Yes they do have less rights in the Arab countries surrounding Israel. Israel has very tight borders and keeping the Arabs outside Israel is not apartheid. Inside Israel, fences around Gaza and the West bank is not apartheid, it's to keep brain fevered lunatics from committing death and destruction inside Israel proper. You're just pissed because your brethern can't operate in Israel.Arabs have less rights than Jews.
Aparatheid.
Thanks for playing.
Ah, here we go, the "Cannibal" argument.
This was the argument South Africa made, because even though they were oppressing the blacks, it was okay, because other African countries were worse. Geezus, some of them were run by freakin' Cannibals. (Idi Amin and Jean Bossaka).
Frankly, if you need to keep tight borders around people WITHIN your country because they want to bomb you, then you are an apartheid state.
The Israel Proper argument doesn't fly because Israel is buidlign settlements and militarily ruling the "Occupped Territories". NOr are they willing to consider a peace agreement based on the 1967 borders.
Since when has gaza and the west bank been in Israel, the last I heard was that gaza was hamas controlled and the west bank fatah controlled. Both of which are Palestinian political groups and are not Israeli. The tight borders keep the threat of attack to a minimum and arte there to protect all Israeli citizens. The Palestinians are not Israeli citizens by choice.
The settlements are built on Jewish owned land that the Jews have title deeds to. The military are occupying the west bank under the aegis of the Geneva conventions.
There were never any 1967 borders, no treaty to say that there were borders mutually agreed. What there was were a set of ceasefire lines were hostilities were halted.
Unless you can find a treaty signed by Israel agreeing to the borders of 1967 after the 6 day war ?