Unmasking Names Dropped - Biden, Comey, Obama Chief of Staff at the top of Flynn Unmsaking list

[Dick Foster]

People are unmasked hundreds of times a year. The unmasking request goes through an approval process set up to determine if it's necessary or not.

Approval process ?
Obama, Biden, Brennan, Comey, Clapper and Rice were in the Oval office at the time.

What they forgot was to approve General Flynn and the others' due process.

The approval process goes through offices at the NSA, not sure about all the details. Flynn was not deprived of due process.

And just exactly how the fuck do you know? Were you a part of the conspiracy too?

 

[Crepitus]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

 

[Crepitus]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

 

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

So, why did tRump fire him?

Because he was taking a guilty plea, again under duress. That would’ve been hard for the administration to explain to the American people had they not fired him.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

No. I gave You the 75/25 example before. We attain herd immunity for the younger / healthy and that is how we save the older/unhealthy. The fact that you cannot remember that is mind boggling. Europe is opening up and following the Sweden example, which always was the correct one. Georgia has been opened for 3 weeks and has fewer cases than the National Average SINCE opening. Florida is doing very well too. Funny how you just ignore that.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

If we wait for end of coronavirus, Massachusetts will never open

What is Gov. Charlie Baker going to do a month, six months or a year from now when the virus is still sending Massachusetts citizens to the hospital and, yes, sadly, sometimes the morgue? More lock…

www.google.com

We need to reopen now. You’re the one writing off folks who are perfectly healthy and cannot work to support their families. Shame shame shame shame shame.

 

[busybee01]

Keep up the good work. Maybe Putin will give you the same medal he gave Tillerson.

I'm hoping Russia will give me the plastic prop that says 'Overcharge' in Russian on it that Hillary gave them and another batch of Russian Intel Service propaganda I can sell to Hillary for a couple million.

The trouble is that Trump gave Russians a roadmap on how to help him

Link?

Go read the Mueller report y6ou lazy bum.

Your name should be Busy Troll

Your name should be stupid asshole. Facts are facts unless you can explain why Manafort would give sensitive campaign information to a Russian business associate with ties to Russian Intelligence. The Trump supporters are the trolls.

 

[easyt65]

Your name should be stupid asshole.

What a vile, miserable leftist snowflake....then again, this is what has become to be expected of you.

 

[busybee01]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

 

[busybee01]

Your name should be stupid asshole.

What a vile, miserable leftist snowflake....then again, this is what has become to be expected of you.

You guys can throw high hard ones but you apparently can't take them. You are a vile miserable fascist Trump asupporter. That is what is expected of you.

 

[easyt65]

You guys can throw high hard ones but you apparently can't take them. You are a vile miserable fascist Trump asupporter. That is what is expected of you.

My dear, the 'high hard pones' 'thrown' at you are substantiated, documented FACT / evidence. The crap you throw back is emotionally-manipulated, RDS-suffering, hate-drivel, opinionated rants that are easily swatted away. Once again, by calling others miserable fascists you project, a self-defense mechanism used to prevent you from having to look at yourself and see who you truly are. I pray you are able to overcome that some day. In the meantime, have a good day and a blessed weekend.

 

[Christ_on_a_croissant]

By contrast, is it not then fair to ask, "Y'all got all worked up about Flynn getting an answer wrong, but seemingly have no problem with this?"

Did she lie to the FBI?

Does it matter who you're lying to if you are under oath?

Yes

 

[Crepitus]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

So, why did tRump fire him?

Because he was taking a guilty plea, again under duress. That would’ve been hard for the administration to explain to the American people had they not fired him.

Lol, you've wandered from the facts again.

Fired first. Guilty plea months later.

You can have your own opinion, but there's only one set of facts.

 

[Crepitus]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

No. I gave You the 75/25 example before. We attain herd immunity for the younger / healthy and that is how we save the older/unhealthy. The fact that you cannot remember that is mind boggling. Europe is opening up and following the Sweden example, which always was the correct one. Georgia has been opened for 3 weeks and has fewer cases than the National Average SINCE opening. Florida is doing very well too. Funny how you just ignore that.

Dude, 1500 deaths, 36000 cases is "doing very well?"

Since when?

Kansas, where I am, has 1/5 the cases and 1/10 the deaths but is considered a hotspot.

 

[Nostra]

Too bad for you trumpers that unmasking is legal.

So what's the next conspiracy?

Legal if for NATIONAL SECURITY, which it clearly was not.

Except that it was for national security.

Lets see the docs. What reason did they give in the applications?

 

[Nostra]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

Judge Nap is much smarter than you are, Dummy.

Judge Nap is not saying unmasking is a crime. If someone leaks it then it is a crime. However we have no evidence of anyone leaking it.

How the fuck did the Washington Post find out it was Flynn on the same day Biden unmasked him, Dummy?

 

[Nostra]

Keep up the good work. Maybe Putin will give you the same medal he gave Tillerson.

I'm hoping Russia will give me the plastic prop that says 'Overcharge' in Russian on it that Hillary gave them and another batch of Russian Intel Service propaganda I can sell to Hillary for a couple million.

The trouble is that Trump gave Russians a roadmap on how to help him

Link?

Go read the Mueller report y6ou lazy bum.

I did. NO COLLUSION.

Oops! You lose again.

 

[Nostra]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

What were the more serious charges?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

No. I gave You the 75/25 example before. We attain herd immunity for the younger / healthy and that is how we save the older/unhealthy. The fact that you cannot remember that is mind boggling. Europe is opening up and following the Sweden example, which always was the correct one. Georgia has been opened for 3 weeks and has fewer cases than the National Average SINCE opening. Florida is doing very well too. Funny how you just ignore that.

Dude, 1500 deaths, 36000 cases is "doing very well?"

Since when?

Kansas, where I am, has 1/5 the cases and 1/10 the deaths but is considered a hotspot.

Out of 10mil? Yes. It’s nothing. Economic turmoil matters too. My dad needs to have his knee scoped and he cannot. He is 69 and in pain daily. I am sure he is not the only one. Cases mean shit. More the better as builds herd immunity quicker. Our goal was to flatten the curve not to have zero cases. Georgia is losing 0.15 people per 1000. You have a better chance dying from a car accident. No reason not to reopen fully and no one is forcing those who are scared to go out. Stay home and have food delivered.