And what is the problem with missiles, reaching the EU? France has missiles, reaching Iran, too. Even with nuclear warheads.Ah, to be a child again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what is the problem with missiles, reaching the EU? France has missiles, reaching Iran, too. Even with nuclear warheads.Ah, to be a child again.
In edition to your oft repeated false claims, you can explain why Turkey has any direct interest in the Straits of Hormuz. I doubt you could find either on a map.Doesn't matter. Iran, a state sponsor of terror, currently developing nuclear weapons in violation of the JCPOA, attacked Turkey, a NATO country, who could invoke Article 5 to allow NATO to help the US open Hormuz and do a regime change in Iran to eliminate the nuclear threat.
Since NATO is worthless when any military action is needed to remove serious threats, the US should put NATO on notice that the US is also not responsible to respond to Article 5.
And what is the problem with missiles, reaching the EU? France has missiles, reaching Iran, too. Even with nuclear warheads.
Trump stabilized Venezuela and is now stabilizing the Middle East. When Biden was president wars broke out how was that stableIt is?
You prefer political instability?
I guess you do. As your beloved fuhrer is devoted to chaos.
So Cheeto lied? Totally obliterated means they can rebuild it in 8 months? So we can expect a 100+ year occupation of Iran since they can rebuild so fast?Then they rebuilt it.
As I've been saying, sock, it's the regime more than the nukes. Lots of countries have nukes, but they are not headed by theocratic maniacs who want to bring about the end of the world.
Evidently not. They TOLD us they had stockpiles of enriched uranium. Are you saying they lied? To what end? Bravado?
So Cheeto lied? Totally obliterated means they can rebuild it in 8 months? So we can expect a 100+ year occupation of Iran since they can rebuild so fast?
You are not well informed about US history
America was an unwilling participant in WW I and WWII
That is in line with your 100 year time period
If they were "totally obliterated" 9 months ago, then the fact that the US is back at war with them proves we failed the first time.
Sock huh? METhen they rebuilt it.
As I've been saying, sock, it's the regime more than the nukes. Lots of countries have nukes, but they are not headed by theocratic maniacs who want to bring about the end of the world.
Cheeto failed or lied?
Both.Cheeto failed or lied?
No, Cheeto used hyperbole.So Cheeto lied? Totally obliterated means they can rebuild it in 8 months? So we can expect a 100+ year occupation of Iran since they can rebuild so fast?
Its not just the Strait of Hormuz dumbass, its that Iran is about to get nuclear weapons and ICBMs.In edition to your oft repeated false claims, you can explain why Turkey has any direct interest in the Straits of Hormuz. I doubt you could find either on a map.
Suppose that is true. Should we really base our U.S. policies on always doing the opposite of what Putin wants us to do?I cannot think of anything that Putin would like more than to see the US withdraw from NATO. Having achieved nothing but chaos with his vastly unpopular war in Iran, one we started, Trump is once again doing the bidding of his KBG master in the Kremlin.
Its not just the Strait of Hormuz dumbass, its that Iran is about to get nuclear weapons and ICBMs.
Why was NATO so interested in the JCPOA? Think hard.
NATO knows that if Iran got nukes, the other Gulf countries would need to get nukes.
If Iran got nukes how long until they used them or gave them to one of their terror cells to use?
Trump knows that Iran cannot be allowed to get nuclear weapons, ever, and is taking military action to enforce that position. A regime change is necessary to end the mullahs reign of terror.
WAR IS EVERYONES PROBLEM.Europe can take care of itself. It's time to withdraw from NATO and the Ukraine war. Ukraine is Europe's problem now.
Most of the time Yes. We should never take the word of a dicktator.Suppose that is true. Should we really base our U.S. policies on always doing the opposite of what Putin wants us to do?
That is insane. You give all power to Putin then. All he has to do is come out in favor of the U.S. doing the opposite of what he really wants us to do.Most of the time Yes. We should never take the word of a dicktator.