Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The baby living in the womb is not property. This of course is the same argument made for centuries to justify slavery, "They're not people, just property".We can agree on this "we believe that we should have control over our own property". A woman's body is her own property. Thanks for clearing that up.
Some people believe a lot of utterly insane BS.Some believe the magaturd party is trying to dismantle all of the above regulations on sex, religion, and national origin so they can freelybe dicks todiscriminate against people not more like them. Do you dispute this obvious fact?
I interpreted your original comment incorrectly, I think. My bad. We are likely in more agreement than anything else.Read the actual wording and what they wrote about it.
Gov't is supposed to be entirely neutral with respect to religion and only intervene when someone might be harmed by such practices as say a cult that wants their members to jump off of a bridge on a certain day, or Crucify members to celebrate Easter, the latter of which actually happened.
No. Too many people. Look at this monkey cage of a message board, for just one single example. America has a serious messaging problem.Some people believe a lot of utterly insane BS.
I didn't know Justice Barrett was a man. I also didn't know a baby was a woman's body.Men voting to control women's bodies. The American Taliban is taking over. Next is gay marriage I suppose?
Hmm. Weird. Does that happen to you often? Do you need me to bring more straw for that monumental man you're building?I always smile when leftwingers claim all pro-lifers are men.
Yeah, it's been done in this very thread. Joe Blow post #9, the post I just responded to. As if you've never heard it before.Hmm. Weird. Does that happen to you often? Do you need me to bring more straw for that monumental man you're building?
Their argument seems to largely be that if men couldn't vote on women's issues abortion would remain legal at all stages for all time.Hmm. Weird. Does that happen to you often? Do you need me to bring more straw for that monumental man you're building?
Yep. Doesn't make a lick of sense. Most married women oppose abortion, in fact. And those are the only women who should be having sex anyway.Their argument seems to largely be that if men couldn't vote on women's issues abortion would remain legal at all stages for all time.
Yes, thank you. I'm familiar with the argument.Their argument seems to largely be that if men couldn't vote on women's issues abortion would remain legal at all stages for all time.
Fact? What's your source? Where's the poll?Most married women oppose abortion, in fact
In fact, in a 2019, the majority of all women described themselves as pro-life, and not pro-choice. This goes against the lying leftwing media narrative.Fact? What's your source? Where's the poll?
Guys can get pregnant now under current law. It's all in how you identify.Some say if guys could get pregnant it would be a whole different issue
I think you're lying.In fact, in a 2019, the majority of all women described themselves as pro-life, and not pro-choice. This goes against the lying leftwing media narrative.
Then don't ask questions if you don't want answers.Yes, thank you. I'm familiar with the argument.
I've seen polling where a majority of Americans are pro life but not any with a majority of women.In fact, in a 2019, the majority of all women described themselves as pro-life, and not pro-choice. This goes against the lying leftwing media narrative.
What specific question do you believe I don't want answers to?Then don't ask questions if you don't want answers.
Now you're just trolling, peddle it elsewhere.What specific question do you believe I don't want answers to?
Not trolling. Just curious.Now you're just trolling, peddle it elsewhere.
