Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything

[surada]

"Higgins believes that anti-Trumpers in the FBI orchestrated the entire thing."

So what's his evidence for that?

And does that mean that Tucker is no longer blaming Ray Epps for everything?

Who is Higgins?

 

[surada]

Why did anyone have to "inspire" them?

When people commit crimes, that's on them. For law enforcement, the idea is not to look for someone who did not commit crimes and say he "inspired" them, and demand anyone who disagrees come up with someone else who "inspired" them.

But if you do, how about the still unknown number of FBI operatives who were in the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters, that the FBI tacitly admits were there but refuses to talk about? That seems much more likely than blaming the one guy we know told them to be peaceful.

Trump egged them on for five weeks before the mob attacked the Capitol.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Trump egged them on for five weeks before the mob attacked the Capitol.

He told them to be violent and to break into the Capitol?

Oh, wait. That was Ray Epps, plus an unknown number of FBI operatives dressed as Trump supporters on Jan 6th.

 

[IM2]

The STOLEN ELECTION was "the insurrection".

Nothing was stolen.

 

[IM2]

He told them to be violent and to break into the Capitol?

Oh, wait. That was Ray Epps, plus an unknown number of FBI operatives dressed as Trump supporters on Jan 6th.

None of that happened.

 

[IM2]

Who is Higgins?

A nutjob elected to congress.

 

[Seymour Flops]

None of that happened.

If the FBI cannot deny it, how can you?

 

[Faun]

Why did anyone have to "inspire" them?

When people commit crimes, that's on them. For law enforcement, the idea is not to look for someone who did not commit crimes and say he "inspired" them, and demand anyone who disagrees come up with someone else who "inspired" them.

But if you do, how about the still unknown number of FBI operatives who were in the Capitol dressed as Trump supporters, that the FBI tacitly admits were there but refuses to talk about? That seems much more likely than blaming the one guy we know told them to be peaceful.

Something had to inspire them. What was it?

 

[PeterPilot]

So show it then. The post you replied to shows it wasn't actually shown. Your whines don't refute my post.

3 years later, if a person does not realize he's been duped by government, he never will understand that. No amount of drawings, maps, constitutional documents, statements from whistleblowers or anything else will not help the fool who believes the statements of known liars.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Something had to inspire them. What was it?

You mean, besides all the irregularities, ballot, harvesting, and outright cheating in the 2020 election?

 

[Faun]

3 years later, if a person does not realize he's been duped by government, he never will understand that. No amount of drawings, maps, constitutional documents, statements from whistleblowers or anything else will not help the fool who believes the statements of known liars.

Quite the opposite, really. If you can't prove claims after 3 years, it means your claims are not true.

 

[Faun]

You mean, besides all the irregularities, ballot, harvesting, and outright cheating in the 2020 election?

Why would they want to assassinate Mike Pence for any of that?

 

[Seymour Flops]

Why would they want to assassinate Mike Pence for any of that?

Was that Trump supporters or FBI plants?

Answer with evidence.

 

[Faun]

Was that Trump supporters or FBI plants?

Answer with evidence.

Trump supporters. The FBI didn't have any plants.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Trump supporters. The FBI didn't have any plants.

Again I asked, how can you say that when Christopher Ray refuses to? Are you guessing?

 

[DGS49]

As I have stated previously in this forum, what prompted the January 6th riots was the widespread (and valid) belief that NONE of the irregularities of the election was being credibly investigated. Leftist Secretaries of State and courts were blocking good-faith efforts to investigate with decisions based on procedural issues.

Certification should have been delayed by at least 90 days.

 

[Faun]

Again I asked, how can you say that when Christopher Ray refuses to? Are you guessing?

No, because there is no evidence if there being an FBI plant there.

 

[Faun]

As I have stated previously in this forum, what prompted the January 6th riots was the widespread (and valid) belief that NONE of the irregularities of the election was being credibly investigated. Leftist Secretaries of State and courts were blocking good-faith efforts to investigate with decisions based on procedural issues.

Certification should have been delayed by at least 90 days.

A delay like that is against the law.

Regardless, there have been investigations and not one found any evidence of widespread fraud which could have overturned the election.

 

[Seymour Flops]

No, because there is no evidence if there being an FBI plant there.

Then why doesn't Chris Wray just say, "there were no FBI plants there?" He was given many opportunities to do so, and refused.

I can't imagine a legitimate reason to hide that information.

 

[Faun]

Then why doesn't Chris Wray just say, "there were no FBI plants there?" He was given many opportunities to do so, and refused.

I can't imagine a legitimate reason to hide that information.

Because he wasn't asked that. Aren't you paying attention to any of this?