US Supreme Court : Agrees with the President : MS13 gangster Kilmar Abrego Garcia must stay in El Salvador's SuperMax

[WorldWatcher]

He was legally in the country... A Judge ordered that....

He asked for asylum and he was granted it after he presented his case...

Why are you against due process and the rule of law...

Garcia wasn't granted asylum after his case was heard in 2019.

Asylum was denied, but ordered that he could not be deported to El Salvador. The Trump Administration did not proceed to deport him to another country.

Here is the order -->> https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815/gov.uscourts.mdd.578815.1.1_3.pdf

WW

 

[Modern Messiah]

I’m not sure he got his hearing. (If he didn’t, he was entitled to it under our laws.) Also, the Admin, itself, acknowledged that a judge had previously granted the alien a measure of legal protection (also, it wasn’t confirmed that he was a gang member).

I’m curious about what happens if the “other” nation denies our request to send back to the U.S. A U.S. judge’s order to the Admin doesn’t bind a foreign land.

He was an illegal alien.
He was in a gang as well.
So let's not get to deep into the weeds here.
Illegal aliens have no constitutional rights.
This is easy concept to understand.
There was no court hearing or vetting process for him to enter into The United States of America.
President Trump talked endlessly about deporting criminal illegal aliens during his campaign and The American People voted for him in a massive landslide.

 

[Marener]

He was an illegal alien.
He was in a gang as well.
So let's not get to deep into the weeds here.
Illegal aliens have no constitutional rights.
This is easy concept to understand.
There was no court hearing or vetting process for him to enter into The United States of America.
President Trump talked endlessly about deporting criminal illegal aliens during his campaign and The American People voted for him in a massive landslide.

So if we vote for someone that wants to send Yiu to a gulag, that’s okay if they win?

 

[Blaster]

Winning!

 

[Blaster]

Amy Coney Barrett dissented with the liberal judges. I bet Trump regrets putting her on SCOTUS.

 

[Care4all]

Winning!

Not really....unless you support LAWLESSNESS.....?

ALL 9 justices agreed that the trump admin illegally deported the 300 because the 300 were not given due process before they were deported.

SC said due process is REQUIRED....THEY HAVE TO BE GIVEN, a chance to defend themselves, before deporting them....

 

[Blaster]

Not really....unless you support LAWLESSNESS.....?

ALL 9 justices agreed that the trump admin illegally deported the 300 because the 300 were not given due process before they were deported.

SC said due process is REQUIRED....THEY HAVE TO BE GIVEN, a chance to defend themselves, before deporting them....

Unlike you I want these criminals out of our country.

 

[Blaster]

**** that guy. I hope he never returns to this country.

 

[Care4all]

Unlike you I want these criminals out of our country.

Everybody does, just do it LEGALLY. Why are you against following the LAW?

 

[Blaster]

Everybody does, just do it LEGALLY. Why are you against following the LAW?

Illegals don't deserve due process.

 

[Care4all]

Illegals don't deserve due process.

Sorry, you're wrong....that breaks the Constitution.

 

[Blaster]

Sorry, you're wrong....that breaks the Constitution.

You are not a lawyer.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Sorry, you're wrong....that breaks the Constitution.

Forfeit due process on the way IN forfeits due process on the way OUT!!!!!!

 

[kyzr]

Not really....unless you support LAWLESSNESS.....?
ALL 9 justices agreed that the trump admin illegally deported the 300 because the 300 were not given due process before they were deported.
SC said due process is REQUIRED....THEY HAVE TO BE GIVEN, a chance to defend themselves, before deporting them....

Deported or sent to prison? (see next post)
Remain in Mexico says they wait in Mexico for their hearing.

 

[Billiejeens]

Recap -

Supreme Court Clears Way for Venezuelan Deportations to Resume, for Now . . . The Supreme Court ruled on Monday night that the Trump administration could continue to deport Venezuelan migrants using a wartime powers act for now, overturning a lower court that had put a temporary stop to the deportations. The decision marks a victory for the Trump administration, although the ruling did not address the constitutionality of using the Alien Enemies Act to send the migrants to a prison in El Salvador.

The justices instead issued a narrow procedural ruling, saying that the migrants’ lawyers had filed their lawsuit in the wrong court.


The supreme court loves to rule as narrow as possible.

 

[Care4all]

You are not a lawyer.

The Supreme court Justices are all lawyers...and ALL 9 said it was Constitutionally required to give them due process before deporting them, and from here on out, before deporting them, they have to give them due process...a way to defend themselves against the govt's accusations and further action....

Most of them would lose, but some of them....a few, or even just one or two, will prove the govt was mistaken, and wrong.

Due process- is one of the reasons America is Great, and was Great, and will forever be great.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Recap -

Supreme Court Clears Way for Venezuelan Deportations to Resume, for Now . . . The Supreme Court ruled on Monday night that the Trump administration could continue to deport Venezuelan migrants using a wartime powers act for now, overturning a lower court that had put a temporary stop to the deportations. The decision marks a victory for the Trump administration, although the ruling did not address the constitutionality of using the Alien Enemies Act to send the migrants to a prison in El Salvador.

The justices instead issued a narrow procedural ruling, saying that the migrants’ lawyers had filed their lawsuit in the wrong court.


The supreme court loves to rule as narrow as possible.

Which sets up the Catch-22.

Plaintiff's must file a Writ of Habeas Corpus in the location where they are detained, which means the individual appears in court and gets to hear the charged and evidence against them.

But now the individuals are not in the country and can't appear before the Judge to plead their habeas case. Therefore Habeas Corpus is not an avenue open to them to attempt to right a wrong.

WW

 

[Care4all]

Recap -

Supreme Court Clears Way for Venezuelan Deportations to Resume, for Now . . . The Supreme Court ruled on Monday night that the Trump administration could continue to deport Venezuelan migrants using a wartime powers act for now, overturning a lower court that had put a temporary stop to the deportations. The decision marks a victory for the Trump administration, although the ruling did not address the constitutionality of using the Alien Enemies Act to send the migrants to a prison in El Salvador.

The justices instead issued a narrow procedural ruling, saying that the migrants’ lawyers had filed their lawsuit in the wrong court.


The supreme court loves to rule as narrow as possible.

But also, Kavanaugh wrote, Make no mistake....all 9 justices agree...due process for those removed and deported, must be given first, from here on out.

 

[Care4all]

Forfeit due process on the way IN forfeits due process on the way OUT!!!!!!

Nope! It doesn't work that way, cutie pie!

 

[Contumacious]

They did not rule on the legality of using the Alien Enemies Act...not yet.

With all due respect they did. They stated what I have been saying for the last 2 months: NO JUDICIAL REVIEW IS ALLOWED

"They challenge the Government’s interpretation of the [Alien Enemy ] Act and assert that they do not fall within the category of removable alien enemies. But we do not reach those arguments. Challenges to removal under the AEA, a statute which largely “ ‘preclude judicial review,’ ” Ludecke v. Watkins, 335 U. S. 160, 163−164, (1948), must be brought in habeas. Cf. Heikkila v. Barber, 345 U. S. 229, 234−235 (1953) (holding that habeas was the only cause of action available to challenge deportation under immigration statutes that “preclud[ed] judicial intervention” beyond what was necessary to vindicate due process rights)

TRUMP v. J. G. G.

www.law.cornell.edu