and those too young to remember the 1960 Presidential election:
All of the MSM denials of voter fraud are deliberately designed to obscure this issue by characterizing it as occurring only if millions of fraudulent votes were to be cast across the country. The real problem of voter fraud is at the local level, where the manipulation of a relatively few number of votes can determine the outcome of an election.
One needs to look no further than the 1960 Presidential election, where a few thousand fraudulent votes in Illinois and Texas gave the election to JFK and LBJ. Rather than send the nation into turmoil by demanding a recount, Richard Nixon graciously conceded the election. (Compare this with Al Gore's attempt after the 2000 election to cherry pick selected Democratic precincts in Florida for recount.) More recently, Al Franken's 2008 Senate election in Minnesota was secured only after a few hundred ballots favoring him were submitted at the last minute.
The point is that voter fraud doesn't have to be widespread in order "fix" elections. Why is it that, in virtually all instances, questionable ballots and their tabulation favor Democratic candidates? No wonder the MSM is desperate to play down this issue.
All of the MSM denials of voter fraud are deliberately designed to obscure this issue by characterizing it as occurring only if millions of fraudulent votes were to be cast across the country. The real problem of voter fraud is at the local level, where the manipulation of a relatively few number of votes can determine the outcome of an election.
One needs to look no further than the 1960 Presidential election, where a few thousand fraudulent votes in Illinois and Texas gave the election to JFK and LBJ. Rather than send the nation into turmoil by demanding a recount, Richard Nixon graciously conceded the election. (Compare this with Al Gore's attempt after the 2000 election to cherry pick selected Democratic precincts in Florida for recount.) More recently, Al Franken's 2008 Senate election in Minnesota was secured only after a few hundred ballots favoring him were submitted at the last minute.
The point is that voter fraud doesn't have to be widespread in order "fix" elections. Why is it that, in virtually all instances, questionable ballots and their tabulation favor Democratic candidates? No wonder the MSM is desperate to play down this issue.
