have rushed the gunman")
 
Back
Top Bottom