UK and France deploy troops to Ukraine to pressure Vladimir Putin: "We must weaken his war machinery"

Europeans taking responsibility for a European war?

That’s just crazy enough to work!
A war the USA provoked and got started - so now FINISH the shit the USA started on YOUR own - before asking Europe to clean the mess the USA caused. Bloody Moron.
 
I suspect neither country has any operational forces to deploy.

They’ve been standing behind the US military for nearly a century.
England has 25,000 troops, 25 tanks and 14 pieces of artillery that are immediately deployable.
 
Zelenski needed to be reminded as to who needs who???? for a war the USA started and only Ukrainians and Russians have been dying - like I stated - you MAGA's are out of your mind.


Zelenski wanted to keep fighting, even though there is no sign that he is in any posiiton to every win.

That is HIM being out of his mind. MAGA is reasonable, rational and we want peace;.

I ask again, why does this offend you?
 
Guess you never studied/observed Putin (show me a single example of him ever having given in, especially in regards to Ukraine), and Ukraine (like it or not) is vital for him and Russia. - he didn't sacrifice 500,000+ dead and his economy for nothing.

But anyway - I have no reason to believe that this BEF or "coalition of the willing" is going to move into Ukraine without a ceasefire agreement having been signed.
He will not have a thing to say about it
 
He will not have a thing to say about it
Putin is the ONLY person who has the final say - or are you now even dreaming about the USA going into war with Russia???

Let me give you some "rude" awakening - mate.

Why do you "think" the USA deployed Pershing2 in the 80'ies in Germany and Europe??? Just to balance (which they never did) those SS20/22's - or to additionally secure and confine a possible nuclear confrontation with the Soviet-Union to Europe. As they had always planed, despite all their direct sabre rattling with the Soviets.

Kennedy willing to get into a nuclear war with the Soviet-Union?? - don't make me laugh
He simply sold out Europe via retracting US nukes from Italy and Turkey - so as to get Soviet nukes out of Cuba.
And for exactly this reason - the Soviets then came up with the intermediate nuke strategy towards Europe.

The USA "sacrificing" its boys for the sake of Europe - don't make me laugh.
Americans died to "liberate" Europe from the Nazis - that was the biggest joke by far, the USA simply knew that the Austrian was a deadly threat to them - and therefore logically went in to get rid of him.

During my 20 years Bundeswehr service, I also happened to serve a couple of years in a German Pershing 1 unit - and Luftwaffe nuclear capable forces. Therefore I knew exactly as to where the targets of these and other US nuclear weapons were planed for - NONE of them onto the Soviet-union.

The US had ALWAYS solely kept their strategic nuclear forces as a deterrent against a possible Russian nuclear attack onto the USA, in case the Russians getting hammered in Europe, would have tried to apply pressure directly onto the USA.

And Putin is proofing it to be correct - upon threatening Europe with a nuclear strike, (article 5) and the USA under Trump is publicly weaseling out of it's "propagated" commitment - and is now calling the shit they solely stirred up, a European problem, that needs to be solved by Europe. Whilst talking Cock&Bull about the USA having paid for NATO aka Europe's defense.

At least Biden tried his best to confine this war to Ukraine, so as not to get the US into the firing line.

BTW, MAGA's don't want peace - they simply expect others to die for their agenda and benefit. Just as the Democrats and Republicans before, who however never made their true intentions public.

Same as they got the RSA (my former home-country) to get involved in Angola to do their dirty business - and upon Reagan getting into business with Gorbachev and the collapse of the Soviet-Union became evident - they dropped and betrayed the RSA. Exactly as Trump is now doing it with Ukraine, whilst expecting some fancy business deals with Russia.

And don't get me wrong, I am not blaming the USA to solely take care for themselves and their own agenda. However just because they pocketed most of Europe's politicians since 1945 - doesn't mean that the USA can sell the European population for stupid.
 
Kruska, your hero can piss all he wants, but he has nothing to stop peace keeping troops in Ukraine and the participating countries agree to do so.

Do you want a war against the rest of the civilized world. Putin knows better even if you don't.
 
Like I said , get back to me when any NATO member sends over 100 troops to a Battle Zone
Get some books, and educate yourself about Bush's sen. & Bush jun war in Iraq, Somalia and Afghanistan
Instead of talking and spreading pure Cock&Bull.

Who's the ONLY NATO member to ever invoke article 5? - Yes the USA. Upon some terrorists blowing up some buildings in the USA.
The USA wasn't even attacked by a nation or a state.

How many troops did the USA send to Angola to support the SADF?? a full scale war the USA had provoked and initiated??
How many troops did the USA send to the Falklands to support the UK??
How many troops did the USA send to Algeria or French Indochina to support France??
How many troops did the USA send to Cyprus to fight invading Turkish forces??

But never-mind - you are amongst the dumbest MAGA's on USMB anyway.
 
Kruska, your hero can piss all he wants, but he has nothing to stop peace keeping troops in Ukraine and the participating countries agree to do so.

Do you want a war against the rest of the civilized world. Putin knows better even if you don't.
What makes you ignorant dummy even think - that Putin would be my hero???

And the "participating countries" haven't agreed onto anything so far - just talking. Since both the UK and France believe that loud-mouthing about Ukraine would help them to replace Germany - that doesn't have a workable government so far - as being the economic/political leader of the EU. It's a pure political power game within the EU - that has no bearing onto Ukraine.

But do tell me, how many peacekeepers would it take according to your opinion, to "effectively" secure a 3000km front-line?
And how much would that cost per year?? - you are a dreamer - mate.
 
15th post
England has 25,000 troops, 25 tanks and 14 pieces of artillery that are immediately deployable.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom