US to withdraw from NATO?

[frigidweirdo]

Why are you asking me? You were the one that replied to me.

Because your response seems to imply you don't know what NATO is for. So I'm just checking to see if you do or not. It's kind of essential to this conversation.

 

[JanetTheGreat]

Because your response seems to imply you don't know what NATO is for. So I'm just checking to see if you do or not. It's kind of essential to this conversation.

I know what it is for, and that is precisely why I want us out of it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I know what it is for, and that is precisely why I want us out of it.

Again, what is it for?

 

[kyzr]

Your claims are false, as usual. I’ll give it to you. When you make it up, you post the most obvious lies. The JCPOA did not expire.
Your fuhrer unilaterally repudiated it. Indeed, all the signatories except Trump accepted the IAEA assessment that Iran was in compliance.
Iran may not have 11 bombs (or whatever sensationalized number you care to make up).
But after having the JCPOA broken by the United States, attacks on Iranian facilities, and now, an unproved, unnecessary war started against them by the United States, they would be crazy not to.

You can keep typing lies or read the answer below:

MSN

Iran claimed to have enough uranium for 11 nuclear bombs, US envoy Witkoff says​

“The 60% material, Sean, can be brought to 90%, that’s weapons-grade, in roughly one week, maybe 10 days at the outside. The 20% can be brought to weapons-grade inside of three to four weeks.”
“They were proud of it,” Witkoff went on. “They were proud that they had evaded all sorts of oversight protocols to get to a place where they could deliver 11 nuclear bombs.”

 

[BothWings]

Leave the wellfare states out to rot. I don't support war. I am anti-war.

With all those "allies" letting us park our tanks in their garages and fly each other's planes, war mongers will bet high and often on conflict. We don't need NATO to have an temporary agreement with another country to join forces against a common problem while the problem exists. This would eliminate a lot of the bureaucratic waste associated with NATO.

 

[JonKoch]

What did NATO do about Putin's invasion of Ukraine?

What do you think NATO would do if China invaded California somehow or if Russia invaded the East Coast?

Suppose Either country promised the European members of NATO not to attack them, so long as they stayed out of the war in North America? Including promising Denmark that they could keep their Greenland colony?

Suppose Russia or China offered further incentives to Europe such as favorable trade deals to stay out?

Please tell me you don't seriously believe that France, Germany, Finland, and Sweden are going to join the war to rush to the U.S.' aid?

Ukraine's NOT part of NATO, but they put sanctions on Russia and have sent $300+ billion in aid

 

[frigidweirdo]

With all those "allies" letting us park our tanks in their garages and fly each other's planes, war mongers will bet high and often on conflict. We don't need NATO to have an temporary agreement with another country to join forces against a common problem while the problem exists. This would eliminate a lot of the bureaucratic waste associated with NATO.

It would also show other countries that they can do whatever they like.