Unpatriotic Dems In Virginia Erases Confederate Holiday

NO Twaddles, you made an absolute statement. I would have re-quoted it here but you just did it for me directly above. And I showed you where ZERO Southern Republicans voted for CRA 1964, zero being fewer than the six Democrats who voted for it.

So you're wrong, and you can't face it. Which is par for this coarse. You've carried the same inability throughout this pointless exercise.



Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.



1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

They have no right to force their heritage of hate on to others
Why aren’t they celebrating the good ole days of Jim Crow?
They could have a day where everything is segregated and they beat blacks for being uppity



I see what you did there.

You made a strawman about what they are doing. THen you supported it, by saying inflammatory shit.


That, ironically, is demagoguery.


You lose.
 
Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.

Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.

1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

They have no right to force their heritage of hate on to others
Why aren’t they celebrating the good ole days of Jim Crow?
They could have a day where everything is segregated and they beat blacks for being uppity

They could indeed. It would look like this

etcqpfde5ut5gjkpcztb.jpg

Or, the street version of any number of whiny threads on this site


What do you think that pic demonstrates?
 
You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.
Don’t see many Democrats fighting for Confederate heritage.

Correct. You switched your target for your racism. Before you used to discriminate against and oppress blacks, and today it is whites.

Your still the party of racism and assholes, but you just lost the last battle and now have switched sides, on whom you are being racist to.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaand you continue to unabashedly wallow in ignorance about your own terms.

Racism, like slavery, like lynchings and the whole orgy of related shit Amurkycan't-do tried to fling against the wall above, IS NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN a political issue. It's a social construct. No one, literally zero people, in the history of the world, has ever needed a political party, or any interest in politics at all, to practice racism, discrimination, slavery, lynchings, etc etc etc. Literally never happened. Ever full stop. Desperate flailing attempts to attach personality traits to political parties demonstrates not only an addiction to generalization fallacy but a direct admission that you don't have the foggiest clue what you're babbling about.

If it was never political issue, how do you explain that ALL racist Jim Crow laws, were voted for by Democrat legislators, signed by Democrat governor, upheld by Democrat judges, and enforced by Democrat sheriffs and police?

I don't know that "ALL" were. Got a link?

Here may be a shortcut --- were they all in the South?

And if they were, how do you explain the segregation that the Great Migration experienced in northern industrial cities like Chicago and Detroit and St.Louis? Meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

That's a social construct, that's why.

See also the CRA 64 figures, which we've posted over and over and over and over, the numbers therein never changing.

If is not political, how do you explain that out of 100 grand wizards and dragons of KKK, every single one was a Democrat, with exception of Duke, who was Democrat, then Republican.

Again, that's absolute bullshit. Again, got a link? A list of these "100"? I'm not aware there were "100", where did you pull that from?

Again, the six ex-soldiers who founded the first KKK had no political party (and no political agenda either); again the guy who re-founded it in 1915 also had no known political party or agenda. Now some historians will point to a Samuel Green who at least intended to re-start the Klan in 1949, which would have been a third Klan -- happily he keeled over from a heart attack and died before he could do it, but again --- Green too had no known political party or agenda. These guys all had social issues in mind, not political ones. Prohibition. Immigrants. Loose women. Uppity negroes. Uppity Jews. Uppity Catholics. Gamblers. Ramblers. Debtors. Furriners. Liberals. Labor unions. People who didn't go to church.

Again, how do you explain Owen Brewster and Ben Paulen and Rice Means and Clarence Morley and Ed Jackson? How do you explain D.C. Stephenson, grand wizard of Indiana Republican politics?



Why would a "Democrat" organization be pushing candidates running against their own party? Why would they nominate a Catholic for President and then send the KKK out to run a national smear campaign against their own guy? Doesn't make a lot of sense, does it. How do you explain Democrats Oscar Underwood and Jack Walton and Stetson Kennedy and Huey Long and Ellis Arnall opposing them?


You lefties always mention him as example, because he is ONLY example, while hiding every other one who stayed in Democrat party for life. Refute this, you lying asshole.

Think I just did, and I didn't even need to bring Dooky up, thanks anyway. Already got more than enough.

See if you can get out of this one. Seems we may need to redefine the word "every".
Got more too, ask and you shall receive.
 
Last edited:
Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.



1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

They have no right to force their heritage of hate on to others
Why aren’t they celebrating the good ole days of Jim Crow?
They could have a day where everything is segregated and they beat blacks for being uppity



I see what you did there.

You made a strawman about what they are doing. THen you supported it, by saying inflammatory shit.


That, ironically, is demagoguery.


You lose.
Isn’t Jim Crow part of Southern heritage?

Why celebrate Confederate slavery and not Jim Crow segregation?
 
You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.



1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

They have no right to force their heritage of hate on to others
Why aren’t they celebrating the good ole days of Jim Crow?
They could have a day where everything is segregated and they beat blacks for being uppity



I see what you did there.

You made a strawman about what they are doing. THen you supported it, by saying inflammatory shit.


That, ironically, is demagoguery.


You lose.
Isn’t Jim Crow part of Southern heritage?

Why celebrate Confederate slavery and not Jim Crow segregation?


They are not celebrating confedeate slavery, but confederate soldiers.


Every other group, you allow to celebrate some portions of their heritage. But not whites.


You have a different standard for whites. Based on race.


You treat people differently, depending on their race.


You are a racist.
 
You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.



1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

They have no right to force their heritage of hate on to others
Why aren’t they celebrating the good ole days of Jim Crow?
They could have a day where everything is segregated and they beat blacks for being uppity



I see what you did there.

You made a strawman about what they are doing. THen you supported it, by saying inflammatory shit.


That, ironically, is demagoguery.


You lose.
Isn’t Jim Crow part of Southern heritage?

Why celebrate Confederate slavery and not Jim Crow segregation?


They are not celebrating confedeate slavery, but confederate soldiers.


Every other group, you allow to celebrate some portions of their heritage. But not whites.


You have a different standard for whites. Based on race.


You treat people differently, depending on their race.


You are a racist.
Nazis were white
 
1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

They have no right to force their heritage of hate on to others
Why aren’t they celebrating the good ole days of Jim Crow?
They could have a day where everything is segregated and they beat blacks for being uppity



I see what you did there.

You made a strawman about what they are doing. THen you supported it, by saying inflammatory shit.


That, ironically, is demagoguery.


You lose.
Isn’t Jim Crow part of Southern heritage?

Why celebrate Confederate slavery and not Jim Crow segregation?


They are not celebrating confedeate slavery, but confederate soldiers.


Every other group, you allow to celebrate some portions of their heritage. But not whites.


You have a different standard for whites. Based on race.


You treat people differently, depending on their race.


You are a racist.
Nazis were white


Correct. Which fits in perfectly with my point about you being the racist here.



They are not celebrating confedeate slavery, but confederate soldiers.


Every other group, you allow to celebrate some portions of their heritage. But not whites.


You have a different standard for whites. Based on race.


You treat people differently, depending on their race.


You are a racist.
 
I make a comment about the broad trends of the nation and the parties over time and you post the vote count from a single bill, without context or even stated reasons as though that refutes it?


Consider your silliness noted and dismissed.


My point stands.


That would be interesting historical detail on the process, if you had not so torpedoed your credibility that I can't trust anything you say.


Also, the republican [sic] party never wavered in it's [sic] support of equality and civil rights. The southern voters that more and more voted Republican were always the pro-civil rights voters of the South, until long after the issue had become politically moot.

NO Twaddles, you made an absolute statement. I would have re-quoted it here but you just did it for me directly above. And I showed you where ZERO Southern Republicans voted for CRA 1964, zero being fewer than the six Democrats who voted for it.

So you're wrong, and you can't face it. Which is par for this coarse. You've carried the same inability throughout this pointless exercise.



Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.



1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

Talk about some bullshit.:bsflag:

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

Nobody is stopping them from celebrating their heritage.
 
I make a comment about the broad trends of the nation and the parties over time and you post the vote count from a single bill, without context or even stated reasons as though that refutes it?


Consider your silliness noted and dismissed.


My point stands.


That would be interesting historical detail on the process, if you had not so torpedoed your credibility that I can't trust anything you say.


Also, the republican [sic] party never wavered in it's [sic] support of equality and civil rights. The southern voters that more and more voted Republican were always the pro-civil rights voters of the South, until long after the issue had become politically moot.

NO Twaddles, you made an absolute statement. I would have re-quoted it here but you just did it for me directly above. And I showed you where ZERO Southern Republicans voted for CRA 1964, zero being fewer than the six Democrats who voted for it.

So you're wrong, and you can't face it. Which is par for this coarse. You've carried the same inability throughout this pointless exercise.



Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You've been schooled on this mythology over and over and over, yet you choose to ignore it and pretend those facts never made it past your lying eyes. ONE, no political party in the world stands in a fixed ideological position and ignores the winds of change around it, EVER; ....



The GOP has been committed to increasing civil rights it's entire existence.

Well we all know that is a lie.
 
You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.
Don’t see many Democrats fighting for Confederate heritage.

Correct. You switched your target for your racism. Before you used to discriminate against and oppress blacks, and today it is whites.

Your still the party of racism and assholes, but you just lost the last battle and now have switched sides, on whom you are being racist to.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaand you continue to unabashedly wallow in ignorance about your own terms.

Racism, like slavery, like lynchings and the whole orgy of related shit Amurkycan't-do tried to fling against the wall above, IS NOT AND NEVER HAS BEEN a political issue. It's a social construct. No one, literally zero people, in the history of the world, has ever needed a political party, or any interest in politics at all, to practice racism, discrimination, slavery, lynchings, etc etc etc. Literally never happened. Ever full stop. Desperate flailing attempts to attach personality traits to political parties demonstrates not only an addiction to generalization fallacy but a direct admission that you don't have the foggiest clue what you're babbling about.

If it was never political issue, how do you explain that ALL racist Jim Crow laws, were voted for by Democrat legislators, signed by Democrat governor, upheld by Democrat judges, and enforced by Democrat sheriffs and police? Why is it that all those racist, after Civil War, for another 100 years wound home in Democratic party? If is not political, how do you explain that out of 100 grand wizards and dragons of KKK, every single one was a Democrat, with exception of Duke, who was Democrat, then Republican. You lefties always mention him as example, because he is ONLY example, while hiding every other one who stayed in Democrat party for life. Refute this, you lying asshole.

Wasn't it a Democrat president that signed all of that away.
 
NO Twaddles, you made an absolute statement. I would have re-quoted it here but you just did it for me directly above. And I showed you where ZERO Southern Republicans voted for CRA 1964, zero being fewer than the six Democrats who voted for it.

So you're wrong, and you can't face it. Which is par for this coarse. You've carried the same inability throughout this pointless exercise.



Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You've been schooled on this mythology over and over and over, yet you choose to ignore it and pretend those facts never made it past your lying eyes. ONE, no political party in the world stands in a fixed ideological position and ignores the winds of change around it, EVER; ....



The GOP has been committed to increasing civil rights it's entire existence.

Well we all know that is a lie.


I challenge you to show me a time period it was not true.


Or admit that you are just a liar that just likes to spew shit from his face anus.
 
Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You've been schooled on this mythology over and over and over, yet you choose to ignore it and pretend those facts never made it past your lying eyes. ONE, no political party in the world stands in a fixed ideological position and ignores the winds of change around it, EVER; ....



The GOP has been committed to increasing civil rights it's entire existence.

Well we all know that is a lie.


I challenge you to show me a time period it was not true.


Or admit that you are just a liar that just likes to spew shit from his face anus.

Hell right now.
 
3 weeks later...and not only did the Confederacy lose....

But judging by the amount of flailing and lying that Cory L is doing -- the confederacy is still losing....

Will these Neo-confederates ever understand that good always prevail over their evil??
Youre+a+clever+one+_99d9aa47dc8609fd769d76757ca011d7.jpg
 
You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You've been schooled on this mythology over and over and over, yet you choose to ignore it and pretend those facts never made it past your lying eyes. ONE, no political party in the world stands in a fixed ideological position and ignores the winds of change around it, EVER; ....



The GOP has been committed to increasing civil rights it's entire existence.

Well we all know that is a lie.


I challenge you to show me a time period it was not true.


Or admit that you are just a liar that just likes to spew shit from his face anus.

Hell right now.


Trump has done nothing to challenge the national consensus on equal rights for blacks, and continues to play the game of giving them extra resources to give them extra help.


YOur claim is simply a lie based on the mass hysteria generated by people like you.


Either back up your claim or admit that you are just a liar that likes to spew shit from your face anus.
 
3 weeks later...and not only did the Confederacy lose....

But judging by the amount of flailing and lying that Cory L is doing -- the confederacy is still losing....

Will these Neo-confederates ever understand that good always prevail over their evil??
View attachment 308724


When will you stop being an assmuncher?
Fuck you and your hissy fits...

You have been obliterated all up and down this thread -- and since you must have some masochist fetish, you continue the punishment....

Can you give me ONE EXAMPLE where some backwards rednecks were stopped from celebrating Confederates day??

You being mad about the rest of the country not loving Confederates like you do is not a requirement for celebrating a bunch of traitors.....so fuk yo tears
 
You've been schooled on this mythology over and over and over, yet you choose to ignore it and pretend those facts never made it past your lying eyes. ONE, no political party in the world stands in a fixed ideological position and ignores the winds of change around it, EVER; ....



The GOP has been committed to increasing civil rights it's entire existence.

Well we all know that is a lie.


I challenge you to show me a time period it was not true.


Or admit that you are just a liar that just likes to spew shit from his face anus.

Hell right now.


Trump has done nothing to challenge the national consensus on equal rights for blacks, and continues to play the game of giving them extra resources to give them extra help.

Give us examples of that so called extra help or hell anything he has done for the benefit of black folks.


YOur claim is simply a lie based on the mass hysteria generated by people like you.

I know we have always done that, it NEVER really happens.


Either back up your claim or admit that you are just a liar that likes to spew shit from your face anus.

You back up your claim, what has the Republican party done for black folks in this country in the last 40yrs. Please enlighten us all.
 
3 weeks later...and not only did the Confederacy lose....

But judging by the amount of flailing and lying that Cory L is doing -- the confederacy is still losing....

Will these Neo-confederates ever understand that good always prevail over their evil??
View attachment 308724


When will you stop being an assmuncher?
Fuck you and your hissy fits...

You have been obliterated all up and down this thread -- and since you must have some masochist fetish, you continue the punishment....

Can you give me ONE EXAMPLE where some backwards rednecks were stopped from celebrating Confederates day??

You being mad about the rest of the country not loving Confederates like you do is not a requirement for celebrating a bunch of traitors.....so fuk yo tears




Biff. I've gotten several of you leftards to reveal that you have different standards for how whites are treated and judged compared to how every other group is treated and judged, based on race.


I have demonstrated, using your own words and actions, that it is you that are racist, not us.


So, take your pretense about being upset over a fight from over 150 years ago, and shove it up your ass.


You lose, loser.
 
The GOP has been committed to increasing civil rights it's entire existence.

Well we all know that is a lie.


I challenge you to show me a time period it was not true.


Or admit that you are just a liar that just likes to spew shit from his face anus.

Hell right now.


Trump has done nothing to challenge the national consensus on equal rights for blacks, and continues to play the game of giving them extra resources to give them extra help.

Give us examples of that so called extra help or hell anything he has done for the benefit of black folks.


YOur claim is simply a lie based on the mass hysteria generated by people like you.

I know we have always done that, it NEVER really happens.


Either back up your claim or admit that you are just a liar that likes to spew shit from your face anus.

You back up your claim, what has the Republican party done for black folks in this country in the last 40yrs. Please enlighten us all.



1. In his State of the Union Address he singled out a little black girl to give her a scholarship. Though the program that it is though it not expressly stated as being targeted at blacks, the symbolic gesture is quite strong. A "DOG WHISTLE" is you will.

2. Your claim is just a lie based on hysteria generated by people like you.

3. Too much too list. How about the Lowest rate of Black Unemployment ever? That is pretty good. Accept that, and I can give you another.
 
3 weeks later...and not only did the Confederacy lose....

But judging by the amount of flailing and lying that Cory L is doing -- the confederacy is still losing....

Will these Neo-confederates ever understand that good always prevail over their evil??
View attachment 308724


When will you stop being an assmuncher?
Fuck you and your hissy fits...

You have been obliterated all up and down this thread -- and since you must have some masochist fetish, you continue the punishment....

Can you give me ONE EXAMPLE where some backwards rednecks were stopped from celebrating Confederates day??

You being mad about the rest of the country not loving Confederates like you do is not a requirement for celebrating a bunch of traitors.....so fuk yo tears




Biff. I've gotten several of you leftards to reveal that you have different standards for how whites are treated and judged compared to how every other group is treated and judged, based on race.


I have demonstrated, using your own words and actions, that it is you that are racist, not us.


So, take your pretense about being upset over a fight from over 150 years ago, and shove it up your ass.


You lose, loser.
Says the person who has been caught lying repeatedly on this thread for the past 2 weeks...and when confronted with those lies -- you cry like a bitch and whine about "civility" and being called names..

There is a reason why I talk to you dic suckers like I do -- because you aren't intellectually honest enough to be treated with respect -- you are the same dic suckers and who praise Trump for personal attacks -- so again, fuck what you whining about.....address all of those lies you been caught in, pussy
 

Forum List

Back
Top