While the Russian Parliament is supposedly meeting again today (4th in Russia) on the biolabs issue, we review Sorensen, Dalgleish and Susrud on SARS-CoV-2 electronics and compare this with electronic low-temperature physics at Kharkiv. Note that there is a sequential rule of science that must be followed, and puts to task those claiming a zoonotic origin of the virus:
In short, SARS-CoV-2 is possessed of dual action capability.
Koroche govoria SARS-CoV-2 obladaet sposobnost'iu dvoinogo destviia.
In this paper we argue that the likelihood of this being the result of natural processes is very small.
V etoi stat'e my utverzhdaem, chto veroiatnost' togo, chto eto rezul'tat estestvennykh protsessov, ochen mala.
This reconstructed historical aetiology meets the criteria of means, timing, agent and place to produce sufficient confidence to reverse the burden of proof.
Eta rekonstruirovannaia istoricheskaia etiologiia sootvetstvuet kriteriami sredstva, vremeni, agenta i mesta, chtoby proizvesti dostatochnuiu everennost', chtoby sniat' bremia dokazyvaniia.
Henceforth, those whon would maintain that the the COVID-19 pandemic arose from zoonotic transfer need to explain precisely why this more parsimonious account is wrong before asserting that their evidence is persuasive, most especially when, as we also show, there are puzzling errors in their use of evidence.
Otnyne tem, kto budet utverzhdat', chto pandemiia COVID-19 voznikla v rezul'tate perenosa zoonozov, neobkhodimo tochno ob'asnit', pochemu eta bolee ekonomnaia versiia neverna, prezhde chem utverzhdat', chto ikh dokazytel'stva uveditel'nye, osobenno kogda kak mu takzhe pokazyvaem, v ikh vyvodakh est' zagadochnye oshibki ispol'zovanie dokazytel'stv.'