UN watchdog group says US strike on Iran fell short of destroying core nuclear capabilities


The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...

What does the Best Biden Ever have to say about this?
 

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...


Didn't the UN say Covid came from a "wet market." That UN? :lol:
 
What was the supposed problem with the “oil for food program”. Be specific and provide evidence.

And what does wildly exaggerated claims made by Trump have to do with Covid guidelines?
Oil for Food was headed up by the UN to facilitate Iraq to sell oil and use proceeds for humanitarian efforts. It turned into a vehicle for UN and Iraqi officials to get bribes and kickbacks.
 
I asked you if you wanted to use UN military might.

You said, 'yes', so you served my purpose.
I do not want the UN to do anything, anywhere, at anytime, except get out of the US, and for us to stop supporting people who have our worse interest in mind!
 
Trump and his cult seem to think requiring a valid evaluation of the attack is somehow supporting Iran over the U.S. Praising trump is more important than reality.
Telling us that mission was a failure is supporting Iran. Plain and simple.
 
There is no doubt about that.

Trump has been consistant in his bad faith dealings with Iran.

They have no reason whatsoever to trust Trump, or the United States any more.

Of course, Trump thinks he can rule by fear.

It doesn't work, unless he has a hold on his victims.

^^^Look how mad the Iran/Russia supporters are about Trump's massive victory.

LOL
 
nothing 'UNFOUNDED" about it-----The US is often cited as an "AUTHORITY". It, clearly has no
"military might" -----except that of "believers". Do you support the idea of UN AUTHORITY?
Can you prove the un has no military might?
 
A. I never said they weren't just that they were years away from being able to do it. That's also the assessment of the domestic security agencies here in the US as well, BTW.

B. I'm not hoping for more bombs, I laughing at tRump and his oompa-loompas. The incompetence is absolutely EPIC!
WFT Creepy. THe incompetence of the US military "is absolutely EPIC!" Go **** yourself
 
15th post
In the OP. Their mission was to destroy the Iran's nuclear equipment, specifically for enriching Uranium.
Months to resume enrichment. Great job trumpy!
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom