U.S. Military Experts "U.S. Needs ‘Actions With Backbone’ to Deter Moscow From Invading Ukraine "

Are you on crack? We are not starting sht. This is Russian brinksmanship no more, no less. We are not even in the 4 way talks to take place. Get a grip or get back to the troll farm.

No, the Russians are not the aggressors.
They need and always owned and used the warm water port
Again, you are talking about some convictions of stealing oil and gas. Care to prove something?

Again, you are talking about some convictions of stealing oil and gas. Care to prove something?

I linked this several times now.
It is just one of many cases where the Ukraine is charged with stealing gas and oil from piplelines running through the country.
But this case was a verdict in favor of Russia, so is significant.


{...
On 8 June 2010, a Stockholm court of arbitration ruled Naftohaz of Ukraine must return 12.1 billion cubic metres (430 billion cubic feet) of gas to RosUkrEnergo, a Swiss-based company in which Gazprom controls a 50% stake. Russia accused Ukrainian side of diverting gas from pipelines passing through Ukraine in 2009.[11][12] Several high-ranking Ukrainian officials stated the return "would not be quick".[13]
...}
 
No, the Russians are not the aggressors.
They need and always owned and used the warm water port




I linked this several times now.
It is just one of many cases where the Ukraine is charged with stealing gas and oil from piplelines running through the country.
But this case was a verdict in favor of Russia, so is significant.


{...
On 8 June 2010, a Stockholm court of arbitration ruled Naftohaz of Ukraine must return 12.1 billion cubic metres (430 billion cubic feet) of gas to RosUkrEnergo, a Swiss-based company in which Gazprom controls a 50% stake. Russia accused Ukrainian side of diverting gas from pipelines passing through Ukraine in 2009.[11][12] Several high-ranking Ukrainian officials stated the return "would not be quick".[13]
...}
And also you maybe know that RosUkrEnergo was a great corruption scheme between some Ukrainian oligarchs and Gazprom.
 
May be, it is more close to Cuba 1962.

The point with Cuba was it was too close to the US for a Russian base, so the equal point with the Ukraine is that it is too close to Russia for a US base.
It is the US that has to back down, just as Russia did in 1962.
It is the US that is out of line or crossing the line in the sand.
 
The point with Cuba was it was too close to the US for a Russian base, so the equal point with the Ukraine is that it is too close to Russia for a US base.
It is the US that has to back down, just as Russia did in 1962.
It is the US that is out of line or crossing the line in the sand.
So make a deal similar to CFE and the problem solved.
 
So make a deal similar to CFE and the problem solved.

The US was also at fault for the Cuban Missile Crisis as well, because we had put nuclear missiles in Turkey and were going to upgrade them with much longer range missiles. So the USSR was then forced to retaliate by putting short range missiles in Cuba.
They never intended those missiles to stay.
It was always the intention they would be removed.
The US should never even have put missiles in Turkey at all.
 
They'll just install a puppet, as they've already done with Biden in the White House.

Putin and Xi couldn't have begun to buy the propaganda that was freely given them during the Trump years by the miserable clods in the MSM and the Pelosi lead House shitshow.
There is only one puppet when it comes to Russia and China cosying up to US politicians. And that traitor was kicked to touch in November 2020.



 
There is only one puppet when it comes to Russia and China cosying up to US politicians. And that traitor was kicked to touch in November 2020.




That's silly. I am far left and don't like Trump, but the best things Trump did was to try to scale back the senseless war propaganda about Russia.
Russia has never been a problem for us and we deliberately caused all the problems.
 
The US was also at fault for the Cuban Missile Crisis as well, because we had put nuclear missiles in Turkey and were going to upgrade them with much longer range missiles. So the USSR was then forced to retaliate by putting short range missiles in Cuba.
They never intended those missiles to stay.
It was always the intention they would be removed.
The US should never even have put missiles in Turkey at all.
Really?
IMG_20220121_185021.jpg


IMG_20220121_185051.jpg



There is the order to attack US missile and SSBN bases by the signal from Moscow.

The USA dodge the bullet in 1962 by prevention delivery of SS-5 to Cuba.

Ten days more and the history would go by the really different way.
 

Forum List

Back
Top