Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Feb 16, 2016
16,451
29,244
2,430

Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything

8 Jan 2024 ~~ By Matt Margolis

PJ Media readers already know that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot wasn’t an insurrection, but it’s still absolutely mind-blowing just how much we’ve been lied about the events of that day.
The truth has never stopped the left from pushing the narrative that it wants, between the criminally partisan House Select Committee on Jan. 6 and Joe Biden's annual speeches making insane accusations and debunked mischaracterizations, it's almost a miracle they haven't turned Jan. 6 into a federal holiday akin to Memorial Day. According to the left, it was not only an insurrection, but as many as five Capitol Police officers died that day when there were actually zero.
Why do they continue to push these falsehoods and bogus narratives? For one thing, it's pretty much the only message Biden has (but, sadly for him, it's not working), and it's also an effective fundraising tool. According to a report from The Hill, Biden's campaign raised more than a million dollars following his January 6 anniversary speech.
Is the truth starting to sink in?
But again, we're being sold a huge barrel of lies. In an interview with Tucker Carlson on the new Tucker Carlson Network, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), who has been investigating the Capitol riot, says that there were at least 200 undercover FBI assets embedded in the crowd, inside and outside of the Capitol Building.
“We believe that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd outside the Capitol, embedded into groups that entered the Capitol or provoked entry of the Capitol,” Higgins told Carlson. "Given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged — and the number of people that were actually outside the Capitol and that entered — we believe 200 [is a] conservative number."
“It’s shocking what you’re saying and confirms everyone’s worst suspicions about this,” Carlson told Higgins, clearly alarmed by this new information. “It’s clearly true.”
Higgins said that based on the evidence he's reviewed, the FBI worked with local law enforcement, including the Capitol Police. The undercover agents, Higgins said, dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol “because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol.”
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
~Snip~
Higgins believes that anti-Trumpers in the FBI orchestrated the entire thing.
“It’s a complex web of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So, if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn’t take much,” Higgins explained.
~Snip~
In other words, according to Higgins, the evidence suggests that the Capitol riot, which has been used as a pretext to incarcerate Trump supporters without trial and to even prevent Trump from being allowed on the ballot in various states, was a set-up.
“I’m following the evidence, and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level,” Higgins said.


Commentary:
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going..
Higgins says the evidence points to FBI undercover agents who planted the seeds of a “radical occupation” of the Capitol online before Jan. 6.
“Some of that evidence shockingly reveals that the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were the first ones to plant the seeds of suggestions of a more radical occupation of the Capitol.”
Like Sullivan’s Insurgence USA? He was posting just that sort of stuff to his followers.
It wasn’t MAGA people he was inciting to go to DC. Sullivan was calling for the people who follow him, leftists or anarchists, to disguise themselves as Trump supporters when they got to DC.
This was a rather ingenious use of violent and non-violent stampeding, go spies, and agent provocateurs, to generate the appearance of aggression from initially peaceful/unarmed protesters who were by stages harassed, led and herded into the wrong place at the wrong time and had to start extricating/defending themselves. the videos I’ve seen speak for themselves.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going.

The government would have never voluntarily told the American people that these armed, undercover DOJ/DEA agents were walking east from the Ellipse area on January 6 during Trump's speech.
 
It was a voting rights protest against the corrupt Democrat Party's ballot rigging and voter fraud crimes.
It looks like the Dems/FBI turned it into a riot and they purposely provoked people to enter the capital.
They removed the barriers and open the doors and waved people in, then they charged them with trespassing.
This looks like entrapment.
 
The evil surrounding this Topic is monster size .

One good thing that is emerging and will continue to grow is that an increasing number of people are seeing how Big and False this Flag was .

Just another reason why the left has destroyed its immediate and even long term future .
And the FBI in particular needs ripping to pieces at the top to identify the true level of Treason that was actually involved .
 
The evil surrounding this Topic is monster size .

One good thing that is emerging and will continue to grow is that an increasing number of people are seeing how Big and False this Flag was .

Just another reason why the left has destroyed its immediate and even long term future .
And the FBI in particular needs ripping to pieces at the top to identify the true level of Treason that was actually involved .
Show us the evidence that it was a false flag.

Because I've got buckets of video of your MAGA ilk attacking the capitol, beating cops, smashing your way through barricaded doors to try and get to members of congress.

Now you try. What evidence do you have that it was a 'false flag'? Or is this just standard MAGA gaslighting, where you recite your belief over and over, backed by jackshit.

You know, like your Big Lie.
 

Tucker Carlson’s Latest Bombshell About January 6 Might Make You Rethink Everything

8 Jan 2024 ~~ By Matt Margolis

PJ Media readers already know that the Jan. 6 Capitol riot wasn’t an insurrection, but it’s still absolutely mind-blowing just how much we’ve been lied about the events of that day.
The truth has never stopped the left from pushing the narrative that it wants, between the criminally partisan House Select Committee on Jan. 6 and Joe Biden's annual speeches making insane accusations and debunked mischaracterizations, it's almost a miracle they haven't turned Jan. 6 into a federal holiday akin to Memorial Day. According to the left, it was not only an insurrection, but as many as five Capitol Police officers died that day when there were actually zero.
Why do they continue to push these falsehoods and bogus narratives? For one thing, it's pretty much the only message Biden has (but, sadly for him, it's not working), and it's also an effective fundraising tool. According to a report from The Hill, Biden's campaign raised more than a million dollars following his January 6 anniversary speech.
Is the truth starting to sink in?
But again, we're being sold a huge barrel of lies. In an interview with Tucker Carlson on the new Tucker Carlson Network, Rep. Clay Higgins (R-La.), who has been investigating the Capitol riot, says that there were at least 200 undercover FBI assets embedded in the crowd, inside and outside of the Capitol Building.
“We believe that there were easily 200 FBI undercover assets operating in the crowd outside the Capitol, embedded into groups that entered the Capitol or provoked entry of the Capitol,” Higgins told Carlson. "Given the scope of the operation and the number of doors where entry was allowed or even encouraged — and the number of people that were actually outside the Capitol and that entered — we believe 200 [is a] conservative number."
“It’s shocking what you’re saying and confirms everyone’s worst suspicions about this,” Carlson told Higgins, clearly alarmed by this new information. “It’s clearly true.”
Higgins said that based on the evidence he's reviewed, the FBI worked with local law enforcement, including the Capitol Police. The undercover agents, Higgins said, dressed as Trump supporters inside the Capitol “because those were the guys that knew their way around the Capitol.”
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
~Snip~
Higgins believes that anti-Trumpers in the FBI orchestrated the entire thing.
“It’s a complex web of FBI assets across the country that can be activated. So, if you have authority at some of the highest levels in the FBI, it doesn’t take much,” Higgins explained.
~Snip~
In other words, according to Higgins, the evidence suggests that the Capitol riot, which has been used as a pretext to incarcerate Trump supporters without trial and to even prevent Trump from being allowed on the ballot in various states, was a set-up.
“I’m following the evidence, and to my horror, it implicates our FBI at the highest level,” Higgins said.


Commentary:
As Carlson explained in the interview, FBI Director Wray has long refused to answer whether the FBI had assets dressed as Trump supporters at the Capitol that day.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going..
Higgins says the evidence points to FBI undercover agents who planted the seeds of a “radical occupation” of the Capitol online before Jan. 6.
“Some of that evidence shockingly reveals that the FBI agents that were operating undercover within the online groups across the country were the first ones to plant the seeds of suggestions of a more radical occupation of the Capitol.”
Like Sullivan’s Insurgence USA? He was posting just that sort of stuff to his followers.
It wasn’t MAGA people he was inciting to go to DC. Sullivan was calling for the people who follow him, leftists or anarchists, to disguise themselves as Trump supporters when they got to DC.
This was a rather ingenious use of violent and non-violent stampeding, go spies, and agent provocateurs, to generate the appearance of aggression from initially peaceful/unarmed protesters who were by stages harassed, led and herded into the wrong place at the wrong time and had to start extricating/defending themselves. the videos I’ve seen speak for themselves.
One point that Higgins made was that it is highly improbable that civilians would know how to get around the Capitol without help from people who knew where they were going.

The government would have never voluntarily told the American people that these armed, undercover DOJ/DEA agents were walking east from the Ellipse area on January 6 during Trump's speech.

J6 Reichstag Fire

I give credit to the Left. Had a Republican Administration used the FBI against Progressives like this they would have burned down the FBI Headquarters
 
Yea, you guys aren’t going to be able to change the narrative on Jan 6. We all saw what happened.

That day is going to be remembered for a very long time and you’re on the wrong side of history.

They're gonna try. And its the same half ass Jedi mind trick that they tried and failed to use with their Big Lie.

"Everybody knows ((insert imaginary bullshit)) happened."

Backed by jackshit.
 
They're gonna try. And its the same half ass Jedi mind trick that they tried and failed to use with their Big Lie.

"Everybody knows ((insert imaginary bullshit)) happened."

Backed by jackshit.
It's kind of amazing how much they use that trick.

In fact, if you go on here, on a daily basis, the simple amount of logical fallacies used in defense of Trump and Trumpism is mind boggling, often several at the same time.

There's this one. Which is begging the question.

You have the appeals to hypocrisy. "You aren't allowed to hold Trump accountable because you Democrats did (insert... well basically anything any Democrat ever did)

Usually used in conjunction with the false equivalency. (Trump had a right to take money from foreign governments, because Hunter Biden a private citizen did business with Chinese nationals)

Red herrings, Strawmen, Post Hoc,etc.etc.

Going on this board most often is a class in how to make bad arguments.

In the beginning I just figured, the people on here don't know how to debate properly. Over the years I've come to the conclusion that fallacies are simply the only way they can justify supporting Trump to themselves.
 
Show us the evidence that it was a false flag.

Because I've got buckets of video of your MAGA ilk attacking the capitol, beating cops, smashing your way through barricaded doors to try and get to members of congress.

Now you try. What evidence do you have that it was a 'false flag'? Or is this just standard MAGA gaslighting, where you recite your belief over and over, backed by jackshit.

You know, like your Big Lie.
The cops shouldn't have originally fired on the peaceful patriotic Trump supporters and hurled flash grenades at them first.
 
It's kind of amazing how much they use that trick.

In fact, if you go on here, on a daily basis, the simple amount of logical fallacies used in defense of Trump and Trumpism is mind boggling, often several at the same time.

There's this one. Which is begging the question.

You have the appeals to hypocrisy. "You aren't allowed to hold Trump accountable because you Democrats did (insert... well basically anything any Democrat ever did)

Usually used in conjunction with the false equivalency. (Trump had a right to take money from foreign governments, because Hunter Biden a private citizen did business with Chinese nationals)

Red herrings, Strawmen, Post Hoc,etc.etc.

Going on this board most often is a class in how to make bad arguments.

In the beginning I just figured, the people on here don't know how to debate properly. Over the years I've come to the conclusion that fallacies are simply the only way they can justify supporting Trump to themselves.

Its the way that they see the world.

Most of our posters.....are not particularly bright people.
 

Forum List

Back
Top