colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
But you don't leave a polling place with a ballot, do you?You can do that now. This changes nothing for you. But makes it more secure for those of us who actually care.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But you don't leave a polling place with a ballot, do you?You can do that now. This changes nothing for you. But makes it more secure for those of us who actually care.
Never needed an ID to vote before. I guess you can call me an originalistWe don't need to connect a ballot to a person. I am against that as well. In person voting using an ID would solve many of these problems, but Democrats don't want this for obvious reasons and it has NOTHING to do with voter disenfranchisement.
They aren't legal according to state law, moron.Well the age old question is "Does mud really stick to the wall"?
They want to throw out any vote that they deem unworthy but is legal according to the rules that the State has set up at the time of the vote.
Lawyer strategy - use any and all options, if it fails well they get paid. It it works well they get paid.
well it may stick for a short time but eventually it falls but hey you still get paid
Doubt it. The type of voter fraud prevented by photo IDs is extremely uncommon. This is an answer in search of a problem.Maybe the immortality in the country has gotten to a point where we can no longer just trust that people(or pollsters) are who they say they are? Personally, I think an ID should be scanned(to eliminate fake ids and such) and your name immediately marked off the list as having voted. This scan would in no way be associated to your actual vote, just that you voted for somebody. Also, the number of ID's scanned and accepted should match the actual number of votes to eliminate the possibility of folks voting without an ID. That would eliminate many issues, but I doubt that the left would be in favor of such a system. It makes it much more difficult to have a few inconsistencies here and there when needed.
You don't have to leave the polling place with a ballot no matter which way you do it. Destroy it as you do the other half of the ballot.But you don't leave a polling place with a ballot, do you?You can do that now. This changes nothing for you. But makes it more secure for those of us who actually care.
EDIT: ESPEICALLY WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS YOU FUCKING STUPID HYPOCRITE. THEY CAN STAND OVER YOUR SHOULDER, OR SIMPLY FILL IT OUT IN FRONT OF YOU AND MAKE YOU SIGN IT.cept now I can intimidate you into voting someone and I can demand proof that you did so.
I'm being contrarian. As I said earlier, it's not perfect but it's not bad either.
Bullshit.Never needed an ID to vote before. I guess you can call me an originalistWe don't need to connect a ballot to a person. I am against that as well. In person voting using an ID would solve many of these problems, but Democrats don't want this for obvious reasons and it has NOTHING to do with voter disenfranchisement.
Colfax is not smart. He submits some of the dumbest posts in this forum.You don't have to leave the polling place with a ballot no matter which way you do it. Destroy it as you do the other half of the ballot.But you don't leave a polling place with a ballot, do you?You can do that now. This changes nothing for you. But makes it more secure for those of us who actually care.
EDIT: ESPEICALLY WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS YOU FUCKING STUPID HYPOCRITE. THEY CAN STAND OVER YOUR SHOULDER, OR SIMPLY FILL IT OUT IN FRONT OF YOU AND MAKE YOU SIGN IT.cept now I can intimidate you into voting someone and I can demand proof that you did so.
I'm being contrarian. As I said earlier, it's not perfect but it's not bad either.
Edit: I get worked up because you SOUND smart... but you're not. You are a hack that follows what other people say you should do and put NO THOUGHT into your stances. If that was actually important to you then you would BE VERY AGAINST MAIL IN BALLOTS.
Unless someone is coercing you to do so.You don't have to leave the polling place with a ballot no matter which way you do it. Destroy it as you do the other half of the ballot.
EDIT: ESPEICALLY WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS YOU FUCKING STUPID HYPOCRITE. THEY CAN STAND OVER YOUR SHOULDER, OR SIMPLY FILL IT OUT IN FRONT OF YOU AND MAKE YOU SIGN IT.Unless someone is coercing you to do so.You don't have to leave the polling place with a ballot no matter which way you do it. Destroy it as you do the other half of the ballot.
tissues? why be a big crying baby? Your idiot lost move on. back to sanity....I won't be making fun of you in here as I won't care about politics post trump....now that his toxic will be gone we can go back to our old ways. The racists won't a locomotive that emboldens them so they can go to hiding again.The entire election was illegal...that's the point....
EDIT: ESPEICALLY WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS YOU FUCKING STUPID HYPOCRITE. THEY CAN STAND OVER YOUR SHOULDER, OR SIMPLY FILL IT OUT IN FRONT OF YOU AND MAKE YOU SIGN IT.Unless someone is coercing you to do so.
Mail in ballots can be later spoiled. There's a perfectly normal process for it.
EDIT: ESPEICALLY WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS YOU FUCKING STUPID HYPOCRITE. THEY CAN STAND OVER YOUR SHOULDER, OR SIMPLY FILL IT OUT IN FRONT OF YOU AND MAKE YOU SIGN IT.Unless someone is coercing you to do so.
Mail in ballots can be later spoiled. There's a perfectly normal process for it.
Edit: I get worked up because you SOUND smart... but you're not. You are a hack that follows what other people say you should do and put NO THOUGHT into your stances. If that was actually important to you then you would BE VERY AGAINST MAIL IN BALLOTS.
You seem not to want to address that. You see that thing down in my sig? Where it says you have no character? This is why. People with character tend to admit when they are wrong or said something.. Pretty stupid.
If you can’t maintain some semblance of emotional stability, maybe you’re not really cut out to reply to my comments.EDIT: ESPEICALLY WITH MAIL IN BALLOTS YOU FUCKING STUPID HYPOCRITE. THEY CAN STAND OVER YOUR SHOULDER, OR SIMPLY FILL IT OUT IN FRONT OF YOU AND MAKE YOU SIGN IT.Unless someone is coercing you to do so.
Mail in ballots can be later spoiled. There's a perfectly normal process for it.
Edit: I get worked up because you SOUND smart... but you're not. You are a hack that follows what other people say you should do and put NO THOUGHT into your stances. If that was actually important to you then you would BE VERY AGAINST MAIL IN BALLOTS.
You seem not to want to address that. You see that thing down in my sig? Where it says you have no character? This is why. People with character tend to admit when they are wrong or said something.. Pretty stupid.
People who are hypocrites annoy me. Well.. Maybe you really are that stupid, and you aren't actually a hypocrite. The good news is people see this. So at least they'll look at it, know your an idiot, and won't make the same arguments themselves.If you can’t maintain some semblance of emotional stability, maybe you’re not really cut out to reply to my comments.
I mean, you’re like this basically every time you do. You sound kind of nuts.
Ballots can be spoiled... Yeah... Umm... Do you know what a spoiled ballot is? It doesn't have anything to do with what we are talking about.You have serious anger management issues. I don’t know what your problem is.
I address the point above, mail in ballots can be later spoiled. Did you not read that?
Jesus, and you accuse me of having no character while flying off the handle for no reason because you didn’t read my own reply (which was three sentences long, not sure how you could so easily miss it).