US adds massive 287,000 jobs in June.....Quite A Change From Bush's Fiasco

[Conservative65]

I found IT! I found it!
H.R. 342 (110th): To designate the United States courthouse located at 555 Independence Street in Cape Girardeau, Missouri, as the “Rush Hudson Limbaugh, Sr. United States Courthouse”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jo Ann Emerson [R-MO8, 1997-2013]
Introduced: Jan 9, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Mar 21, 2007

No wonder they didn't have time to approve a Supreme Court Justice

That and naming Post Offices.

H.R. 6197 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7095 Highway 57 in Counce, Tennessee, as the “Pickwick Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Marsha Blackburn [R-TN7]
Introduced: Jun 5, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 22, 2008

H.R. 6847 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 801 Industrial Boulevard in Ellijay, Georgia, as the “First Lieutenant Noah Harris Ellijay Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Nathan Deal [R-GA9, 2007-2010]
Introduced: Sep 9, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 21, 2008

H.R. 6681 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 300 Vine Street in New Lenox, Illinois, as the “Jacob M. Lowell Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Gerald “Jerry” Weller [R-IL11, 1995-2008]
Introduced: Jul 30, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 21, 2008

H.R. 6902 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 513 6th Avenue in Dayton, Kentucky, as the “Staff Sergeant Nicholas Ray Carnes Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Geoff Davis [R-KY4, 2005-2012]
Introduced: Sep 15, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 21, 2008

H.R. 3511 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2150 East Hardtner Drive in Urania, Louisiana, as the “Murphy A. Tannehill Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Rodney Alexander [R-LA5, 2003-2013]
Introduced: Sep 10, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 21, 2008

H.R. 6437 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 North Texas Avenue in Odessa, Texas, as the “Corporal Alfred Mac Wilson Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Michael Conaway [R-TX11]
Introduced: Jul 8, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 7, 2008

S. 3015 (110th): A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 18 S. G Street, Lakeview, Oregon, as the “Dr. Bernard Daly Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Sen. Gordon Smith [R-OR, 1997-2008]
Introduced: May 14, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 7, 2008

H.R. 6092 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 101 Tallapoosa Street in Bremen, Georgia, as the “Sergeant Paul Saylor Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Phil Gingrey [R-GA11, 2003-2014]
Introduced: May 20, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 7, 2008

S. 171 (110th): A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the “Mickey Mantle Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Sen. James “Jim” Inhofe [R-OK]
Introduced: Jan 4, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Sep 30, 2008
S. 3241 (110th): A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1717 Orange Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the “CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Sen. Mel Martinez [R-FL, 2005-2009]
Introduced: Jul 10, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Sep 30, 2008

H.R. 5631 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the “Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Virgil Goode [R-VA5, 1997-2008]
Introduced: Mar 13, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 12, 2008

H.R. 5483 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the “Private First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Thomas “Tom” Davis [R-VA11, 1995-2008]
Introduced: Feb 25, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 12, 2008

H.R. 5517 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7231 FM 1960 in Humble, Texas, as the “Texas Military Veterans Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Ted Poe [R-TX2]
Introduced: Feb 28, 2008

Enacted — Signed by the President: Jul 15, 2008
H.R. 5479 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 117 North Kidd Street in Ionia, Michigan, as the “Alonzo Woodruff Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Vernon Ehlers [R-MI3, 1993-2010]
Introduced: Feb 25, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Jul 15, 2008

H.R. 5489 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6892 Main Street in Gloucester, Virginia, as the “Congresswoman Jo Ann S. Davis Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Robert Wittman [R-VA1]
Introduced: Feb 26, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008

H.R. 5400 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the “Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Steven LaTourette [R-OH14, 2003-2012]
Introduced: Feb 12, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008

H.R. 3532 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5815 McLeod Street in Lula, Georgia, as the “Private Johnathon Millican Lula Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Nathan Deal [R-GA9, 2007-2010]
Introduced: Sep 14, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008
H.R. 3988 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3701 Altamesa Boulevard in Fort Worth, Texas, as the “Master Sergeant Kenneth N. Mack Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Kay Granger [R-TX12]
Introduced: Oct 29, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008
H.R. 5135 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the “Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Todd Tiahrt [R-KS4, 1995-2010]
Introduced: Jan 23, 2008

Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008
H.R. 3936 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 116 Helen Highway in Cleveland, Georgia, as the “Sgt. Jason Harkins Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Nathan Deal [R-GA9, 2007-2010]
Introduced: Oct 23, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008

H.R. 3470 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 744 West Oglethorpe Highway in Hinesville, Georgia, as the “John Sidney ‘Sid’ Flowers Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jack Kingston [R-GA1, 1993-2014]
Introduced: Sep 4, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Dec 26, 2007

H.R. 3974 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 797 Sam Bass Road in Round Rock, Texas, as the “Marine Corps Corporal Steven P. Gill Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. John Carter [R-TX31]
Introduced: Oct 25, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Dec 26, 2007

H.R. 4009 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 567 West Nepessing Street in Lapeer, Michigan, as the “Turrill Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Candice Miller [R-MI10]
Introduced: Oct 30, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Dec 26, 2007

S. 2174 (110th): A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 175 South Monroe Street in Tiffin, Ohio, as the “Paul E. Gillmor Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Sen. George Voinovich [R-OH, 1999-2010]
Introduced: Oct 17, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Dec 21, 2007

H.R. 3446 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 202 East Michigan Avenue in Marshall, Michigan, as the “Michael W. Schragg Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Tim Walberg [R-MI7]
Introduced: Aug 3, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007

H.R. 3308 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 216 East Main Street in Atwood, Indiana, as the “Lance Corporal David K. Fribley Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Mark Souder [R-IN3, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Aug 1, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007

Introduced: Aug 1, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007
H.R. 3518 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1430 South Highway 29 in Cantonment, Florida, as the “Charles H. Hendrix Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jeff Miller [R-FL1]
Introduced: Sep 10, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007
H.R. 3530 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 Highway 41 North in Inverness, Florida, as the “Chief Warrant Officer Aaron Weaver Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Virginia “Ginny” Brown-Waite [R-FL5, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Sep 14, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007
H.R. 3233 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at Highway 49 South in Piney Woods, Mississippi, as the “Laurence C. and Grace M. Jones Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Charles “Chip” Pickering [R-MS3, 1997-2008]
Introduced: Jul 31, 2007

Introduced: Feb 12, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 25, 2007
H.R. 2825 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 326 South Main Street in Princeton, Illinois, as the “Owen Lovejoy Princeton Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Gerald “Jerry” Weller [R-IL11, 1995-2008]
Introduced: Jun 21, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 24, 2007

H.R. 2570 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the “Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Marilyn Musgrave [R-CO4, 2003-2008]
Introduced: Jun 5, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 2309 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3916 Milgen Road in Columbus, Georgia, as the “Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Lynn Westmoreland [R-GA3]
Introduced: May 14, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 1384 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 118 Minner Street in Bakersfield, California, as the “Buck Owens Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Kevin McCarthy [R-CA23]
Introduced: Mar 7, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 2078 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, as the “Staff Sergeant Omer T. ‘O.T.’ Hawkins Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jean Schmidt [R-OH2, 2005-2012]
Introduced: Apr 30, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 1260 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, as the “Claude Ramsey Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Zach Wamp [R-TN3, 1995-2010]
Introduced: Mar 1, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007
H.R. 2563 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, as the “Major Scott Nisely Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Tom Latham [R-IA3, 2013-2014]
Introduced: Jun 5, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007
H.R. 2077 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 20805 State Route 125 in Blue Creek, Ohio, as the “George B. Lewis Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jean Schmidt [R-OH2, 2005-2012]
Introduced: Apr 30, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 1335 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 508 East Main Street in Seneca, South Carolina, as the “S/Sgt Lewis G. Watkins Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. James “J. Gresham” Barrett [R-SC3, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Mar 6, 2007

H.R. 1425 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the “Staff Sergeant Marvin “Rex” Young Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Michael Conaway [R-TX11]
Introduced: Mar 9, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 414 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 60 Calle McKinley, West in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, as the “Miguel Angel Garcia Mendez Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Commish. Luis Fortuño [R-PR0, 2005-2008]
Introduced: Jan 11, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Jun 1, 2007

H.R. 1402 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 320 South Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida, as the “Sergeant Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Virginia “Ginny” Brown-Waite [R-FL5, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Mar 8, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Jun 1, 2007

H.R. 988 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5757 Tilton Avenue in Riverside, California, as the “Lieutenant Todd Jason Bryant Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Ken Calvert [R-CA42]
Introduced: Feb 12, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: May 25, 2007

H.R. 514 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 16150 Aviation Loop Drive in Brooksville, Florida, as the “Sergeant Lea Robert Mills Brooksville Aviation Branch Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Virginia “Ginny” Brown-Waite [R-FL5, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Jan 17, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Mar 7, 2007

H.R. 335 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 152 North 5th Street in Laramie, Wyoming, as the “Gale W. McGee Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Barbara Cubin [R-WY0, 1995-2008]
Introduced: Jan 9, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Mar 7, 2007

So they can name Post Offices but not Supreme Court Justices?

Hell, Republucans don't even like the Post Office

Was it a matter of time when Joe Biden, as a Senator, said it was "essential" to delay a Supreme Court nominee with George Bush was President in 1992? The Democrats controlled both houses then. Guess the standard the Democrats say they support only applies when the other side hold the presidency.

No nominees were delayed. In fact, all conservative judges received a quick confirmation hearing and even the most conservative judges were approved by the Dems

A President is elected for four years, not three

Most judges Obama appointed were approved. Your problem is you want whomever Obama appoints to get a rubber stamp approval. Republicans told Obama no and he doesn't like being told no.

 

[xband]

Hamburger flipper' jobs are a dime a dozen.

 

[rightwinger]

Well...why don't you just wait for a Republican President to name a nice Conservative for you?

May take a generation or two

So the lesser of two evils? What I thought. You're willing to accept evil and think a lesser dose of it makes it better.

This is why conservatives always lose and have nothing to show for the last ten years. They have lost on EVERY issue.....Obamacare, gay rights, abortion, energy

The reason is that everything is Good vs Evil with them. They can't compromise with what they call evil and end up with nothing

I don't compromise my principles with evil. That you are willing to do so makes you a loser.

The losers are those that only get their healthcare due to someone else being forced to provide them a subsidy. If they were winners, they'd provide it to themselves. By choosing to be a homosexual, they've automatically lost. If someone chooses to kill an unborn child because she doesn't like the results of spreading her legs, another loser.

And that's the problem with todays conservatives. They have been indoctrinated that anything liberal is "evil" and can't compromise on anything

There can be no middle ground on taxes, gun legislation, healthcare, education

That is why government is broken

When Liberals expect people to compromise principled beliefs, it is evil.

You lefties don't want middle ground on any of that. Your answer to everything is tax those you think have too much in order to provide those you think have too little with things like healthcare and college.

Budgets always require compromise.....add this tax and we will take that spending cut. It comes down to priorities and a willingness to find a middle ground

When conservatives are taught that all taxation is evil and sign a Norquist pledge, nothing can get done

 

[rightwinger]

No wonder they didn't have time to approve a Supreme Court Justice

That and naming Post Offices.

H.R. 6197 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7095 Highway 57 in Counce, Tennessee, as the “Pickwick Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Marsha Blackburn [R-TN7]
Introduced: Jun 5, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 22, 2008

H.R. 6847 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 801 Industrial Boulevard in Ellijay, Georgia, as the “First Lieutenant Noah Harris Ellijay Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Nathan Deal [R-GA9, 2007-2010]
Introduced: Sep 9, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 21, 2008

H.R. 6681 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 300 Vine Street in New Lenox, Illinois, as the “Jacob M. Lowell Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Gerald “Jerry” Weller [R-IL11, 1995-2008]
Introduced: Jul 30, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 21, 2008

H.R. 6902 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 513 6th Avenue in Dayton, Kentucky, as the “Staff Sergeant Nicholas Ray Carnes Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Geoff Davis [R-KY4, 2005-2012]
Introduced: Sep 15, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 21, 2008

H.R. 3511 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 2150 East Hardtner Drive in Urania, Louisiana, as the “Murphy A. Tannehill Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Rodney Alexander [R-LA5, 2003-2013]
Introduced: Sep 10, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 21, 2008

H.R. 6437 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 200 North Texas Avenue in Odessa, Texas, as the “Corporal Alfred Mac Wilson Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Michael Conaway [R-TX11]
Introduced: Jul 8, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 7, 2008

S. 3015 (110th): A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 18 S. G Street, Lakeview, Oregon, as the “Dr. Bernard Daly Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Sen. Gordon Smith [R-OR, 1997-2008]
Introduced: May 14, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 7, 2008

H.R. 6092 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 101 Tallapoosa Street in Bremen, Georgia, as the “Sergeant Paul Saylor Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Phil Gingrey [R-GA11, 2003-2014]
Introduced: May 20, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 7, 2008

S. 171 (110th): A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 Commerce Street in Commerce, Oklahoma, as the “Mickey Mantle Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Sen. James “Jim” Inhofe [R-OK]
Introduced: Jan 4, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Sep 30, 2008
S. 3241 (110th): A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1717 Orange Avenue in Fort Pierce, Florida, as the “CeeCee Ross Lyles Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Sen. Mel Martinez [R-FL, 2005-2009]
Introduced: Jul 10, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Sep 30, 2008

H.R. 5631 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1155 Seminole Trail in Charlottesville, Virginia, as the “Corporal Bradley T. Arms Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Virgil Goode [R-VA5, 1997-2008]
Introduced: Mar 13, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 12, 2008

H.R. 5483 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 10449 White Granite Drive in Oakton, Virginia, as the “Private First Class David H. Sharrett II Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Thomas “Tom” Davis [R-VA11, 1995-2008]
Introduced: Feb 25, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 12, 2008

H.R. 5517 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 7231 FM 1960 in Humble, Texas, as the “Texas Military Veterans Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Ted Poe [R-TX2]
Introduced: Feb 28, 2008

Enacted — Signed by the President: Jul 15, 2008
H.R. 5479 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 117 North Kidd Street in Ionia, Michigan, as the “Alonzo Woodruff Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Vernon Ehlers [R-MI3, 1993-2010]
Introduced: Feb 25, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: Jul 15, 2008

H.R. 5489 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6892 Main Street in Gloucester, Virginia, as the “Congresswoman Jo Ann S. Davis Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Robert Wittman [R-VA1]
Introduced: Feb 26, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008

H.R. 5400 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 160 East Washington Street in Chagrin Falls, Ohio, as the “Sgt. Michael M. Kashkoush Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Steven LaTourette [R-OH14, 2003-2012]
Introduced: Feb 12, 2008
Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008

H.R. 3532 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5815 McLeod Street in Lula, Georgia, as the “Private Johnathon Millican Lula Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Nathan Deal [R-GA9, 2007-2010]
Introduced: Sep 14, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008
H.R. 3988 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3701 Altamesa Boulevard in Fort Worth, Texas, as the “Master Sergeant Kenneth N. Mack Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Kay Granger [R-TX12]
Introduced: Oct 29, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008
H.R. 5135 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 201 West Greenway Street in Derby, Kansas, as the “Sergeant Jamie O. Maugans Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Todd Tiahrt [R-KS4, 1995-2010]
Introduced: Jan 23, 2008

Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008
H.R. 3936 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 116 Helen Highway in Cleveland, Georgia, as the “Sgt. Jason Harkins Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Nathan Deal [R-GA9, 2007-2010]
Introduced: Oct 23, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: May 7, 2008

H.R. 3470 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 744 West Oglethorpe Highway in Hinesville, Georgia, as the “John Sidney ‘Sid’ Flowers Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jack Kingston [R-GA1, 1993-2014]
Introduced: Sep 4, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Dec 26, 2007

H.R. 3974 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 797 Sam Bass Road in Round Rock, Texas, as the “Marine Corps Corporal Steven P. Gill Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. John Carter [R-TX31]
Introduced: Oct 25, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Dec 26, 2007

H.R. 4009 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 567 West Nepessing Street in Lapeer, Michigan, as the “Turrill Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Candice Miller [R-MI10]
Introduced: Oct 30, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Dec 26, 2007

S. 2174 (110th): A bill to designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 175 South Monroe Street in Tiffin, Ohio, as the “Paul E. Gillmor Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Sen. George Voinovich [R-OH, 1999-2010]
Introduced: Oct 17, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Dec 21, 2007

H.R. 3446 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 202 East Michigan Avenue in Marshall, Michigan, as the “Michael W. Schragg Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Tim Walberg [R-MI7]
Introduced: Aug 3, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007

H.R. 3308 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 216 East Main Street in Atwood, Indiana, as the “Lance Corporal David K. Fribley Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Mark Souder [R-IN3, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Aug 1, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007

Introduced: Aug 1, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007
H.R. 3518 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1430 South Highway 29 in Cantonment, Florida, as the “Charles H. Hendrix Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jeff Miller [R-FL1]
Introduced: Sep 10, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007
H.R. 3530 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 1400 Highway 41 North in Inverness, Florida, as the “Chief Warrant Officer Aaron Weaver Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Virginia “Ginny” Brown-Waite [R-FL5, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Sep 14, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Nov 30, 2007
H.R. 3233 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at Highway 49 South in Piney Woods, Mississippi, as the “Laurence C. and Grace M. Jones Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Charles “Chip” Pickering [R-MS3, 1997-2008]
Introduced: Jul 31, 2007

Introduced: Feb 12, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 25, 2007
H.R. 2825 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 326 South Main Street in Princeton, Illinois, as the “Owen Lovejoy Princeton Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Gerald “Jerry” Weller [R-IL11, 1995-2008]
Introduced: Jun 21, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Oct 24, 2007

H.R. 2570 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 301 Boardwalk Drive in Fort Collins, Colorado, as the “Dr. Karl E. Carson Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Marilyn Musgrave [R-CO4, 2003-2008]
Introduced: Jun 5, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 2309 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 3916 Milgen Road in Columbus, Georgia, as the “Frank G. Lumpkin, Jr. Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Lynn Westmoreland [R-GA3]
Introduced: May 14, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 1384 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 118 Minner Street in Bakersfield, California, as the “Buck Owens Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Kevin McCarthy [R-CA23]
Introduced: Mar 7, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 2078 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 14536 State Route 136 in Cherry Fork, Ohio, as the “Staff Sergeant Omer T. ‘O.T.’ Hawkins Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jean Schmidt [R-OH2, 2005-2012]
Introduced: Apr 30, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 1260 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 6301 Highway 58 in Harrison, Tennessee, as the “Claude Ramsey Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Zach Wamp [R-TN3, 1995-2010]
Introduced: Mar 1, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007
H.R. 2563 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 309 East Linn Street in Marshalltown, Iowa, as the “Major Scott Nisely Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Tom Latham [R-IA3, 2013-2014]
Introduced: Jun 5, 2007

Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007
H.R. 2077 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 20805 State Route 125 in Blue Creek, Ohio, as the “George B. Lewis Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Jean Schmidt [R-OH2, 2005-2012]
Introduced: Apr 30, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 1335 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 508 East Main Street in Seneca, South Carolina, as the “S/Sgt Lewis G. Watkins Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. James “J. Gresham” Barrett [R-SC3, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Mar 6, 2007

H.R. 1425 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4551 East 52nd Street in Odessa, Texas, as the “Staff Sergeant Marvin “Rex” Young Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Michael Conaway [R-TX11]
Introduced: Mar 9, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Aug 9, 2007

H.R. 414 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 60 Calle McKinley, West in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico, as the “Miguel Angel Garcia Mendez Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Commish. Luis Fortuño [R-PR0, 2005-2008]
Introduced: Jan 11, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Jun 1, 2007

H.R. 1402 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 320 South Lecanto Highway in Lecanto, Florida, as the “Sergeant Dennis J. Flanagan Lecanto Post Office Building”.
Sponsor: Rep. Virginia “Ginny” Brown-Waite [R-FL5, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Mar 8, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Jun 1, 2007

H.R. 988 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 5757 Tilton Avenue in Riverside, California, as the “Lieutenant Todd Jason Bryant Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Ken Calvert [R-CA42]
Introduced: Feb 12, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: May 25, 2007

H.R. 514 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 16150 Aviation Loop Drive in Brooksville, Florida, as the “Sergeant Lea Robert Mills Brooksville Aviation Branch Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Virginia “Ginny” Brown-Waite [R-FL5, 2003-2010]
Introduced: Jan 17, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Mar 7, 2007

H.R. 335 (110th): To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 152 North 5th Street in Laramie, Wyoming, as the “Gale W. McGee Post Office”.
Sponsor: Rep. Barbara Cubin [R-WY0, 1995-2008]
Introduced: Jan 9, 2007
Enacted — Signed by the President: Mar 7, 2007

So they can name Post Offices but not Supreme Court Justices?

Hell, Republucans don't even like the Post Office

Was it a matter of time when Joe Biden, as a Senator, said it was "essential" to delay a Supreme Court nominee with George Bush was President in 1992? The Democrats controlled both houses then. Guess the standard the Democrats say they support only applies when the other side hold the presidency.

No nominees were delayed. In fact, all conservative judges received a quick confirmation hearing and even the most conservative judges were approved by the Dems

A President is elected for four years, not three

Most judges Obama appointed were approved. Your problem is you want whomever Obama appoints to get a rubber stamp approval. Republicans told Obama no and he doesn't like being told no.

Actually, no

Outside of a vacant Supreme Court seat, there are over a hundred federal judge seats waiting to be filled.

Republicans cannot be content with destroying the legislative branch of government, they must destroy the judicial branch also

 

[xband]

When the Democrats confiscate everyone's IRA and 401-K to fund their welfare programs without confiscating their own, we will be up shit creek without a paddle.

 

[rightwinger]

When the Democrats confiscate everyone's IRA and 401-K to fund their welfare programs without confiscating their own, we will be up shit creek without a paddle.

Paranoid ranting

 

[Conservative65]

So the lesser of two evils? What I thought. You're willing to accept evil and think a lesser dose of it makes it better.

This is why conservatives always lose and have nothing to show for the last ten years. They have lost on EVERY issue.....Obamacare, gay rights, abortion, energy

The reason is that everything is Good vs Evil with them. They can't compromise with what they call evil and end up with nothing

I don't compromise my principles with evil. That you are willing to do so makes you a loser.

The losers are those that only get their healthcare due to someone else being forced to provide them a subsidy. If they were winners, they'd provide it to themselves. By choosing to be a homosexual, they've automatically lost. If someone chooses to kill an unborn child because she doesn't like the results of spreading her legs, another loser.

And that's the problem with todays conservatives. They have been indoctrinated that anything liberal is "evil" and can't compromise on anything

There can be no middle ground on taxes, gun legislation, healthcare, education

That is why government is broken

When Liberals expect people to compromise principled beliefs, it is evil.

You lefties don't want middle ground on any of that. Your answer to everything is tax those you think have too much in order to provide those you think have too little with things like healthcare and college.

Budgets always require compromise.....add this tax and we will take that spending cut. It comes down to priorities and a willingness to find a middle ground

When conservatives are taught that all taxation is evil and sign a Norquist pledge, nothing can get done

Priorities are what the Constitution say. Liberals want more taxes to fund things that aren't in the Constitution and cuts on things that are.

When Liberals use "general welfare" to justify spending on things for which the Constitution doesn't authorize, it's evil. You guys never met a tax you didn't want to enact or raise.

 

[rightwinger]

This is why conservatives always lose and have nothing to show for the last ten years. They have lost on EVERY issue.....Obamacare, gay rights, abortion, energy

The reason is that everything is Good vs Evil with them. They can't compromise with what they call evil and end up with nothing

I don't compromise my principles with evil. That you are willing to do so makes you a loser.

The losers are those that only get their healthcare due to someone else being forced to provide them a subsidy. If they were winners, they'd provide it to themselves. By choosing to be a homosexual, they've automatically lost. If someone chooses to kill an unborn child because she doesn't like the results of spreading her legs, another loser.

And that's the problem with todays conservatives. They have been indoctrinated that anything liberal is "evil" and can't compromise on anything

There can be no middle ground on taxes, gun legislation, healthcare, education

That is why government is broken

When Liberals expect people to compromise principled beliefs, it is evil.

You lefties don't want middle ground on any of that. Your answer to everything is tax those you think have too much in order to provide those you think have too little with things like healthcare and college.

Budgets always require compromise.....add this tax and we will take that spending cut. It comes down to priorities and a willingness to find a middle ground

When conservatives are taught that all taxation is evil and sign a Norquist pledge, nothing can get done

Priorities are what the Constitution say. Liberals want more taxes to fund things that aren't in the Constitution and cuts on things that are.

When Liberals use "general welfare" to justify spending on things for which the Constitution doesn't authorize, it's evil. You guys never met a tax you didn't want to enact or raise.

The Constitution says nothing about priorities. It establishes a Congress to do what is best for We the People

It specifically created a legislative body to encourage a compromise in positions and reach that "middle ground"

Guess what? The Constitution was a compromise and it has worked for over 200 years

 

[Conservative65]

I don't compromise my principles with evil. That you are willing to do so makes you a loser.

The losers are those that only get their healthcare due to someone else being forced to provide them a subsidy. If they were winners, they'd provide it to themselves. By choosing to be a homosexual, they've automatically lost. If someone chooses to kill an unborn child because she doesn't like the results of spreading her legs, another loser.

And that's the problem with todays conservatives. They have been indoctrinated that anything liberal is "evil" and can't compromise on anything

There can be no middle ground on taxes, gun legislation, healthcare, education

That is why government is broken

When Liberals expect people to compromise principled beliefs, it is evil.

You lefties don't want middle ground on any of that. Your answer to everything is tax those you think have too much in order to provide those you think have too little with things like healthcare and college.

Budgets always require compromise.....add this tax and we will take that spending cut. It comes down to priorities and a willingness to find a middle ground

When conservatives are taught that all taxation is evil and sign a Norquist pledge, nothing can get done

Priorities are what the Constitution say. Liberals want more taxes to fund things that aren't in the Constitution and cuts on things that are.

When Liberals use "general welfare" to justify spending on things for which the Constitution doesn't authorize, it's evil. You guys never met a tax you didn't want to enact or raise.

The Constitution says nothing about priorities. It establishes a Congress to do what is best for We the People

It specifically created a legislative body to encourage a compromise in positions and reach that "middle ground"

Guess what? The Constitution was a compromise and it has worked for over 200 years

Never said the Constitution did set priorities. However, if you read it for what it SAYS rather than what you want it to say, it actually does set priorities. It specifically states things for which the federal government has authority and reserves others for which it doesn't to the States.

The Constitution says nothing about compromise and reaching a middle ground.

Guess what? The Constitution doesn't say what you think the government has the authority to do, therefore, the authority does not exist. It says nothing about social welfare but Liberals want to claim it does.

 

[rightwinger]

And that's the problem with todays conservatives. They have been indoctrinated that anything liberal is "evil" and can't compromise on anything

There can be no middle ground on taxes, gun legislation, healthcare, education

That is why government is broken

When Liberals expect people to compromise principled beliefs, it is evil.

You lefties don't want middle ground on any of that. Your answer to everything is tax those you think have too much in order to provide those you think have too little with things like healthcare and college.

Budgets always require compromise.....add this tax and we will take that spending cut. It comes down to priorities and a willingness to find a middle ground

When conservatives are taught that all taxation is evil and sign a Norquist pledge, nothing can get done

Priorities are what the Constitution say. Liberals want more taxes to fund things that aren't in the Constitution and cuts on things that are.

When Liberals use "general welfare" to justify spending on things for which the Constitution doesn't authorize, it's evil. You guys never met a tax you didn't want to enact or raise.

The Constitution says nothing about priorities. It establishes a Congress to do what is best for We the People

It specifically created a legislative body to encourage a compromise in positions and reach that "middle ground"

Guess what? The Constitution was a compromise and it has worked for over 200 years

Never said the Constitution did set priorities. However, if you read it for what it SAYS rather than what you want it to say, it actually does set priorities. It specifically states things for which the federal government has authority and reserves others for which it doesn't to the States.

The Constitution says nothing about compromise and reaching a middle ground.

Guess what? The Constitution doesn't say what you think the government has the authority to do, therefore, the authority does not exist. It says nothing about social welfare but Liberals want to claim it does.

Actually, the courts do not agree with your interpretation of the tenth amendment. So, yes the authority does exist

 

[Faun]

Was it a matter of time when Joe Biden, as a Senator, said it was "essential" to delay a Supreme Court nominee with George Bush was President in 1992? The Democrats controlled both houses then. Guess the standard the Democrats say they support only applies when the other side hold the presidency.

Who was "delayed?"

And a delay is not a cancellation, which is what the GOP is unconstitutional doing now.

 

[Conservative65]

When Liberals expect people to compromise principled beliefs, it is evil.

You lefties don't want middle ground on any of that. Your answer to everything is tax those you think have too much in order to provide those you think have too little with things like healthcare and college.

Budgets always require compromise.....add this tax and we will take that spending cut. It comes down to priorities and a willingness to find a middle ground

When conservatives are taught that all taxation is evil and sign a Norquist pledge, nothing can get done

Priorities are what the Constitution say. Liberals want more taxes to fund things that aren't in the Constitution and cuts on things that are.

When Liberals use "general welfare" to justify spending on things for which the Constitution doesn't authorize, it's evil. You guys never met a tax you didn't want to enact or raise.

The Constitution says nothing about priorities. It establishes a Congress to do what is best for We the People

It specifically created a legislative body to encourage a compromise in positions and reach that "middle ground"

Guess what? The Constitution was a compromise and it has worked for over 200 years

Never said the Constitution did set priorities. However, if you read it for what it SAYS rather than what you want it to say, it actually does set priorities. It specifically states things for which the federal government has authority and reserves others for which it doesn't to the States.

The Constitution says nothing about compromise and reaching a middle ground.

Guess what? The Constitution doesn't say what you think the government has the authority to do, therefore, the authority does not exist. It says nothing about social welfare but Liberals want to claim it does.

Actually, the courts do not agree with your interpretation of the tenth amendment. So, yes the authority does exist

It's not my interpretation. It's what the 10th SAYS.

 

[Conservative65]

Was it a matter of time when Joe Biden, as a Senator, said it was "essential" to delay a Supreme Court nominee with George Bush was President in 1992? The Democrats controlled both houses then. Guess the standard the Democrats say they support only applies when the other side hold the presidency.

Who was "delayed?"

And a delay is not a cancellation, which is what the GOP is unconstitutional doing now.

Biden say it was OK to delay. When a delay is used, now it's wrong.

Where has the GOP cancelled anything? Because you don't like the time frame doesn't make it a cancellation.

 

[rightwinger]

Was it a matter of time when Joe Biden, as a Senator, said it was "essential" to delay a Supreme Court nominee with George Bush was President in 1992? The Democrats controlled both houses then. Guess the standard the Democrats say they support only applies when the other side hold the presidency.

Who was "delayed?"

And a delay is not a cancellation, which is what the GOP is unconstitutional doing now.

Biden say it was OK to delay. When a delay is used, now it's wrong.

Where has the GOP cancelled anything? Because you don't like the time frame doesn't make it a cancellation.

Biden was speaking in July with a November election
Republicans have been holding up the seat since February

 

[Conservative65]

Was it a matter of time when Joe Biden, as a Senator, said it was "essential" to delay a Supreme Court nominee with George Bush was President in 1992? The Democrats controlled both houses then. Guess the standard the Democrats say they support only applies when the other side hold the presidency.

Who was "delayed?"

And a delay is not a cancellation, which is what the GOP is unconstitutional doing now.

Biden say it was OK to delay. When a delay is used, now it's wrong.

Where has the GOP cancelled anything? Because you don't like the time frame doesn't make it a cancellation.

Biden was speaking in July with a November election
Republicans have been holding up the seat since February

Irrelevant. Biden didn't put a parameter on the delay he simply said it was OK to do so. You're arguing time frame and the issue is a delay that the current VP believes was OK. Had Biden's statement been at an earlier time, would you oppose it?

Actually, Biden said it in June not July.

 

[rightwinger]

Was it a matter of time when Joe Biden, as a Senator, said it was "essential" to delay a Supreme Court nominee with George Bush was President in 1992? The Democrats controlled both houses then. Guess the standard the Democrats say they support only applies when the other side hold the presidency.

Who was "delayed?"

And a delay is not a cancellation, which is what the GOP is unconstitutional doing now.

Biden say it was OK to delay. When a delay is used, now it's wrong.

Where has the GOP cancelled anything? Because you don't like the time frame doesn't make it a cancellation.

Biden was speaking in July with a November election
Republicans have been holding up the seat since February

Irrelevant. Biden didn't put a parameter on the delay he simply said it was OK to do so. You're arguing time frame and the issue is a delay that the current VP believes was OK. Had Biden's statement been at an earlier time, would you oppose it?

Actually, Biden said it in June not July.

You think that a few months before an election is the same as a year before the election?
Why not four years then?

 

[Conservative65]

Was it a matter of time when Joe Biden, as a Senator, said it was "essential" to delay a Supreme Court nominee with George Bush was President in 1992? The Democrats controlled both houses then. Guess the standard the Democrats say they support only applies when the other side hold the presidency.

Who was "delayed?"

And a delay is not a cancellation, which is what the GOP is unconstitutional doing now.

Biden say it was OK to delay. When a delay is used, now it's wrong.

Where has the GOP cancelled anything? Because you don't like the time frame doesn't make it a cancellation.

Biden was speaking in July with a November election
Republicans have been holding up the seat since February

Irrelevant. Biden didn't put a parameter on the delay he simply said it was OK to do so. You're arguing time frame and the issue is a delay that the current VP believes was OK. Had Biden's statement been at an earlier time, would you oppose it?

Actually, Biden said it in June not July.

You think that a few months before an election is the same as a year before the election?
Why not four years then?

You mean 6 vs. 9 month? As slow as government works, 3 months is hardly a large span.

Had Biden made his statement in February, would it have made a difference to you?

 

[rightwinger]

Who was "delayed?"

And a delay is not a cancellation, which is what the GOP is unconstitutional doing now.

Biden say it was OK to delay. When a delay is used, now it's wrong.

Where has the GOP cancelled anything? Because you don't like the time frame doesn't make it a cancellation.

Biden was speaking in July with a November election
Republicans have been holding up the seat since February

Irrelevant. Biden didn't put a parameter on the delay he simply said it was OK to do so. You're arguing time frame and the issue is a delay that the current VP believes was OK. Had Biden's statement been at an earlier time, would you oppose it?

Actually, Biden said it in June not July.

You think that a few months before an election is the same as a year before the election?
Why not four years then?

You mean 6 vs. 9 month? As slow as government works, 3 months is hardly a large span.

Had Biden made his statement in February, would it have made a difference to you?

The typical Supreme Court affirmation process is 3-4 months.

Claiming you can't do it in a year is blatant politics. If not one year, why not four years?

 

[Conservative65]

Biden say it was OK to delay. When a delay is used, now it's wrong.

Where has the GOP cancelled anything? Because you don't like the time frame doesn't make it a cancellation.

Biden was speaking in July with a November election
Republicans have been holding up the seat since February

Irrelevant. Biden didn't put a parameter on the delay he simply said it was OK to do so. You're arguing time frame and the issue is a delay that the current VP believes was OK. Had Biden's statement been at an earlier time, would you oppose it?

Actually, Biden said it in June not July.

You think that a few months before an election is the same as a year before the election?
Why not four years then?

You mean 6 vs. 9 month? As slow as government works, 3 months is hardly a large span.

Had Biden made his statement in February, would it have made a difference to you?

The typical Supreme Court affirmation process is 3-4 months.

Claiming you can't do it in a year is blatant politics. If not one year, why not four years?

Still refuse to answer the Biden question? I'll take that to mean your problem isn't with the time but with Republicans doing it despite Biden saying it was OK to do so.

It wasn't a year. For it to be a year, a 33% increase in the time YOU posted would have to be added.

 

[rightwinger]

Biden was speaking in July with a November election
Republicans have been holding up the seat since February

Irrelevant. Biden didn't put a parameter on the delay he simply said it was OK to do so. You're arguing time frame and the issue is a delay that the current VP believes was OK. Had Biden's statement been at an earlier time, would you oppose it?

Actually, Biden said it in June not July.

You think that a few months before an election is the same as a year before the election?
Why not four years then?

You mean 6 vs. 9 month? As slow as government works, 3 months is hardly a large span.

Had Biden made his statement in February, would it have made a difference to you?

The typical Supreme Court affirmation process is 3-4 months.

Claiming you can't do it in a year is blatant politics. If not one year, why not four years?

Still refuse to answer the Biden question? I'll take that to mean your problem isn't with the time but with Republicans doing it despite Biden saying it was OK to do so.

It wasn't a year. For it to be a year, a 33% increase in the time YOU posted would have to be added.

I did answer the question

The political ramifications of a July nominee are not the same as for a February nominee