candycorn
Diamond Member
Correct.We're really getting off topic here.
Please account for the wreckage at the Pentagon if no plane hit the building.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Correct.We're really getting off topic here.
You were saying?Being that mere birds are capable of doing this kind of damage to Jet Air liners,....... It's amazing that Candy's light poles could stand in a weak wind,. So Candy,.... what were/are Commercial Grade light poles made of where they do not shear off the wings, etc. of a Jet Air LIner, nor leave any wreckage in the Pentagon Parking lot? :
![]()
Airplane Damage From Birds - Bing
Intelligent search from Bing makes it easier to quickly find what you’re looking for and rewards you.www.bing.com
You have trouble comprehending that your claim is cartoonishly false.Candy has trouble understanding that a plane did hit the Pentagon, but it was small and was NOT American 77. Too complicated for her comprehension. Still chasing lightpoles through the windmills of her mind.
and you just HAD to resurrect this old dead buried thread to tell him that.^^^^^
Zionist Fascist bullshit
great,way to go,feed the troll.obviously you have never heard of the ignore button EVERYBODY should use for langley agents soupnazi and candyass.The ignore button which you ignore because you consantly respondand you just HAD to resurrect this old dead buried thread to tell him that.great,way to go,feed the troll.obviously you have never heard of the ignore button EVERYBODY should use for langley agents soupnazi and candyass.
this langley agent DUDE candyass who is so warped in the head he seriously thinks he is a woman.Candy has trouble understanding that a plane did hit the Pentagon, but it was small and was NOT American 77. Too complicated for her comprehension. Still chasing lightpoles through the windmills of her mind.



Yet you claim to have candy on ignore.this langley agent DUDE candyass who is so warped in the head he seriously thinks he is a woman.
no surprise there with his obsession over lightpoles.LOL
Candyass USED to post under another sock here by the named of Obamaerica but when it became obvious to everybody on the boards he was socking,he just went back to just this user name.
he gave it away back then it was him because they were the ONLY two people onthe boards at the time that had a counting problem and did not know how to count.![]()
There was never any part of the 911 narrative which described steel meltingLA RAM,
I'm having trouble recovering Files, since My Browser crashed, and I was told how to go through that procedure, and had problems, of which, I have to get back with this "Computer Whiz", to see if he can figure out what I did wrong, so that I can post that Mind Blowing Data herein.
Those files, have very Technical Data on the melting points of The Support Beams at the World Trade Center crash sites, as well as melting points of the Titanium Alloy Metals used in the Jet Air Liners.
That Data absolutely proves that "Splashed Jet Fuel", absolutely will not reach the temperature required to melt the WTC Support Beams, nor the Engines, & Landing gear of the Jet Air Liners.
Have You come across any Data, like this? I tried to go back to the "Sandia Laboratories" to get that Data, .......I went to their Website in 2003, with No Problems, but now,..... The Data that they require for me to even enter their Web site, at least on my part, is as if, one has to have a very high Security Clearance!!
Do You, or anybody else that refuses the "9-11 Narrative", have that Data?
Regarding the melting points of the structural steel there, and how it complied with the NY building code and insurance requirements related, check out Kevin Ryan. He blew the whistle on that point within days of the event, working at Underwriters Laboratory, would not back down and was eventually fired from UL.LA RAM,
I'm having trouble recovering Files, since My Browser crashed, and I was told how to go through that procedure, and had problems, of which, I have to get back with this "Computer Whiz", to see if he can figure out what I did wrong, so that I can post that Mind Blowing Data herein.
Those files, have very Technical Data on the melting points of The Support Beams at the World Trade Center crash sites, as well as melting points of the Titanium Alloy Metals used in the Jet Air Liners.
That Data absolutely proves that "Splashed Jet Fuel", absolutely will not reach the temperature required to melt the WTC Support Beams, nor the Engines, & Landing gear of the Jet Air Liners.
Have You come across any Data, like this? I tried to go back to the "Sandia Laboratories" to get that Data, .......I went to their Website in 2003, with No Problems, but now,..... The Data that they require for me to even enter their Web site, at least on my part, is as if, one has to have a very high Security Clearance!!
Do You, or anybody else that refuses the "9-11 Narrative", have that Data?
There was no melted steel on 911 for ***** sakeRegarding the melting points of the structural steel there, and how it complied with the NY building code and insurance requirements related, check out Kevin Ryan. He blew the whistle on that point within days of the event, working at Underwriters Laboratory, would not back down and was eventually fired from UL.
![]()
About
I’m Kevin Ryan and this is my blog. My work as Site Manager for the environmental testing division of Underwriters Laboratories (UL) led me to begin investigating the tragedy of September 11t…digwithin.net
All true
The number of people needed to pull off 9/11 would have been insane. No way that could have been kept a secret.All true
Also fairly unimportant.
What is willfully ignored by conspiracy theorists is that most of the calls were made with satellite phones not cell phones and there was never a narrative to the contrary
Oh...so now it was another plane? How many planes did they hijack?Candy has trouble understanding that a plane did hit the Pentagon, but it was small and was NOT American 77.
Well...you can’t explain how a small plane hit 5 light poles can you dickless?Too complicated for her comprehension. Still chasing lightpoles through the windmills of her mind.
To Make Money on More Office Space, It Was a Fragile Structure to Begin WithLA RAM,
I'm having trouble recovering Files, since My Browser crashed, and I was told how to go through that procedure, and had problems, of which, I have to get back with this "Computer Whiz", to see if he can figure out what I did wrong, so that I can post that Mind Blowing Data herein.
Those files, have very Technical Data on the melting points of The Support Beams at the World Trade Center crash sites, as well as melting points of the Titanium Alloy Metals used in the Jet Air Liners.
That Data absolutely proves that "Splashed Jet Fuel", absolutely will not reach the temperature required to melt the WTC Support Beams, nor the Engines, & Landing gear of the Jet Air Liners.
Have You come across any Data, like this? I tried to go back to the "Sandia Laboratories" to get that Data, .......I went to their Website in 2003, with No Problems, but now,..... The Data that they require for me to even enter their Web site, at least on my part, is as if, one has to have a very high Security Clearance!!
Do You, or anybody else that refuses the "9-11 Narrative", have that Data?
Odd how the wreckage was identified as from a Boeing 757 and not from a smaller aircraft.Oh...so now it was another plane? How many planes did they hijack?
I wish you morons could pick a conspiracy theory and stick to it.
Well...you can’t explain how a small plane hit 5 light poles can you dickless?
No?
I didn’t think so.
Now run a long little boy.
I point to Operation Gladio.The number of people needed to pull off 9/11 would have been insane. No way that could have been kept a secret.