US to withdraw from NATO?

Don’t know whether you realize this, but the U.S. is a global bully sticking our noses where it doesn’t belong.
We use those NATO bases to launch those attacks and stage invasions
Iran attacked us 47 years ago and has been chanting death to America ever since.

We finally said enough is enough.
 
Iran attacked us 47 years ago and has been chanting death to America ever since.

We finally said enough is enough.
Yep. They attacked you by taking their land and their oil back?
And yes, chancons about destruction of America are quite popular in the world.


I wonder why?
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
Iran attacked us 47 years ago and has been chanting death to America ever since.

We finally said enough is enough.
So Trump attacked Iran because of hostages who were safely returned 47 years ago and because they call us names?
 
We have oil and gas. I guess you forgot.
We have the world’s highest cost oil and gas.

High enough, in fact, that wells were being capped and wildcatters need work because the low oil prices that prevailed before your fuhrer started his stupid war, made American oil unprofitable.

Oil trades on a global market. You parochial Tru,posters don’t seem to understand that, or that the United States is not a separate planet, immune from world markets.

Solar and wind are virtually free once the infrastructure is built.

And the sun will still shine whether the Straits of Hormuz are closed, or not.

But, you’d clearly rather be hostage to oil politics.
 
NATO without the US still has a GDP that is staggering vs. Russia. They will be fine. Time for them to stand up. Time for us to pull ourselves out of foreign entanglements. We are bankrupt.
Without NATO we would not be as strong. We are not paying for NATO. The arrangement is that each nation pay a certain amount of their GDP for defense. We are the ones who decided to spend more money on defense than the other top 10 militaries combined. Article 5 has only been used once, this means that we have not had to stand up for Europe, they stood up for us when we started a war for no reason. Furthermore, it has been this partnership that has saved up from additional terrorist strikes due to them sharing intel with us. We cannot afford to lose any allies. It is time to stop listening to the rambling of an idiot who doesn't know wtf he is talking about.
 
Last edited:
Without NATO we would not be as strong. We are not paying for NATO. The arrangement is that each nation pay a certain amount of their GDP for defense. We are the one who decided to spend more money on defense than the other top 10 militaries combined. Article 5 has only been used once, this means that we have not had to stand up for Europe, they stood up for us when we started a war for no reason. Furthermore, it has been this partnership that has saved up from additional terrorist strikes due to them sharing intel with us. We cannot afford to lose any allies. It is time to stop listening to the rambling of an idiot who doesn't know wtf he is talking about.
I am not disagreeing with any of that.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
So Trump attacked Iran because of hostages who were safely returned 47 years ago and because they call us names?
And the thousand or so Americans murdered in the interim, plus the continued efforts to obtain a nuke, which they would immediately use.

But you know that, you're just a liar.
 
And the thousand or so Americans murdered in the interim, plus the continued efforts to obtain a nuke, which they would immediately use.

But you know that, you're just a liar.
Name them
I will wait
 
  • Winner
Reactions: IM2
Yep. They attacked you by taking their land and their oil back?
And yes, chancons about destruction of America are quite popular in the world.


I wonder why?

No, you dimbass, they took over our embassy which is a declaration of war, then committed war crimes by holding our people hostage.
 
15th post
JCPOA worked without firing a shot
The JCPOA was not working. It expired in 10-15 years, it was moronic.

Iran claimed to have enough uranium for 11 nuclear bombs, US envoy Witkoff says​

“They were proud of it,” Witkoff went on. “They were proud that they had evaded all sorts of oversight protocols to get to a place where they could deliver 11 nuclear bombs.”
But Trump said he could do better
I guess closing the Strait is better
Enforcing the "JCPOA" with military force is much better than giving Iran $56,000,000,000 to develop nukes and ICBMs. Trump simplified the JCPOA, saying "Iran will never be allowed to have nuclear weapons".
 
No, you dimbass, they took over our embassy which is a declaration of war, then committed war crimes by holding our people hostage.
Hey, they took our embassy back in 1829 and even killed our ambassador, Griboedov. But then, we made their Shah very sorry and he paid us a lot for settling the things down.
But as I said, you started it first, by removing democratic Iranian government in 1953.
 
Sure, I thought Cheeto was the great negotiator, he couldn't do much with it huh? Even though they gave international inspectors 24/7 access and video feeds?

Oh well, another broken promise to Cheeto's CULT. AmeriKKKa first!
Then if there had been a terrorist strike you would have been the first to blame Trump for allowing it.
 
Back
Top Bottom