Ukraine Was Investigating Hunter Biden Before Trump’s Phone Call: A revelation alters the timeline

[Skylar]

You're honestly arguing that Hunter Biden was a 'no-name' average American lawyer?

Of course not, but thank you for proving you are too stupid to keep up.

I am saying any American lawyer with everything equal as Hunter who was NOT the VP's son would not have been given the time of day by the criminal Ukrainian or China.

Save of course Hunter Biden wasn't anything CLOSE to an average lawyer. His resume was deep, extensive and spectacular.With experience in government, being on boards of multi-billion dollar corporations, lobbying, and extensive experience in private equity.

Are 'average' American lawyers VPs MBNA Holding company, the world's largest independent credit card issuer, worth 1.9 billion dollars. And that's 'average' to you?

'Average' American lawyers ALSO serve in the Commerce Departmeent of the United States?

'Average' American lawyers co-found their own lobbying firms?

'Average' America lawyers are on the Board of Directors of Amtrak?

'Average' American lawyers are founders and co-owners of Rosemont Seneca, a $2.4 billion private equity firm?

I don't think 'average' means what you think it means. Remember, you don't actually know what the hell you're talking about, my little Russian Stooge.

 

[easyt65]

That Trump personally held up Ukrainian military aid isn't really in doubt.

You're right - it's NOT in doubt because it has been completely debunked. Ukraine's PM, Military Commander, and Foreign Affairs Rep have all said no pressure was ever put on them, military sales was never mentioned, military aid was never withheld _ it was delivered, and Ukraine was already conducting an investigation when Trump executed the existing treaty by requesting aid.

You can make stupid statements like that, but they fail to overcome the evidence that has already debunked them.

 

[easyt65]

You're honestly arguing that Hunter Biden was a 'no-name' average American lawyer?

Of course not, but thank you for proving you are too stupid to keep up.

I am saying any American lawyer with everything equal as Hunter who was NOT the VP's son would not have been given the time of day by the criminal Ukrainian or China.

Save of course Hunter Biden wasn't anything CLOSE to an average lawyer. His resume was deep, extensive and spectacular.With experience in government, being on boards of multi-billion dollar corporations, lobbying, and extensive experience in private equity.

Are 'average' American lawyers VPs MBNA Holding company, the world's largest independent credit card issuer, worth 1.9 billion dollars. And that's 'average' to you?

'Average' American lawyers ALSO serve in the Commerce Departmeent of the United States?

'Average' American lawyers co-found their own lobbying firms?

'Average' America lawyers are on the Board of Directors of Amtrak?

'Average' American lawyers are founders and co-owners of Rosemont Seneca, a $2.4 billion private equity firm?

I don't think 'average' means what you think it means. Remember, you don't actually know what the hell you're talking about, my little Russian Stooge.

Average lawyers who ride the coat tails of their father, the Vice President of the United States, are capable of ALL of that!

 

[Skylar]

Not one snowflake has been able to explain why a notorious Ukrainian criminal - owning a corrupt Ukraine energy company - and known for working with Putin AND who stood to significantly gain financially from annexing Crimea would actively seek out a NO-NAME average AMERICAN lawyer who had no knowledge of or experience with Energy companies and who was kicked out of the US military for drug use to come to the Ukraine, not to be an EMPLOYEE - one of their lawyers - but to immediately join as a BOARD MEMBER making 6-figures per month....

That is what snowflakes are demanding we believe happened by laughably claiming that the fact that Hunter's last name was BIDEN, that is daddy being the VP of the United States - Obama's new Point Man on all things 'Ukraine'...who happened to be getting money himself from a Ukraine supporter / donor....

Bwuhahaha...

You're honestly arguing that Hunter Biden was a 'no-name' average American lawyer?

Are 'average' American lawyers VPs MBNA Holding company, the world's largest independent credit card issuer, worth 1.9 billion dollars. And that's 'average' to you?

'Average' American lawyers ALSO serve in the Commerce Departmeent of the United States?

'Average' American lawyers co-found their own lobbying firms?

'Average' America lawyers are on the Board of Directors of Amtrak?

'Average' American lawyers are founders and co-owners of Rosemont Seneca, a $2.4 billion private equity firm?

I don't think 'average' means what you think it means. Or that you have the slightest clue what you're talking about, my little Russian stooge.

Remember, the conspiracy that John Solomon has made up is one of the stupidest on record. As the prosecutor in question has already said that Hunter Biden commited no crime in Ukraine. And Joe Biden has no authority to cut any funding to anyone....its simply not a power the VP has.

So your working conspiracy is that Joe Biden DIDN'T cut funding to the Ukraine....in order to help save his son, who hadn't commited any crimes.

Ah, my little Ruskie.......you never thought this through, did you?

Joe Biden admitted his crime on a televised snippet everyone here has seen. His son was a player in that crime and benefitted with a mega salary in an industry he knows nothing about, only a famous famous Vice President who was using his office for monetary gain. I'm sorry this came to a head. I thought Joe Biden was a decent man. Unfortunately, sources are finding that his misuse of public office goes way back into his years in the Senate as well. I wish it weren't the truth, but more just keeps coming up with each passing day. We broke away from royal privileges in 1776. Democrats want them. I'm horrified.

What crime exactly?

Joe Biden didn't have the authority to cut any funding of any kind to anyone. Which is why Biden never says that HE will cut funding.....as he couldn't.

Just obliterating your entire silly conspiracy. As what you're insisting Joe did....he couldn't do.

Trump on the other had most definitely had the authority to hold back funding. And used it for his own personal gain, soliciting the Ukrainian president to conduct investigations on Trump's political rival, meeting with Trump's personal lawyers. And sent an off the books legal team with Guiliani to try and get the Ukrainian president to comply with Trump's demand.

This after Trump PERSONALLY halted the funding for Ukraine........a manipulation of tax payer funded and congressionally apportioned money so egregious that the Pentagon was deeply concerned that it was illegal.

And when Zelensky asked about additional missiles, Trump replied 'We have a favor to ask you though'....before going into the specifics of his demands for investigations into Crowdstrike and the Bidens. Ukraine was definitely made to understand that cooperation with the United States was being held back until the corruption investigations were completed .

How do we know? This was the Ukraine's public summary of the call before the shit hit the fan and it became an impeachment issue:

Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

There's a reason Trump's team desperately tried to hide this transcript and keep the public from ever seeing it. As its an absolutely devastating demonstration of his abuses of power.

 

[Skylar]

That Trump personally held up Ukrainian military aid isn't really in doubt.

You're right - it's NOT in doubt because it has been completely debunked. Ukraine's PM, Military Commander, and Foreign Affairs Rep have all said no pressure was ever put on them, military sales was never mentioned, military aid was never withheld _ it was delivered, and Ukraine was already conducting an investigation when Trump executed the existing treaty by requesting aid.

You can make stupid statements like that, but they fail to overcome the evidence that has already debunked them.

None of which has a thing to do with the fact that Trump personally held back funding to the Ukraine.

You've conceded the point. Even Trump doesn't deny that he held back funding to the Ukrainians. Ukraine was definitely made to understand that cooperation with the United States was being held back until the corruption investigations were completed .

How do we know? This was the Ukraine's public summary of the call before the shit hit the fan and it became an impeachment issue:

Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

This is why Trump's team desperately tried to keep the transcript hidden. And what spawned multiple whistleblower complaints, an IC IG investigation that found that complaint both credible and urgent, provoked an impeachment inquiry, motivated to the CIA's top lawyer to request an criminal investigation, and sent Trump's people scrambling to hide the transcript on a sever dedicated to top secret conversations of national security importance.

Sorry Ruskie.....you'll need to go back to Pravda for your next round of talking points for me to debunk.

 

[easyt65]

BwuhahaHaha....

 

[Skylar]

BwuhahaHaha....

Laughing.....dude, your desperate willful ignorance doesn't make the transcript change.

There's a reason why support for Trump's impeachment has skyrocketed since the transcript's release.

Keep those eyes screwed shut. It won't matter.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The transcript debunked the false accusation

Dude...we all read it. It SCREWED Trump

LOLz!

Sure it did

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Frontpage Mag ^ | 10/15/2019

Officials in Ukraine reportedly opened an investigation into an energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son long before President Donald Trump’s July 25 nothing-burger of a telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the Democrats’ haphazard, increasingly Kafkaesque impeachment inquiry.



The time element of the revelation, devastating as it is to the 2016-election-nullification push disguised as an impeachment process, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media which is overly preoccupied –as usual— attacking President Trump.



The information came last week from investigative reporter John Solomon, who recently was hired as a Fox News contributor, after Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said Oct. 4 he plans to review previous corruption investigations into Hunter Biden and his former employer, Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. Hunter got the job in 2014 while his father was the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine.



Solomon’s growing prominence in the media ecosystem means that leftist journalists –when they’re not busy making excuses for the secretive un-American Star Chamber-like impeachment process initiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi– now feel obligated to engage in character-assassination efforts against him.



For example, Casey Michel, who boasts about being a former Peace Corps volunteer in Kazakhstan and supposedly a former “investigative reporter” at failed George Soros-funded media outlet ThinkProgress, launched a venomous, lie-packed Media Matters-style hit piece against Solomon as he moved to Fox.



In the sleazy, tabloid-like Daily Beast, Michel mocked the respected veteran newsman from the Washington Times and The Hill as “the self-proclaimed journalist at the heart of the unfolding scandal involving Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani, and the impending impeachment of Donald Trump.”



Solomon’s work “has underpinned the entire cascade of lies the White House and Trump in particular have pushed over the past few weeks,” and is “drenched in innuendo and mischaracterizations, all in service of attacking Trump’s political opponents,” he wrote.



Meanwhile, more information is beginning to emerge about the charmed life of ne’er-do-well Hunter Biden who throughout his adult life has kept blundering into highly lucrative job opportunities because his father was famous and politically powerful.



A handful of media outlets reminded readers of the August 2008 news story –when Joe Biden was still a U.S. senator representing Delaware— about Hunter Biden being paid “an undisclosed amount of money as a consultant by MBNA, the largest employer in Delaware, during the years the senator supported legislation that was promoted by the credit card industry and opposed by consumer groups.”



That law, opposed by left-wing activists, made it more difficult for consumers to obtain bankruptcy protection in the federal courts. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) opposed the 2005 bankruptcy legislation at the time.



The Bidens’ obvious intergenerational corruption is beginning to worry some left-wing journalists like Ryan Grim at The Intercept who argues in a paywalled article that Democrats need to come clean about the Bidens if they are to salvage the 2020 presidential election.



“The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication — and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden.”



Grim cannot resist being childish and petty, referring to presidential son Eric Trump by the awkward neologism “failson,” whatever that means.



But leftists are going to find it hard to ignore the mountain of evidence accumulating about the Bidens.



On Sean Hannity’s television show Solomon said the U.S. government knew the government of Ukraine intended to examine the activities of Burisma Holdings, which employed Hunter Biden and paid him a spectacularly generous salary even though the younger Biden lacked expertise in the energy field.



The report is important because it mothballs Trump-hating Democrats’ false talking point that the president threatened during the storied phone call to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if its new president failed to launch a probe into Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role there.



“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” Solomon said. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still the president of Ukraine at that time.



Solomon said that earlier this year NABU, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, asked to reopen an investigation into Burisma and owner Mykola Zlochevsky, and the probe began. It led to a 15-page “Notice of Suspicion” being lodged that alleged that “illicit funds” were moving through Burisma, he said.



This information was left out of the U.S. intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint, itself a bungled report on the July 25 phone call, against President Trump that was filed in September, Solomon said.



Solomon noted this allegation of “illicit funds” partly coincides with Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board, which reportedly brought him up to $1 million a year. He added that Ukrainian investigators filed the Notice of Suspicion stating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”



“A month later, in April, the prosecutor’s office -- open-source intelligence, again -- the U.S. government officials confirming they were aware of this -- made a request of another investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records,” Solomon said.



“That is a significant change in the timeline -- it was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint, and the question is did he not know it or did he exclude it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was trying to write,” he said.


“That’s a question for Congress to answer.”

Indeed it is!!!

------------

What?! You mean he was investigating corruption JUST BECAUSE IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE?! Another subversive. I won’t believe it. No no no no. It can’t be true. It’s just a conspiracy to get Joe Biden because he’d otherwise beat Trump like a drum! It’s true! It has to be true! GNASH! SNARL!/that’s how you do parody, Schiff.

“What do you think about graft, your excellency?”
“It’s a living.”

—Groucho

You have to imagine a world where Hillary won. Hunter would be on 6 other boards by now

 

[easyt65]

None of which has a thing to do with the fact that Trump personally held back funding to the Ukraine.

Sorry, lil' snowflake, but the entire 'Collusion Delusion 2.0' has been debunked. Every bit of it. There is ZERO evidence.

According to you, the US President is lying, the Ukraine PM is lying, the Ukraine Military Commander is lying, Volker is lying...everyone except Adam Schiff is lying...Schiff, the admitted classified leaker who lied for 2 years about having direct evidence of crimes committed by the President, who was just recently caught lying about having no contact with the Whistle Blower, who was caught lying in a committee hearing during which he tried to present fiction he wrote himself as actual evidence....


BWUHAHAHAHAHA

'Nuff said...

 

[Skylar]

None of which has a thing to do with the fact that Trump personally held back funding to the Ukraine.

Sorry, lil' snowflake, but the entire 'Collusion Delusion 2.0' has been debunked. Every bit of it.

Except of course, it hasn't.

There is ZERO evidence.

That's not what the IC IG concluded, instead finding the whistleblower complaint both credible and urgent.

With the CIA's top lawyer finding the evidence so compelling that she requested a criminal inquiry into the President.

And of course, the transcript is hellaciously damning. With Trump undeniably soliciting a foreign government to investigate his leading political rival.

You can ignore all the evidence. But you can't make us ignore it. Which is why support for impeaching the president is at an all time high, at 55% per even Fox News polls.

Ignore as you will. It doesn't matter.

 

[easyt65]

None of which has a thing to do with the fact that Trump personally held back funding to the Ukraine.

Sorry, lil' snowflake, but the entire 'Collusion Delusion 2.0' has been debunked. Every bit of it.

Except of course, it hasn't.

There is ZERO evidence.

That's not what the IC IG concluded, instead finding the whistleblower complaint both credible and urgent.

With the CIA's top lawyer finding the evidence so compelling that she requested a criminal inquiry into the President.

And of course, the transcript is hellaciously damning. With Trump undeniably soliciting a foreign government to investigate his leading political rival.

You can ignore all the evidence. But you can't make us ignore it. Which is why support for impeaching the president is at an all time high, at 55% per even Fox News polls.

Ignore as you will. It doesn't matter.

Again, there is no evidence - it has all been debunked....but you keep believing Schiff and Deep State moles who have no 1st-hand account info....

Bwuhahahaha

 

[AntonToo]

None of which has a thing to do with the fact that Trump personally held back funding to the Ukraine.

Sorry, lil' snowflake, but the entire 'Collusion Delusion 2.0' has been debunked. Every bit of it.

Except of course, it hasn't.

There is ZERO evidence.

That's not what the IC IG concluded, instead finding the whistleblower complaint both credible and urgent.

With the CIA's top lawyer finding the evidence so compelling that she requested a criminal inquiry into the President.

And of course, the transcript is hellaciously damning. With Trump undeniably soliciting a foreign government to investigate his leading political rival.

You can ignore all the evidence. But you can't make us ignore it. Which is why support for impeaching the president is at an all time high, at 55% per even Fox News polls.

Ignore as you will. It doesn't matter.

Again, there is no evidence

What. The. Fuck. Is. Wrong. With. You?

"No evidence" after Trump holds up the military aid and (as WH transcript clearly shows) gets on the phone with Ukranian president to tell him Ukraine is not recieprocating generous American help and how they need to investigate his political opposition?

"No evidence" after envoy to Ukraine in private texts is questioning why the fuck President is trading foreign policy for personal political gain?

"No evidence" after multiple whistleblowers came forward with what NSA Inspector Genereal called credible and urgent matter for Congress to consider?

"No evidence" after it was testified to Congress that John Bolton called this fiasco a "drug deal" he wanted no part of and advised Hill to notify White House lawyers?


You are either retarded or have been in a coma for the last 2 weeks.

 

[easyt65]

What. The. Fuck. Is. Wrong. With. You?

"No evidence" after Trump holds up the military aid and (as WH transcript clearly shows) gets on the phone with Ukranian president to tell him Ukraine is not recieprocating generous American help and how they need to investigate his political opposition?

Yeah, no evidence. As pointed out, that lie has been debunked already several times from several different angles.

Again, Ukraine was already investigating. There was no pressure put on Ukraine's PM ... according to the Ukraine PM, the transcript of the call, and Volker.

The only ones who say differently are Trump-hating Conspirators and snowflakes, none of which have actual 1st-hand account information of the event, the latest being this Soros-connected, butt-hurt-Bolton aide who wasn't even there at the time.

Thank you, however, for sharing you emotionally manipulatedand ignorant, unsubstantiated. opinion

 

[airplanemechanic]

The transcript debunked the false accusation

Dude...we all read it. It SCREWED Trump

Really? Care to explain to everyone why the president of the United States cannot ask for assistance from a foreign gov't in investigating the behavior of a past vice president while he was in office when there is overwhelming evidence of corruption? Biden being a candidate for president now does not absolve him of investigation for past illegal behavior or make him totally immune to investigation by the current president.

Please quote the law that makes that what Trump did illegal.

It's already been proven Trump had discussed withholding money from them before the phone call and they weren't even aware he was withholding it anyway. So quid pro quo is dead.

 

[Bush92]

Frontpage Mag ^ | 10/15/2019

Officials in Ukraine reportedly opened an investigation into an energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son long before President Donald Trump’s July 25 nothing-burger of a telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the Democrats’ haphazard, increasingly Kafkaesque impeachment inquiry.



The time element of the revelation, devastating as it is to the 2016-election-nullification push disguised as an impeachment process, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media which is overly preoccupied –as usual— attacking President Trump.



The information came last week from investigative reporter John Solomon, who recently was hired as a Fox News contributor, after Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said Oct. 4 he plans to review previous corruption investigations into Hunter Biden and his former employer, Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. Hunter got the job in 2014 while his father was the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine.



Solomon’s growing prominence in the media ecosystem means that leftist journalists –when they’re not busy making excuses for the secretive un-American Star Chamber-like impeachment process initiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi– now feel obligated to engage in character-assassination efforts against him.



For example, Casey Michel, who boasts about being a former Peace Corps volunteer in Kazakhstan and supposedly a former “investigative reporter” at failed George Soros-funded media outlet ThinkProgress, launched a venomous, lie-packed Media Matters-style hit piece against Solomon as he moved to Fox.



In the sleazy, tabloid-like Daily Beast, Michel mocked the respected veteran newsman from the Washington Times and The Hill as “the self-proclaimed journalist at the heart of the unfolding scandal involving Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani, and the impending impeachment of Donald Trump.”



Solomon’s work “has underpinned the entire cascade of lies the White House and Trump in particular have pushed over the past few weeks,” and is “drenched in innuendo and mischaracterizations, all in service of attacking Trump’s political opponents,” he wrote.



Meanwhile, more information is beginning to emerge about the charmed life of ne’er-do-well Hunter Biden who throughout his adult life has kept blundering into highly lucrative job opportunities because his father was famous and politically powerful.



A handful of media outlets reminded readers of the August 2008 news story –when Joe Biden was still a U.S. senator representing Delaware— about Hunter Biden being paid “an undisclosed amount of money as a consultant by MBNA, the largest employer in Delaware, during the years the senator supported legislation that was promoted by the credit card industry and opposed by consumer groups.”



That law, opposed by left-wing activists, made it more difficult for consumers to obtain bankruptcy protection in the federal courts. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) opposed the 2005 bankruptcy legislation at the time.



The Bidens’ obvious intergenerational corruption is beginning to worry some left-wing journalists like Ryan Grim at The Intercept who argues in a paywalled article that Democrats need to come clean about the Bidens if they are to salvage the 2020 presidential election.



“The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication — and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden.”



Grim cannot resist being childish and petty, referring to presidential son Eric Trump by the awkward neologism “failson,” whatever that means.



But leftists are going to find it hard to ignore the mountain of evidence accumulating about the Bidens.



On Sean Hannity’s television show Solomon said the U.S. government knew the government of Ukraine intended to examine the activities of Burisma Holdings, which employed Hunter Biden and paid him a spectacularly generous salary even though the younger Biden lacked expertise in the energy field.



The report is important because it mothballs Trump-hating Democrats’ false talking point that the president threatened during the storied phone call to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if its new president failed to launch a probe into Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role there.



“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” Solomon said. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still the president of Ukraine at that time.



Solomon said that earlier this year NABU, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, asked to reopen an investigation into Burisma and owner Mykola Zlochevsky, and the probe began. It led to a 15-page “Notice of Suspicion” being lodged that alleged that “illicit funds” were moving through Burisma, he said.



This information was left out of the U.S. intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint, itself a bungled report on the July 25 phone call, against President Trump that was filed in September, Solomon said.



Solomon noted this allegation of “illicit funds” partly coincides with Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board, which reportedly brought him up to $1 million a year. He added that Ukrainian investigators filed the Notice of Suspicion stating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”



“A month later, in April, the prosecutor’s office -- open-source intelligence, again -- the U.S. government officials confirming they were aware of this -- made a request of another investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records,” Solomon said.



“That is a significant change in the timeline -- it was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint, and the question is did he not know it or did he exclude it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was trying to write,” he said.


“That’s a question for Congress to answer.”

Indeed it is!!!

------------

What?! You mean he was investigating corruption JUST BECAUSE IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE?! Another subversive. I won’t believe it. No no no no. It can’t be true. It’s just a conspiracy to get Joe Biden because he’d otherwise beat Trump like a drum! It’s true! It has to be true! GNASH! SNARL!/that’s how you do parody, Schiff.

“What do you think about graft, your excellency?”
“It’s a living.”

—Groucho

Exactly why the Democrats argument doesn’t hold weight. The dope fiend who fucked his dead brother’s wife was dropping daddy’s name to make $$$.

 

[Bush92]

It is a coup.

 

[AntonToo]

What. The. Fuck. Is. Wrong. With. You?

"No evidence" after Trump holds up the military aid and (as WH transcript clearly shows) gets on the phone with Ukranian president to tell him Ukraine is not recieprocating generous American help and how they need to investigate his political opposition?

Yeah, no evidence. As pointed out, that lie has been debunked already several times from several different angles.

Horseshit, no it wasn't "debunked" stop making up bs.

I've posted the chew up of the Quid Pro Quo play by Trump on the call many many times and there has been ZERO refute. Your post is just one more non-refute.

No one is home in Trumpster movement, it's just a bunch of braindead dupes noding at never ending bullshit parade.

 

[easyt65]

Horseshit, no it wasn't "debunked" stop making up bs.
I've posted the chew up of the Quid Pro Quo play by Trump on the call many times and there has been ZERO refute.

The 'Collusion Delusion 2.0: Ukraine' has already been completely debunked:
- 2nd-hand account info from a Deep State CIA Agent who worked with and supports Biden
- The Transcript destroyed the false narrative
- The Ukraine PM destroyed the false narrative
- The head of the Ukraine military destroyed the false narrative
- Volker destroyed the false narrative
- D-Schiff destroyed his own narrative by trying to pass off is own fictional account of the call as 'evidence'
** D-Schiff could be Censured soon for this as support continues to grow to force a vote on it
** An Ethics Violation Complaint has been filed against him for demonstrating a willingness to collaborate with foreign politicians to acquire 'dirt' on the President to help remove the President from Office'
- The fact that the Ukraine aide was sent destroys the narrative
- The fact that the Ukraine Prosecutor said they opened up an investigation before taking to Trump destroys the false narrative
- The existence of a Mutual Assistance and Cooperation Treaty that establishes a program in which nations help each other investigate crime, corruption and terrorism, one that is initiated by one leader requesting the assistance of the other completely destroys the false narrative.

But if you want 'Quid Pro Quo':

CNN's Chris Cuomo admits Biden 'absolutely' engaged in quid pro quo with Ukraine, but not for 'personal advantage'

"CNN anchor Chris Cuomo made a rare concession on Wednesday night when he said former Vice President Joe Biden "absolutely" engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukraine but not for his "personal advantage."

 

[g5000]

Frontpage Mag ^ | 10/15/2019

Officials in Ukraine reportedly opened an investigation into an energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son long before President Donald Trump’s July 25 nothing-burger of a telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the Democrats’ haphazard, increasingly Kafkaesque impeachment inquiry.



The time element of the revelation, devastating as it is to the 2016-election-nullification push disguised as an impeachment process, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media which is overly preoccupied –as usual— attacking President Trump.



The information came last week from investigative reporter John Solomon, who recently was hired as a Fox News contributor, after Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said Oct. 4 he plans to review previous corruption investigations into Hunter Biden and his former employer, Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. Hunter got the job in 2014 while his father was the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine.



Solomon’s growing prominence in the media ecosystem means that leftist journalists –when they’re not busy making excuses for the secretive un-American Star Chamber-like impeachment process initiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi– now feel obligated to engage in character-assassination efforts against him.



For example, Casey Michel, who boasts about being a former Peace Corps volunteer in Kazakhstan and supposedly a former “investigative reporter” at failed George Soros-funded media outlet ThinkProgress, launched a venomous, lie-packed Media Matters-style hit piece against Solomon as he moved to Fox.



In the sleazy, tabloid-like Daily Beast, Michel mocked the respected veteran newsman from the Washington Times and The Hill as “the self-proclaimed journalist at the heart of the unfolding scandal involving Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani, and the impending impeachment of Donald Trump.”



Solomon’s work “has underpinned the entire cascade of lies the White House and Trump in particular have pushed over the past few weeks,” and is “drenched in innuendo and mischaracterizations, all in service of attacking Trump’s political opponents,” he wrote.



Meanwhile, more information is beginning to emerge about the charmed life of ne’er-do-well Hunter Biden who throughout his adult life has kept blundering into highly lucrative job opportunities because his father was famous and politically powerful.



A handful of media outlets reminded readers of the August 2008 news story –when Joe Biden was still a U.S. senator representing Delaware— about Hunter Biden being paid “an undisclosed amount of money as a consultant by MBNA, the largest employer in Delaware, during the years the senator supported legislation that was promoted by the credit card industry and opposed by consumer groups.”



That law, opposed by left-wing activists, made it more difficult for consumers to obtain bankruptcy protection in the federal courts. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) opposed the 2005 bankruptcy legislation at the time.



The Bidens’ obvious intergenerational corruption is beginning to worry some left-wing journalists like Ryan Grim at The Intercept who argues in a paywalled article that Democrats need to come clean about the Bidens if they are to salvage the 2020 presidential election.



“The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication — and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden.”



Grim cannot resist being childish and petty, referring to presidential son Eric Trump by the awkward neologism “failson,” whatever that means.



But leftists are going to find it hard to ignore the mountain of evidence accumulating about the Bidens.



On Sean Hannity’s television show Solomon said the U.S. government knew the government of Ukraine intended to examine the activities of Burisma Holdings, which employed Hunter Biden and paid him a spectacularly generous salary even though the younger Biden lacked expertise in the energy field.



The report is important because it mothballs Trump-hating Democrats’ false talking point that the president threatened during the storied phone call to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if its new president failed to launch a probe into Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role there.



“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” Solomon said. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still the president of Ukraine at that time.



Solomon said that earlier this year NABU, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, asked to reopen an investigation into Burisma and owner Mykola Zlochevsky, and the probe began. It led to a 15-page “Notice of Suspicion” being lodged that alleged that “illicit funds” were moving through Burisma, he said.



This information was left out of the U.S. intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint, itself a bungled report on the July 25 phone call, against President Trump that was filed in September, Solomon said.



Solomon noted this allegation of “illicit funds” partly coincides with Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board, which reportedly brought him up to $1 million a year. He added that Ukrainian investigators filed the Notice of Suspicion stating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”



“A month later, in April, the prosecutor’s office -- open-source intelligence, again -- the U.S. government officials confirming they were aware of this -- made a request of another investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records,” Solomon said.



“That is a significant change in the timeline -- it was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint, and the question is did he not know it or did he exclude it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was trying to write,” he said.


“That’s a question for Congress to answer.”

Indeed it is!!!

------------

What?! You mean he was investigating corruption JUST BECAUSE IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE?! Another subversive. I won’t believe it. No no no no. It can’t be true. It’s just a conspiracy to get Joe Biden because he’d otherwise beat Trump like a drum! It’s true! It has to be true! GNASH! SNARL!/that’s how you do parody, Schiff.

“What do you think about graft, your excellency?”
“It’s a living.”

—Groucho

Pretty sure you are violating forum rules by copying and pasting all that, parrot.

Secondly, the investigation into Burisma began and ended BEFORE Biden joined the board.

Goddam, you people are being led around by the nose!