Trump Shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks’ Body is GONE — Body CREMATED Just 10 Days After Trump’s Assassination Attempt

[konradv]

Trump Shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks’ Body is GONE ​

— ​

Body CREMATED Just 10 Days After Trump’s Assassination Attempt​

BREAKING: Trump Shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks' Body is GONE — Body CREMATED 10 Days After Trump’s Assassination Attempt | The Gateway Pundit | by Anthony Scott

A preliminary investigation report by Rep.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

15 Aug 2024 ~~ By Anthony Scott

A preliminary investigation report by Rep. Clay Higgins (LA-R) has revealed the body of Trump rally shooter Thomas Matthew Crooks is gone.
In Rep. Higgins’s report, he wrote that on August 5th, when he requested to view the body of Thomas Matthew Crooks, he was told the body of Crooks was “gone.”
The representative from Louisiana further noted that the FBI released the body to be cremated just ten days after the shooting occurred on July 13.
Higgins, in his preliminary report of the Trump rally shooting, wrote, “My effort to examine Crooks’ body on Monday, August 5, caused quite a stir and revealed a disturbing fact… the FBI released the body for cremation 10 days after J13.”
~Snip~
Higgins also noted in his report that the FBI released the crime scene after three days and cleaned up biological evidence from the scene.

**********
​

Commentary:
Like Dallas, feds running all over themselves to hide or destroying evidence IN A LOCAL CRIME WITHIN THE JUSIDICTION OF THE COUNTY AND STATE. That's a felony in Texas and Pennsylvania if you can find an uncompromised D.A. to pursue it!
One would find that since the media is fully controlled similar to Nazi or East Berlin. This is exactly what they want us to think. Not saying it's not true.. likely is true, but it obvious isn't a threat to them. And it works great to keep us all distracted as we get closer to November. The last thing they want is us focused on stopping another steal.
This assassination attempt gets "curiouser and curiouser" as each day goes by. If the FBI, Secret Service, CIA and DHS were not complicit in the attempt on the life of Trump you have to wonder WTF is going on?
There's nothing more we need to know really. The security failures that never should have happened, did happen. The danger was suspected, but no action was taken against it. The sniper teams that should have been looking at threats outside of the event didn't see him, or didn't act until afterwards. Then there is the evidence that the FBI may have had a informant that was working with Crooks, and this cleansing of that evidence is a burial of that relationship.

Got nothing better to do?!

#INSIDEJOB

 

[FireFly]

When Hinkley shot Reagan, SS agents leaped on him and covered him so no other potential shooter could kill him.

But this time, the potential assassin didn't survive.

What good did that serve???

All we learned was he wanted to impress Jodie Foster.

They jumped on him to stop bullets flying a Reagan. Every bullet Hinkley fired hit a blocker person & took them all out of action or Reagan. They couldn't shoot back because there were too many people around Hinkley. There were no more blockers & no other choice but to tackle Hinkley.

 

[Foolardi]

What good did that serve???

All we learned was he wanted to impress Jodie Foster.

They jumped on him to stop bullets flying a Reagan. Every bullet Hinkley fired hit a blocker person & took them all out of action or Reagan. They couldn't shoot back because there were too many people around Hinkley. There were no more blockers & no other choice but to tackle Hinkley.

Plus a Made-for-TV Movie could be in the offing.
Dynamically proving how tough a cookie Donald Trump
virtually is.That even a gang of FBI agents had their hands full
taking The Don down to the ground for safe keeping.
Trump is rather big.Plus he's in good physical shape.
We already know full well how unflinching his persona
can be.He seldom backs down when he feels he's in the Right.
That one of his greatest assets.Plus he admires tough guys.
So in true fashion Tough guys like Dana White { UFC }
promoter and President of Ultimate Fighting Chamionships
is very close to Trump.
It was said that Trump was headed for a UFC event after his
attempted Asassination.I don''t recall if Trump went that night.
But I wouldn't doubt it.
The guy is the next best example of a Superman
or Clark Kent.Sans the eyeglasses and pencil.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

These people are corrupt to the core, and arrogant. Dems will be out of power soon. Then they start burning cities

 

[Skylar]

When Hinkley shot Reagan, SS agents leaped on him and covered him so no other potential shooter could kill him.

But this time, the potential assassin didn't survive.

Hinkley was 15 feet away, on the sidewalk. Crooks was 450 ft away, on top of another building.

 

[Skylar]

These people are corrupt to the core, and arrogant. Dems will be out of power soon. Then they start burning cities

Releasing the body to family after an autopsy is pretty standard stuff. I don't see what all the panty shitting about.

 

[Mac-7]

Dead bodies decompose rapidly & must be dealt with in a timely manor.

However you Trumptards believe they had to destroy it so investigators couldn't discover the chip in his brain linked back to Biden's remote control. LOL!

The government can keep a body in cold storage for a long time pending investigation

Cremation after just 10 days looks very suspicious

 

[Skylar]

The government can keep a body in cold storage for a long time pending investigation

Cremation after just 10 days looks very suspicious

Why? How long after an autopsy is done is a body 'supposed' to be held, according to who?

The FBI says its standard procedure. Do you have a source better than the FBI?

 

[Mac-7]

Why? How long after an autopsy is done is a body 'supposed' to be held, according to who?

The FBI says its standard procedure. Do you have a source better than the FBI?

99.99% of the time where there is no suspicion of foul play I think 10 days after an autopsy may be ok

But not when a presidential assassination is involved

 

[Skylar]

99.99% of the time where there is no suspicion of foul play I think 10 days after an autopsy may be ok

So this was an absolutely normal period of time within which to release the body.

And what 'foul play' is being suspected, backed by what evidence?

An accusation alone isn't justification for any change in policy. Neither is insinuation.

 

[Mac-7]

So this was an absolutely normal period of time within which to release the body.

And what 'foul play' is being suspected, backed by what evidence?

An accusation alone isn't justification for any change in policy. Neither is insinuation.

I’ll use the normal FBI fig leaf that the libs hide behind

The investigation is still in progress so its premature to destroy evidence

 

[Skylar]

I’ll use the normal FBI fig leaf that the libd hide behind

The investigation in still in progress so its premature to destroy evidence

The autopsy was finished. Pictures were taken. Measurements were made. Investigators have ample evidence to refer to. Investigations normally continue long past the autopsy. And yet this is a perfectly normal period of time to release the body.

So there's an obvious disconnect between your claims of an 'investigation in progress' and the 'destroying of evidence'. In every other circumstance, this is standard procedure.

You're claiming that this is somehow special....because of your apparent belief in 'foul play'. That you have no evidence to support. And insinuation is not a valid reason to hold a body. Nor is accusation alone. Nor is speculation.

So....why all the panty shitting?

 

[Mac-7]

The autopsy was finished. Investigations normally continue long past the autopsy. And yet this is a perfectly normal period of time to release the body.

Yes, and bodies can be exhumed if necessary and examined again

But not if they’ve been creamated

 

[Skylar]

Yes, and bodies can be exhumed if necessary and examined again

But not if they’ve been creamated

There's no requirement that a body be only buried but not cremated if there is an active investigation. This is a perfectly normal way for a family to handle a body once released.

The autopsy photos, measurements, and report are all considered valid evidence for investigators, prosecutors, and defense attorneys.

In every other instance, there are no restrictions in releasing the body to the family. There are no cremation restrictions. And there's no 'destruction of evidence'. The autopsy collects the evidence.

So why is this different? With evidence, please.

 

[Mac-7]

There's no requirement that a body be only buried but not cremated if there is an active investigation. This is a perfectly normal way for a family to handle a body once released.

The autopsy photos, measurements, and report are all considered valid evidence for investigators, prosecutors, and defense attorneys.

In every other instance, there are no restrictions in releasing the body to the family. There are no cremation restrictions. And there's no 'destruction of evidence'. The autopsy collects the evidence.

So why is this different? With evidence, please.

There is nothing normal or “usual” about an attempted assassination of a former president and current presidential candidate

 

[Skylar]

There is nothing normal or “usual” about an attempted assassination of a former president and current presidential candidate

Why would the body be handled differently here? The autopsy had already been conducted. There are no such restrictions as Higgins is referring to. Not for releasing of the body to family. Not for how they can handle the body. Not the time frame in which the body was released.

Everything about the way this was handled was routine and perfectly normal.

What is the issue? Vague and fact free allegations of 'foul play' aren't a valid basis for holding up a body. Or inventing non-existent restrictions.

 

[Blackrook]

The autopsy was finished. Pictures were taken. Measurements were made. Investigators have ample evidence to refer to. Investigations normally continue long past the autopsy. And yet this is a perfectly normal period of time to release the body.

So there's an obvious disconnect between your claims of an 'investigation in progress' and the 'destroying of evidence'. In every other circumstance, this is standard procedure.

You're claiming that this is somehow special....because of your apparent belief in 'foul play'. That you have no evidence to support. And insinuation is not a valid reason to hold a body. Nor is accusation alone. Nor is speculation.

So....why all the panty shitting?

Because, Skylar, we think your side tried to kill Trump and now with all the SS and FBI tampering with the evidence, we'll never know for sure.

 

[Skylar]

Because, Skylar, we think your side tried to kill Trump and now with all the SS and FBI tampering with the evidence, we'll never know for sure.

Yeah, but you guys think a lot of crazy shit. And you imagining a conspiracy theory doesn't translate into anyone's obligation to humor you......let alone, make up non-existent restrictions on how dead bodies are handled, or changes to FBI procedure.

What was done with Crooks body was perfectly normal, from the time to release to the family to what the family did with the body.

And, there was an autopsy. So plenty of pictures, measurements and an eventual report on the condition of the body. All of which is evidence.

 

[Mac-7]

Because, Skylar, we think your side tried to kill Trump and now with all the SS and FBI tampering with the evidence, we'll never know for sure.

Skylar knows all of that

This is just endzone dancing by a leftie

 

[Skylar]

Skylar knows all of that

This is just endzone dancing by a leftie

Oh, I know that you all have a conspiracy and feelings about it. But I'm asking for a rational, factual, evidence based connection to reality that would justify a change from normal procedure on the release of a body, including invention of non-existent restrictions on when it can be released and how the body can be handled after release.

As this was handled in a perfectly normal manner, in a perfectly ordinary time frame.

Its the gap between normal procedure and a standard autopsy........and all the 'foul play' claims that you can't back factually, where your justification for such hyperbolic overreaction becomes unreasonable and indefensible.

In short, why all the panty shitting? With evidence, please.