The IDF recognized the attack coming from Syrian vehicles, the IDF responded. For all Israel cares, it was the regime.
I now Lip and the rest of the ZioNuts discount my contention, that Israel is in a long term war of attrition with all Islamic countries...this sixty eight year festering wound has given Jihadism favor with the people...One thing unites them, their disdain for the Israeli occupiers...
Jihadism is growing, if Israel does not make an acceptable peace with the Arab League...she will be slowly smothered.
That's what they said in 1948. and 1956. and 1967. and 1973. and 1982, and 1992, and 2005, and 2006, and 2008 and 2012...and I could go on and on and name many of Israel's wars....But you get the point.
All agree that a solution is needed. We don't agree that expelling Jews is the proper one.
Jihad is at rise, and you better stop lying to yourselves saying it's all about Israel. It's about anyone who's not in their little crazy cult.
I find his post amusing. Ask any Pro Palestinian what a " acceptible Peace" is and there will be no response
Is the Arab Peace Plan Really About Peace? « Commentary Magazine
Is the Arab Peace Plan Really About Peace?
Jonathan S. Tobin | @tobincommentary
05.01.2013 - 12:00 PM
Secretary of State John Kerry hailed the idea of reviving the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative put forward yesterday in Washington by a delegation from the Arab League. Kerry, who reportedly is hoping to host a multi-party peace conference this spring, was pleased that Qatar’s foreign minister had suggested that the proposal might be modified from its original take-it-or-leave-it demand that Israel return to the 1967 lines to one that allowed for a mutually-agreed “minor swap of land” that would modify the border.
This is progress of a sort, and should not be entirely dismissed. But before those advocating for more Israeli concessions in response to the proposal get too excited, it’s important to remember why this initiative flopped the first time around: it’s not really a peace proposal.
While the Arab Peace Initiative continues to be cited by Israel’s critics as proof that the Jewish state really does have partners, this idea has always been more about polishing the image of the Arab world in the United States than anything else. Conceived in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks when the Arab states, and in particular Saudi Arabia, were viewed with disgust by most Americans, the initiative was part of an effort to rehabilitate their image. But despite the fact that New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman (who claimed it stemmed from a conversation he had with Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah) and others in the foreign policy community promoted the idea, it fizzled. Why? Because it was not an invitation to negotiate, but a diktat. Even worse, it contained a vital poison pill: the return of Palestinian refugees to Israel that would, in effect, mean the end of the Jewish state, not peace with it.
I now Lip and the rest of the ZioNuts discount my contention, that Israel is in a long term war of attrition with all Islamic countries...this sixty eight year festering wound has given Jihadism favor with the people...One thing unites them, their disdain for the Israeli occupiers...
Forgot this; His comment that the Jews have been" occupying "for 68 years when the Country was founded. Nothing to do with " borders" or the 67 War.
Which is EXACTLY why this won't happen