US veto on UN resolution on Israeli occupied territories.

[JBeukema]

Fuck that

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Fuck that

See what I mean? Just as I expected.

 

[8236]

wow, I am startled.....Obama actually displayed some back bone, kudo's, I have to give it up to him. I didn't think he would block it.

By extrapolating your statement: You want to encourage the (so far) quiet muslim groups to take a front row seat, and become powerful opinion formers in these countries so that they can guide their countries in an anti-western anti-israeli anti-secular direction?

Do you work for the oil industry or the US military or its industrial complex by any chance?

 

[Trajan]

wow, I am startled.....Obama actually displayed some back bone, kudo's, I have to give it up to him. I didn't think he would block it.

By extrapolating your statement: You want to encourage the (so far) quiet muslim groups to take a front row seat, and become powerful opinion formers in these countries so that they can guide their countries in an anti-western anti-israeli anti-secular direction?

Do you work for the oil industry or the US military or its industrial complex by any chance?

answered already-

no, he just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate the pali-Israeli settlement issue.

That’s not negotiation.

__________________

 

[8236]

wow, I am startled.....Obama actually displayed some back bone, kudo's, I have to give it up to him. I didn't think he would block it.

More like he bowed down to his Zionist masters.

no, he just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate the pali-Israeli settlement issue.

That’s not negotiation.

I would refer you to UN resolution 242. (a long, long time ago)

 

[JBeukema]

Fuck that

See what I mean? Just as I expected.

Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracle

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Not too long ago the UN passed a resolution stating that Zionism is racism, they later took that back and rescinded it when its obvious what Zionism is.

 

[8236]

Not too long ago the UN passed a resolution stating that Zionism is racism, they later took that back and rescinded it when its obvious what Zionism is.

Which resolution was that? It was either passed or wasn't. If it was rescinded then that would have to be a different resolution. A resolution that states that zionism is racism would have been vetoed by the US in any case.

 

[JBeukema]

So I Googled it

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379, adopted on November 10, 1975 by a vote of 72 to 35 (with 32 abstentions), "determine[d] that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination". The resolution was revoked by Resolution 46/86 on December 16, 1991. In the history of the UN, this is the only resolution that has ever been revoked.

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[JBeukema]

3379 (XXX). Elimination of all forms of racial discrimination
The General Assembly,
Recalling its resolution 1904 (XVIII) of 20 November 1963, proclaiming the United Nations Declaration on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, and in particular its affirmation that "any doctrine of racial differentiation or superiority is scientifically false, morally condemnable, socially unjust and dangerous" and its expression of alarm at "the manifestations of racial discrimination still in evidence in some areas in the world, some of which are imposed by certain Governments by means of legislative, administrative or other measures",
Recalling also that, in its resolution 3151 G (XXVIII) of 14 December 1973, the General Assembly condemned, inter alia, the unholy alliance between South African racism and zionism,
Taking note of the Declaration of Mexico on the Equality of Women and Their Contribution to Development and Peace 1975, proclaimed by the World Conference of the International Women's Year, held at Mexico City from 19 June to 2 July 1975, which promulgated the principle that "international co-operation and peace require the achievement of national liberation and independence, the elimination of colonialism and neo-colonialism, foreign occupation, zionism, apartheid and racial discrimination in all its forms, as well as the recognition of the dignity of peoples and their right to self-determination",
Taking note also of resolution 77 (XII) adopted by the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity at its twelfth ordinary session, held at Kampala from 28 July to 1 August 1975, which considered "that the racist regime in occupied Palestine and the racist regime in Zimbabwe and South Africa have a common imperialist origin, forming a whole and having the same racist structure and being organically linked in their policy aimed at repression of the dignity and integrity of the human being",
Taking note also of the Political Declaration and Strategy to Strengthen International Peace and Security and to Intensify Solidarity and Mutual Assistance among Non-Aligned Countries, adopted at the Conference of Ministers for Foreign Affairs of Non-Aligned Countries held at Lima from 25 to 30 August 1975, which most severely condemned zionism as a threat to world peace and security and called upon all count

 

[William Joyce]

Seriously, people, if a black man can't tell the Jews to fuck off, he might as well put the shackles on himself and high-tail back it to the slave shack.

 

[8236]

Fuck that

See what I mean? Just as I expected.

Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracle

JBeukema, what's with all the bad language and attitude? Compared to your (excellent)contribs on one of the religion and ethics threads I read you sound like a different person. Lighten up!.... You smokin something?

 

[JBeukema]

See what I mean? Just as I expected.

Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracle

JBeukema, what's with all the bad language and attitude? Compared to your (excellent)contribs on one of the religion and ethics threads I read you sound like a different person. Lighten up!.... You smokin something?

He got a stick up his ass over it, so I kept sayin' it.

Same reason for my posts in Willows '****' thread.

Some people get too worked up over a word

 

[jgarden]

wow, I am startled.....Obama actually displayed some back bone, kudo's, I have to give it up to him. I didn't think he would block it.

More like he bowed down to his Zionist masters.

no, he just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate the pali-Israeli settlement issue.

That’s not negotiation.

**********************************************************************************

Document 47: Department of State Cable from George P. Shultz to the Mission to the European Office of the United Nations and Other International Organizations. "U.N. Human Rights Commission: Item 12: Iranian Resolution on Use of Chemical Weapons by Iraq," March 14, 1984.

The State Department instructs the U.S. delegate to the United Nations to get the support of other Western missions for a motion of "no decision" regarding Iran's draft resolution condemning Iraq's use of chemical weapons. Failing that, the U.S. is to abstain on the resolution.

The U.S. is to emphasize points made in a recent State Department press conference, including the assertion that "The USG evenhandedly condemns the prohibited use of chemical weapons whenever it occurs."

Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Appearently back in March 1984, the Reagan Administration "..... just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate" concerning Iranian Resolution on Use of Chemical Weapons by Iraq.

We all know that the US would go on to reverse this position on Iraq's "chemical weapons," and would even appeal for UN intervention, once it became evident that Saddam that might use them on America's friends - instead of her enemies.

Although the official US foreign policy has always been, "The USG evenhandedly condemns the prohibited use of chemical weapons whenever it occurs," there was never any evidence that the Iranians had ever resorted to the use of "chemical weapons!"

 

[8236]

So I Googled it

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379, adopted on November 10, 1975 by a vote of 72 to 35 (with 32 abstentions), "determine[d] that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination". The resolution was revoked by Resolution 46/86 on December 16, 1991. In the history of the UN, this is the only resolution that has ever been revoked.

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wow! Well there you go, thanks for the info. One learns something every day. Amazed it was ever passed in the 1st place.

(I see that it was General Assembly, so the US couldn't veto it in any case)

 

[Bass v 2.0]

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 3379 wasn't against Judaism, it was against Zionism, how in the hell could it be anti-Semitic unless they think Zionism=Judaism? The Jews that use that strawman argument are dead damn wrong. The KKK for example, uses "Christianity" and the Bible heavily in their racist BS, but no one in their right mind would ever say KKK racist proganda and the Bible are one in the same.

 

[Bass v 2.0]

Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracle

JBeukema, what's with all the bad language and attitude? Compared to your (excellent)contribs on one of the religion and ethics threads I read you sound like a different person. Lighten up!.... You smokin something?

He got a stick up his ass over it, so I kept sayin' it.

Same reason for my posts in Willows '****' thread.

Some people get too worked up over a word

I simply asked you not to use profanity in the your posts to me, you didn't do it, so screw it, you don't see me chimping out over it.

 

[JerkInTheBox]

I really hope that there is a metric shit-ton of sarcasm in this thread, that is being completely lost on me.

Either that or we have a cute little gaggle of Jew hating neo-Nazi wannabes giving each other some pretty sweet ZJ's.

-the jerque

 

[Trajan]

More like he bowed down to his Zionist masters.

no, he just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate the pali-Israeli settlement issue.

That’s not negotiation.

**********************************************************************************

Document 47: Department of State Cable from George P. Shultz to the Mission to the European Office of the United Nations and Other International Organizations. "U.N. Human Rights Commission: Item 12: Iranian Resolution on Use of Chemical Weapons by Iraq," March 14, 1984.

The State Department instructs the U.S. delegate to the United Nations to get the support of other Western missions for a motion of "no decision" regarding Iran's draft resolution condemning Iraq's use of chemical weapons. Failing that, the U.S. is to abstain on the resolution.

The U.S. is to emphasize points made in a recent State Department press conference, including the assertion that "The USG evenhandedly condemns the prohibited use of chemical weapons whenever it occurs."

Source: Declassified under the Freedom of Information Act

Appearently back in March 1984, the Reagan Administration "..... just would not let a place like the UN basically adjudicate" concerning Iranian Resolution on Use of Chemical Weapons by Iraq.

We all know that the US would go on to reverse this position on Iraq's "chemical weapons," and would even appeal for UN intervention, once it became evident that Saddam that might use them on America's friends - instead of her enemies.

Although the official US foreign policy has always been, "The USG evenhandedly condemns the prohibited use of chemical weapons whenever it occurs," there was never any evidence that the Iranians had ever resorted to the use of "chemical weapons!"

and?

 

[jgarden]

Congratufuckin'lations you're a fuckin' oracle

JBeukema, what's with all the bad language and attitude? Compared to your (excellent)contribs on one of the religion and ethics threads I read you sound like a different person. Lighten up!.... You smokin something?

He got a stick up his ass over it, so I kept sayin' it.

Same reason for my posts in Willows '****' thread.

Some people get too worked up over a word

- Congratufuckin'lations

- fuckin' oracle

- '****' thread.

The reality is that "JBeukema's" use of bad language serves no purpose unless it gets people "worked up over a word!"

Despite "JBeukema's" denial, the only reason to resort to bad language is for its "shock" value!