Unmasking Names Dropped - Biden, Comey, Obama Chief of Staff at the top of Flynn Unmsaking list

[Crepitus]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

No. I gave You the 75/25 example before. We attain herd immunity for the younger / healthy and that is how we save the older/unhealthy. The fact that you cannot remember that is mind boggling. Europe is opening up and following the Sweden example, which always was the correct one. Georgia has been opened for 3 weeks and has fewer cases than the National Average SINCE opening. Florida is doing very well too. Funny how you just ignore that.

Dude, 1500 deaths, 36000 cases is "doing very well?"

Since when?

Kansas, where I am, has 1/5 the cases and 1/10 the deaths but is considered a hotspot.

Out of 10mil? Yes. It’s nothing. Economic turmoil matters too. My dad needs to have his knee scoped and he cannot. He is 69 and in pain daily. I am sure he is not the only one. Cases mean shit. More the better as builds herd immunity quicker. Our goal was to flatten the curve not to have zero cases. Georgia is losing 0.15 people per 1000. You have a better chance dying from a car accident. No reason not to reopen fully and no one is forcing those who are scared to go out. Stay home and have food delivered.

Supremely selfish viewpoint.

Don't you conservatives care about anyone but yourselves?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

No. I gave You the 75/25 example before. We attain herd immunity for the younger / healthy and that is how we save the older/unhealthy. The fact that you cannot remember that is mind boggling. Europe is opening up and following the Sweden example, which always was the correct one. Georgia has been opened for 3 weeks and has fewer cases than the National Average SINCE opening. Florida is doing very well too. Funny how you just ignore that.

Dude, 1500 deaths, 36000 cases is "doing very well?"

Since when?

Kansas, where I am, has 1/5 the cases and 1/10 the deaths but is considered a hotspot.

Out of 10mil? Yes. It’s nothing. Economic turmoil matters too. My dad needs to have his knee scoped and he cannot. He is 69 and in pain daily. I am sure he is not the only one. Cases mean shit. More the better as builds herd immunity quicker. Our goal was to flatten the curve not to have zero cases. Georgia is losing 0.15 people per 1000. You have a better chance dying from a car accident. No reason not to reopen fully and no one is forcing those who are scared to go out. Stay home and have food delivered.

Supremely selfish viewpoint.

Don't you conservatives care about anyone but yourselves?

I am not a “conservative” it is because I do care about others that we should reopen. We are punishing 95% now to help less than 1%. 4% are indifferent. That doesn’t make any logical sense. How is me going to the gym impacting an 80-year old at home? It is not. Open the country. Enough.

Sweden’s Coronavirus Strategy Will Soon Be the World’s

Herd immunity is the only realistic option—the question is how to get there safely.

www.foreignaffairs.com

 

[Crepitus]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

No. I gave You the 75/25 example before. We attain herd immunity for the younger / healthy and that is how we save the older/unhealthy. The fact that you cannot remember that is mind boggling. Europe is opening up and following the Sweden example, which always was the correct one. Georgia has been opened for 3 weeks and has fewer cases than the National Average SINCE opening. Florida is doing very well too. Funny how you just ignore that.

Dude, 1500 deaths, 36000 cases is "doing very well?"

Since when?

Kansas, where I am, has 1/5 the cases and 1/10 the deaths but is considered a hotspot.

Out of 10mil? Yes. It’s nothing. Economic turmoil matters too. My dad needs to have his knee scoped and he cannot. He is 69 and in pain daily. I am sure he is not the only one. Cases mean shit. More the better as builds herd immunity quicker. Our goal was to flatten the curve not to have zero cases. Georgia is losing 0.15 people per 1000. You have a better chance dying from a car accident. No reason not to reopen fully and no one is forcing those who are scared to go out. Stay home and have food delivered.

Supremely selfish viewpoint.

Don't you conservatives care about anyone but yourselves?

I am not a “conservative” it is because I do care about others that we should reopen. We are punishing 95% now to help less than 1%. 4% are indifferent. That doesn’t make any logical sense. How is me going to the gym impacting an 80-year old at home? It is not. Open the country. Enough.

Sweden’s Coronavirus Strategy Will Soon Be the World’s

Herd immunity is the only realistic option—the question is how to get there safely.

www.foreignaffairs.com

How much is one life worth?

Do you know how many dead people 1% of the population is?

Now multiply the first number by the second.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Why should the Govt dictate what I do?

To protect it's vulnerable citizens. Surely you've heard of the "general welfare"?

Best way to protect them is to let us live our lives. The fact that you don’t see that is fucking mind boggling.

The fact that you are basically writing off the lives of all the folks who will die from reckless actions is mind boggling.

No. I gave You the 75/25 example before. We attain herd immunity for the younger / healthy and that is how we save the older/unhealthy. The fact that you cannot remember that is mind boggling. Europe is opening up and following the Sweden example, which always was the correct one. Georgia has been opened for 3 weeks and has fewer cases than the National Average SINCE opening. Florida is doing very well too. Funny how you just ignore that.

Dude, 1500 deaths, 36000 cases is "doing very well?"

Since when?

Kansas, where I am, has 1/5 the cases and 1/10 the deaths but is considered a hotspot.

Out of 10mil? Yes. It’s nothing. Economic turmoil matters too. My dad needs to have his knee scoped and he cannot. He is 69 and in pain daily. I am sure he is not the only one. Cases mean shit. More the better as builds herd immunity quicker. Our goal was to flatten the curve not to have zero cases. Georgia is losing 0.15 people per 1000. You have a better chance dying from a car accident. No reason not to reopen fully and no one is forcing those who are scared to go out. Stay home and have food delivered.

Supremely selfish viewpoint.

Don't you conservatives care about anyone but yourselves?

I am not a “conservative” it is because I do care about others that we should reopen. We are punishing 95% now to help less than 1%. 4% are indifferent. That doesn’t make any logical sense. How is me going to the gym impacting an 80-year old at home? It is not. Open the country. Enough.

Sweden’s Coronavirus Strategy Will Soon Be the World’s

Herd immunity is the only realistic option—the question is how to get there safely.

www.foreignaffairs.com

How much is one life worth?

Do you know how many dead people 1% of the population is?

Now multiply the first number by the second.

1% is a pipe dream if deaths multiply 10 fold it would be 2 deaths per 10k. How much are lives of those who lost their business and or house worth? Who cannot afford to pay for their kids school. Those who aren’t getting cancer treatments or early diagnosis? Those who die from drug overdoses due to depression? 95% of the people are negatively impacted and you’re worried about less than 1%. So you don’t drive a car since we lose 45k in car accidents annually and a lot more in serious injuries and such. There is a car accident in the US every 30 minutes when we are open. Life is about risk not the Govt telling me what risks I can or cannot take.

 

[easyt65]

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was.

...and of course you and Adam Schiff have personal direct evidence to confirm all of this, right......?!




.

 

[easyt65]

How much is one life worth?

Why don't you ask HILLARY.....

 

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

So, why did tRump fire him?

Because he was taking a guilty plea, again under duress. That would’ve been hard for the administration to explain to the American people had they not fired him.

Lol, you've wandered from the facts again.

Fired first. Guilty plea months later.

You can have your own opinion, but there's only one set of facts.

It was coming down the pike, the whole conviction process takes months. You and your lawyer know what’s coming for months even though it may not be public. You don’t just walk outside and shout, I PLEA GUILTY. You have to wait for a court date and judge. It would not have been a good look for him to work in the WH up until the FBI announces he’s taking a plea. The WH has no choice but to fire him as soon as this was made apparent to them.

I don’t even know what you’re arguing about. We have all the documents and transcripts now. We know the FBI agent on the case filled out a closure EC, which is the final step in a long process of closing a case.

 

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

 

[Wapasha]

None of these clowns had any reason to unmask Flynn since all these requests were between when Trump won and his inauguration.

The Barry Hussein regime is the most corrupt in history, and it isn't close.

The truth is coming out, and it isn't pretty for Barry and his gang.

List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them

Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of former national security adviser Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.


The list was declassified in recent days by Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell and then sent to GOP Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson, who made the documents public. The roster features top-ranking figures including then-Vice President Joe Biden -- a detail already being raised by the Trump campaign in the bare-knuckle 2020 presidential race where Biden is now the Democrats' presumptive nominee.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

READ THE DOCUMENTS

"I declassified the enclosed document, which I am providing to you for your situational awareness," Grenell wrote to the GOP senators in sending along the list.

Grenell’s note was addressed to Sens. Grassley, R-Iowa, and Johnson, R-Wis., who had penned a letter to him and Attorney General Bill Barr regarding the declassification of files related to the unmasking process earlier in the day.

As Fox News previously reported, Grenell already made the decision to declassify information about Obama administration officials who were involved in the “unmasking” of Flynn — whose calls with the former Russian ambassador during the presidential transition were picked up in surveillance and later leaked. His case has returned to the national spotlight after the DOJ moved to dismiss charges against him of lying to the FBI about those conversations, despite a guilty plea that he later sought to withdraw.
The list revealed that then-U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Samantha Power made unmasking requests seven times between Nov. 30, 2016 and Jan. 11, 2017. The list revealed that Clapper made three requests from Dec. 2, 2016 through Jan. 7, 2017; and that Brennan made two requests, one on Dec. 14 and one on Dec. 15, 2016. Comey also made a request on Dec. 15, 2016. On Jan. 5, 2017, McDonough made one request, and on Jan. 12, 2017, Biden made one request.

List of officials who sought to 'unmask' Flynn released: Biden, Comey, Obama chief of staff among them

Top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of former national security adviser Michael Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

www.foxnews.com

Another "Unmasking" thread. Don't know how many, now? I can't remember. Was Flynn in "Deep Cover", Nostra? What a joke!

How many of these damn threads are we going to have.

Probably as many as it takes for the truth to finally sink into the heads of Democrats and libtards

 

[Crepitus]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

So, why did tRump fire him?

Because he was taking a guilty plea, again under duress. That would’ve been hard for the administration to explain to the American people had they not fired him.

Lol, you've wandered from the facts again.

Fired first. Guilty plea months later.

You can have your own opinion, but there's only one set of facts.

It was coming down the pike, the whole conviction process takes months. You and your lawyer know what’s coming for months even though it may not be public. You don’t just walk outside and shout, I PLEA GUILTY. You have to wait for a court date and judge. It would not have been a good look for him to work in the WH up until the FBI announces he’s taking a plea. The WH has no choice but to fire him as soon as this was made apparent to them.

I don’t even know what you’re arguing about. We have all the documents and transcripts now. We know the FBI agent on the case filled out a closure EC, which is the final step in a long process of closing a case.

Lol, more excuse making.

 

[Crepitus]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Not because of the Logan act, but because if what he lies to conceal.

Then there's the plot to kidnap the Muslim cleric and get paid $15,000,000. That one involved his son.

And the crap with Turkey.

And a buncha other crap I can't remember.

 

[basquebromance]

Sen. Rand Paul: "Biden accessed the identity and the private conversation of a political opponent. There is no more clear violation of a politician using their office and abusing their office to go after a political opponent -- and I think he's caught red-handed here."

 

[basquebromance]

Here Is Everything You Need To Know About ‘Unmasking’ And Michael Flynn, All In One Place

The release of a list of U.S. government officials who made unmasking requests for information about Michael Flynn has descended into a tense partisan debate.

dailycaller.com

 

[basquebromance]

"Trump’s campaign really should just hire a British guy to ask some Chinese nationals about Joe and Hunter Biden’s shady dealings, take that totally unverified gossip to the FBI, and get FISA warrants on the Bidens

Because the media insists that’s totally legit behavior "

 

[dudmuck]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

 

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Not because of the Logan act, but because if what he lies to conceal.

Then there's the plot to kidnap the Muslim cleric and get paid $15,000,000. That one involved his son.

And the crap with Turkey.

And a buncha other crap I can't remember.

To kidnap Gulen?...the fake story that was “leaked”??? How did that turn out? We already know it’s bullshit. Gulen, the friend and big donor to the Clinton foundation. Who ran a scam through his charter schools? That same gulen? The one who magically got more H1B visas approved than google for “English” teachers who don’t speak English. Then got the government to pay their “salary”, then they split said salary between gulen and Clinton foundation. This is the same Gulen we’re talking about with this “alleged” plot to kidnap investigation that went no where? I wonder what possible motivation there could be to leak such a preposterous story? Maybe to cover up and take the heat off of some corruption

 

[sakinago]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

 

[dudmuck]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Perhaps more serious was the charge Flynn escaped from. Flynn was paid to extradite a turkish cleric from the USA. Flynn plead guilty to avoid being charged with this crime related to Turkey.

100% not true. If it were, they’d be coming after Flynn for that now, instead of bizarrely asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case, which I’m pretty sure has never happened before. Maybe it has, but that’s how rare of a request asking for amicus briefings is. Requesting that means they have absolutely nothing, and it’s a last ditch effort to change the narrative and deflect from some pretty clear abuse of power. Asking for amicus briefings in a criminal case is like yelling out UNO on a blackjack table. That’s how bizarre that request is. It makes no sense. On top of that, every prosecution on earth would never ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever ever lead with a lesser crime to go for a conviction/guilty plea. They might offer him to plead to a lesser crime, but that’s not even close to what happened as we all know.

Its all described in the foreign agent section of Flynn's wikipedia page.
Even Trump's team knew of this.
Why would you say 100% not true?

 

[Crepitus]

The most corrupt administration in history is getting called out once again by Liberal Hero Judge Nap.

ESPIONAGE!

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'


Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

Napolitano explained that U.S. authorities who are spying on a foreign person are supposed to report to their superiors if an American is involved in the communications without exposing the identity. Only those with a national security clearance can request the “unmasking" of that person.

“That’s what happened with respect to General Flynn,” Napolitano told "Fox & Friends," referring to Flynn's phone call with the Russian ambassador.

He said such requests happen often, but in Flynn's case, someone in the Obama administration leaked the name and it was reported on by The Washington Post.

“That is arguably the crime of espionage,” Napolitano said.


Napolitano's comments come after it was revealed top Obama administration officials purportedly requested to "unmask" the identity of Flynn during the presidential transition period, according to a list of names from that controversial process made public on Wednesday.

The list also includes then-FBI Director James Comey, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, and Obama's then-chief of staff Denis McDonough.

Napolitano said that it is “bizarre” that there were 39 requests for such information by members of the Obama administration, career Department of Justice officials and intelligence officials about conversations involving Flynn.

“Not one of those requests is about the Dec. 29th conversation with Ambassador Kislyak, which formed the basis of this prosecution in his guilty plea. Now that’s odd. Why isn’t the person who asked for that mentioned there? Maybe, that’s the person that went to The Washington Post and, maybe the intelligence community has kept that information even from their boss [Richard Grenell], so that name doesn’t get out there," he argued.

Judge Napolitano: How Flynn's unmasking by Obama officials became 'arguably a crime'

Judge Andrew Napolitano said on Thursday that one of the individuals involved in the unmasking of White House national security adviser Michael Flynn may have committed the "crime of espionage."

www.foxnews.com

Stupidity. It's a perfectly legal process done thousands of times every year. No laws were broken. All "t"s were crossed and "I"s dotted.

It's s time for you kids to let.this go.

A crime was committed as soon as the unmasked names (Flynn) were leaked to the press. That was 3 years ago now and is a felony with a MINIMUM sentence of 5 years prison. There’s also the Brady law that was broken god only knows how many times now. Withholding exculpatory evidence to the defense is as corrupt as it gets. They were also withholding information from the FISA court, that info being knowing the Steele dossier was horseshit. Do you care to explain how exactly they crossed all their Ts and dotted their Is?

We don't know who leaked the name. We do know lots of people requested the unmasking. We also know unmasking is legal and a fairly common practice. We also know Flynn was doing something illegal and that he lied about it. tRump and Pence said he did.

We also know that you clearly haven’t a clue. Flynn’s alleged crime that he plead guilty to under duress, because they threatened to go after his son, was “lying” to the FBI. They didn’t even have a good case for that, since Flynn acknowledged he doesn’t remember exact details of the phone call in question. They asked him what he talked to kysliack about on a certain issue with policy concerning Israel. Flynn said that probably went something like feeling out kysliaks position on the issue. But the FBI who had the transcripts, which Flynn acknowledged they had in that interview, are claiming that the “lie” was that the completely normal and legal conversation actually went into a little more detail. In order to charge someone with lying to the FBI, the lie has to be material to an ongoing investigation. There was no ongoing investigation, there was no underlying crime, they were just trying to nail Flynn with something. The recently revealed FBI documents prove as much.

He agreed to plead guilty to forestall more serious charges. His son was vulnerable because he was up to his neck in the same corruption Flynn was. You are not Flynn and you have no clue what you are talking about.

More serious charges as in the Logan Act? A law made in 1799 that a grand total of ZERO other people have ever been charged with. I’m sorry I’m confused, is your position that the United States policy that Flynn went against was to fuck over our long standing ally Israel by voting that settlements are a human rights violation? Is that seriously your position? So being against voting for that, which was trumps position, as the incoming intel secretary is a Logan violation...but John Carrey after he retired meeting with Iranian officials discussing the Iran deal against what the trump administration wanted to do isn’t a Logan violation?

Not because of the Logan act, but because if what he lies to conceal.

Then there's the plot to kidnap the Muslim cleric and get paid $15,000,000. That one involved his son.

And the crap with Turkey.

And a buncha other crap I can't remember.

To kidnap Gulen?...the fake story that was “leaked”??? How did that turn out? We already know it’s bullshit. Gulen, the friend and big donor to the Clinton foundation. Who ran a scam through his charter schools? That same gulen? The one who magically got more H1B visas approved than google for “English” teachers who don’t speak English. Then got the government to pay their “salary”, then they split said salary between gulen and Clinton foundation. This is the same Gulen we’re talking about with this “alleged” plot to kidnap investigation that went no where? I wonder what possible motivation there could be to leak such a preposterous story? Maybe to cover up and take the heat off of some corruption

Wasn't fake.

 

[candycorn]

I'm sure they'll all be in jail very soon, right?