Unpatriotic Dems In Virginia Erases Confederate Holiday

[Correll]

3 weeks later...and not only did the Confederacy lose....

But judging by the amount of flailing and lying that Cory L is doing -- the confederacy is still losing....

Will these Neo-confederates ever understand that good always prevail over their evil??
View attachment 308724

When will you stop being an assmuncher?

Fuck you and your hissy fits...

You have been obliterated all up and down this thread -- and since you must have some masochist fetish, you continue the punishment....

Can you give me ONE EXAMPLE where some backwards rednecks were stopped from celebrating Confederates day??

You being mad about the rest of the country not loving Confederates like you do is not a requirement for celebrating a bunch of traitors.....so fuk yo tears

Biff. I've gotten several of you leftards to reveal that you have different standards for how whites are treated and judged compared to how every other group is treated and judged, based on race.


I have demonstrated, using your own words and actions, that it is you that are racist, not us.


So, take your pretense about being upset over a fight from over 150 years ago, and shove it up your ass.


You lose, loser.

Says the person who has been caught lying repeatedly on this thread for the past 2 weeks...and when confronted with those lies -- you cry like a bitch and whine about "civility" and being called names..

There is a reason why I talk to you dic suckers like I do -- because you aren't intellectually honest enough to be treated with respect -- you are the same dic suckers and who praise Trump for personal attacks -- so again, fuck what you whining about.....address all of those lies you been caught in, pussy

1 I assume that you are referring to the little troll games that I refuse to play with certain troll boys. You can shove that up your ass too. RW, for example, asking me to post a link to him discussing his views? FUCK THAT SHIT.


2. I don't care about your rationalizations, for your choice to use personal attacks or logical fallacies instead of actual supporting arguments or logic. You libs all know that your policies and beliefs are shit, and that you have to play asshole games to pretend to win any debates.

 

[Pogo]

Either back up your claim or admit that you are just a liar that likes to spew shit from your face anus.

When will you stop being an assmuncher?

You know you won the argument when all your opponent can come up with is kiester-oriented scatalogical ad homs.

 

[Pogo]

1 I assume that you are referring to the little troll games that I refuse to play with certain troll boys. You can shove that up your ass too. RW, for example, asking me to post a link to him discussing his views? FUCK THAT SHIT.

Here's a guy who actually wants to have sexual intercourse with the abstract fact that he can't back up his own assertions.

I don't even know what psychological term applies here.

 

[Correll]

Either back up your claim or admit that you are just a liar that likes to spew shit from your face anus.

When will you stop being an assmuncher?

You know you won the argument when all your opponent can come up with is kiester-oriented scatalogical ad homs.

Soooo, you didn't see how my post opened with a demand that the other poster back up his accusations?


Which, he has not done. Because he can't. Because his claims were just shit.

It is so telling, that you felt sooooo strongly that I was in the wrong there, that you felt the need to cut the post I was replying to.



Do you think you are fooling someone with this shit? Or is this more about self delusion for you?

 

[Correll]

1 I assume that you are referring to the little troll games that I refuse to play with certain troll boys. You can shove that up your ass too. RW, for example, asking me to post a link to him discussing his views? FUCK THAT SHIT.

Here's a guy who actually wants to have sexual intercourse with the abstract fact that he can't back up his own assertions.

I don't even know what psychological term applies here.

Your odd spin, on my refusal to play your silly little troll games, is noted and dismissed


Meanwhile on topic, we have established that your side's position is primary based on treating whites differently based on race.


You are racists.

 

[Pogo]

1 I assume that you are referring to the little troll games that I refuse to play with certain troll boys. You can shove that up your ass too. RW, for example, asking me to post a link to him discussing his views? FUCK THAT SHIT.

Here's a guy who actually wants to have sexual intercourse with the abstract fact that he can't back up his own assertions.

I don't even know what psychological term applies here.

Your odd spin, on my refusal to play your silly little troll games, is noted and dismissed


Meanwhile on topic, we have established that your side's position is primary based on treating whites differently based on race.


You are racists.

And yet ----- you can't back that turd-flinging up with anything because, and I quote, "fuck that shit".

Alllllllllllllll Righty then.

 

[Correll]

1 I assume that you are referring to the little troll games that I refuse to play with certain troll boys. You can shove that up your ass too. RW, for example, asking me to post a link to him discussing his views? FUCK THAT SHIT.

Here's a guy who actually wants to have sexual intercourse with the abstract fact that he can't back up his own assertions.

I don't even know what psychological term applies here.

Your odd spin, on my refusal to play your silly little troll games, is noted and dismissed


Meanwhile on topic, we have established that your side's position is primary based on treating whites differently based on race.


You are racists.

And yet ----- you can't back that turd-flinging up with anything because, and I quote, "fuck that shit".

Alllllllllllllll Righty then.

I backed it up with your actions.


My post, that you ridiculed, was a challenge to one of your libtard allies to back up his shit accusations.

 

[Pogo]

1 I assume that you are referring to the little troll games that I refuse to play with certain troll boys. You can shove that up your ass too. RW, for example, asking me to post a link to him discussing his views? FUCK THAT SHIT.

Here's a guy who actually wants to have sexual intercourse with the abstract fact that he can't back up his own assertions.

I don't even know what psychological term applies here.

Your odd spin, on my refusal to play your silly little troll games, is noted and dismissed


Meanwhile on topic, we have established that your side's position is primary based on treating whites differently based on race.


You are racists.

And yet ----- you can't back that turd-flinging up with anything because, and I quote, "fuck that shit".

Alllllllllllllll Righty then.

I backed it up with your actions.
My post, that you ridiculed, was a challenge to one of your libtard allies to back up his shit accusations.

And why exactly should anyone else have to back something up when you have already FAILED multiple times to back yours up?

Hm?

And ONCE AGAIN, unless you're data-mining or hiding outside my window here, you have no clue what my "actions" might be, so that's bullshit.

 

[Correll]

1 I assume that you are referring to the little troll games that I refuse to play with certain troll boys. You can shove that up your ass too. RW, for example, asking me to post a link to him discussing his views? FUCK THAT SHIT.

Here's a guy who actually wants to have sexual intercourse with the abstract fact that he can't back up his own assertions.

I don't even know what psychological term applies here.

Your odd spin, on my refusal to play your silly little troll games, is noted and dismissed


Meanwhile on topic, we have established that your side's position is primary based on treating whites differently based on race.


You are racists.

And yet ----- you can't back that turd-flinging up with anything because, and I quote, "fuck that shit".

Alllllllllllllll Righty then.

I backed it up with your actions.
My post, that you ridiculed, was a challenge to one of your libtard allies to back up his shit accusations.

And why exactly should anyone else have to back something up when you have already FAILED multiple times to back yours up?

Hm?

And ONCE AGAIN, unless you're data-mining or hiding outside my window here, you have no clue what my "actions" might be, so that's bullshit.

You have judged whites by standards that you do not apply to any other group. You stand by that, even after having it pointed out to you.


That is an action of yours, a racist action.

 

[Pogo]

Here's a guy who actually wants to have sexual intercourse with the abstract fact that he can't back up his own assertions.

I don't even know what psychological term applies here.

Your odd spin, on my refusal to play your silly little troll games, is noted and dismissed


Meanwhile on topic, we have established that your side's position is primary based on treating whites differently based on race.


You are racists.

And yet ----- you can't back that turd-flinging up with anything because, and I quote, "fuck that shit".

Alllllllllllllll Righty then.

I backed it up with your actions.
My post, that you ridiculed, was a challenge to one of your libtard allies to back up his shit accusations.

And why exactly should anyone else have to back something up when you have already FAILED multiple times to back yours up?

Hm?

And ONCE AGAIN, unless you're data-mining or hiding outside my window here, you have no clue what my "actions" might be, so that's bullshit.

You have judged whites by standards that you do not apply to any other group. You stand by that, even after having it pointed out to you.
That is an action of yours, a racist action.

And where is that? Hm?

Are we unclear on what the phrase "where is" means?

Would kinda be useful to actually SEE something I could "stand by". Whelp---- you claim to "see" it, why can't you show it?

Hm?

We sit, and we wait.

 

[rightwinger]

Well we all know that is a lie.

I challenge you to show me a time period it was not true.


Or admit that you are just a liar that just likes to spew shit from his face anus.

Hell right now.

Trump has done nothing to challenge the national consensus on equal rights for blacks, and continues to play the game of giving them extra resources to give them extra help.

Give us examples of that so called extra help or hell anything he has done for the benefit of black folks.

YOur claim is simply a lie based on the mass hysteria generated by people like you.

I know we have always done that, it NEVER really happens.

Either back up your claim or admit that you are just a liar that likes to spew shit from your face anus.

You back up your claim, what has the Republican party done for black folks in this country in the last 40yrs. Please enlighten us all.

1. In his State of the Union Address he singled out a little black girl to give her a scholarship. Though the program that it is though it not expressly stated as being targeted at blacks, the symbolic gesture is quite strong. A "DOG WHISTLE" is you will.

2. Your claim is just a lie based on hysteria generated by people like you.

3. Too much too list. How about the Lowest rate of Black Unemployment ever? That is pretty good. Accept that, and I can give you another.

Yes, Trump hammed it up to give a scholarship to a black girl. Look at me! I am giving an award to a BLACK PERSON

Meanwhile, his administration is attacking affirmative action, Medicaid, Headstart and voter protections

 

[Correll]

Your odd spin, on my refusal to play your silly little troll games, is noted and dismissed


Meanwhile on topic, we have established that your side's position is primary based on treating whites differently based on race.


You are racists.

And yet ----- you can't back that turd-flinging up with anything because, and I quote, "fuck that shit".

Alllllllllllllll Righty then.

I backed it up with your actions.
My post, that you ridiculed, was a challenge to one of your libtard allies to back up his shit accusations.

And why exactly should anyone else have to back something up when you have already FAILED multiple times to back yours up?

Hm?

And ONCE AGAIN, unless you're data-mining or hiding outside my window here, you have no clue what my "actions" might be, so that's bullshit.

You have judged whites by standards that you do not apply to any other group. You stand by that, even after having it pointed out to you.
That is an action of yours, a racist action.

And where is that? Hm?

Are we unclear on what the phrase "where is" means?

Would kinda be useful to actually SEE something I could "stand by". Whelp---- you claim to "see" it, why can't you show it?

Hm?

We sit, and we wait.

In this thread, where you insist that a group of whites, who are celebrating some aspects of their heritage, will be judged, and judged harshly, holding them responsible as though they are celebrating ALL the aspects of their heritage.


This is a standard you apply only to whites.


You are a racist.

 

[Correll]

I challenge you to show me a time period it was not true.


Or admit that you are just a liar that just likes to spew shit from his face anus.

Hell right now.

Trump has done nothing to challenge the national consensus on equal rights for blacks, and continues to play the game of giving them extra resources to give them extra help.

Give us examples of that so called extra help or hell anything he has done for the benefit of black folks.

YOur claim is simply a lie based on the mass hysteria generated by people like you.

I know we have always done that, it NEVER really happens.

Either back up your claim or admit that you are just a liar that likes to spew shit from your face anus.

You back up your claim, what has the Republican party done for black folks in this country in the last 40yrs. Please enlighten us all.

1. In his State of the Union Address he singled out a little black girl to give her a scholarship. Though the program that it is though it not expressly stated as being targeted at blacks, the symbolic gesture is quite strong. A "DOG WHISTLE" is you will.

2. Your claim is just a lie based on hysteria generated by people like you.

3. Too much too list. How about the Lowest rate of Black Unemployment ever? That is pretty good. Accept that, and I can give you another.

Yes, Trump hammed it up to give a scholarship to a black girl. Look at me! I am giving an award to a BLACK PERSON

Meanwhile, his administration is attacking affirmative action, Medicaid, Headstart and voter protections

My point was that he is still supporting the status quo of the national consensus on equal rights for blacks, and continues to play the game of giving them extra resources to give them extra help.


IN response to superbruther's challenge.


Would you like to address this?

 

[Pogo]

And yet ----- you can't back that turd-flinging up with anything because, and I quote, "fuck that shit".

Alllllllllllllll Righty then.

I backed it up with your actions.
My post, that you ridiculed, was a challenge to one of your libtard allies to back up his shit accusations.

And why exactly should anyone else have to back something up when you have already FAILED multiple times to back yours up?

Hm?

And ONCE AGAIN, unless you're data-mining or hiding outside my window here, you have no clue what my "actions" might be, so that's bullshit.

You have judged whites by standards that you do not apply to any other group. You stand by that, even after having it pointed out to you.
That is an action of yours, a racist action.

And where is that? Hm?

Are we unclear on what the phrase "where is" means?

Would kinda be useful to actually SEE something I could "stand by". Whelp---- you claim to "see" it, why can't you show it?

Hm?

We sit, and we wait.

In this thread, where you insist that a group of whites, who are celebrating some aspects of their heritage, will be judged, and judged harshly, holding them responsible as though they are celebrating ALL the aspects of their heritage.
This is a standard you apply only to whites.
You are a racist.

Actually, you are an inept clown. Where did I specify ANYTHING about "whites"?

Hm?

NO Hunior, *YOU* brought up "whites" in a frank confession about the dynamics of the Slavery connection of this Lost Cause propaganda. Not me ..... YOU. Sitting there on your throne in Columbus Freaking Ohio trying to paint all Southerners as "you are racists". As we say here, "bless your heart".

 

[bodecea]

Moving that way?
The attempt towards integration was met with terrorist attacks in the south

Correct. You do realize that what you said, does not conflict with what I said, right?

That is the complete opposite of your ridiculous claim that the nation was moving towards integration.......It wasn’t

If it was, returning black soldiers would have been treated as heroes instead of second class citizens

That the nation as a whole was moving towards more and more civil rights and equality for blacks, which is my position, is not refuted by the existence of some resistance, ie what you posted.


You are acting like you think it did.


I mean, am I being mean to you? Is there a reason that you are not up to normal functioning today? If so, let me know and I will make allowances.

That's why Wilson banned blacks from the Civil Service when they used to serve? Because the nation as a whole was moving towards more and more civil rights?

So, to be clear, me and RW, are discussing the situation of the nation in the 60s, and to refute my point, about what was going on in the 60s, you cite a dem President from almost 50 years earlier.


Yeah. Well, I don't know exactly how to argue against your point, beyond ...


I guess, I have to link to a discussion of the concept of linear time....yes, that is what I will do.


What is linear time? | Yahoo Answers

I find it interesting how certain people want to talk about past political positions of parties as if they still exist...........ONLY when it's convenient for them.

 

[bodecea]

I make a comment about the broad trends of the nation and the parties over time and you post the vote count from a single bill, without context or even stated reasons as though that refutes it?


Consider your silliness noted and dismissed.


My point stands.


That would be interesting historical detail on the process, if you had not so torpedoed your credibility that I can't trust anything you say.


Also, the republican [sic] party never wavered in it's [sic] support of equality and civil rights. The southern voters that more and more voted Republican were always the pro-civil rights voters of the South, until long after the issue had become politically moot.

NO Twaddles, you made an absolute statement. I would have re-quoted it here but you just did it for me directly above. And I showed you where ZERO Southern Republicans voted for CRA 1964, zero being fewer than the six Democrats who voted for it.

So you're wrong, and you can't face it. Which is par for this coarse. You've carried the same inability throughout this pointless exercise.

Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.

1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

And your southern white heritage consists of what exactly? You talk ABOUT it but never define what it consists of......how about doing that now for us.

 

[Pogo]

I challenge you to show me a time period it was not true.


Or admit that you are just a liar that just likes to spew shit from his face anus.

Hell right now.

Trump has done nothing to challenge the national consensus on equal rights for blacks, and continues to play the game of giving them extra resources to give them extra help.

Give us examples of that so called extra help or hell anything he has done for the benefit of black folks.

YOur claim is simply a lie based on the mass hysteria generated by people like you.

I know we have always done that, it NEVER really happens.

Either back up your claim or admit that you are just a liar that likes to spew shit from your face anus.

You back up your claim, what has the Republican party done for black folks in this country in the last 40yrs. Please enlighten us all.

1. In his State of the Union Address he singled out a little black girl to give her a scholarship. Though the program that it is though it not expressly stated as being targeted at blacks, the symbolic gesture is quite strong. A "DOG WHISTLE" is you will.

2. Your claim is just a lie based on hysteria generated by people like you.

3. Too much too list. How about the Lowest rate of Black Unemployment ever? That is pretty good. Accept that, and I can give you another.

Yes, Trump hammed it up to give a scholarship to a black girl. Look at me! I am giving an award to a BLACK PERSON

Meanwhile, his administration is attacking affirmative action, Medicaid, Headstart and voter protections

I believe what he said was, "Black girls getting my scholarships, I hate it. Laziness is a trait in blacks. The only people I want getting scholarships are short guys who wear yarmulkes every day".

 

[Pogo]

NO Twaddles, you made an absolute statement. I would have re-quoted it here but you just did it for me directly above. And I showed you where ZERO Southern Republicans voted for CRA 1964, zero being fewer than the six Democrats who voted for it.

So you're wrong, and you can't face it. Which is par for this coarse. You've carried the same inability throughout this pointless exercise.

Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.

1. Our commitment to equality has never been stronger.

2. Southern whites have the same right to celebrate their heritage as any other group.

And your southern white heritage consists of what exactly? You talk ABOUT it but never define what it consists of......how about doing that now for us.

He's not even IN the South.

 

[bodecea]

NO Twaddles, you made an absolute statement. I would have re-quoted it here but you just did it for me directly above. And I showed you where ZERO Southern Republicans voted for CRA 1964, zero being fewer than the six Democrats who voted for it.

So you're wrong, and you can't face it. Which is par for this coarse. You've carried the same inability throughout this pointless exercise.

Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You notice how the right wing loves to try and take credit for Civil Rights legislation, but today they are the party that is anti-minority.

Also it is the right wing who want to honor and defend the very Democrats that they claim were racist.

Don’t see many Democrats fighting for Confederate heritage.

Correct. You switched your target for your racism. Before you used to discriminate against and oppress blacks, and today it is whites.


Your still the party of racism and assholes, but you just lost the last battle and now have switched sides, on whom you are being racist to.

More name-calling....and it's "you're", not "your".

 

[bodecea]

I make a comment about the broad trends of the nation and the parties over time and you post the vote count from a single bill, without context or even stated reasons as though that refutes it?


Consider your silliness noted and dismissed.


My point stands.


That would be interesting historical detail on the process, if you had not so torpedoed your credibility that I can't trust anything you say.


Also, the republican [sic] party never wavered in it's [sic] support of equality and civil rights. The southern voters that more and more voted Republican were always the pro-civil rights voters of the South, until long after the issue had become politically moot.

NO Twaddles, you made an absolute statement. I would have re-quoted it here but you just did it for me directly above. And I showed you where ZERO Southern Republicans voted for CRA 1964, zero being fewer than the six Democrats who voted for it.

So you're wrong, and you can't face it. Which is par for this coarse. You've carried the same inability throughout this pointless exercise.

Oh, sorry, I couldn't event tell what you were trying to say with that.


Southern Republicans, of that time, were a tiny faction of the party. They certainly did not define the party. I'm not sure what the story was with them and their relationship with the larger national party, but the Party, as a whole, was solidly behind the bill and was in favor of civil rights before, during and after that vote,


YOur attempt to focus on one small faction of the Party and ignore what the vast majority were doing and what the stated party platform was,


is stupid.

You notice how lefties always claim how Democrats of the past are not the same Democrats of today. Party of slavery, KKK, segregation, lynching, Jim Crow laws, party of opposition to civil rights, somehow they evolved, changed, switched, they are the good guys, but for some reason always kept the same name.

On the other hand... Republicans, who were since the establishment of the party always supporting civil rights and party that opposed everything that Democrat stand for in the past are in minds of leftists always somehow bad guys, conservative Southerners incapable of change and acceptance.

You've been schooled on this mythology over and over and over, yet you choose to ignore it and pretend those facts never made it past your lying eyes. ONE, no political party in the world stands in a fixed ideological position and ignores the winds of change around it, EVER; ....

The GOP has been committed to increasing civil rights it's entire existence.

"Its", not "it's".