You must skip a lot of posts.....This has been stated many times.
1. The plot was carried out by A Q
2. The US Government had no fore knowledge of the attack
3. The US Government had nothing to do with the planning or execution of the attack.
4. There were no pre-planted explosives.
5. The entire WTC complex was destroyed by 2 planes.
6. Flight 77 hit the pentagon
7. Flight 93 crashed in PA.
8. There were no stand down orders.
9. We were caught with our pants down.
10. It will probably happen again...........(That ones from me)
So these are the main points that you agree with? Every single on of them cab be shown to be in dispute, and there is evidence that proves the disputes validity. Some like #4 were not even looked inot by NIST! So they can't claim that is true at all, since they didn't even investigate it!
So show us the real evidence you constantly claim to have, yet to date have never produced a real piece of.
BTW, #4 WAS looked at and proven to be false given all the evidence you ignore.... like no seismic evidence,
no audio evidence,
no steel blown apart by explosives, and no physical evidence of the
paraphanalia used for high explosives like detonators.
More lies from you that are easily disproven and well documented. You lose. Again.
BS. You are proven wrong.
paraphernalia used for high explosives like detonators would not be found as they would be consumed.
You are deceptively assuming conventional explosives and methods were used in a CD that would be intended to LOOK LIKE PLANES AND FIRES WERE TO BLAME. This is explained by Tom Sullivan in the video linked on here many times. Stop lying your ass off.
Many eyewitnesses who were near the South Tower when it began its precipitous collapse reported sights and sounds of explosions.
Where are they mentioned in the NIST report?
The towers' destruction cannot be accurately described without the word 'explosion.' Huge clouds billowed out from the towers, starting around the crash zones, and grew rapidly as they consumed each tower, converting them to fine powder and fragments of steel, and depositing the bulk of the remains outside of each tower's footprint in a radial pattern.
The cores were obliterated. There is no gravity collapse scenario that can account for the complete leveling of the massive columns of the towers' cores. Where's NIST calculations and explanation for this in their report?
Nearly all the concrete was pulverized in the air, so finely that it blanketed parts of Lower Manhattan with inches of dust. In a gravity collapse, there would not have been enough energy to pulverize the concrete until it hit the ground, if then.The towers exploded into immense clouds of dust, which were several times the original volumes of the buildings by the time their disintegration reached the ground. Where is NISTS calculations and explanation for this in their report?
Parts of the towers were thrown 500 feet laterally. The downward forces of a gravity collapse cannot account for the energetic lateral ejection of pieces. Where is NISTS calculations and explanation for this in their report?
Explosive events were visible before many floors had collapsed.
The towers had just started to collapse...So where does NIST adequately explain this in their report?
Since overpressures are the only possible explanations for the explosive dust plumes emerging from the buildings, the top would have to be falling to produce them in a gravity collapse. But in the South Tower collapse, energetic dust ejections are first seen while the top is only slightly tipping, not falling. Where is NISTS calculations and explanation for this in their report?
A three-second movie shows about 2.5 seconds of the South Tower collapse starting at about three seconds into the plunge of the tower's top. The short movie shows the roughly spherical debris cloud nearly double in size, even accounting for the perspective. The leading edge of the wave is about to reach the 44th-floor sky lobby when the camera operator turns to run. The movie (mpeg) was found on plaguepuppy's cafe with the following description.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/docs/wtc_2_demolition_waves.mpg
Though the view of the building is brief, looking at it in slow motion reveals some peculiar features. At the very start of the clip we can see how perfectly even the collapse is, advancing with what looks for all the world like rows of explosions progressing in a perfectly straight line around the building, and advancing down in an extremely uniform way. As the demolition wave advances there is only dust and smoke where the top of the building used to be, and a great quantity of dust mixed with small pieces of structural steel is ejected out horizontally at high speed.
Here’s NIST’s Statement from their website “Did investigators consider the possibility that an explosion caused or contributed to the collapse of WTC 7?
Yes, this possibility was investigated carefully. NIST concluded that blast events inside the building did not occur and found no evidence supporting the existence of a blast event.
In addition, no blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses. …”
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
They lie their asses off just like you do.
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » Evidence
Extremism- N.F.P.A. 921- 19.4.8.2.6
During an investigation, many things must be considered. Aside from the physical evidence, and witness testimony, suspect criminal history also must be analyzed. The investigation must include past history and the Modus Operandi, “M.O.” for short.
N.F.P.A. 921 19.4.8.2.6 – Extremism” addresses terrorism specifically. It reads:
Extremism-motivated firesetting is committed to further a social, political, or religious cause. Fires have been used as a weapon of social protest since revolutions first began. Extremist firesetters may work in groups or as individuals. Also, due to planning aspects and the selection of their targets, extremist firesetters generally have a great degree of organization, as reflected in their use of more elaborate ignition or incendiary devices. Subcategories of extremist firesetting are identified as follows.
(a) Terrorism. The targets set by terrorists may appear to be at random; however, target locations are generally selected with some degree of political or economic significance. Political targets generally include government offices, newspapers, universities, political party headquarters, and military or law enforcement installations. Political terrorists may also target diverse properties such as animal research facilities or abortion clinics. Economic targets may include business offices, distribution facilities of utility providers, banks, or companies thought to have an adverse impact on the environments. Fires or explosions become a means of creation confusion fear, or anarchy. THE TERRORIST MAY INCLUDE FIRE AS BUT ONE OF A VARITETY OF WEAPONS, ALONG WITH EXPLOSIVES, USED IN FURTHERING HIS OR HER GOAL…
It very clearly states the Terrorist may use explosives along with fire to further their goal. Did NIST investigate for explosives in conducting a thorough investigation? **** no.
Fire Fighters For 9-11 Truth » Blog Archive » Extremism- N.F.P.A. 921- 19.4.8.2.6
9-11 Research: Explosions
PlaguePuppy's Caf and Sanctuary for the Unspeakable Truth, Home
So show everybody the proof of calculations and explanations by NIST concerning all of this?
You can't because NIST leaves any verifiable explanations and calculations out, by simply ignoring this, thus you are proven wrong that they did, thus you are proven a liar and are exposed for spreading misinformation and more lies. I have posted evidence and proof of NIST deceptions and lies like you have been crying about, now it's your turn. Show us what NIST has.
Your opinions are no proof of anything, post links about NIST that prove your claims or STFU and go away you loser.
