Unmasking Names Dropped - Biden, Comey, Obama Chief of Staff at the top of Flynn Unmsaking list

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

It’s not the more serious crime they tried to nab him with. That crime was the Logan act. Again a law from 1799 that zero people have been charged with ever, and one you can’t even argue he broke since he was the incoming intel secretary. As far as the kidnapping of Gulen, it never happened. There may have been a meeting and here’s probably how it went. A rep from turkey called up and said let’s meet for dinner, I have a business opportunity for your firm. They meet up, the rep discusses the job,
Flynn says no. NO CRIME, nor should there be. I’ve already explained how flimsy the FBIs Logan act claim was, but they still tried that. Now, if they had any angle or shred of evidence that they could argue a conspiracy to kidnap on Flynn’s part, the FBI would’ve grabbed onto that like a bulldog instead of a law from 1799 they had to dust off.

Holy shit, I just read that the judge is requesting amicus briefings to discuss if Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, and then revoking it..........you get pressured into a plea, evidence that shows your innocence that was withheld from your defense team comes out, Brady violation, motion to dismiss case gets bizarrely held up for amicus briefings in a criminal matter, and now they’re saying “well you lied when you took a guilty plea even though you were innocent so we’re gonna have to charge you with perjury”. How loudly do y’all sing to yourself when your closing your eyes and plugging your ears to actual corruption that’s going on right in front of your noses

 

[dudmuck]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

It’s not the more serious crime they tried to nab him with. That crime was the Logan act. Again a law from 1799 that zero people have been charged with ever, and one you can’t even argue he broke since he was the incoming intel secretary. As far as the kidnapping of Gulen, it never happened. There may have been a meeting and here’s probably how it went. A rep from turkey called up and said let’s meet for dinner, I have a business opportunity for your firm. They meet up, the rep discusses the job,
Flynn says no. NO CRIME, nor should there be. I’ve already explained how flimsy the FBIs Logan act claim was, but they still tried that. Now, if they had any angle or shred of evidence that they could argue a conspiracy to kidnap on Flynn’s part, the FBI would’ve grabbed onto that like a bulldog instead of a law from 1799 they had to dust off.

Holy shit, I just read that the judge is requesting amicus briefings to discuss if Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, and then revoking it..........you get pressured into a plea, evidence that shows your innocence that was withheld from your defense team comes out, Brady violation, motion to dismiss case gets bizarrely held up for amicus briefings in a criminal matter, and now they’re saying “well you lied when you took a guilty plea even though you were innocent so we’re gonna have to charge you with perjury”. How loudly do y’all sing to yourself when your closing your eyes and plugging your ears to actual corruption that’s going on right in front of your noses

Flynn has escaped FARA and influence-peddling charges.

 

[Crepitus]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

It’s not the more serious crime they tried to nab him with. That crime was the Logan act. Again a law from 1799 that zero people have been charged with ever, and one you can’t even argue he broke since he was the incoming intel secretary. As far as the kidnapping of Gulen, it never happened. There may have been a meeting and here’s probably how it went. A rep from turkey called up and said let’s meet for dinner, I have a business opportunity for your firm. They meet up, the rep discusses the job,
Flynn says no. NO CRIME, nor should there be. I’ve already explained how flimsy the FBIs Logan act claim was, but they still tried that. Now, if they had any angle or shred of evidence that they could argue a conspiracy to kidnap on Flynn’s part, the FBI would’ve grabbed onto that like a bulldog instead of a law from 1799 they had to dust off.

Holy shit, I just read that the judge is requesting amicus briefings to discuss if Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, and then revoking it..........you get pressured into a plea, evidence that shows your innocence that was withheld from your defense team comes out, Brady violation, motion to dismiss case gets bizarrely held up for amicus briefings in a criminal matter, and now they’re saying “well you lied when you took a guilty plea even though you were innocent so we’re gonna have to charge you with perjury”. How loudly do y’all sing to yourself when your closing your eyes and plugging your ears to actual corruption that’s going on right in front of your noses

Lol!

You sure have a rosy picture of the guy.

We know it went farther than that.

 

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

It’s not the more serious crime they tried to nab him with. That crime was the Logan act. Again a law from 1799 that zero people have been charged with ever, and one you can’t even argue he broke since he was the incoming intel secretary. As far as the kidnapping of Gulen, it never happened. There may have been a meeting and here’s probably how it went. A rep from turkey called up and said let’s meet for dinner, I have a business opportunity for your firm. They meet up, the rep discusses the job,
Flynn says no. NO CRIME, nor should there be. I’ve already explained how flimsy the FBIs Logan act claim was, but they still tried that. Now, if they had any angle or shred of evidence that they could argue a conspiracy to kidnap on Flynn’s part, the FBI would’ve grabbed onto that like a bulldog instead of a law from 1799 they had to dust off.

Holy shit, I just read that the judge is requesting amicus briefings to discuss if Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, and then revoking it..........you get pressured into a plea, evidence that shows your innocence that was withheld from your defense team comes out, Brady violation, motion to dismiss case gets bizarrely held up for amicus briefings in a criminal matter, and now they’re saying “well you lied when you took a guilty plea even though you were innocent so we’re gonna have to charge you with perjury”. How loudly do y’all sing to yourself when your closing your eyes and plugging your ears to actual corruption that’s going on right in front of your noses

Flynn has escaped FARA and influence-peddling charges.

Don’t even get me started about lawfare their most recent piece about this is littered falsehoods and misleading statements. One response to this whole BS article. If all it said was true, why did the FBI agent on this matter and his supervisor, decide to close this case with no recommended charges?

 

[dudmuck]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

It’s not the more serious crime they tried to nab him with. That crime was the Logan act. Again a law from 1799 that zero people have been charged with ever, and one you can’t even argue he broke since he was the incoming intel secretary. As far as the kidnapping of Gulen, it never happened. There may have been a meeting and here’s probably how it went. A rep from turkey called up and said let’s meet for dinner, I have a business opportunity for your firm. They meet up, the rep discusses the job,
Flynn says no. NO CRIME, nor should there be. I’ve already explained how flimsy the FBIs Logan act claim was, but they still tried that. Now, if they had any angle or shred of evidence that they could argue a conspiracy to kidnap on Flynn’s part, the FBI would’ve grabbed onto that like a bulldog instead of a law from 1799 they had to dust off.

Holy shit, I just read that the judge is requesting amicus briefings to discuss if Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, and then revoking it..........you get pressured into a plea, evidence that shows your innocence that was withheld from your defense team comes out, Brady violation, motion to dismiss case gets bizarrely held up for amicus briefings in a criminal matter, and now they’re saying “well you lied when you took a guilty plea even though you were innocent so we’re gonna have to charge you with perjury”. How loudly do y’all sing to yourself when your closing your eyes and plugging your ears to actual corruption that’s going on right in front of your noses

Flynn has escaped FARA and influence-peddling charges.

Don’t even get me started about lawfare their most recent piece about this is littered falsehoods and misleading statements. One response to this whole BS article. If all it said was true, why did the FBI agent on this matter and his supervisor, decide to close this case with no recommended charges?

lawfareblog has a rating of least biased and factual reporting: very high, which not many sites achieve.

Flynn was given a deal: plea guilty to lying to FBI, or face charges relating Turkey (influence peddling and FARA violations).

 

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

It’s not the more serious crime they tried to nab him with. That crime was the Logan act. Again a law from 1799 that zero people have been charged with ever, and one you can’t even argue he broke since he was the incoming intel secretary. As far as the kidnapping of Gulen, it never happened. There may have been a meeting and here’s probably how it went. A rep from turkey called up and said let’s meet for dinner, I have a business opportunity for your firm. They meet up, the rep discusses the job,
Flynn says no. NO CRIME, nor should there be. I’ve already explained how flimsy the FBIs Logan act claim was, but they still tried that. Now, if they had any angle or shred of evidence that they could argue a conspiracy to kidnap on Flynn’s part, the FBI would’ve grabbed onto that like a bulldog instead of a law from 1799 they had to dust off.

Holy shit, I just read that the judge is requesting amicus briefings to discuss if Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, and then revoking it..........you get pressured into a plea, evidence that shows your innocence that was withheld from your defense team comes out, Brady violation, motion to dismiss case gets bizarrely held up for amicus briefings in a criminal matter, and now they’re saying “well you lied when you took a guilty plea even though you were innocent so we’re gonna have to charge you with perjury”. How loudly do y’all sing to yourself when your closing your eyes and plugging your ears to actual corruption that’s going on right in front of your noses

Flynn has escaped FARA and influence-peddling charges.

Don’t even get me started about lawfare their most recent piece about this is littered falsehoods and misleading statements. One response to this whole BS article. If all it said was true, why did the FBI agent on this matter and his supervisor, decide to close this case with no recommended charges?

lawfareblog has a rating of least biased and factual reporting: very high, which not many sites achieve.

Flynn was given a deal: plea guilty to lying to FBI, or face charges relating Turkey (influence peddling and FARA violations).

By who, the Obama administration? And you didn’t answer the question. It can’t be predicated if the FBI was shutting down the case. Remember, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation.

Lawfareblog Forfeits Claim to Integrity -- No Other Explanation For Consistent Falsehoods In Story By Barbara McQuade

www.redstate.com

 

[Crepitus]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

It’s not the more serious crime they tried to nab him with. That crime was the Logan act. Again a law from 1799 that zero people have been charged with ever, and one you can’t even argue he broke since he was the incoming intel secretary. As far as the kidnapping of Gulen, it never happened. There may have been a meeting and here’s probably how it went. A rep from turkey called up and said let’s meet for dinner, I have a business opportunity for your firm. They meet up, the rep discusses the job,
Flynn says no. NO CRIME, nor should there be. I’ve already explained how flimsy the FBIs Logan act claim was, but they still tried that. Now, if they had any angle or shred of evidence that they could argue a conspiracy to kidnap on Flynn’s part, the FBI would’ve grabbed onto that like a bulldog instead of a law from 1799 they had to dust off.

Holy shit, I just read that the judge is requesting amicus briefings to discuss if Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, and then revoking it..........you get pressured into a plea, evidence that shows your innocence that was withheld from your defense team comes out, Brady violation, motion to dismiss case gets bizarrely held up for amicus briefings in a criminal matter, and now they’re saying “well you lied when you took a guilty plea even though you were innocent so we’re gonna have to charge you with perjury”. How loudly do y’all sing to yourself when your closing your eyes and plugging your ears to actual corruption that’s going on right in front of your noses

Flynn has escaped FARA and influence-peddling charges.

Don’t even get me started about lawfare their most recent piece about this is littered falsehoods and misleading statements. One response to this whole BS article. If all it said was true, why did the FBI agent on this matter and his supervisor, decide to close this case with no recommended charges?

Because plea bargains.

You knew this, why are you asking?

 

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

It’s not the more serious crime they tried to nab him with. That crime was the Logan act. Again a law from 1799 that zero people have been charged with ever, and one you can’t even argue he broke since he was the incoming intel secretary. As far as the kidnapping of Gulen, it never happened. There may have been a meeting and here’s probably how it went. A rep from turkey called up and said let’s meet for dinner, I have a business opportunity for your firm. They meet up, the rep discusses the job,
Flynn says no. NO CRIME, nor should there be. I’ve already explained how flimsy the FBIs Logan act claim was, but they still tried that. Now, if they had any angle or shred of evidence that they could argue a conspiracy to kidnap on Flynn’s part, the FBI would’ve grabbed onto that like a bulldog instead of a law from 1799 they had to dust off.

Holy shit, I just read that the judge is requesting amicus briefings to discuss if Flynn committed perjury by pleading guilty, and then revoking it..........you get pressured into a plea, evidence that shows your innocence that was withheld from your defense team comes out, Brady violation, motion to dismiss case gets bizarrely held up for amicus briefings in a criminal matter, and now they’re saying “well you lied when you took a guilty plea even though you were innocent so we’re gonna have to charge you with perjury”. How loudly do y’all sing to yourself when your closing your eyes and plugging your ears to actual corruption that’s going on right in front of your noses

Flynn has escaped FARA and influence-peddling charges.

Don’t even get me started about lawfare their most recent piece about this is littered falsehoods and misleading statements. One response to this whole BS article. If all it said was true, why did the FBI agent on this matter and his supervisor, decide to close this case with no recommended charges?

Because plea bargains.

You knew this, why are you asking?

No they were in the final process of closing the case on the original investigation. You know this. So why did they do that?