US Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring ID verification for porn sites

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The US Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law that requires users accessing pornography sites to verify their age using a government ID or a face scan.

The 2023 law was challenged by PornHub and other sites that argued the requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech by placing a burden on adults who want to access that content.


I suspect the traffic on porn sites is going to plummet dramatically.

MAGA Mike Johnson isn't going to want to show his face or his ID on PornHub.

Hackers will be all over this shit.

US Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring ID verification for porn sites

The state law was challenged by porn sites that argued the age-checking requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech.

www.bbc.com

Members of the bar in Shreveport have discussed Johnson's online porn addiction,

 

[Polishprince]

What is wrong with the 3 "justices" who think its a good idea to show smut to minors? Is it a personal thing with them, or are they getting gratuities from NAMBLA and other pro-pedo pressure groups on the left?

 

[Captain Caveman]

Meh. I'm cool with this.

Porn age restriction verification starts this month in the UK, larger sites have more time to comply. Those that don't will be fined £250,000, or 5% of their turnover.

That means Tommy Tit will have to ID himself on the gay porn website to keep viewing it.

 

[Midnight FM]

The US Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law that requires users accessing pornography sites to verify their age using a government ID or a face scan.

The 2023 law was challenged by PornHub and other sites that argued the requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech by placing a burden on adults who want to access that content.


I suspect the traffic on porn sites is going to plummet dramatically.

MAGA Mike Johnson isn't going to want to show his face or his ID on PornHub.

Hackers will be all over this shit.

US Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring ID verification for porn sites

The state law was challenged by porn sites that argued the age-checking requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech.

www.bbc.com

The reality is that porn is much more easy to access today via the internet, especially for minors, than it was prior to the digital age. And, of course, porn companies don't care about "free speech" or the well-being of children. Only their profit margins.

I'm aware that there are fairly easy ways to bypass regional restrictions, such using VPNs.

 

[Polishprince]

The reality is that porn is much more easy to access today via the internet, especially for minors, than it was prior to the digital age. And, of course, porn companies don't care about "free speech" or the well-being of children. Only their profit margins.

I'm aware that there are fairly easy ways to bypass regional restrictions, such using VPNs.

Its certainly easier even for adults to access smut nowadays.

50 years ago, you had to go into a sketchy part of town and buy mags from seedy porn clerks, or watch films in theatres with sticky seats. In any event, it required getting dressed and leaving the house.

In the current age, its just about picking up your phone.

But gambling sites and others can check ID, I don't see why its such a probably for the porno sites.

 

[Nostra]

The US Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law that requires users accessing pornography sites to verify their age using a government ID or a face scan.

The 2023 law was challenged by PornHub and other sites that argued the requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech by placing a burden on adults who want to access that content.


I suspect the traffic on porn sites is going to plummet dramatically.

MAGA Mike Johnson isn't going to want to show his face or his ID on PornHub.

Hackers will be all over this shit.

US Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring ID verification for porn sites

The state law was challenged by porn sites that argued the age-checking requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech.

www.bbc.com

Sounds racist.

 

[Nostra]

Donald is going to miss Stormy's pornos.

He can't risk getting caught since he's president now. Hackers are going to be all over this like stink on shit.

And don't pretend you aren't projecting your own proclivities, mmkay?

Dimtards all the sudden love IDs.

Weird.

 

[Nostra]

Maybe they can move their porn to kindergarten classes. Dimwingers love porn in kindergarten classes.

 

[struth]

The US Supreme Court has upheld a Texas law that requires users accessing pornography sites to verify their age using a government ID or a face scan.

The 2023 law was challenged by PornHub and other sites that argued the requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech by placing a burden on adults who want to access that content.


I suspect the traffic on porn sites is going to plummet dramatically.

MAGA Mike Johnson isn't going to want to show his face or his ID on PornHub.

Hackers will be all over this shit.

US Supreme Court upholds Texas law requiring ID verification for porn sites

The state law was challenged by porn sites that argued the age-checking requirement violated constitutional rights to free speech.

www.bbc.com

Well, can’t say I’m surprised a dembot, party of Epstein voter is the first to be outraged that they can’t expose minors to porn

 

[Papageorgio]

The Republican Nanny State is alive and well.

So you are in favor of kids having access to porn, would that include brick and mortar?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So you are in favor of kids having access to porn, would that include brick and mortar?

Since porn is nearly an all-Right addiction, it will dry up immediately if the laws are passed requiring ID.

 

[Papageorgio]

Since porn is nearly an all-Right addiction, it will dry up immediately if the laws are passed requiring ID.

I have no issue with it not being available to those under 18.

 

[Polishprince]

Since porn is nearly an all-Right addiction, it will dry up immediately if the laws are passed requiring ID.

Where did you get that crazy idea. The greatest smut journalist of our time is the late Larry Flynt, who was a huge supporter of the Far Left.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Where did you get that crazy idea. The greatest smut journalist of our time is the late Larry Flynt, who was a huge supporter of the Far Left.

Hasty generalization like that is meaningless.

Those of the MAGA persuasion are notorious pervs.

 

[Nostra]

Since porn is nearly an all-Right addiction, it will dry up immediately if the laws are passed requiring ID.

Hasty generalization like that is meaningless.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Why would anyone be against children viewing porn?

Strange

 

[g5000]

Well, can’t say I’m surprised a dembot, party of Epstein voter is the first to be outraged that they can’t expose minors to porn

That's not what I said fucktard.

Maybe this will help your diminutive comprehension skills:

Ashley Madison data breach - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[struth]

That's not what I said fucktard.

Maybe this will help your diminutive comprehension skills:

Ashley Madison data breach - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

What does that have to do with you being upset minors cant freely access porn?

 

[marvin martian]

Poor John Edgar Slow Horses is too dumb to even realize what he did.

 

[Billiejeens]

Come on now, them perty girls are await'in for ya!!

Why waste time posting here?

Girls?

I laugh