Ukraine Was Investigating Hunter Biden Before Trump’s Phone Call: A revelation alters the timeline

Horseshit, no it wasn't "debunked" stop making up bs.
I've posted the chew up of the Quid Pro Quo play by Trump on the call many times and there has been ZERO refute.

The 'Collusion Delusion 2.0: Ukraine' has already been completely debunked:
- 2nd-hand account info from a Deep State CIA Agent who worked with and supports Biden
- The Transcript destroyed the false narrative
- The Ukraine PM destroyed the false narrative
- The head of the Ukraine military destroyed the false narrative
- Volker destroyed the false narrative
- D-Schiff destroyed his own narrative by trying to pass off is own fictional account of the call as 'evidence'
** D-Schiff could be Censured soon for this as support continues to grow to force a vote on it
** An Ethics Violation Complaint has been filed against him for demonstrating a willingness to collaborate with foreign politicians to acquire 'dirt' on the President to help remove the President from Office'
- The fact that the Ukraine aide was sent destroys the narrative
- The fact that the Ukraine Prosecutor said they opened up an investigation before taking to Trump destroys the false narrative
- The existence of a Mutual Assistance and Cooperation Treaty that establishes a program in which nations help each other investigate crime, corruption and terrorism, one that is initiated by one leader requesting the assistance of the other completely destroys the false narrative.

But if you want 'Quid Pro Quo':

CNN's Chris Cuomo admits Biden 'absolutely' engaged in quid pro quo with Ukraine, but not for 'personal advantage'

"CNN anchor Chris Cuomo made a rare concession on Wednesday night when he said former Vice President Joe Biden "absolutely" engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukraine but not for his "personal advantage."

Moron straight from the fucking text of the call:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conte...MBa2SSG1bumdyNoJhXVCDNtBYugM-klXGctnWce6qDjD0

Trump: "I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time.....the United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very . good to Ukraine."

So thats Trump talking about Ukraine not reciprocating generous American Aid that he has held up (thats the Quid)

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though ...I would like you to find out what happened with this whole siuation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike....The oter thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. (the Quo)....I will. have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to· the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out.

And thats Trump following up the Quid with the Quo of Ukraine investigating Crowdstrike and Bidens.


All of this is confrmed by internal communications of the Ukranian envoy where apropriateness of holding up millitary aid for political dirt is questioned. It is now re-inforced by Hill's testimony that she and Bolton (who in his own words "wanted nothing to do with this drug deal") went to National Security Council lawyer to document this matter next day after this call.


When you say "The Transcript destroyed the false narrative" you again show yourself the brainless idiot dupe I say you are. No sane, honest person who ACTUALLY READ the transcript of the call would consider it to be anything less than damning for Trump.
 
Horseshit, no it wasn't "debunked" stop making up bs.
I've posted the chew up of the Quid Pro Quo play by Trump on the call many times and there has been ZERO refute.

The 'Collusion Delusion 2.0: Ukraine' has already been completely debunked:
- 2nd-hand account info from a Deep State CIA Agent who worked with and supports Biden
- The Transcript destroyed the false narrative
- The Ukraine PM destroyed the false narrative
- The head of the Ukraine military destroyed the false narrative
- Volker destroyed the false narrative
- D-Schiff destroyed his own narrative by trying to pass off is own fictional account of the call as 'evidence'
** D-Schiff could be Censured soon for this as support continues to grow to force a vote on it
** An Ethics Violation Complaint has been filed against him for demonstrating a willingness to collaborate with foreign politicians to acquire 'dirt' on the President to help remove the President from Office'
- The fact that the Ukraine aide was sent destroys the narrative
- The fact that the Ukraine Prosecutor said they opened up an investigation before taking to Trump destroys the false narrative
- The existence of a Mutual Assistance and Cooperation Treaty that establishes a program in which nations help each other investigate crime, corruption and terrorism, one that is initiated by one leader requesting the assistance of the other completely destroys the false narrative.

But if you want 'Quid Pro Quo':

CNN's Chris Cuomo admits Biden 'absolutely' engaged in quid pro quo with Ukraine, but not for 'personal advantage'

"CNN anchor Chris Cuomo made a rare concession on Wednesday night when he said former Vice President Joe Biden "absolutely" engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukraine but not for his "personal advantage."

Moron straight from the fucking text of the call:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conte...MBa2SSG1bumdyNoJhXVCDNtBYugM-klXGctnWce6qDjD0

Trump: "I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time.....the United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very . good to Ukraine."

So thats Trump talking about Ukraine not reciprocating generous American Aid that he has held up (thats the Quid)

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though ...I would like you to find out what happened with this whole siuation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike....The oter thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. (the Quo)....I will. have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to· the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out.

And thats Trump following up the Quid with the Quo of Ukraine investigating Crowdstrike and Bidens.


All of this is confrmed by internal communications of the Ukranian envoy where apropriateness of holding up millitary aid for political dirt is questioned. It is now re-inforced by Hill's testimony that she and Bolton (who in his own words "wanted nothing to do with this drug deal") went to National Security Council lawyer to document this matter next day after this call.


When you say "The Transcript destroyed the false narrative" you again show yourself the brainless idiot dupe I say you are. No sane, honest person who ACTUALLY READ the transcript of the call would consider it to be anything less than damning for Trump.

Bwuhahahahahaha......of course Trump-hating, butt-hurt snowflakes can make up their own translation of what the transcript said.

The fact is the transcript does NOT say what you claim it does. Proof? Having access to this same transcript YOU claim shows there was a 'Quid Pro Quo', Schiff recognized that the transcript does NOT say what you claim it does...which is why the SOB authored his own fictional account of the conversation and attempted to pass it off as the actual transcript / what was said.

If the transcript said what you claimed it does Schiff would not have had to crate a fictional account of the phone call and attempt to pass it off as what was actually said!

He was busted for that, and right now 140+ House members are forcing a petition to Censure Schiff for is seditious lie / attempt to defraud the country and incite a call for Impeachment based on HIS written BS 'parody'.

Even Nancy Pelosi believed Schiff's initial lie, declaring what Schiff read was TRIUMP'S OWN WORDS...only to end up looking like an imbecile when Schiff as forced to admit it was a lie.

“I want the American people to know what that phone call was about. I want them to hear, it. So yeah it’s fair,” she said. “It’s sad, but it’s using the president’s own words.”
- Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
** Nancy Pelosi On Schiff's Made Up Trump Phone Call: 'He Did Not Make It Up'

Based on your own posts Pelosi was not the only idiot duped by Schiff's lie.
 
Horseshit, no it wasn't "debunked" stop making up bs.
I've posted the chew up of the Quid Pro Quo play by Trump on the call many times and there has been ZERO refute.

The 'Collusion Delusion 2.0: Ukraine' has already been completely debunked:
- 2nd-hand account info from a Deep State CIA Agent who worked with and supports Biden
- The Transcript destroyed the false narrative
- The Ukraine PM destroyed the false narrative
- The head of the Ukraine military destroyed the false narrative
- Volker destroyed the false narrative
- D-Schiff destroyed his own narrative by trying to pass off is own fictional account of the call as 'evidence'
** D-Schiff could be Censured soon for this as support continues to grow to force a vote on it
** An Ethics Violation Complaint has been filed against him for demonstrating a willingness to collaborate with foreign politicians to acquire 'dirt' on the President to help remove the President from Office'
- The fact that the Ukraine aide was sent destroys the narrative
- The fact that the Ukraine Prosecutor said they opened up an investigation before taking to Trump destroys the false narrative
- The existence of a Mutual Assistance and Cooperation Treaty that establishes a program in which nations help each other investigate crime, corruption and terrorism, one that is initiated by one leader requesting the assistance of the other completely destroys the false narrative.

But if you want 'Quid Pro Quo':

CNN's Chris Cuomo admits Biden 'absolutely' engaged in quid pro quo with Ukraine, but not for 'personal advantage'

"CNN anchor Chris Cuomo made a rare concession on Wednesday night when he said former Vice President Joe Biden "absolutely" engaged in a quid pro quo with Ukraine but not for his "personal advantage."

Moron straight from the fucking text of the call:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conte...MBa2SSG1bumdyNoJhXVCDNtBYugM-klXGctnWce6qDjD0

Trump: "I will say that we do a lot for Ukraine. We spend a lot of effort and a lot of time.....the United States has been very very good to Ukraine. I wouldn't say that it's reciprocal necessarily because things are happening that are not good but the United States has been very very . good to Ukraine."

So thats Trump talking about Ukraine not reciprocating generous American Aid that he has held up (thats the Quid)

Trump: I would like you to do us a favor though ...I would like you to find out what happened with this whole siuation with Ukraine, they say Crowdstrike....The oter thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that. (the Quo)....I will. have Mr. Giuliani give you a call and I am also going to have Attorney General Barr call and we will get to· the bottom of it. I'm sure you will figure it out.

And thats Trump following up the Quid with the Quo of Ukraine investigating Crowdstrike and Bidens.


All of this is confrmed by internal communications of the Ukranian envoy where apropriateness of holding up millitary aid for political dirt is questioned. It is now re-inforced by Hill's testimony that she and Bolton (who in his own words "wanted nothing to do with this drug deal") went to National Security Council lawyer to document this matter next day after this call.


When you say "The Transcript destroyed the false narrative" you again show yourself the brainless idiot dupe I say you are. No sane, honest person who ACTUALLY READ the transcript of the call would consider it to be anything less than damning for Trump.

Bwuhahahahahaha......of course Trump-hating, butt-hurt snowflakes can make up their own translation of what the transcript said.

The fact is the transcript does NOT say what you claim it does. Proof? Having access to this same transcript YOU claim shows there was a 'Quid Pro Quo'


You are completely fucking nuts.

Absolutely Trump talks about Ukraine not recieprocating generous American aid that he held up. You can deny it all you want but it is IN BLACK AND WHITE, right in the transcript WH released.

Absolutely Trump is asking for Ukranian president to investigate Crowdstrike and Bidens. Again, you can deny it all you want but it is IN BLACK AND WHITE, right in the transcript WH released.
 
Last edited:
What To Know About The Ukrainian Company At The Heart Of Trump's Biden Allegations

On Friday, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, Ukraine's newly appointed chief prosecutor, told reporters his office will review all investigations shelved by his predecessors, including those involving Burisma and Zlochevsky. Those investigations were into activities that took place before Hunter Biden joined the board in 2014.

All caught up now, parrots?
 
Last edited:
Absolutely Trump talks about Ukraine not recieprocating generous American aid that he held up. You can deny it all you want but it is IN BLACK AND WHITE, right in the transcript WH released.

Absolutely Trump is asking for Ukranian president to investigate Crowdstrike and Bidens. Again, you can deny it all you want but it is IN BLACK AND WHITE, right in the transcript WH released.
Regurgitating the same ol' Democrat / Socialist opinionated emotional talking points results in the same outcome - FAIL!

Ukraine PM said it never happened.
Ukraine Ambassador said it never happened.
Transcript shows it never happened.
Volker said it never happened.
Ukraine prosecutors / Criminal authorities stated an investigation has already been opened.
No aid was every held up - it was delivered.
D-Schiff abandoned the claim - refused to use the transcript and ended up writing his own because the actual transcript did not show any

Snowflakes like you continue to ignore the existing Mutual Law Enforcement Assistance and Cooperation treaties which establish a process in which one nation assists the other in investigations of corruption, crime, and terrorism, a process that is initiated by one leader asking assistance of another, which is exactly what President Trump did.

'Do us a favor....'

Asking for a favor - a friendly way of asking for assistance. The President does not Extort, as Biden confessed to on video-tape, the Ukraine PM. The Ukraine PM, in fact, says what Democrats / snowflakes are claiming NEVER HAPPENED....but we are supposed to ignore the individual actually on the phone and accept your hate-driven, emotionally manipulated OPINION / translation, not even 2nd, erd, 4th, or 5th-hand account information.

Bwuhahahahahaha. Good one, lil' snowflake.
 
There is a steady stream of witnesses now testifying before Congress that they were all alarmed by Trump's collusion with Giuliani and Zelensky.

They were raising alarms and notifying legal authorities long before the infamous phone call.
 
Frontpage Mag ^ | 10/15/2019

hunter.jpg



Officials in Ukraine reportedly opened an investigation into an energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son long before President Donald Trump’s July 25 nothing-burger of a telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the Democrats’ haphazard, increasingly Kafkaesque impeachment inquiry.



The time element of the revelation, devastating as it is to the 2016-election-nullification push disguised as an impeachment process, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media which is overly preoccupied –as usual— attacking President Trump.



The information came last week from investigative reporter John Solomon, who recently was hired as a Fox News contributor, after Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said Oct. 4 he plans to review previous corruption investigations into Hunter Biden and his former employer, Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. Hunter got the job in 2014 while his father was the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine.



Solomon’s growing prominence in the media ecosystem means that leftist journalists –when they’re not busy making excuses for the secretive un-American Star Chamber-like impeachment process initiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi– now feel obligated to engage in character-assassination efforts against him.



For example, Casey Michel, who boasts about being a former Peace Corps volunteer in Kazakhstan and supposedly a former “investigative reporter” at failed George Soros-funded media outlet ThinkProgress, launched a venomous, lie-packed Media Matters-style hit piece against Solomon as he moved to Fox.



In the sleazy, tabloid-like Daily Beast, Michel mocked the respected veteran newsman from the Washington Times and The Hill as “the self-proclaimed journalist at the heart of the unfolding scandal involving Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani, and the impending impeachment of Donald Trump.”



Solomon’s work “has underpinned the entire cascade of lies the White House and Trump in particular have pushed over the past few weeks,” and is “drenched in innuendo and mischaracterizations, all in service of attacking Trump’s political opponents,” he wrote.



Meanwhile, more information is beginning to emerge about the charmed life of ne’er-do-well Hunter Biden who throughout his adult life has kept blundering into highly lucrative job opportunities because his father was famous and politically powerful.



A handful of media outlets reminded readers of the August 2008 news story –when Joe Biden was still a U.S. senator representing Delaware— about Hunter Biden being paid “an undisclosed amount of money as a consultant by MBNA, the largest employer in Delaware, during the years the senator supported legislation that was promoted by the credit card industry and opposed by consumer groups.”



That law, opposed by left-wing activists, made it more difficult for consumers to obtain bankruptcy protection in the federal courts. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) opposed the 2005 bankruptcy legislation at the time.



The Bidens’ obvious intergenerational corruption is beginning to worry some left-wing journalists like Ryan Grim at The Intercept who argues in a paywalled article that Democrats need to come clean about the Bidens if they are to salvage the 2020 presidential election.



“The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication — and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden.”



Grim cannot resist being childish and petty, referring to presidential son Eric Trump by the awkward neologism “failson,” whatever that means.



But leftists are going to find it hard to ignore the mountain of evidence accumulating about the Bidens.



On Sean Hannity’s television show Solomon said the U.S. government knew the government of Ukraine intended to examine the activities of Burisma Holdings, which employed Hunter Biden and paid him a spectacularly generous salary even though the younger Biden lacked expertise in the energy field.



The report is important because it mothballs Trump-hating Democrats’ false talking point that the president threatened during the storied phone call to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if its new president failed to launch a probe into Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role there.



“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” Solomon said. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still the president of Ukraine at that time.



Solomon said that earlier this year NABU, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, asked to reopen an investigation into Burisma and owner Mykola Zlochevsky, and the probe began. It led to a 15-page “Notice of Suspicion” being lodged that alleged that “illicit funds” were moving through Burisma, he said.



This information was left out of the U.S. intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint, itself a bungled report on the July 25 phone call, against President Trump that was filed in September, Solomon said.



Solomon noted this allegation of “illicit funds” partly coincides with Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board, which reportedly brought him up to $1 million a year. He added that Ukrainian investigators filed the Notice of Suspicion stating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”



“A month later, in April, the prosecutor’s office -- open-source intelligence, again -- the U.S. government officials confirming they were aware of this -- made a request of another investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records,” Solomon said.



“That is a significant change in the timeline -- it was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint, and the question is did he not know it or did he exclude it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was trying to write,” he said.


“That’s a question for Congress to answer.”

Indeed it is!!!

------------

What?! You mean he was investigating corruption JUST BECAUSE IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE?! Another subversive. I won’t believe it. No no no no. It can’t be true. It’s just a conspiracy to get Joe Biden because he’d otherwise beat Trump like a drum! It’s true! It has to be true! GNASH! SNARL!/that’s how you do parody, Schiff.

“What do you think about graft, your excellency?”
“It’s a living.”

—Groucho
Pretty sure you are violating forum rules by copying and pasting all that, parrot.

Secondly, the investigation into Burisma began and ended BEFORE Biden joined the board.

Goddam, you people are being led around by the nose!
No one has notified me...but I'm sure you will try to get VIDEOS BANNED especially when they bitch slap your lying asss...and show us a link or 2 stating Hunter wasn't there when the investigation was going on as Jojo Had the prosecutor FIRED or NO $2.5 BILLION in aid!
 
Frontpage Mag ^ | 10/15/2019

hunter.jpg



Officials in Ukraine reportedly opened an investigation into an energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son long before President Donald Trump’s July 25 nothing-burger of a telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the Democrats’ haphazard, increasingly Kafkaesque impeachment inquiry.



The time element of the revelation, devastating as it is to the 2016-election-nullification push disguised as an impeachment process, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media which is overly preoccupied –as usual— attacking President Trump.



The information came last week from investigative reporter John Solomon, who recently was hired as a Fox News contributor, after Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said Oct. 4 he plans to review previous corruption investigations into Hunter Biden and his former employer, Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. Hunter got the job in 2014 while his father was the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine.



Solomon’s growing prominence in the media ecosystem means that leftist journalists –when they’re not busy making excuses for the secretive un-American Star Chamber-like impeachment process initiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi– now feel obligated to engage in character-assassination efforts against him.



For example, Casey Michel, who boasts about being a former Peace Corps volunteer in Kazakhstan and supposedly a former “investigative reporter” at failed George Soros-funded media outlet ThinkProgress, launched a venomous, lie-packed Media Matters-style hit piece against Solomon as he moved to Fox.



In the sleazy, tabloid-like Daily Beast, Michel mocked the respected veteran newsman from the Washington Times and The Hill as “the self-proclaimed journalist at the heart of the unfolding scandal involving Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani, and the impending impeachment of Donald Trump.”



Solomon’s work “has underpinned the entire cascade of lies the White House and Trump in particular have pushed over the past few weeks,” and is “drenched in innuendo and mischaracterizations, all in service of attacking Trump’s political opponents,” he wrote.



Meanwhile, more information is beginning to emerge about the charmed life of ne’er-do-well Hunter Biden who throughout his adult life has kept blundering into highly lucrative job opportunities because his father was famous and politically powerful.



A handful of media outlets reminded readers of the August 2008 news story –when Joe Biden was still a U.S. senator representing Delaware— about Hunter Biden being paid “an undisclosed amount of money as a consultant by MBNA, the largest employer in Delaware, during the years the senator supported legislation that was promoted by the credit card industry and opposed by consumer groups.”



That law, opposed by left-wing activists, made it more difficult for consumers to obtain bankruptcy protection in the federal courts. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) opposed the 2005 bankruptcy legislation at the time.



The Bidens’ obvious intergenerational corruption is beginning to worry some left-wing journalists like Ryan Grim at The Intercept who argues in a paywalled article that Democrats need to come clean about the Bidens if they are to salvage the 2020 presidential election.



“The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication — and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden.”



Grim cannot resist being childish and petty, referring to presidential son Eric Trump by the awkward neologism “failson,” whatever that means.



But leftists are going to find it hard to ignore the mountain of evidence accumulating about the Bidens.



On Sean Hannity’s television show Solomon said the U.S. government knew the government of Ukraine intended to examine the activities of Burisma Holdings, which employed Hunter Biden and paid him a spectacularly generous salary even though the younger Biden lacked expertise in the energy field.



The report is important because it mothballs Trump-hating Democrats’ false talking point that the president threatened during the storied phone call to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if its new president failed to launch a probe into Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role there.



“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” Solomon said. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still the president of Ukraine at that time.



Solomon said that earlier this year NABU, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, asked to reopen an investigation into Burisma and owner Mykola Zlochevsky, and the probe began. It led to a 15-page “Notice of Suspicion” being lodged that alleged that “illicit funds” were moving through Burisma, he said.



This information was left out of the U.S. intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint, itself a bungled report on the July 25 phone call, against President Trump that was filed in September, Solomon said.



Solomon noted this allegation of “illicit funds” partly coincides with Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board, which reportedly brought him up to $1 million a year. He added that Ukrainian investigators filed the Notice of Suspicion stating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”



“A month later, in April, the prosecutor’s office -- open-source intelligence, again -- the U.S. government officials confirming they were aware of this -- made a request of another investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records,” Solomon said.



“That is a significant change in the timeline -- it was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint, and the question is did he not know it or did he exclude it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was trying to write,” he said.


“That’s a question for Congress to answer.”

Indeed it is!!!

------------

What?! You mean he was investigating corruption JUST BECAUSE IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE?! Another subversive. I won’t believe it. No no no no. It can’t be true. It’s just a conspiracy to get Joe Biden because he’d otherwise beat Trump like a drum! It’s true! It has to be true! GNASH! SNARL!/that’s how you do parody, Schiff.

“What do you think about graft, your excellency?”
“It’s a living.”

—Groucho
Pretty sure you are violating forum rules by copying and pasting all that, parrot.

Secondly, the investigation into Burisma began and ended BEFORE Biden joined the board.

Goddam, you people are being led around by the nose!
No one has notified me...but I'm sure you will try to get VIDEOS BANNED especially when they bitch slap your lying asss...and show us a link or 2 stating Hunter wasn't there when the investigation was going on as Jojo Had the prosecutor FIRED or NO $2.5 BILLION in aid!
See post 44. Let me know which words you don't understand.
 
Frontpage Mag ^ | 10/15/2019

hunter.jpg



Officials in Ukraine reportedly opened an investigation into an energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son long before President Donald Trump’s July 25 nothing-burger of a telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the Democrats’ haphazard, increasingly Kafkaesque impeachment inquiry.



The time element of the revelation, devastating as it is to the 2016-election-nullification push disguised as an impeachment process, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media which is overly preoccupied –as usual— attacking President Trump.



The information came last week from investigative reporter John Solomon, who recently was hired as a Fox News contributor, after Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said Oct. 4 he plans to review previous corruption investigations into Hunter Biden and his former employer, Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. Hunter got the job in 2014 while his father was the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine.



Solomon’s growing prominence in the media ecosystem means that leftist journalists –when they’re not busy making excuses for the secretive un-American Star Chamber-like impeachment process initiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi– now feel obligated to engage in character-assassination efforts against him.



For example, Casey Michel, who boasts about being a former Peace Corps volunteer in Kazakhstan and supposedly a former “investigative reporter” at failed George Soros-funded media outlet ThinkProgress, launched a venomous, lie-packed Media Matters-style hit piece against Solomon as he moved to Fox.



In the sleazy, tabloid-like Daily Beast, Michel mocked the respected veteran newsman from the Washington Times and The Hill as “the self-proclaimed journalist at the heart of the unfolding scandal involving Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani, and the impending impeachment of Donald Trump.”



Solomon’s work “has underpinned the entire cascade of lies the White House and Trump in particular have pushed over the past few weeks,” and is “drenched in innuendo and mischaracterizations, all in service of attacking Trump’s political opponents,” he wrote.



Meanwhile, more information is beginning to emerge about the charmed life of ne’er-do-well Hunter Biden who throughout his adult life has kept blundering into highly lucrative job opportunities because his father was famous and politically powerful.



A handful of media outlets reminded readers of the August 2008 news story –when Joe Biden was still a U.S. senator representing Delaware— about Hunter Biden being paid “an undisclosed amount of money as a consultant by MBNA, the largest employer in Delaware, during the years the senator supported legislation that was promoted by the credit card industry and opposed by consumer groups.”



That law, opposed by left-wing activists, made it more difficult for consumers to obtain bankruptcy protection in the federal courts. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) opposed the 2005 bankruptcy legislation at the time.



The Bidens’ obvious intergenerational corruption is beginning to worry some left-wing journalists like Ryan Grim at The Intercept who argues in a paywalled article that Democrats need to come clean about the Bidens if they are to salvage the 2020 presidential election.



“The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication — and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden.”



Grim cannot resist being childish and petty, referring to presidential son Eric Trump by the awkward neologism “failson,” whatever that means.



But leftists are going to find it hard to ignore the mountain of evidence accumulating about the Bidens.



On Sean Hannity’s television show Solomon said the U.S. government knew the government of Ukraine intended to examine the activities of Burisma Holdings, which employed Hunter Biden and paid him a spectacularly generous salary even though the younger Biden lacked expertise in the energy field.



The report is important because it mothballs Trump-hating Democrats’ false talking point that the president threatened during the storied phone call to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if its new president failed to launch a probe into Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role there.



“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” Solomon said. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still the president of Ukraine at that time.



Solomon said that earlier this year NABU, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, asked to reopen an investigation into Burisma and owner Mykola Zlochevsky, and the probe began. It led to a 15-page “Notice of Suspicion” being lodged that alleged that “illicit funds” were moving through Burisma, he said.



This information was left out of the U.S. intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint, itself a bungled report on the July 25 phone call, against President Trump that was filed in September, Solomon said.



Solomon noted this allegation of “illicit funds” partly coincides with Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board, which reportedly brought him up to $1 million a year. He added that Ukrainian investigators filed the Notice of Suspicion stating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”



“A month later, in April, the prosecutor’s office -- open-source intelligence, again -- the U.S. government officials confirming they were aware of this -- made a request of another investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records,” Solomon said.



“That is a significant change in the timeline -- it was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint, and the question is did he not know it or did he exclude it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was trying to write,” he said.


“That’s a question for Congress to answer.”

Indeed it is!!!

------------

What?! You mean he was investigating corruption JUST BECAUSE IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE?! Another subversive. I won’t believe it. No no no no. It can’t be true. It’s just a conspiracy to get Joe Biden because he’d otherwise beat Trump like a drum! It’s true! It has to be true! GNASH! SNARL!/that’s how you do parody, Schiff.

“What do you think about graft, your excellency?”
“It’s a living.”

—Groucho
Pretty sure you are violating forum rules by copying and pasting all that, parrot.

Secondly, the investigation into Burisma began and ended BEFORE Biden joined the board.

Goddam, you people are being led around by the nose!
No one has notified me...but I'm sure you will try to get VIDEOS BANNED especially when they bitch slap your lying asss...and show us a link or 2 stating Hunter wasn't there when the investigation was going on as Jojo Had the prosecutor FIRED or NO $2.5 BILLION in aid!
See post 44. Let me know which words you don't understand.
Dont have to. Your bullshit stands by itself!
 
Sorry Ruskie.....you'll need to go back to Pravda for your next round of talking points for me to debunk.
Screeching RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA removes any shred of credibility you may once have enjoyed.

My points stand on their own.

Which is, of course, why you omitted any of them in your reply. Let me help you;

"Even Trump doesn't deny that he held back funding to the Ukrainians. Ukraine was definitely made to understand that cooperation with the United States was being held back until the corruption investigations were completed .

How do we know? This was the Ukraine's public summary of the call before the shit hit the fan and it became an impeachment issue:


Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

This is why Trump's team desperately tried to keep the transcript hidden. And what spawned multiple whistleblower complaints, an IC IG investigation that found that complaint both credible and urgent, provoked an impeachment inquiry, motivated to the CIA's top lawyer to request an criminal investigation, and sent Trump's people scrambling to hide the transcript on a sever dedicated to top secret conversations of national security importance."
 
Frontpage Mag ^ | 10/15/2019

hunter.jpg



Officials in Ukraine reportedly opened an investigation into an energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son long before President Donald Trump’s July 25 nothing-burger of a telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the Democrats’ haphazard, increasingly Kafkaesque impeachment inquiry.



The time element of the revelation, devastating as it is to the 2016-election-nullification push disguised as an impeachment process, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media which is overly preoccupied –as usual— attacking President Trump.



The information came last week from investigative reporter John Solomon, who recently was hired as a Fox News contributor, after Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said Oct. 4 he plans to review previous corruption investigations into Hunter Biden and his former employer, Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. Hunter got the job in 2014 while his father was the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine.



Solomon’s growing prominence in the media ecosystem means that leftist journalists –when they’re not busy making excuses for the secretive un-American Star Chamber-like impeachment process initiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi– now feel obligated to engage in character-assassination efforts against him.



For example, Casey Michel, who boasts about being a former Peace Corps volunteer in Kazakhstan and supposedly a former “investigative reporter” at failed George Soros-funded media outlet ThinkProgress, launched a venomous, lie-packed Media Matters-style hit piece against Solomon as he moved to Fox.



In the sleazy, tabloid-like Daily Beast, Michel mocked the respected veteran newsman from the Washington Times and The Hill as “the self-proclaimed journalist at the heart of the unfolding scandal involving Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani, and the impending impeachment of Donald Trump.”



Solomon’s work “has underpinned the entire cascade of lies the White House and Trump in particular have pushed over the past few weeks,” and is “drenched in innuendo and mischaracterizations, all in service of attacking Trump’s political opponents,” he wrote.



Meanwhile, more information is beginning to emerge about the charmed life of ne’er-do-well Hunter Biden who throughout his adult life has kept blundering into highly lucrative job opportunities because his father was famous and politically powerful.



A handful of media outlets reminded readers of the August 2008 news story –when Joe Biden was still a U.S. senator representing Delaware— about Hunter Biden being paid “an undisclosed amount of money as a consultant by MBNA, the largest employer in Delaware, during the years the senator supported legislation that was promoted by the credit card industry and opposed by consumer groups.”



That law, opposed by left-wing activists, made it more difficult for consumers to obtain bankruptcy protection in the federal courts. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) opposed the 2005 bankruptcy legislation at the time.



The Bidens’ obvious intergenerational corruption is beginning to worry some left-wing journalists like Ryan Grim at The Intercept who argues in a paywalled article that Democrats need to come clean about the Bidens if they are to salvage the 2020 presidential election.



“The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication — and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden.”



Grim cannot resist being childish and petty, referring to presidential son Eric Trump by the awkward neologism “failson,” whatever that means.



But leftists are going to find it hard to ignore the mountain of evidence accumulating about the Bidens.



On Sean Hannity’s television show Solomon said the U.S. government knew the government of Ukraine intended to examine the activities of Burisma Holdings, which employed Hunter Biden and paid him a spectacularly generous salary even though the younger Biden lacked expertise in the energy field.



The report is important because it mothballs Trump-hating Democrats’ false talking point that the president threatened during the storied phone call to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if its new president failed to launch a probe into Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role there.



“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” Solomon said. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still the president of Ukraine at that time.



Solomon said that earlier this year NABU, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, asked to reopen an investigation into Burisma and owner Mykola Zlochevsky, and the probe began. It led to a 15-page “Notice of Suspicion” being lodged that alleged that “illicit funds” were moving through Burisma, he said.



This information was left out of the U.S. intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint, itself a bungled report on the July 25 phone call, against President Trump that was filed in September, Solomon said.



Solomon noted this allegation of “illicit funds” partly coincides with Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board, which reportedly brought him up to $1 million a year. He added that Ukrainian investigators filed the Notice of Suspicion stating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”



“A month later, in April, the prosecutor’s office -- open-source intelligence, again -- the U.S. government officials confirming they were aware of this -- made a request of another investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records,” Solomon said.



“That is a significant change in the timeline -- it was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint, and the question is did he not know it or did he exclude it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was trying to write,” he said.


“That’s a question for Congress to answer.”

Indeed it is!!!

------------

What?! You mean he was investigating corruption JUST BECAUSE IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE?! Another subversive. I won’t believe it. No no no no. It can’t be true. It’s just a conspiracy to get Joe Biden because he’d otherwise beat Trump like a drum! It’s true! It has to be true! GNASH! SNARL!/that’s how you do parody, Schiff.

“What do you think about graft, your excellency?”
“It’s a living.”

—Groucho
Pretty sure you are violating forum rules by copying and pasting all that, parrot.

Secondly, the investigation into Burisma began and ended BEFORE Biden joined the board.

Goddam, you people are being led around by the nose!
No one has notified me...but I'm sure you will try to get VIDEOS BANNED especially when they bitch slap your lying asss...and show us a link or 2 stating Hunter wasn't there when the investigation was going on as Jojo Had the prosecutor FIRED or NO $2.5 BILLION in aid!
See post 44. Let me know which words you don't understand.
Dont have to. Your bullshit stands by itself!
There's that willful blindness which has become all too familiar in you pseudocons.

"Those investigations were into activities that took place before Hunter Biden joined the board in 2014."
 
Absolutely Trump talks about Ukraine not recieprocating generous American aid that he held up. You can deny it all you want but it is IN BLACK AND WHITE, right in the transcript WH released.

Absolutely Trump is asking for Ukranian president to investigate Crowdstrike and Bidens. Again, you can deny it all you want but it is IN BLACK AND WHITE, right in the transcript WH released.
Regurgitating the same ol' Democrat / Socialist opinionated emotional talking points results in the same outcome - FAIL!

Ukraine PM said it never happened.
Ukraine Ambassador said it never happened.
Transcript shows it never happened.
Volker said it never happened.
Ukraine prosecutors / Criminal authorities stated an investigation has already been opened.
No aid was every held up - it was delivered.
D-Schiff abandoned the claim - refused to use the transcript and ended up writing his own because the actual transcript did not show any

Snowflakes like you continue to ignore the existing Mutual Law Enforcement Assistance and Cooperation treaties which establish a process in which one nation assists the other in investigations of corruption, crime, and terrorism, a process that is initiated by one leader asking assistance of another, which is exactly what President Trump did.

'Do us a favor....'

Asking for a favor - a friendly way of asking for assistance. The President does not Extort, as Biden confessed to on video-tape, the Ukraine PM. The Ukraine PM, in fact, says what Democrats / snowflakes are claiming NEVER HAPPENED....but we are supposed to ignore the individual actually on the phone and accept your hate-driven, emotionally manipulated OPINION / translation, not even 2nd, erd, 4th, or 5th-hand account information.

Bwuhahahahahaha. Good one, lil' snowflake.


Moron, IM QUOTING THE WHITE HOUSE TRANSCRIPT.

Nothing you said refutes any of it.

Trump said Ukraine is not reciprocating the generous American aid (that he is holding back) and from there he goes straight to favors Ukraine ought to do for him in investigating Crowdstrike and Bidens.

Comeback when you could put togather a sane reply.
 
Last edited:
Sorry Ruskie.....you'll need to go back to Pravda for your next round of talking points for me to debunk.
Screeching RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA removes any shred of credibility you may once have enjoyed.

My points stand on their own.

Which is, of course, why you omitted any of them in your reply. Let me help you;

"Even Trump doesn't deny that he held back funding to the Ukrainians. Ukraine was definitely made to understand that cooperation with the United States was being held back until the corruption investigations were completed .

How do we know? This was the Ukraine's public summary of the call before the shit hit the fan and it became an impeachment issue:


Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

This is why Trump's team desperately tried to keep the transcript hidden. And what spawned multiple whistleblower complaints, an IC IG investigation that found that complaint both credible and urgent, provoked an impeachment inquiry, motivated to the CIA's top lawyer to request an criminal investigation, and sent Trump's people scrambling to hide the transcript on a sever dedicated to top secret conversations of national security importance."
Your points are crap. Trump released the transcript as soon as you bozos started shitting your pants in incoherent rage yet again.

Hey, did you hear Pelosi's not going to call for impeachment? That just doesn't stop being funny.
 
BIDENGHAZI - the NEW RW CIRCLE JERK WITHOUT A PIVOT MAN !
 
Sorry Ruskie.....you'll need to go back to Pravda for your next round of talking points for me to debunk.
Screeching RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA removes any shred of credibility you may once have enjoyed.

My points stand on their own.

Which is, of course, why you omitted any of them in your reply. Let me help you;

"Even Trump doesn't deny that he held back funding to the Ukrainians. Ukraine was definitely made to understand that cooperation with the United States was being held back until the corruption investigations were completed .

How do we know? This was the Ukraine's public summary of the call before the shit hit the fan and it became an impeachment issue:


Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

This is why Trump's team desperately tried to keep the transcript hidden. And what spawned multiple whistleblower complaints, an IC IG investigation that found that complaint both credible and urgent, provoked an impeachment inquiry, motivated to the CIA's top lawyer to request an criminal investigation, and sent Trump's people scrambling to hide the transcript on a sever dedicated to top secret conversations of national security importance."
Your points are crap. Trump released the transcript as soon as you bozos started shitting your pants in incoherent rage yet again.

Trump released the transcript....

.....only AFTER he tried to hide it on a national security server in a flagrant abuse of power.

.....only AFTER the whistleblower complaint on the call

.....only AFTER the IC IG investigation found the complaint both credible and urgent

.....only AFTER the CIA head counsel requested a criminal inquiry into the President regarding the call

.....only AFTER Bill Barr did his best to squash the criminal inquiry.

.....only AFTER the merely *existence* of whistleblower complaint was leaked to the press.

.....only AFTER denying the entire story by calling it 'fake news'.

.....only AFTER trying to keep the Whistleblower complaint from Congress once its existence was known.

.....only AFTER ordering the Acting Intelligence Director to withhold testimony to Congress about the Whistleblower complaint.

.....only AFTER stonewalling Congress for weeks on the Whistleblower complaint.

.....only AFTER the specifics of the Whistleblower complaint was leaked to the press.

.....only AFTER months of trying to hide, stonewall, lie about, and suppress the trranscript and the whistleblower complaint....

......did Trump finally release it.

And of course, the release of the transcript was a disaster for Trump. Which is why he and his team went to such elaborate lengths to suppress it.

Hey, did you hear Pelosi's not going to call for impeachment? That just doesn't stop being funny.

Laughing....did you hear the voices in your head say that?
 
Your points are crap. Trump released the transcript as soon as you bozos started shitting your pants in incoherent rage yet again.
Hey, did you hear Pelosi's not going to call for impeachment? That just doesn't stop being funny.

Wow you are clueless.

White House specifically buried (inapropriately) the original transcript in CIA Vault for Top Secret materials.

Administration (illegaly) blocked whistleblower complaint for weeks, untill NSA Inspector General did the right thing to alert Congress and NSA chief threatened to quit if WH didn't release the complaint.

It was only when it became clear that the whistleblower complaint can't be stopped from being delivered to congress did Trump release a memorandum of the call (not direct transcript).
 
Sorry Ruskie.....you'll need to go back to Pravda for your next round of talking points for me to debunk.
Screeching RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA removes any shred of credibility you may once have enjoyed.

My points stand on their own.

Which is, of course, why you omitted any of them in your reply. Let me help you;

"Even Trump doesn't deny that he held back funding to the Ukrainians. Ukraine was definitely made to understand that cooperation with the United States was being held back until the corruption investigations were completed .

How do we know? This was the Ukraine's public summary of the call before the shit hit the fan and it became an impeachment issue:


Donald Trump expressed his conviction that the new Ukrainian government will be able to quickly improve Ukraine's image and complete the investigation of corruption cases that have held back cooperation between Ukraine and the United States."

This is why Trump's team desperately tried to keep the transcript hidden. And what spawned multiple whistleblower complaints, an IC IG investigation that found that complaint both credible and urgent, provoked an impeachment inquiry, motivated to the CIA's top lawyer to request an criminal investigation, and sent Trump's people scrambling to hide the transcript on a sever dedicated to top secret conversations of national security importance."
Your points are crap. Trump released the transcript as soon as you bozos started shitting your pants in incoherent rage yet again.

Trump released the transcript....

.....only AFTER he tried to hide it on a national security server in a flagrant abuse of power.

.....only AFTER the whistleblower complaint on the call

.....only AFTER the IC IG investigation found the complaint both credible and urgent

.....only AFTER the CIA head counsel requested a criminal inquiry into the President regarding the call

.....only AFTER Bill Barr did his best to squash the criminal inquiry.

.....only AFTER the merely *existence* of whistleblower complaint was leaked to the press.

.....only AFTER denying the entire story by calling it 'fake news'.

.....only AFTER trying to keep the Whistleblower complaint from Congress once its existence was known.

.....only AFTER ordering the Acting Intelligence Director to withhold testimony to Congress about the Whistleblower complaint.

.....only AFTER stonewalling Congress for weeks on the Whistleblower complaint.

.....only AFTER the specifics of the Whistleblower complaint was leaked to the press.

.....only AFTER months of trying to hide, stonewall, lie about, and suppress the trranscript and the whistleblower complaint....

......did Trump finally release it.

And of course, the release of the transcript was a disaster for Trump. Which is why he and his team went to such elaborate lengths to suppress it.

Hey, did you hear Pelosi's not going to call for impeachment? That just doesn't stop being funny.

Laughing....did you hear the voices in your head say that?
Oh, the transcript that proves there was no quid pro quo is a disaster for Trump?

I agree, if by "Trump" you mean "Democrats".

Meanwhile, Pelosi's not going to call for a House vote. Your hysterical laughter is meaningless.
 
Frontpage Mag ^ | 10/15/2019

hunter.jpg



Officials in Ukraine reportedly opened an investigation into an energy company that employed former Vice President Joe Biden’s son long before President Donald Trump’s July 25 nothing-burger of a telephone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky that spurred the Democrats’ haphazard, increasingly Kafkaesque impeachment inquiry.



The time element of the revelation, devastating as it is to the 2016-election-nullification push disguised as an impeachment process, has been largely ignored by the mainstream media which is overly preoccupied –as usual— attacking President Trump.



The information came last week from investigative reporter John Solomon, who recently was hired as a Fox News contributor, after Ukraine’s new prosecutor general, Ruslan Ryaboshapka, said Oct. 4 he plans to review previous corruption investigations into Hunter Biden and his former employer, Ukraine-based Burisma Holdings. Hunter got the job in 2014 while his father was the Obama administration’s point man on Ukraine.



Solomon’s growing prominence in the media ecosystem means that leftist journalists –when they’re not busy making excuses for the secretive un-American Star Chamber-like impeachment process initiated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi– now feel obligated to engage in character-assassination efforts against him.



For example, Casey Michel, who boasts about being a former Peace Corps volunteer in Kazakhstan and supposedly a former “investigative reporter” at failed George Soros-funded media outlet ThinkProgress, launched a venomous, lie-packed Media Matters-style hit piece against Solomon as he moved to Fox.



In the sleazy, tabloid-like Daily Beast, Michel mocked the respected veteran newsman from the Washington Times and The Hill as “the self-proclaimed journalist at the heart of the unfolding scandal involving Ukraine, Rudy Giuliani, and the impending impeachment of Donald Trump.”



Solomon’s work “has underpinned the entire cascade of lies the White House and Trump in particular have pushed over the past few weeks,” and is “drenched in innuendo and mischaracterizations, all in service of attacking Trump’s political opponents,” he wrote.



Meanwhile, more information is beginning to emerge about the charmed life of ne’er-do-well Hunter Biden who throughout his adult life has kept blundering into highly lucrative job opportunities because his father was famous and politically powerful.



A handful of media outlets reminded readers of the August 2008 news story –when Joe Biden was still a U.S. senator representing Delaware— about Hunter Biden being paid “an undisclosed amount of money as a consultant by MBNA, the largest employer in Delaware, during the years the senator supported legislation that was promoted by the credit card industry and opposed by consumer groups.”



That law, opposed by left-wing activists, made it more difficult for consumers to obtain bankruptcy protection in the federal courts. Then-Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) opposed the 2005 bankruptcy legislation at the time.



The Bidens’ obvious intergenerational corruption is beginning to worry some left-wing journalists like Ryan Grim at The Intercept who argues in a paywalled article that Democrats need to come clean about the Bidens if they are to salvage the 2020 presidential election.



“The problem for Democrats is that a review of Hunter Biden’s career shows clearly that he, along with Joe Biden’s brother James, has been trading on their family name for decades, cashing in on the implication — and sometimes the explicit argument — that giving money to a member of Joe Biden’s family wins the favor of Joe Biden.”



Grim cannot resist being childish and petty, referring to presidential son Eric Trump by the awkward neologism “failson,” whatever that means.



But leftists are going to find it hard to ignore the mountain of evidence accumulating about the Bidens.



On Sean Hannity’s television show Solomon said the U.S. government knew the government of Ukraine intended to examine the activities of Burisma Holdings, which employed Hunter Biden and paid him a spectacularly generous salary even though the younger Biden lacked expertise in the energy field.



The report is important because it mothballs Trump-hating Democrats’ false talking point that the president threatened during the storied phone call to withhold foreign aid to Ukraine if its new president failed to launch a probe into Burisma and Hunter Biden’s role there.



“The U.S. government had open-source intelligence and was aware as early as February of 2019 that the Ukrainian government was planning to reopen the Burisma investigation,” Solomon said. “This is long before the president ever imagined having a call with President Zelensky,” he added, noting Petro Poroshenko was still the president of Ukraine at that time.



Solomon said that earlier this year NABU, the Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, asked to reopen an investigation into Burisma and owner Mykola Zlochevsky, and the probe began. It led to a 15-page “Notice of Suspicion” being lodged that alleged that “illicit funds” were moving through Burisma, he said.



This information was left out of the U.S. intelligence community whistleblower’s complaint, itself a bungled report on the July 25 phone call, against President Trump that was filed in September, Solomon said.



Solomon noted this allegation of “illicit funds” partly coincides with Hunter Biden’s service on Burisma’s board, which reportedly brought him up to $1 million a year. He added that Ukrainian investigators filed the Notice of Suspicion stating they were “looking at the possibility that the $3.4 million paid to Hunter Biden’s firm may have been part of the illicit funds that were moving through the company.”



“A month later, in April, the prosecutor’s office -- open-source intelligence, again -- the U.S. government officials confirming they were aware of this -- made a request of another investigative agency in Ukraine for assistance in going through these bank records,” Solomon said.



“That is a significant change in the timeline -- it was omitted from the whistleblower’s complaint, and the question is did he not know it or did he exclude it because it didn’t fit the narrative he was trying to write,” he said.


“That’s a question for Congress to answer.”

Indeed it is!!!

------------

What?! You mean he was investigating corruption JUST BECAUSE IT WAS A CAMPAIGN PROMISE?! Another subversive. I won’t believe it. No no no no. It can’t be true. It’s just a conspiracy to get Joe Biden because he’d otherwise beat Trump like a drum! It’s true! It has to be true! GNASH! SNARL!/that’s how you do parody, Schiff.

“What do you think about graft, your excellency?”
“It’s a living.”

—Groucho
Pretty sure you are violating forum rules by copying and pasting all that, parrot.

Secondly, the investigation into Burisma began and ended BEFORE Biden joined the board.

Goddam, you people are being led around by the nose!
No one has notified me...but I'm sure you will try to get VIDEOS BANNED especially when they bitch slap your lying asss...and show us a link or 2 stating Hunter wasn't there when the investigation was going on as Jojo Had the prosecutor FIRED or NO $2.5 BILLION in aid!
See post 44. Let me know which words you don't understand.
Dont have to. Your bullshit stands by itself!
There's that willful blindness which has become all too familiar in you pseudocons.

"Those investigations were into activities that took place before Hunter Biden joined the board in 2014."
Again link please and if you can find one we will see just what biased website it is from!....ROTFLMFAO
 

Forum List

Back
Top