the watcher
Diamond Member
how is this even considered? Who is running this shit show? 158 House Democrats voted against deporting sex offenders
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They can’t deport their biggest voter demographichow is this even considered? Who is running this shit show? 158 House Democrats voted against deporting sex offenders
how is this even considered? Who is running this shit show? 158 House Democrats voted against deporting sex offenders
The two noted above shouldn't be deported, they should spend their days in prison.They also arrested a Salvadoran national charged with numerous sex crimes against a child on Nantucket Island, including child rape and indecent assault and battery.
They also recently arrested a Guatemalan national convicted of molesting a Missouri minor. He was previously deported, illegally reentered the country and has an extensive criminal history, according to ICE.
They are already legally deportable. Is this going to make them doubly deportable? It also reads a bit like the Catholic Church. Their idea was to simply move the offender as opposed to hold them accountable where they could molest again. The two noted above shouldn't be deported, they should spend their days in prison.
If you care about protecting children, why would you want to release them to molest again?
The two noted above shouldn't be deported, they should spend their days in prison.
I agree
Until we build the wall and seal the border with mexico prison is the best option
Lets compromise
Prison first, then deportation
Due to politicians who factually serve the public's interesthow is this even considered? Who is running this shit show? 158 House Democrats voted against deporting sex offenders
Unfortunately by the time they are released from prison we may have another open borders democrat in office who refuses to deport themNo, prison is always the best option. Again, you sound like the Catholic Church. "Lets just relocate them".
That's already the law. It long has been.
Unfortunately by the time they are released from prison we may have another open borders democrat in office who refuses to deport them
Due to politicians who factually serve the public's interestDue to politicians who factually serve the public's interest
E.g. California
The state’s convicted sex offenders are referred to the Department of State Hospitals within six months of their parole to undergo a mental health evaluation to determine if they are sexually violent predators.
The 1,300 men at Coalinga have been diagnosed as having a mental disorder and being likely to reoffend, according to the state, which spends $250 million a year to operate the hospital.
While California law limits the state’s cooperation with ICE, it doesn’t apply when dealing with people convicted of serious or violent felonies, including sexual abuse and crimes endangering children.
An ICE spokesman said the state of California determines the custody of sexually violent predators.
“If ICE has an interest in an individual after being released from custody, our agency would review the case and make appropriate decisions regarding next steps,” spokesman Richard Rocha said in an email.
Therefore it seems to be obvious that Republicans do not have a problem with letting rapists and sex-offenders roam other countries and also making it possible, for such people being able to reenter the USA.
Nope - this article is from 2018 - and in this case, obviously politicians acting in the interest of the common sense public.Due to politicians who factually serve the public's interest
E.g. California
California has politicians like this?....maybe last century, today?.....you have to be kidding me......
Laws already exist for these crimes in the US.how is this even considered? Who is running this shit show? 158 House Democrats voted against deporting sex offenders
try living there...you might have a different opinion....the politicians there act in the common interests for themselves and the party........Nope - this article is from 2018 - and in this case, obviously politicians acting in the interest of the common sense public.
That is something which ALL politicians have in common - sometimes they get lucky, in that minor parts of their own agenda coincide with the peoples wants.try living there...you might have a different opinion....the politicians there act in the common interests for themselves and the party........