- Dec 18, 2013
- 136,275
- 27,868
- 2,180
exactly, they are showing everyone why there is a second amendment. Fk weren't our fore fathers smart.It is nice they were showing that they stand up to the domestic terrorists, but the woman should have had an AR also. Didn't get a look at her pistol but 7 rounds is not enough for a mob. Even the rifle needed a bigger magazine. That house is off the charts though. IMO, the local Deep State "justice system," MSM, democrats, etc., would fuck them over if they had discharged a weapon in that scenario. They should have simply waited behind their front door or whatever and ventilated any of the domestic terrorists who banged on the door.
This is why magazine limits are so stupid.......
And to reinforce it........ the mob was stopped and no shots were fired.
This is why we have the 2nd Amendment....when one political party, the democrat party, turns loose terrorists, antifa and black lives matter, to burn, loot and kill leading up to an election.....and then, that political party orders the police to stand down.......... the 2nd Amendment prevents the democrat party terrorists from burning, looting and killing legally armed citizens of the opposing party......
If you go back and look at gun control in democrat party controlled New York city, the very first gun control laws were put in place because the democrat party wanted to keep their thugs safe. When the democrat party thugs would go to beat up political rivals, those rivals had guns.....the thugs complained to their democrat party leaders, and they passed the first gun bans in New York....
The strange birth of NY’s gun laws
Problem was the gangs worked for Tammany. The Democratic machine used them asshtarkers (sluggers), enforcing discipline at the polls and intimidating the opposition. Gang leaders like Monk Eastman were even employed as informal “sheriffs,” keeping their turf under Tammany control.
The Tammany Tiger needed to rein in the gangs without completely crippling them. Enter Big Tim with the perfect solution: Ostensibly disarm the gangs — and ordinary citizens, too — while still keeping them on the streets.
In fact, he gave the game away during the debate on the bill, which flew through Albany: “I want to make it so the young thugs in my district will get three years for carrying dangerous weapons instead of getting a sentence in the electric chair a year from now.”
Sullivan knew the gangs would flout the law, but appearances were more important than results. Young toughs took to sewing the pockets of their coats shut, so that cops couldn’t plant firearms on them, and many gangsters stashed their weapons inside their girlfriends’ “bird cages” — wire-mesh fashion contraptions around which women would wind their hair.
----Ordinary citizens, on the other hand, were disarmed, which solved another problem: Gangsters had been bitterly complaining to Tammany that their victims sometimes shot back at them.
So gang violence didn’t drop under the Sullivan Act — and really took off after the passage of Prohibition in 1920. Spectacular gangland rubouts — like the 1932 machine-gunning of “Mad Dog” Coll in a drugstore phone booth on 23rd Street — became the norm.