Trump's New York Hush-Money Case Will Start March 25. It's The First Criminal Trials.

[Procrustes Stretched]

Senate confirmed TWICE dumbass.

Law professor's opinion

MSN

By ERIC TUCKER

Judge sharply rebukes Barr's handling of Mueller report

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday sharply rebuked Attorney General William Barr's handling of the special counsel's Russia report, saying Barr had made “misleading public statements” to spin the investigation's findings in favor of President Donald Trump and had shown a “lack of candor."

apnews.com

Published 3:52 PM PDT, March 5, 2020

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday sharply rebuked Attorney General William Barr’s handling of the special counsel’s Russia report, saying Barr had made “misleading public statements” to spin the investigation’s findings in favor of President Donald Trump and had shown a “lack of candor.”

U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton delivered the criticism in a 23-page order in which he directed the Justice Department to provide him with an unredacted version of the report so that he could decide if any additional information from the document could be publicly disclosed.
The scolding was unusually blunt, with Walton saying Barr had appeared to make a “calculated attempt” to influence public opinion about the report in ways favorable to Trump. The rebuke tapped into lingering criticism of Barr, from Democrats in Congress and special counsel Robert Mueller himself, that he had misrepresented some of the investigation’s most damning findings.

Mueller confronted Barr over characterization of special counsel's report​

People Were Trying to Figure Out William Barr. Was he Busy Stockpiling Power.​

Is he the operator who spun the then-secret Mueller report? Or the straight shooter who later disclosed portions that were damaging to President Trump?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If committing adultery is a crime, we'll have to build many prisons.

Wrong.

‘“The allegations are in substance," New York judge Juan Merchan told prospective jurors, "that Donald Trump falsified business records to conceal an agreement with others to unlawfully influence the 2016 presidential election."’

MSN

 

[Blackrook]

Wrong.

‘“The allegations are in substance," New York judge Juan Merchan told prospective jurors, "that Donald Trump falsified business records to conceal an agreement with others to unlawfully influence the 2016 presidential election."’

MSN

He paid off a prostitute to keep her quiet. It's immoral, but not a crime.

 

[kyzr]

WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge on Thursday sharply rebuked Attorney General William Barr’s handling of the special counsel’s Russia report, saying Barr had made “misleading public statements” to spin the investigation’s findings in favor of President Donald Trump and had shown a “lack of candor.”

U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton delivered the criticism in a 23-page order in which he directed the Justice Department to provide him with an unredacted version of the report so that he could decide if any additional information from the document could be publicly disclosed.
The scolding was unusually blunt, with Walton saying Barr had appeared to make a “calculated attempt” to influence public opinion about the report in ways favorable to Trump. The rebuke tapped into lingering criticism of Barr, from Democrats in Congress and special counsel Robert Mueller himself, that he had misrepresented some of the investigation’s most damning findings.

Mueller confronted Barr over characterization of special counsel's report​

People Were Trying to Figure Out William Barr. Was he Busy Stockpiling Power.​

Is he the operator who spun the then-secret Mueller report? Or the straight shooter who later disclosed portions that were damaging to President Trump?

LOL!! You really want to put up the RUSSIA HOAX!!!!!
THERE WAS NO FUCKING RUSSIA COLLUSION BY TRUMP

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

LOL!! You really want to put up the RUSSIA HOAX!!!!!
THERE WAS NO FUCKING RUSSIA COLLUSION BY TRUMP

By Trump? No. By his campaign? Yes.

 

[AntonToo]

He paid off a prostitute to keep her quiet. It's immoral, but not a crime.

Leave it to Trump to find a way to make a crime of it.

Trump Co. checks with Trump signature say they are bussiness expenses for Cohen's legal services, not pay offs for keeping prostitutes quiet.

That's still called fraud in NY and is a crime when done for the purpose of illicit electioneering.

 

[Lakhota]

 

[Faun]

He paid off a prostitute to keep her quiet. It's immoral, but not a crime.

So? He's not charged with paying off a prostitute.

 

[kyzr]

By Trump? No. By his campaign? Yes.

Nope. That was Hillary paying Russians for the Steele Dossier.

Hillary Clinton and Democrats settle Steele dossier electoral case for $113,000

Federal Election Commission had investigated alleged misreporting of expenditure by campaign during 2016 election

www.theguardian.com

Hillary Clinton and Democrats settle Steele dossier electoral case for $113,000​

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

He paid off a prostitute to keep her quiet. It's immoral, but not a crime.

Trump falsified business records, for which he is being appropriately and lawfully prosecuted.

 

[rightwinger]

/---/ Trump's home state is Florida, dummy.

home state - Wiktionary, the free dictionary

en.wiktionary.org

1. The state of the United States of America in which a person was born or raised or currently resides.

 

[HaShev]

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Nope. That was Hillary paying Russians for the Steele Dossier.

Hillary Clinton and Democrats settle Steele dossier electoral case for $113,000

Federal Election Commission had investigated alleged misreporting of expenditure by campaign during 2016 election

www.theguardian.com

Hillary Clinton and Democrats settle Steele dossier electoral case for $113,000​

Wow!

"Federal Election Commission had investigated alleged misreporting of expenditure by campaign during 2016 election"

you do know this is and was no big deal?