skews13
Diamond Member
- Mar 18, 2017
- 10,336
- 13,497
- 2,415
In a little-known 70-year-old ruling, Feres v. United States, active-duty service members are unable to sue their employer—the U.S. government—in civil court. This includes cases where the service member’s injury is caused by military negligence or when a family member of a victim attempts to sue after the service member was killed in noncombat-related circumstances, Vanity Fair’s Maximillian Potter reports.
Justice Robert Jackson wrote in a minority opinion of the doctrine, “The Government is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service.” As Potter points out, it’s the "incident to the service” part that is at the core—meaning any injuries sustained while in service should be ineligible for a lawsuit—such as the case of medical malpractice.
According to CNBC, 250,000 people in the U.S. die every year from medical errors, making it the third-leading cause of death in the nation. However, as Potter reports, each year, practically no medical malpractice suits are filed on behalf of those serving active duty in the military—and Feres is essentially the reason why.
So, if you’re serving in the military and a doctor or facility misdiagnoses or mistreats you, or you’re sexually assaulted or harassed, you’re essentially unable to sue the government in a civil court.
This means that even when a soldier is injured, and medical malpractice or a non-combat injury happens, a victim is unable to sue. The Court reasoned that if Congress had wanted to allow such claims, Potter writes, then it would have more clearly written the doctrine.
Recently, several veterans have begun challenging Feres in court, aiming to get Congress to abolish it.
What say you?
Justice Robert Jackson wrote in a minority opinion of the doctrine, “The Government is not liable under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) for injuries to servicemen where the injuries arise out of or are in the course of activity incident to service.” As Potter points out, it’s the "incident to the service” part that is at the core—meaning any injuries sustained while in service should be ineligible for a lawsuit—such as the case of medical malpractice.
According to CNBC, 250,000 people in the U.S. die every year from medical errors, making it the third-leading cause of death in the nation. However, as Potter reports, each year, practically no medical malpractice suits are filed on behalf of those serving active duty in the military—and Feres is essentially the reason why.
So, if you’re serving in the military and a doctor or facility misdiagnoses or mistreats you, or you’re sexually assaulted or harassed, you’re essentially unable to sue the government in a civil court.
This means that even when a soldier is injured, and medical malpractice or a non-combat injury happens, a victim is unable to sue. The Court reasoned that if Congress had wanted to allow such claims, Potter writes, then it would have more clearly written the doctrine.
Recently, several veterans have begun challenging Feres in court, aiming to get Congress to abolish it.
Active-duty service members need our help. Push Congress to abolish the Feres doctrine
As the nation honored our veterans on Friday, it never ceases to amaze how much those in the military are willing to give and how little our government offers them in return. Specifically, a decades-old legal decision that has effectively protected the...
www.dailykos.com
What say you?