Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
ABC News disagrees.After a quick read of the ruling, thanks for the link, it's not a ruling in favor of President Trump,
abcnews.go.com
ABC News disagrees.
Score one for AMERICA!!!in an 9-0 decision, SCOTUS rules for Trump to be on ballot in Colorado.
Supreme Court Rules That Donald Trump Can Remain On Colorado Ballot, Rejecting Effort To Remove Him Under 14th Amendment
Donald Trump cannot be removed from state ballots in the 2024 election, despite a clause in the Constitution that restricts those who have engaged in an insurrection from holding office, the Supreme Court ruled today. In a 9-0 decision, the justices ruled that it was up to Congress, and not the...www.yahoo.com
"In a 9-0 decision, the justices ruled that it was up to Congress, and not the states, to make such a determination."
I'm glad it was 9-0. I guess it was just too embarrassing to be the one or two to clearly show their TDS so they voted with the others.in an 9-0 decision, SCOTUS rules for Trump to be on ballot in Colorado.
Supreme Court Rules That Donald Trump Can Remain On Colorado Ballot, Rejecting Effort To Remove Him Under 14th Amendment
Donald Trump cannot be removed from state ballots in the 2024 election, despite a clause in the Constitution that restricts those who have engaged in an insurrection from holding office, the Supreme Court ruled today. In a 9-0 decision, the justices ruled that it was up to Congress, and not the...
"In a 9-0 decision, the justices ruled that it was up to Congress, and not the states, to make such a determination."
Nope. It is what it is. WE don't riot and beat up cops like MAGAts do if they don't get their way.Insane Liberal twats in 3...2...1...
Nice catch, what a fucking hypocritical piece of shit he is.
Did they rule it was "an attack on our democracy"?Imagine an attack on our democracy so evil, so fascist, and so plain shitty, even Ketanji Brown and Sonia Sotomayor said "no, fuck that"!
This decision is a "punt", nothing more and nothing less. It was cowardice, plain and simple. From Sotomayer, Kagan, and Jackson concurring opinion.After a quick read of the ruling, thanks for the link, it's not a ruling in favor of President Trump, it is a ruling overturning the CO state decision.
No where does the court acquit FPOTUS#45, what the court did was find a way to overturn CO based on the lack of law by Congress. Which wasn't really a surprise given the questioning during oral arguments.
What does that mean? It is Congresses responsibility to establish a law as it pertains to federals office holders that would be the process that states have to follow. The court didn't rule here that only Congress can designate an individual as an insurrectionist, but that Congress must establish the process. Those are two different things.
WW
Just a few more minutes!
Scotusblog is live:
Announcement of opinions for Monday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
Opinions will be posted here:
2008 Term Opinions of the Court
Live feed from Agenda Free TV
I predict much REEEEEEEEE-ing.
That is not what the ruling says. Not even close.Poor babies!
It’s official and unanimously so: Trump is no insurrectionist so he is fully eligible to be president again.
Polls show he’s the people’s choice so it’s just a matter of time.
If you were here in my office, I’d give you a crying rag. This is tough, but you can get through it.That is not what the court ruled. At least read a bit so you do not make such a fool out of yourself again
YES, you do.WE don't riot and beat up cops
Care for a wager on whether he comes off any ballots due to being an “insurrectionist?”That is not what the ruling says. Not even close.
