Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is a simple truth about the Trump Cult Party...They are unable to field candidates who can win fair elections, so they have to try and steal them by eliminating as many opposition voters as they can get away with. They have been doing it forever and aren't about to stop. Bigly!!!Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
There were many states. Jack is just a JackassPennsylvania, Georgia Michigan and North Carolina there was another,
There were many states. Jack is just a JackassPennsylvania, Georgia Michigan and North Carolina there was another,
Dummy. The Fed can't tell any State what to do on voting. Each state is different.Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
Delaware is the 6th most densely populated state. The top 7 are East coast Dem shitholes.And yet places like Delaware have even more restrictive mail in voting rules, remind me when Garland will sue them? Or New York or any other democratic state with more restrictive laws?who is being disenfranchised and how??Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
Let's see, anyone who can't get away to vote because of a job requirement, the disabled, the house bound, the caregivers. Lot's of people.
Add to that, reducing the number of polling place causing people to stand and wait in long lines for hours, reducing the number of drop boxes..curiously, both happening in districts largely populated by people of color.
Let's not even get started about those pesky mail in votes.
I wonder why that is?
Georgia’s voter suppression bill is an assault on our democracy | Brookings
Just as President Trump targeted voters in majority-Black cities such as Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia, these state lawmakers are taking their cues from the old white supremacy playbook, which teaches: If you can’t win fair and square, then suppress the vote.www.brookings.edu
My apologies. What # does Delaware rank on a population scale in the US?..and density? How many urban centers with packed populations does it have? I only travel through Delaware. I've never actually spent any time there.
My guess, the rules can stand because based on population, those rules don't result in any disenfranchisement. Gonna guess Garland will ignore Delaware.
How do their voting requirements effect blacks differently than everyone else?Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
Its not opinion. Some people are literate.There were many states. Jack is just a JackassPennsylvania, Georgia Michigan and North Carolina there was another,
As I routinely tell another poster. Put up and we can discuss.
Just typing it...is your opinion only. And you know all about opinions.
trendingpolitics.com
Steal how? What is in their voting laws that helps republicans?There is a simple truth about the Trump Cult Party...They are unable to field candidates who can win fair elections, so they have to try and steal them by eliminating as many opposition voters as they can get away with. They have been doing it forever and aren't about to stop. Bigly!!!Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
dems claim ID discriminates that making people actually ask for a ballot discriminates for example.Steal how? What is in their voting laws that helps republicans?There is a simple truth about the Trump Cult Party...They are unable to field candidates who can win fair elections, so they have to try and steal them by eliminating as many opposition voters as they can get away with. They have been doing it forever and aren't about to stop. Bigly!!!Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
Ohhh, so they are worried because they know republicans are responsible people who have ID's, while democrats are a bunch of fucktards who cant handle the most basic things in life? Thats embarrassing.dems claim ID discriminates that making people actually ask for a ballot discriminates for example.Steal how? What is in their voting laws that helps republicans?There is a simple truth about the Trump Cult Party...They are unable to field candidates who can win fair elections, so they have to try and steal them by eliminating as many opposition voters as they can get away with. They have been doing it forever and aren't about to stop. Bigly!!!Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
And yet places like Delaware have even more restrictive mail in voting rules, remind me when Garland will sue them? Or New York or any other democratic state with more restrictive laws?who is being disenfranchised and how??Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
Let's see, anyone who can't get away to vote because of a job requirement, the disabled, the house bound, the caregivers. Lot's of people.
Add to that, reducing the number of polling place causing people to stand and wait in long lines for hours, reducing the number of drop boxes..curiously, both happening in districts largely populated by people of color.
Let's not even get started about those pesky mail in votes.
I wonder why that is?
Georgia’s voter suppression bill is an assault on our democracy | Brookings
Just as President Trump targeted voters in majority-Black cities such as Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia, these state lawmakers are taking their cues from the old white supremacy playbook, which teaches: If you can’t win fair and square, then suppress the vote.
Its not opinion. Some people are literate.There were many states. Jack is just a JackassPennsylvania, Georgia Michigan and North Carolina there was another,
As I routinely tell another poster. Put up and we can discuss.
Just typing it...is your opinion only. And you know all about opinions.
Michigan Court: Sec. of State Broke Election Law with Absentee Ballot Order
A Michigan court has ruled that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson broke the law by unilaterally changing rules on absentee ballots before the 2020 election. The Michigan Secretary of State thus usurped the constitutional role delegated to the state legislatures. It was an argument that was...
bipartisanpolicy.org
Second sentenceIts not opinion. Some people are literate.There were many states. Jack is just a JackassPennsylvania, Georgia Michigan and North Carolina there was another,
As I routinely tell another poster. Put up and we can discuss.
Just typing it...is your opinion only. And you know all about opinions.
Michigan Court: Sec. of State Broke Election Law with Absentee Ballot Order
A Michigan court has ruled that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson broke the law by unilaterally changing rules on absentee ballots before the 2020 election. The Michigan Secretary of State thus usurped the constitutional role delegated to the state legislatures. It was an argument that was...
I'm sorry, this ruling was about ONE judge's opinion about a ruling of a SOS accepting signatures on those ballots. Not challenging the state constitutionality of mail in voting or the reasons the state did so.
Ultimately, this will probably be appealed.
And my by recollection, the Michigan legislature expanded that mail-in voting in a bipartisan fashion.
Michigan Makes Positive Election Law Changes | Bipartisan Policy Center
The Michigan legislature recently passed two bipartisan election laws and sent them to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) for her signature. Election officials initiated these…
And yet places like Delaware have even more restrictive mail in voting rules, remind me when Garland will sue them? Or New York or any other democratic state with more restrictive laws?who is being disenfranchised and how??Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
Let's see, anyone who can't get away to vote because of a job requirement, the disabled, the house bound, the caregivers. Lot's of people.
Add to that, reducing the number of polling place causing people to stand and wait in long lines for hours, reducing the number of drop boxes..curiously, both happening in districts largely populated by people of color.
Let's not even get started about those pesky mail in votes.
I wonder why that is?
Georgia’s voter suppression bill is an assault on our democracy | Brookings
Just as President Trump targeted voters in majority-Black cities such as Atlanta, Detroit, Milwaukee, and Philadelphia, these state lawmakers are taking their cues from the old white supremacy playbook, which teaches: If you can’t win fair and square, then suppress the vote.
My apologies. What # does Delaware rank on a population scale in the US?..and density? How many urban centers with packed populations does it have? I only travel through Delaware. I've never actually spent any time there.
My guess, the rules can stand because based on population, those rules don't result in any disenfranchisement. Gonna guess Garland will ignore Delaware.
Its not opinion. Some people are literate.There were many states. Jack is just a JackassPennsylvania, Georgia Michigan and North Carolina there was another,
As I routinely tell another poster. Put up and we can discuss.
Just typing it...is your opinion only. And you know all about opinions.
Michigan Court: Sec. of State Broke Election Law with Absentee Ballot Order
A Michigan court has ruled that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson broke the law by unilaterally changing rules on absentee ballots before the 2020 election. The Michigan Secretary of State thus usurped the constitutional role delegated to the state legislatures. It was an argument that was...
I'm sorry, this ruling was about ONE judge's opinion about a ruling of a SOS accepting signatures on those ballots. Not challenging the state constitutionality of mail in voting or the reasons the state did so.
Ultimately, this will probably be appealed.
And my by recollection, the Michigan legislature expanded that mail-in voting in a bipartisan fashion.
Michigan Makes Positive Election Law Changes | Bipartisan Policy Center
The Michigan legislature recently passed two bipartisan election laws and sent them to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) for her signature. Election officials initiated these…
Filibustering the For The People Act isn't going to stop preventing the republicans from changing voting laws in their states to prevent people from voting.
I'm very glad to see the DOJ is doing this.
The republicans shouldn't be able to pass laws that disenfranchises millions of people.
The new law will not go into effect. The DOJ will get a judge to stop it from going into effect while the case is ongoing. Hopefully people will come out in droves next year to vote these republicans who hate democracy out of office to replace them with people who do love democracy and our nation.
My senior community is very concerned about the GOP efforts to stop mail in voting. So many of us no longer have transportation or have walkers and canes and can't stand in line for hours. ..
For the most part these voters find Trump disgusting whether they are conservatives, moderates or liberals.
Second sentenceIts not opinion. Some people are literate.There were many states. Jack is just a JackassPennsylvania, Georgia Michigan and North Carolina there was another,
As I routinely tell another poster. Put up and we can discuss.
Just typing it...is your opinion only. And you know all about opinions.
Michigan Court: Sec. of State Broke Election Law with Absentee Ballot Order
A Michigan court has ruled that Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson broke the law by unilaterally changing rules on absentee ballots before the 2020 election. The Michigan Secretary of State thus usurped the constitutional role delegated to the state legislatures. It was an argument that was...
I'm sorry, this ruling was about ONE judge's opinion about a ruling of a SOS accepting signatures on those ballots. Not challenging the state constitutionality of mail in voting or the reasons the state did so.
Ultimately, this will probably be appealed.
And my by recollection, the Michigan legislature expanded that mail-in voting in a bipartisan fashion.
Michigan Makes Positive Election Law Changes | Bipartisan Policy Center
The Michigan legislature recently passed two bipartisan election laws and sent them to Gov. Gretchen Whitmer (D) for her signature. Election officials initiated these…
The Michigan Secretary of State thus usurped the constitutional role delegated to the state legislatures
Can you see it now?
