There are a few things that could come to light, potentially, that might not be covered by traditional IRS audits:
- I don't know if IRS auditors have gone so far as to check the accusation that he manipulated commercial real estate values to maximize insurance and minimize taxes. That would be a problem, but I can't imagine it would matter politically.
- I suppose sources of income, rather than how it was reported, could mean something, if the money came from unsavory sources or global adversaries. That wouldn't necessarily be illegal, but it could possibly advance a storyline about him.
- Without having legal ramifications, the documents could point to a man and an organization who are far more in debt and far weaker financially than they have been leading people to believe. That certainly wouldn't be a surprise, but it's not actionable.
Or they really don't find much of anything. My wild-ass guess is that there won't be any blockbuster news from this, though.