UN watchdog group says US strike on Iran fell short of destroying core nuclear capabilities

[0311]

Trump and his cult seem to think requiring a valid evaluation of the attack is somehow supporting Iran over the U.S. Praising trump is more important than reality.

They have a desperate to affirm their dear leader.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/29/world/iaea-iran-enriched-uranium-intl

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...

Trump and his Cult members will continue to ignore facts and the truth.

 

[0311]

I think by now everyone knows the tRump *administration's claims of "total destruction" are bullshit.

He lies like he breathes.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

I think by now everyone knows the tRump *administration's claims of "total destruction" are bullshit.

Including Trump Cult members – who will continue to lie regardless.

 

[JimH52]

Powell is beginning to question economic data. While we see prices skyrocketing, the data coming from this regime shows modest inflation increases. No one can believe anything coming from the trump regime.

 

[whitehall]

You can almost sense the desperation in CNN to legitimize the initial network's anti-Trump and anti Military stance designed to downplay the brilliant Iran nuclear strike before all the data was in.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Remember when Bush43 had General Powell fabricate about WMDs in Iraq, meaning nukes not bio or chem?

Yeah, not total destruction of Iran's enriched uranium program.

I wish the US would try again.

 

[JimH52]

You can almost sense the desperation in CNN to legitimize the initial network's anti-Trump and anti Military stance designed to downplay the brilliant Iran nuclear strike before all the data was in.

You will never see facts like this on FOX news. You will only see 24/7 news on how wonderful trump and his fellow criminals are. FOX has been sued multiple times for lying to it's viewers. They always spin facts to suit their Dear Leader.

 

[Harry Dresden]

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/29/world/iaea-iran-enriched-uranium-intl

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...

you believe the useless UN?...have they been there?...

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

you believe the useless UN?...have they been there?...

Have you? I would trust the UN before you.

 

[hadit]

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/29/world/iaea-iran-enriched-uranium-intl

The head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog says US strikes on Iran fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear program and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium “in a matter of months,” contradicting President Donald Trump’s claims the US set Tehran’s ambitions back by decades.

Rafael Grossi’s comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon’s Defense Intelligence Agency, first reported on by CNN, which suggests the United States’ strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months.

This agrees with the preliminary report from US intel. So, we spent millions of tax payer's dollars on an attack that sets back Iran's nuclear program for months. But since trump will fix the data, the final report will say the program was "obliterated." Nothing out of this regime can be taken as true...

And here I thought the narrative was that they did not have a nuclear enrichment program.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Have you? I would trust the UN before you.

i didnt say i was....were you there john?...the UN hasnt been there either.....i would trust you over those useless assholes....

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

You have no idea what the UN has done or where it has been.

You have no idea where you are or what you have done.

Just be quiet, please, Harry,

 

[TimFitz]

Well no shit “they could start to rebuild” it someday.

We destroyed their current stockpile and facilities.

We already know that is not true.

 

[TimFitz]

Trump and his cult seem to think requiring a valid evaluation of the attack is somehow supporting Iran over the U.S. Praising trump is more important than reality.

I hope you;re not surprised!

When the Bush crowd was scaremongering the public into supporting an unnecessary war in the wrong country, and the IAEA wouldn’t support the lurid claims being made by Chalabi, Pearle,Wolfowitz, Cheney a nd Rumsfeld, the exact same people attacked any international verification effort.

Some things never changed.

 

[Harry Dresden]

You have no idea what the UN has done or where it has been.

You have no idea where you are or what you have done.

Just be quiet, please, Harry,

what have they done john?....look at all the conflicts going on....what have they done john to stop any of this bullshit?...

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

what have they done john?....look at all the conflicts going on....what have they done john to stop any of this bullshit?...

What do you want the UN to do? Intervene militarily?

 

[TimFitz]

remember when the UN told US they could trust them for Saddam’s “oil for food program?” And then there was the UN’s WHO organization’s guidelines for COVID.

What was the supposed problem with the “oil for food program”. Be specific and provide evidence.

And what does wildly exaggerated claims made by Trump have to do with Covid guidelines?

 

[Harry Dresden]

What do you want the UN to do? Intervene militarily?

what is the purpose of the so called "security" council?...

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

what is the purpose of the so called "security" council?...

I asked you a question. Answer it.