Deadstick
Platinum Member
No one was shot for protesting.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No one was shot for protesting.
You are a Russophile, so no soap for you.It almost caused a civil war in America, when the Government start shooting Students dead for protesting at Kent State University and attacking people at the Democrat convention like they did in Chicago with extreme brutality they have crossed a line.
Yes but not for protesting you dumbassOf course they were, shot dead by the National guard.
We still had no business sending troops there.Wrong
It was not a civil war. North and South Vietnam were tradiitional seperate kingdoms for hundreds or years. It was a war of communist aggression started by the north
Yes we did.We still had no business sending troops there.
You are wrong.Yes we did.
I am quitre correct. They needed our help against communist agreesion which is a worth while cause.You are wrong.
Even after all these years some of you Muppets are lying and trying to defend the Imperialist war, a war that was started on a pack of lies.,you also said no one was shot for protesting the war at Kent State, you are either ignorant about the history of Vietnam of you are lying.Wrong
It was not a civil war. North and South Vietnam were tradiitional seperate kingdoms for hundreds or years. It was a war of communist aggression started by the north
It was a no win war because the Pentagon forbid our troops from invading the north.I am quitre correct. They needed our help against communist agreesion which is a worth while cause.
We simply should have fought smarter and won
I am stating historic facts.Even after all these years some of you Muppets are lying and trying to defend the Imperialist war, a war that was started on a pack of lies.
It was a no win war because the Pentagon forbid our troops from invading the north.
I don't have the time or inclination to give you a history lesson on Vietnam like i have on here before, i have just one thing to say, the Gulf of Tonkin incidentI am stating historic facts.
You are stating loing debunked and disproven left wing lies and propaganda
You never haveI don't have the time or inclination to give you a history lesson on Vietnam like i have on here before, i have just one thing to say, the Gulf of Tonkin incident
So you have no actual answer?You are a Russophile, so no soap for you.
Wrong
It was not a civil war. North and South Vietnam were tradiitional seperate kingdoms for hundreds or years. It was a war of communist aggression started by the north
None of which justifies North Vietnam crossing that line and attempting to impose communismFINAL DECLARATION, dated the 21st July, 1954, of the Geneva Conference on the problem of restoring peace in Indo-China, in which the representatives of Cambodia, the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam, France, Laos, the People's Republic of China, the State of Viet-Nam, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America took part...
6. The Conference recognizes that the essential purpose of the agreement relating to Viet-Nam is to settle military questions with a view to ending hostilities and that the military demarcation line is provisional and should not in any way be interpreted as constituting a political or territorial boundary.
I know more than you will ever know, the only thing you need to know is Vietnam was liberated by General Giap, get over it.You never have
It is not about time or inclination it is about ignorance. You are massively ignorant about that war and know nothing about the history.
for example there were two incidents.
No tyou do notI know more than you will ever know, the only thing you need to know is Vietnam was liberated by General Giap, get over it.
North Vietnam did not impose anything nearly 80% of the Vietnamese wanted.None of which justifies North Vietnam crossing that line and attempting to impose communism
Thank's that is the info i have posted several times about Vietnam and just couldn't be bothered educating the ignorant again.FINAL DECLARATION, dated the 21st July, 1954, of the Geneva Conference on the problem of restoring peace in Indo-China, in which the representatives of Cambodia, the Democratic Republic of Viet-Nam, France, Laos, the People's Republic of China, the State of Viet-Nam, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom, and the United States of America took part...
6. The Conference recognizes that the essential purpose of the agreement relating to Viet-Nam is to settle military questions with a view to ending hostilities and that the military demarcation line is provisional and should not in any way be interpreted as constituting a political or territorial boundary.