It's the one on the right, but thanks for being honest enough to admit you couldn't tell right off the bat.
Mormon Bob just ignores the question.
I don't consider it an admission. "Admission" would imply that my not being able to identity the trans dude in a photo lineup is evidence against my position. If that has a deeper meaning, I'm missing it.
I like to think that I can spot transwomen as such, because I see them so frequently. But maybe I'm only seeing half, or a third, or ten percent, and the rest are passing. As the art of womanface advances through science, they will likely be harder to spot. So what?
A white man today who wanted to identify a black rapper could probably be much more passable than Al Jolsen was as a black jazz singer, but that wouldn't make him any more a "real" black man.
Dylan Mulvaney is a performer whose schicht is to mock not just women, but very young girls. Somehow this makes him a hero to some people, and his affiliation with a beer label a victory for some cause or other.
I will say this. If Mulvaney is going to endorse a product, beer is among the most appropriate. It is a product for adults, and it is often used to take the edge off of reality, and to relax and avoid being serious. If he did not insist that he is a "transgirl" rather than a transwoman, I'd really have no problem with him. He's a drag performer. So long as he performs for adults, that's his and their business.
here's the thing... beauty pageant contestants get boob jobs, tummy tucks, face lifts... My personal least favorite is blepharoplasties performed on Asian Women to make their eyes "rounder", because I find Asian eyes beautiful.
I have eclectic tastes in women.
I also wouldn't have sex with most cisgendered women. Most of them aren't my type. I still, however respect them as individuals and treat them the way I would want to be treated.
Right, but you would not have sex with the dude on the right, even though he was just officially recognized as the winner in a contest of who can be the most beautiful and desireable woman. Because . . . it's a dude.
Ask me nicely to be respectful and call that person "she" and "her" and I don't mind at all. Live and let live, address people as they wish to be addressed. But don't do the 1984 thing where you hold up four fingers and apply shocks until I see five because you say there are five. Don't say I have to say that she is a biological female because she identifies as female and is made of biological stuff.
Go ahead and report me to HR for not denying reality. The left operates by inducing fear in normal people, such as people with jobs who don't want to be cancelled for having an opinion, or people with guns who don't want to be branded criminals for not following the latest annoying rule, like take the brace off your pistol. Threats don't fly with me, I'm too old to be intimidated by punks.
I may be talking to HR as a teacher someday, because I am not going to lie to a parent about their child being transitioned. I work in a reasonable district, so I'm hoping that doesn't come up. But if it does, I'm not going to knuckle under.
I'll call the transwoman "ma'am," but if you are her date (which you would not be) and say, "I'm so glad that you acknowledge that Glenda is a real woman in every way, since she announced it last year," I'm going to say, "uh, no."