Two Judges Rule that Abrego Garcia Should be Released - He's Still in Custody

[struth]

Millions of marriage counselors would disagree.

What a ******* hypocrite you are.

Donald Trump biopic The Apprentice depicts him as a rapist

Ali Abbasi’s film, starring Sebastian Stan, presents a fictionalised account of an incident recorded in Ivana Trump’s 1990 divorce deposition, and since retracted

www.theguardian.com

The scene, which occurs near the end of The Apprentice, depicts Trump reacting with fury after Ivana disparages his physical appearance. “You have a face like a ******* orange,” she tells him. “You’re getting fat, you’re getting ugly, and you’re getting bald.” The future president is then shown forcing his wife to the floor and raping her. “Did I find your G-spot?” he asks in the film.

In her 1990 divorce deposition, Ivana Trump described a similar assault that she said occurred shortly after her husband’s scalp-reduction surgery. She claimed that Trump pushed her to the floor and pulled out handfuls of her hair. Ivana initially described what followed as a rape, but later walked back on the claim. In a 1993 statement, she said, “On one occasion during 1989, Mr Trump and I had marital relations in which he behaved very differently towards me than he had during our marriage. As a woman I felt violated … I referred to this as a rape, but I do not want my words to be interpreted in a literal or criminal sense.”

Link to a marriage counselor saying domestic violence is ok…

Actually Ivanka address your propaganda

Donald Trump's Ex-Wife Ivana Disavows Old 'Rape' Allegation

Ivana Trump says she is the "the best of friends" with her ex-husband.

abcnews.go.com

 

[JoeB131]

No, an accusation thirty years after the fact by a woman who claims to have met Trump once and not screamed when he walked into her changing room and raped her is not nearly as credible as Abrego Garcia's description of the beatings she suffered while he was in the country illegally.

Question: Do you want a return to Biden-level border crossings?

The thing is, only one of those things ever got in front of a jury, and TWO juries didn't believe Trump.

I would like to see us reform immigration so that illegal border crossings aren't necessary.

We need immigrants. Otherwise, we'll end up as a country of old people with no one to take care of the work.

The fact that our policies don't match our needs is why we have border crossings.

 

[JoeB131]

Link to a marriage counselor saying domestic violence is ok…

Actually Ivanka address your propaganda

In short, before he buried her on the Golf Course, he bribed her to toe the party line

Not to mention the 25 other women who have said Trump abused them.

And the tape where he brags about how he can grab women by the *****.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The thing is, only one of those things ever got in front of a jury, and TWO juries didn't believe Trump.

So?

I would like to see us reform immigration so that illegal border crossings aren't necessary.

Uh-huh.

But since that is not going to happen anytime soon, do you want Biden-level illegal crossings, or Trump-level illegal crossings.

We need immigrants. Otherwise, we'll end up as a country of old people with no one to take care of the work.

The fact that our policies don't match our needs is why we have border crossings.

Sure, but no one wants to increase legal immigration because our social services and police are already overwhelmed by Biden'd illegals. Once the border has been secure for several years, real immigration reform will be possible.

Or would you prefer to go back to Biden-level illegal crossings? It's okay if you do prefer that. You voted for Biden, so you preferred it less than a year ago. Do you still?

 

[excalibur]

Nope. Courts granted him legal status.



NOt how our laws work.

I'd personally like to round up all you racists, but I can't think of another country I dislike enough to send you to.

He was never granted legal status, and you cannot provide proof that he was, because it never happened.

He was given an order of removal as entering illegally, he appealed to BIA and lost, he waived any further appeals years ago.

 

[excalibur]

So he had permission to be here, and he married an American, which gives him the right to residency.

Nope.

 

[excalibur]

So?

Uh-huh.

But since that is not going to happen anytime soon, do you want Biden-level illegal crossings, or Trump-level illegal crossings.

Sure, but no one wants to increase legal immigration because our social services and police are already overwhelmed by Biden'd illegals. Once the border has been secure for several years, real immigration reform will be possible.

Or would you prefer to go back to Biden-level illegal crossings? It's okay if you do prefer that. You voted for Biden, so you preferred it less than a year ago. Do you still?

IOW, he's for open borders.

 

[Seymour Flops]

IOW, he's for open borders.

Of course he is.

But, now he no longer has the "nothing we can do to stop border crossings" argument.

 

[excalibur]

Of course he is.

But, now he no longer has the "nothing we can do to stop border crossings" argument.

If he is an American, well, I don't get guys like that. Who want unending third world immigration that wrecks society, turns major cities into third world hellholes, and keeps wages depressed and housing costs high.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

 

[JoeB131]

Uh-huh.

But since that is not going to happen anytime soon, do you want Biden-level illegal crossings, or Trump-level illegal crossings.

Um, we need immigration, stupid. That Trump has temporarily scared people out of crossing and screwed up the economy to where there are less jobs here is not going to solve that.

Eventually, they will find new ways to get across.

He was never granted legal status, and you cannot provide proof that he was, because it never happened.

He was given an order of removal as entering illegally, he appealed to BIA and lost, he waived any further appeals years ago.

That order was stayed and he was granted a green card to work. Argument fail.

Look, I realize that most of you just can man up and admit you made a mistake.

 

[JoeB131]

Of course he is.

But, now he no longer has the "nothing we can do to stop border crossings" argument.

Eventually, they'll start crossing again the way they were before they figured out the asylum loophole.

The underlying cause- they have bodies and we have jobs - hasn't been solved. I guess when Trump wrecks the economy, we won't have jobs anymore.

If he is an American, well, I don't get guys like that. Who want unending third world immigration that wrecks society, turns major cities into third world hellholes, and keeps wages depressed and housing costs high.

Liberalism is a mental disorder.

Uh, what does all those things are wealth inequality, not immigration.

That you are too racist to see the benefits of immigration is your problem.

 

[Mac-7]

He could be sent to a third country. Am I wrong?
Seeing how the SC ruled, it opens doors.

They say the South Pole is lovely this time of year

 

[Mac-7]

Um, we need immigration, stupid. That Trump has temporarily scared people out of crossing and screwed up the economy to where there are less jobs here is not going to solve that.
Eventually, they will find new ways to get across.
That order was stayed and he was granted a green card to work. Argument fail.

Look, I realize that most of you just can man up and admit you made a mistake.

The mistake was letting him in the country to begin with

 

[Seymour Flops]

Um, we need immigration, stupid.

Legal immigration, liar.

Human smugglers and wife-beaters are not "vital to our economy."

 

[JoeB131]

Legal immigration, liar.

Human smugglers and wife-beaters are not "vital to our economy."

No proof he did either.

And I'm all for legal immigration. Let's make it easier to do so and not harder.

Garcia's case should have been resolved 10 years ago.

 

[Seymour Flops]

No proof he did either.

There's enough evidence to get rid of him. The principle is "innocent until proven guilty" not "allowed to stay in this country until proven guilty." If he is acquitted on the latest charges, hand him over to ICE and he's gone.

No problem.

And I'm all for legal immigration. Let's make it easier to do so and not harder.

Once we get Biden's mess cleaned up, we can do that. If the Democrats don't try to make it about letting in 5K+ illegals per day again.

Garcia's case should have been resolved 10 years ago.

Yes, by him legally immigrating and not joining a gang when he got here.

 

[struth]

In short, before he buried her on the Golf Course, he bribed her to toe the party line

Not to mention the 25 other women who have said Trump abused them.

And the tape where he brags about how he can grab women by the *****.

Name a woman that got a protective order because of domestic assault against Trump…

Yes, many men can grab women by the *****…comparing women letting men touch their oussies domestic violence is pathetic and desperate

 

[excalibur]

...

Uh, what does all those things are wealth inequality, not immigration.

That you are too racist to see the benefits of immigration is your problem.

LOL

Millions of impoverished third world people claw their way into America; impoverished and mostly illiterate, and you cry "wealth inequality". Give them your money then, Joe.

There is zero benefit to that sort of immigration.

And, oh my, the race card. The last argument the left always falls back on.

 

[excalibur]

No proof he did either.

...

His wife filed several official complaints. Are you claiming she filed false complaints? That is a chargeable offense.

 

[JoeB131]

There's enough evidence to get rid of him. The principle is "innocent until proven guilty" not "allowed to stay in this country until proven guilty." If he is acquitted on the latest charges, hand him over to ICE and he's gone.

Why? If he's acquitted, he's entitled to a residency visa through his wife. That's the law.

Once we get Biden's mess cleaned up, we can do that. If the Democrats don't try to make it about letting in 5K+ illegals per day again.

Actually, it's only a matter of time before they figure new ways to sneak in.

Yes, by him legally immigrating and not joining a gang when he got here.

No evidence he was ever in a gang.

Name a woman that got a protective order because of domestic assault against Trump…

His wife said she raped her. 25 other women said he sexually assaulted them.

Yes, many men can grab women by the *****…comparing women letting men touch their oussies domestic violence is pathetic and desperate

Um, guy, what Trump described was not consensual.