Venezuela continues to "progress" into poverty. A repetitive history...

Another example of the results "progressive" policy.

Unsurprisingly the people responsible for the deteriorating state of affairs sound just like the moonbat messiah's sycophants in the media.

Funny how angry victims of poverty spreading, equal misery regressivism always turn out to be "right wing extremists" no matter what country on the road to failure they're in.



Looting, violence on rise in Venezuela supermarkets...

Almost as though despite being a major oil exporter that money isn't going back into their economy. Like someone's stealing it. :)
who is the owner?

the government? If so that would explain everything to those that can think
Bad management? The People also own and work Hoover Dam.
ahhh, I see what you want to do.

cherry pick some bullshit from history and think you're right.

that's desperation

socialism is wrong and what you support leads to what is happening in Ven. just deal with and admit to yourself you're wrong.
wrong about what. you are the one stereotyping socialism with nothing but propaganda and rhetoric. why not admit to yourself that you're wrong since you have nothing but follacy to work with.
So what part of the 'socialist government of Ven doesn't have enough money to feed it's citizens' is made up?
What part of spending money, you don't have, is a bad idea, is made up?

socialism is a fucking nightmare, you're just an idiot to keep supporting it.
 
socialism is wrong and what you support leads to what is happening in Venezuela...
wrong about what. you are the one stereotyping socialism with nothing but propaganda and rhetoric. why not admit to yourself that you're wrong since you have nothing but follacy to work with.

The desperate attempt to rebrand socialism as "soft and fuzzy" or "new and improved" is betrayed by its past excesses (and failures) and the devastation it causes in countries that still fall for the siren's "free lunch" call.

no clue and no Cause; i got it.

how would modernizing production methods be worse?
they have no money to spend
the government has fucked everything up, so thinking they won't fuck it up again is just leftist thinking

seriously, doing stewpud harder isn't the answer, it never was and never will be.

government 'help' always makes things worse.

I guess you missed it.
He wants Venezuela's "official Mint" (whatever that is) to "upgrade those sectors of the economy in need the most."

He seems to believe when a country has destroyed its currency's value by issuing too much of it, the solution to their financial crisis is to buy more money printing machines.
the private sector can make money all the time with other people's money, and they don't have recourse to a Peoples Mint. I guess capitalism and a positive multiplier effect is just useless to the right

There is a significant diff between the private sector making money and the gov't printing it but I no longer have the patience to explain economics to you, Comrade, so go right ahead and crank up your "People's Mint."
not grasping the difference between 'making money' and 'printing money' just put dannyboi in the eternal fool spot. I will assume anything he says is wrong on any subject.
 
the private sector can make money all the time with other people's money, and they don't have recourse to a Peoples Mint...
There is a significant diff between the private sector making money and the gov't printing it but I no longer have the patience to explain economics to you, Comrade, so go right ahead and crank up your "People's Mint."
not grasping the difference between 'making money' and 'printing money' just put dannyboi in the eternal fool spot. I will assume anything he says is wrong on any subject.

He's what I call an "Ideological Idiot" ... so completely consumed (and blinded) by his "Worker's Paradise" propaganda he not only swallows it whole, he believes everyone else must also.
 
socialism is wrong and what you support leads to what is happening in Venezuela...
wrong about what. you are the one stereotyping socialism with nothing but propaganda and rhetoric. why not admit to yourself that you're wrong since you have nothing but follacy to work with.

The desperate attempt to rebrand socialism as "soft and fuzzy" or "new and improved" is betrayed by its past excesses (and failures) and the devastation it causes in countries that still fall for the siren's "free lunch" call.

no clue and no Cause; i got it.

how would modernizing production methods be worse?
they have no money to spend
the government has fucked everything up, so thinking they won't fuck it up again is just leftist thinking

seriously, doing stewpud harder isn't the answer, it never was and never will be.

government 'help' always makes things worse.

I guess you missed it.
He wants Venezuela's "official Mint" (whatever that is) to "upgrade those sectors of the economy in need the most."

He seems to believe when a country has destroyed its currency's value by issuing too much of it, the solution to their financial crisis is to buy more money printing machines.
the private sector can make money all the time with other people's money, and they don't have recourse to a Peoples Mint. I guess capitalism and a positive multiplier effect is just useless to the right

There is a significant diff between the private sector making money and the gov't printing it but I no longer have the patience to explain economics to you, Comrade, so go right ahead and crank up your "People's Mint."
what desparate attemp to rebrand socialism. the only ones appealing to ignorance are those on the right, with their special pleading about what socialism is. why not admit you're simply wrong instead of appealing to ignorance.
 
socialism is wrong and what you support leads to what is happening in Venezuela...
wrong about what. you are the one stereotyping socialism with nothing but propaganda and rhetoric. why not admit to yourself that you're wrong since you have nothing but follacy to work with.

The desperate attempt to rebrand socialism as "soft and fuzzy" or "new and improved" is betrayed by its past excesses (and failures) and the devastation it causes in countries that still fall for the siren's "free lunch" call.

no clue and no Cause; i got it.

how would modernizing production methods be worse?
they have no money to spend
the government has fucked everything up, so thinking they won't fuck it up again is just leftist thinking

seriously, doing stewpud harder isn't the answer, it never was and never will be.

government 'help' always makes things worse.

I guess you missed it.
He wants Venezuela's "official Mint" (whatever that is) to "upgrade those sectors of the economy in need the most."

He seems to believe when a country has destroyed its currency's value by issuing too much of it, the solution to their financial crisis is to buy more money printing machines.
the private sector can make money all the time with other people's money, and they don't have recourse to a Peoples Mint. I guess capitalism and a positive multiplier effect is just useless to the right

There is a significant diff between the private sector making money and the gov't printing it but I no longer have the patience to explain economics to you, Comrade, so go right ahead and crank up your "People's Mint."
dear you merely need to explain how a positive multiplier effect doesn't work under any form of capitalist regardless of socialism
 
Almost as though despite being a major oil exporter that money isn't going back into their economy. Like someone's stealing it. :)
who is the owner?

the government? If so that would explain everything to those that can think
Bad management? The People also own and work Hoover Dam.
ahhh, I see what you want to do.

cherry pick some bullshit from history and think you're right.

that's desperation

socialism is wrong and what you support leads to what is happening in Ven. just deal with and admit to yourself you're wrong.
wrong about what. you are the one stereotyping socialism with nothing but propaganda and rhetoric. why not admit to yourself that you're wrong since you have nothing but follacy to work with.
So what part of the 'socialist government of Ven doesn't have enough money to feed it's citizens' is made up?
What part of spending money, you don't have, is a bad idea, is made up?

socialism is a fucking nightmare, you're just an idiot to keep supporting it.
the part where people can make money with other people's money under any form of capitalism; that part dear
 
socialism is wrong and what you support leads to what is happening in Venezuela...
wrong about what. you are the one stereotyping socialism with nothing but propaganda and rhetoric. why not admit to yourself that you're wrong since you have nothing but follacy to work with.

The desperate attempt to rebrand socialism as "soft and fuzzy" or "new and improved" is betrayed by its past excesses (and failures) and the devastation it causes in countries that still fall for the siren's "free lunch" call.

no clue and no Cause; i got it.

how would modernizing production methods be worse?
they have no money to spend
the government has fucked everything up, so thinking they won't fuck it up again is just leftist thinking

seriously, doing stewpud harder isn't the answer, it never was and never will be.

government 'help' always makes things worse.

I guess you missed it.
He wants Venezuela's "official Mint" (whatever that is) to "upgrade those sectors of the economy in need the most."

He seems to believe when a country has destroyed its currency's value by issuing too much of it, the solution to their financial crisis is to buy more money printing machines.
the private sector can make money all the time with other people's money, and they don't have recourse to a Peoples Mint. I guess capitalism and a positive multiplier effect is just useless to the right

There is a significant diff between the private sector making money and the gov't printing it but I no longer have the patience to explain economics to you, Comrade, so go right ahead and crank up your "People's Mint."
not grasping the difference between 'making money' and 'printing money' just put dannyboi in the eternal fool spot. I will assume anything he says is wrong on any subject.
Where is our inflation after quantitative easing?
 
the private sector can make money all the time with other people's money, and they don't have recourse to a Peoples Mint...
There is a significant diff between the private sector making money and the gov't printing it but I no longer have the patience to explain economics to you, Comrade, so go right ahead and crank up your "People's Mint."
not grasping the difference between 'making money' and 'printing money' just put dannyboi in the eternal fool spot. I will assume anything he says is wrong on any subject.

He's what I call an "Ideological Idiot" ... so completely consumed (and blinded) by his "Worker's Paradise" propaganda he not only swallows it whole, he believes everyone else must also.
With nothing but strawman arguments. You must be on the right.
 
Does unemployment compensation not exist in at-will employment States? Why is Capitalism not flourishing due to a lack of poverty even when labor is unemployed?

Your post was so stupid I spit out my gum.

1) Unemployment Comp is INSURANCE, paid for by both employee and employer contributions.

2) Capitalism is an economic system which do not flourish, however thanks to capitalism many individuals and societies do.

3) There has never been a lack of poverty and neither people nor societies flourish due to a lack of it regardless of the unemployment rate.

I'm now wondering which is your greater deficiency ... knowledge or communication skills. You generally make little or no sense.
 
who is the owner?

the government? If so that would explain everything to those that can think
Bad management? The People also own and work Hoover Dam.
ahhh, I see what you want to do.

cherry pick some bullshit from history and think you're right.

that's desperation

socialism is wrong and what you support leads to what is happening in Ven. just deal with and admit to yourself you're wrong.
wrong about what. you are the one stereotyping socialism with nothing but propaganda and rhetoric. why not admit to yourself that you're wrong since you have nothing but follacy to work with.
So what part of the 'socialist government of Ven doesn't have enough money to feed it's citizens' is made up?
What part of spending money, you don't have, is a bad idea, is made up?

socialism is a fucking nightmare, you're just an idiot to keep supporting it.
the part where people can make money with other people's money under any form of capitalism; that part dear
So you don't understand a capitalist economy.

You don't understand that Ven failed b/c it lacks capitalism.


Try to grasp this; In a capitalist society anyone can get rich, in a socialist society everyone is poor and no one, not even the government, can get rich
 
socialism is wrong and what you support leads to what is happening in Venezuela...
wrong about what. you are the one stereotyping socialism with nothing but propaganda and rhetoric. why not admit to yourself that you're wrong since you have nothing but follacy to work with.

The desperate attempt to rebrand socialism as "soft and fuzzy" or "new and improved" is betrayed by its past excesses (and failures) and the devastation it causes in countries that still fall for the siren's "free lunch" call.

they have no money to spend
the government has fucked everything up, so thinking they won't fuck it up again is just leftist thinking

seriously, doing stewpud harder isn't the answer, it never was and never will be.

government 'help' always makes things worse.

I guess you missed it.
He wants Venezuela's "official Mint" (whatever that is) to "upgrade those sectors of the economy in need the most."

He seems to believe when a country has destroyed its currency's value by issuing too much of it, the solution to their financial crisis is to buy more money printing machines.
the private sector can make money all the time with other people's money, and they don't have recourse to a Peoples Mint. I guess capitalism and a positive multiplier effect is just useless to the right

There is a significant diff between the private sector making money and the gov't printing it but I no longer have the patience to explain economics to you, Comrade, so go right ahead and crank up your "People's Mint."
not grasping the difference between 'making money' and 'printing money' just put dannyboi in the eternal fool spot. I will assume anything he says is wrong on any subject.
Where is our inflation after quantitative easing?
:lol:

coke cost 20 cents a can in the 70's, now it's $1.20

inflation never stops, printing money devalues the money. Everyone knows this, so I don't understand how you've missed this, unless you came of age under obama, there's not excuse not to grasp this basic idea
 
coke cost 20 cents a can in the 70's, now it's $1.20

inflation never stops, printing money devalues the money. Everyone knows this, so I don't understand how you've missed this, unless you came of age under obama, there's not excuse not to grasp this basic idea

One of the greatest.....and largest oil exporting countries in the world, this is hard to understand.


Shadow 355
 
coke cost 20 cents a can in the 70's, now it's $1.20

inflation never stops, printing money devalues the money. Everyone knows this, so I don't understand how you've missed this, unless you came of age under obama, there's not excuse not to grasp this basic idea

One of the greatest.....and largest oil exporting countries in the world, this is hard to understand.

No it;s not.

Even countries with large, nationalized natural resources have financial limits and are sensitive to price fluctuations. Venezuela's gov't made big socialist promises in the face of falling demand and rising global supply of their only export product ... oil.

Their economic demise was as predictable as Greece's.
 
No it's not.

Even countries with large, nationalized natural resources have financial limits and are sensitive to price fluctuations. Venezuela's gov't made big socialist promises in the face of falling demand and rising global supply of their only export product ... oil.

Their economic demise was as predictable as Greece's.

The World Factbook
List of countries by oil production - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Number 12 by 2013 estimates.
I lost the links - but current estimates has Venezuela at #4.

You misunderstood me. You said Venezuela's economic collapse was "hard to understand" to which I responded, "no it's not" and then explained why it's not:
"Even countries with large, nationalized natural resources have financial limits and are sensitive to price fluctuations. Venezuela's gov't made big socialist promises in the face of falling demand and rising global supply of their only export product ... oil."
 
No it;s not.


The World Factbook

List of countries by oil production - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Number 12 by 2013 estimates.

I lost the links - but current estimates has Venezuela at #4.


Shadow 355
Ven runs or taxes the fuck outta any industry.

The only people that are making are the leading politicians and the ones that bribe them.

The "let's nationalize the assets of production" (better known as stealing from the rightful owners) movement has it's downside. When revenues fall and the money gets tight, capital markets are hesitant to lend money to countries that do such things.
 
So you don't understand a capitalist economy.

You don't understand that Ven failed b/c it lacks capitalism.


Try to grasp this; In a capitalist society anyone can get rich, in a socialist society everyone is poor and no one, not even the government, can get rich

I'll disagree with you on one point. The people running the system can get filthy rich if they're corrupt which they always are.

But yeah, if EVERYONE is honest the best you'll get is stagnant poverty.


 

Forum List

Back
Top