Voting against deporting illegals who are sex offenders,

how is this even considered? Who is running this shit show? 158 House Democrats voted against deporting sex offenders

Boring perhaps .
But it is a simple and obvious extension of Deep State Strategy to drive population north and create Chaos .

It is a basic tenet of the Chaos Project .

And with the mental donkeys popularising Multi Culturism within a PC World,the Deep State project is a success .


Now those that I call Extremist Lefty Mutants simply cannot see how they have been manipulated and brain washed, and they run around like Goody Goody kind , caring and compassionate people and simply create more Chaos .

They simply have lost the ability to see the dead wood because of the forest of trees they are trapped in .
 

They also arrested a Salvadoran national charged with numerous sex crimes against a child on Nantucket Island, including child rape and indecent assault and battery.

They also recently arrested a Guatemalan national convicted of molesting a Missouri minor. He was previously deported, illegally reentered the country and has an extensive criminal history, according to ICE.


They are already legally deportable. Is this going to make them doubly deportable? It also reads a bit like the Catholic Church. Their idea was to simply move the offender as opposed to hold them accountable where they could molest again. The two noted above shouldn't be deported, they should spend their days in prison.

If you care about protecting children, why would you want to release them to molest again?
 
The creepy Pedocrats voting to protect their pedos from deportation.

immigrationhmdnfxnbnnx.webp
 
They also arrested a Salvadoran national charged with numerous sex crimes against a child on Nantucket Island, including child rape and indecent assault and battery.

They also recently arrested a Guatemalan national convicted of molesting a Missouri minor. He was previously deported, illegally reentered the country and has an extensive criminal history, according to ICE.


They are already legally deportable. Is this going to make them doubly deportable? It also reads a bit like the Catholic Church. Their idea was to simply move the offender as opposed to hold them accountable where they could molest again. The two noted above shouldn't be deported, they should spend their days in prison.

If you care about protecting children, why would you want to release them to molest again?
The two noted above shouldn't be deported, they should spend their days in prison.

I agree

Until we build the wall and seal the border with mexico prison is the best option

Lets compromise

Prison first, then deportation
 
The two noted above shouldn't be deported, they should spend their days in prison.

I agree

Until we build the wall and seal the border with mexico prison is the best option

No, prison is always the best option. Again, you sound like the Catholic Church. "Lets just relocate them".


Lets compromise

Prison first, then deportation

That's already the law. It long has been.
 
how is this even considered? Who is running this shit show? 158 House Democrats voted against deporting sex offenders
Due to politicians who factually serve the public's interest
E.g. California

The state’s convicted sex offenders are referred to the Department of State Hospitals within six months of their parole to undergo a mental health evaluation to determine if they are sexually violent predators.

The 1,300 men at Coalinga have been diagnosed as having a mental disorder and being likely to reoffend, according to the state, which spends $250 million a year to operate the hospital.

While California law limits the state’s cooperation with ICE, it doesn’t apply when dealing with people convicted of serious or violent felonies, including sexual abuse and crimes endangering children.

An ICE spokesman said the state of California determines the custody of sexually violent predators.
“If ICE has an interest in an individual after being released from custody, our agency would review the case and make appropriate decisions regarding next steps,” spokesman Richard Rocha said in an email.


Therefore it seems to be obvious that Republicans do not have a problem with letting rapists and sex-offenders roam other countries and also making it possible, for such people being able to reenter the USA.
 
No, prison is always the best option. Again, you sound like the Catholic Church. "Lets just relocate them".

That's already the law. It long has been.
Unfortunately by the time they are released from prison we may have another open borders democrat in office who refuses to deport them
 
Unfortunately by the time they are released from prison we may have another open borders democrat in office who refuses to deport them

Tens of thousand were deported under Biden.

Of course, the one who wanted to, just returned.
 
Due to politicians who factually serve the public's interest
E.g. California

The state’s convicted sex offenders are referred to the Department of State Hospitals within six months of their parole to undergo a mental health evaluation to determine if they are sexually violent predators.

The 1,300 men at Coalinga have been diagnosed as having a mental disorder and being likely to reoffend, according to the state, which spends $250 million a year to operate the hospital.

While California law limits the state’s cooperation with ICE, it doesn’t apply when dealing with people convicted of serious or violent felonies, including sexual abuse and crimes endangering children.

An ICE spokesman said the state of California determines the custody of sexually violent predators.
“If ICE has an interest in an individual after being released from custody, our agency would review the case and make appropriate decisions regarding next steps,” spokesman Richard Rocha said in an email.


Therefore it seems to be obvious that Republicans do not have a problem with letting rapists and sex-offenders roam other countries and also making it possible, for such people being able to reenter the USA.
Due to politicians who factually serve the public's interest
E.g. California


California has politicians like this?....maybe last century, today?.....you have to be kidding me......
 
Due to politicians who factually serve the public's interest
E.g. California


California has politicians like this?....maybe last century, today?.....you have to be kidding me......
Nope - this article is from 2018 - and in this case, obviously politicians acting in the interest of the common sense public.
 

US deportations under Biden surpass Trump's record​

1736251026333.webp
BBC
https://www.bbc.com › news › articles




Dec 20, 2024 — President Biden had pledged to pause deportations, but ended up expanding it following a surge in border crossings.
 
Nope - this article is from 2018 - and in this case, obviously politicians acting in the interest of the common sense public.
try living there...you might have a different opinion....the politicians there act in the common interests for themselves and the party........
 
try living there...you might have a different opinion....the politicians there act in the common interests for themselves and the party........
That is something which ALL politicians have in common - sometimes they get lucky, in that minor parts of their own agenda coincide with the peoples wants.
 
Back
Top Bottom