US implements socialism for 80 years, China gets rid of it for 30, China leaps ahead

[CrusaderFrank]

You betcha, skippy. A couple of people who compare obama unfavorably to Putin means Putin's a right wing hero.

I think you underestimate how much we despise Obama and the left.

If given the choice, would our board rightwingers vote for Putin over Obama?

Putin loves the nation he leads and is looking to increase and expand it's power and influence. Obama started by apologizing and has done everything thing in his power to bring us low

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

 

[rightwinger]

You betcha, skippy. A couple of people who compare obama unfavorably to Putin means Putin's a right wing hero.

I think you underestimate how much we despise Obama and the left.

If given the choice, would our board rightwingers vote for Putin over Obama?

Putin loves the nation he leads and is looking to increase and expand it's power and influence. Obama started by apologizing and has done everything thing in his power to bring us low

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

Winner, winner, chicken dinner

We got one....any other takers?

 

[buckeye45_73]

You betcha, skippy. A couple of people who compare obama unfavorably to Putin means Putin's a right wing hero.

I think you underestimate how much we despise Obama and the left.

If given the choice, would our board rightwingers vote for Putin over Obama?

nope they fight each other in the democrat primary, its a false choice.

now ill take sarkosky, cameron, and harper over obama

 

[Mustang]

You betcha, skippy. A couple of people who compare obama unfavorably to Putin means Putin's a right wing hero.

I think you underestimate how much we despise Obama and the left.

If given the choice, would our board rightwingers vote for Putin over Obama?

Putin loves the nation he leads and is looking to increase and expand it's power and influence. Obama started by apologizing and has done everything thing in his power to bring us low

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

What do you call a person who actively undermines the elected leader of his own country while openly praising the dictator of a potential adversary?

 

[koshergrl]

Obama's a piece of shit who belongs in prison, along with about 4/5 of the current admin, and 2/3 of Congress.

What do you call a person who supports tyranny, villainy, and criminality?

 

[Mustang]

Obama's a piece of shit who belongs in prison, along with about 4/5 of the current admin, and 2/3 of Congress.

What do you call a person who supports tyranny, villainy, and criminality?

A conservative talk radio host?

 

[The T]

Obama's a piece of shit who belongs in prison, along with about 4/5 of the current admin, and 2/3 of Congress.

What do you call a person who supports tyranny, villainy, and criminality?

And uses the power of Government to launch a WAR against the American people?

YES folks...this Government IS at war against YOU.

 

[The T]

Obama's a piece of shit who belongs in prison, along with about 4/5 of the current admin, and 2/3 of Congress.

What do you call a person who supports tyranny, villainy, and criminality?

A conservative talk radio host?

No people like YOU that support them.

Bugger Off.

 

[Flopper]

You betcha, skippy. A couple of people who compare obama unfavorably to Putin means Putin's a right wing hero.

I think you underestimate how much we despise Obama and the left.

Skippy? No, it's kiwiman. My wife used to call my Skippy because I stuck to the roof of her mouth. Do you know her or something?
Oh come on KG, you might despise "O" but I bet you have friends that lean left. I have friends from all sides of the aisle, we have get-togethers and the whole thing. Everybody gets along just fine, we just agree to disagree.

That is the most common characteristics of liberals. Unlike most conservatives, they are more open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values. That's what makes them liberal.

 

[The T]

You betcha, skippy. A couple of people who compare obama unfavorably to Putin means Putin's a right wing hero.

I think you underestimate how much we despise Obama and the left.

If given the choice, would our board rightwingers vote for Putin over Obama?

Putin loves the nation he leads and is looking to increase and expand it's power and influence. Obama started by apologizing and has done everything thing in his power to bring us low

Sent from smartphone using my wits and Taptalk

Absolutely. PUTIN is looking to re-assemble the former Soviet Union...Obama is inept to stop it. Obama is a *****.

 

[Mustang]

Obama's a piece of shit who belongs in prison, along with about 4/5 of the current admin, and 2/3 of Congress.

What do you call a person who supports tyranny, villainy, and criminality?

A conservative talk radio host?

No people like YOU that support them.

Bugger Off.

The difference between me and you is that I can back up what I say.

Conservative talk radio hosts are highly paid liars with little to no accountability except to the broadcast industry standards and practices. Consequently, they believe that they can easily get away with saying pretty much anything they want as long as they usually couch it as their opinion because the 1st Amendment protects free speech, AND because they don't believe that any public figure will ever bother to give these hosts even greater attention, and/or visibility, and notoriety by challenging them openly.

What all this means is that talk radio hosts effectively have carte blanche to say pretty much anything they please, even when it's factually untrue. THAT lack of accountability is tyrannical. Slander is criminal, even if it's not prosecuted. And it's villainous to project moral virtue while either saying things you don't know to be true or knowingly spreading falsehoods in order to enrich yourself while also in the pursuit of a political agenda.

 

[The T]

A conservative talk radio host?

No people like YOU that support them.

Bugger Off.

The difference between me and you is that I can back up what I say.

Conservative talk radio hosts are highly paid liars with little to no accountability except to the broadcast industry standards and practices. Consequently, they believe that they can easily get away with saying pretty much anything they want as long as they usually couch it as their opinion because the 1st Amendment protects free speech, AND because they don't believe that any public figure will ever bother to give these hosts even greater attention, and/or visibility, and notoriety by challenging them openly.

What all this means is that talk radio hosts effectively have carte blanche to say pretty much anything they please, even when it's factually untrue. THAT lack of accountability is tyrannical. Slander is criminal, even if it's not prosecuted. And it's villainous to project moral virtue while either saying things you don't know to be true or knowingly spreading falsehoods in order to enrich yourself while also in the pursuit of a political agenda.

Back it UP...YOU have done nothing but foist OPINION. YOURS. Provide proof or shut the **** up Mustink

 

[Plasmaball]

That's not what we were talking about, however.

The question was...how can a society kill off tens of millions of their own people, unnecessarily.

My answer was...a godless society.

well no...

 

[Mustang]

No people like YOU that support them.

Bugger Off.

The difference between me and you is that I can back up what I say.

Conservative talk radio hosts are highly paid liars with little to no accountability except to the broadcast industry standards and practices. Consequently, they believe that they can easily get away with saying pretty much anything they want as long as they usually couch it as their opinion because the 1st Amendment protects free speech, AND because they don't believe that any public figure will ever bother to give these hosts even greater attention, and/or visibility, and notoriety by challenging them openly.

What all this means is that talk radio hosts effectively have carte blanche to say pretty much anything they please, even when it's factually untrue. THAT lack of accountability is tyrannical. Slander is criminal, even if it's not prosecuted. And it's villainous to project moral virtue while either saying things you don't know to be true or knowingly spreading falsehoods in order to enrich yourself while also in the pursuit of a political agenda.

Back it UP...YOU have done nothing but foist OPINION. YOURS. Provide proof or shut the **** up Mustink

The proof in what I say is plain to anyone who knows the difference between the definitions of journalism and entertainment, AND the fact that conservative radio hosts openly acknowledge that they are entertainers. Know why? Because entertainers (comedians, satirists, radio hosts, even newspapers like The Onion) can get away with ALL kinds of statements and accusations that they otherwise could not do if they tried to pass themselves off as journalists.

 

[The T]

The difference between me and you is that I can back up what I say.

Conservative talk radio hosts are highly paid liars with little to no accountability except to the broadcast industry standards and practices. Consequently, they believe that they can easily get away with saying pretty much anything they want as long as they usually couch it as their opinion because the 1st Amendment protects free speech, AND because they don't believe that any public figure will ever bother to give these hosts even greater attention, and/or visibility, and notoriety by challenging them openly.

What all this means is that talk radio hosts effectively have carte blanche to say pretty much anything they please, even when it's factually untrue. THAT lack of accountability is tyrannical. Slander is criminal, even if it's not prosecuted. And it's villainous to project moral virtue while either saying things you don't know to be true or knowingly spreading falsehoods in order to enrich yourself while also in the pursuit of a political agenda.

Back it UP...YOU have done nothing but foist OPINION. YOURS. Provide proof or shut the **** up Mustink

The proof in what I say is plain to anyone who knows the difference between the definitions of journalism and entertainment, AND the fact that conservative radio hosts openly acknowledge that they are entertainers. Know why? Because entertainers (comedians, satirists, radio hosts, even newspapers like The Onion) can get away with ALL kinds of statements and accusations that they otherwise could not do if they tried to pass themselves off as journalists.

YOU are STILL giving Opinion. Go Fish Mustink.

 

[Mustang]

Back it UP...YOU have done nothing but foist OPINION. YOURS. Provide proof or shut the **** up Mustink

The proof in what I say is plain to anyone who knows the difference between the definitions of journalism and entertainment, AND the fact that conservative radio hosts openly acknowledge that they are entertainers. Know why? Because entertainers (comedians, satirists, radio hosts, even newspapers like The Onion) can get away with ALL kinds of statements and accusations that they otherwise could not do if they tried to pass themselves off as journalists.

YOU are STILL giving Opinion. Go Fish Mustink.

Me thinks thou doth protest too much.

 

[bripat9643]

A conservative talk radio host?

No people like YOU that support them.

Bugger Off.

The difference between me and you is that I can back up what I say.

Conservative talk radio hosts are highly paid liars with little to no accountability except to the broadcast industry standards and practices. Consequently, they believe that they can easily get away with saying pretty much anything they want as long as they usually couch it as their opinion because the 1st Amendment protects free speech, AND because they don't believe that any public figure will ever bother to give these hosts even greater attention, and/or visibility, and notoriety by challenging them openly.

What all this means is that talk radio hosts effectively have carte blanche to say pretty much anything they please, even when it's factually untrue. THAT lack of accountability is tyrannical. Slander is criminal, even if it's not prosecuted. And it's villainous to project moral virtue while either saying things you don't know to be true or knowingly spreading falsehoods in order to enrich yourself while also in the pursuit of a political agenda.

What do you believe talk radio hosts can get away with that so-called "journalists" can't get away with? Provide examples.

 

[bripat9643]

The difference between me and you is that I can back up what I say.

Conservative talk radio hosts are highly paid liars with little to no accountability except to the broadcast industry standards and practices. Consequently, they believe that they can easily get away with saying pretty much anything they want as long as they usually couch it as their opinion because the 1st Amendment protects free speech, AND because they don't believe that any public figure will ever bother to give these hosts even greater attention, and/or visibility, and notoriety by challenging them openly.

What all this means is that talk radio hosts effectively have carte blanche to say pretty much anything they please, even when it's factually untrue. THAT lack of accountability is tyrannical. Slander is criminal, even if it's not prosecuted. And it's villainous to project moral virtue while either saying things you don't know to be true or knowingly spreading falsehoods in order to enrich yourself while also in the pursuit of a political agenda.

Back it UP...YOU have done nothing but foist OPINION. YOURS. Provide proof or shut the **** up Mustink

The proof in what I say is plain to anyone who knows the difference between the definitions of journalism and entertainment, AND the fact that conservative radio hosts openly acknowledge that they are entertainers. Know why? Because entertainers (comedians, satirists, radio hosts, even newspapers like The Onion) can get away with ALL kinds of statements and accusations that they otherwise could not do if they tried to pass themselves off as journalists.

What do talk radio hosts "get away with" that so-called journalists don't get away with?

We're all dying to know.

 

[Mustang]

No people like YOU that support them.

Bugger Off.

The difference between me and you is that I can back up what I say.

Conservative talk radio hosts are highly paid liars with little to no accountability except to the broadcast industry standards and practices. Consequently, they believe that they can easily get away with saying pretty much anything they want as long as they usually couch it as their opinion because the 1st Amendment protects free speech, AND because they don't believe that any public figure will ever bother to give these hosts even greater attention, and/or visibility, and notoriety by challenging them openly.

What all this means is that talk radio hosts effectively have carte blanche to say pretty much anything they please, even when it's factually untrue. THAT lack of accountability is tyrannical. Slander is criminal, even if it's not prosecuted. And it's villainous to project moral virtue while either saying things you don't know to be true or knowingly spreading falsehoods in order to enrich yourself while also in the pursuit of a political agenda.

What do you believe talk radio hosts can get away with that so-called "journalists" can't get away with? Provide examples.

Are you obtuse?

Here's the way it generally works.

Certain professions are held up to a higher or a lower standard of truthfulness than others are. I think everyone understands this.

As far as the dissemination of information is concerned, journalists (both print and broadcast journalists) are held to the highest standards. That's why they have fact checkers to check claims before publications go to print. That's why they can be sued and/or lose their jobs if they write or broadcast something that's factually untrue.

Op/Ed columnists have more leeway. They can offer their OPINION on current events. An opinion is NOT a fact.

Entertainers have incredible leeway. I remember a famous case from back in the 1980s when Larry Flynt printed a parody ad that claimed to have Jerry Falwell recounting his first sexual experience which was supposedly with his mother in an outhouse while he was drunk. Falwell sued, and he lost. The jury 'rejected the invasion of privacy and libel claims, holding that the parody could not have reasonably been taken to describe true events'. No reputable newspaper would ever be able to get away with that.

The POINT is that talk radio falls under the heading of ENTERTAINMENT which gives it a certain license to make claims that it otherwise could not get away with if it was classified as news and therefore held to a higher standard of journalistic ingegrity. Alas, a lot of gullible people listen to talk radio and simply don't understand that conservative talk radio is not held to the same standards of truthfulness as a news program. Many people simply assume that it must be true if it's broadcast over the air. That's just not the case.

 

[bripat9643]

The difference between me and you is that I can back up what I say.

Conservative talk radio hosts are highly paid liars with little to no accountability except to the broadcast industry standards and practices. Consequently, they believe that they can easily get away with saying pretty much anything they want as long as they usually couch it as their opinion because the 1st Amendment protects free speech, AND because they don't believe that any public figure will ever bother to give these hosts even greater attention, and/or visibility, and notoriety by challenging them openly.

What all this means is that talk radio hosts effectively have carte blanche to say pretty much anything they please, even when it's factually untrue. THAT lack of accountability is tyrannical. Slander is criminal, even if it's not prosecuted. And it's villainous to project moral virtue while either saying things you don't know to be true or knowingly spreading falsehoods in order to enrich yourself while also in the pursuit of a political agenda.

What do you believe talk radio hosts can get away with that so-called "journalists" can't get away with? Provide examples.

Are you obtuse?

Here's the way it generally works.

Certain professions are held up to a higher or a lower standard of truthfulness than others are. I think everyone understands this.

As far as the dissemination of information is concerned, journalists (both print and broadcast journalists) are held to the highest standards. That's why they have fact checkers to check claims before publications go to print. That's why they can be sued and/or lose their jobs if they write or broadcast something that's factually untrue.

Op/Ed columnists have more leeway. They can offer their OPINION on current events. An opinion is NOT a fact.

Entertainers have incredible leeway. I remember a famous case from back in the 1980s when Larry Flynt printed a parody ad that claimed to have Jerry Falwell recounting his first sexual experience which was supposedly with his mother in an outhouse while he was drunk. Falwell sued, and he lost. The jury 'rejected the invasion of privacy and libel claims, holding that the parody could not have reasonably been taken to describe true events'. No reputable newspaper would ever be able to get away with that.

The POINT is that talk radio falls under the heading of ENTERTAINMENT which gives it a certain license to make claims that it otherwise could not get away with if it was classified as news and therefore held to a higher standard of journalistic ingegrity. Alas, a lot of gullible people listen to talk radio and simply don't understand that conservative talk radio is not held to the same standards of truthfulness as a news program. Many people simply assume that it must be true if it's broadcast over the air. That's just not the case.

In short, you can't name anything.