his lawyers copped to violating the constitution? violating the oath triggers the 14th.
Trump's lawyers: He didn't take an oath to defend the Constitution
- Thread starter Mac1958
- Start date
progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 67,897
- 42,701
- 2,615
DudleySmith
Diamond Member
- Dec 21, 2020
- 22,369
- 15,932
- 2,288
BULLFUCKINGSHIT.....
lol these deviants are complete idiots.
EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 87,951
- 63,369
- 3,645
There is no oath to support the constitution.
the oath is to "uphold and defend the constitution...." do you need a thesaurus? is english not your native language?
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,288
- 21,277
- 2,320
"This" could be taken to mean a number of things. Too many to mention them all. Here's one..I ran out of adjectives to describe this disaster a long time ago. I know Trump's followers -- and I do mean followers -- will defend this.
From the Colorado case:
In a filing made to the Colorado Supreme Court, lawyers for former President Donald Trump say that he never took an oath “to support the Constitution of the United States’’ and should therefore not be banned from the state’s presidential ballots in 2024 based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Trump legal news brief: Appeals court rules Trump can be sued for inciting Jan. 6 violence
A federal appeals court rules that civil lawsuits seeking damages against former President Donald Trump for his role in inciting the U.S. Capitol riot carried out by his supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, can proceed.news.yahoo.com
I would ask the Trumpsters what they think of this, but I know they're fine with the idea.
I still can't believe this is happening here. In America. No way.
The judge who spearheaded the judiciary’s response to the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, blamed that event on “big lies” and warned that the country is in danger of turning toward authoritarianism.
As the federal court in Washington that Judge Beryl Howell once oversaw prepares for a historic trial of former President Donald Trump on charges of attempting to fraudulently overturn the results of the 2020 election, the jurist used a rare public speech Tuesday to lament that many of those convicted for their actions on Jan. 6 fell under the sway of falsehoods.
“My D.C. judicial colleagues and I regularly see the impact of big lies at the sentencing of hundreds, hundreds of individuals who have been convicted for offense conduct on Jan. 6, 2021, when they disrupted the certification of the 2020 presidential election at the U.S. Capitol,” said Howell, an appointee of President Barack Obama.
Howell, who served as chief judge of the District Court from 2016 until March and remains on the bench there, also suggested that the dangers evident on the day of the Capitol riot have not passed — in part because some Americans have become unmoored from facts.
Judge key to Jan. 6 cases warns US faces 'authoritarian' threat
Judge Beryl Howell sees “time of testing” for nation as facts are denied and disputed.
www.politico.com
"Uphold and defend" do not require "support?" i guess it depends on what "is" is.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,288
- 21,277
- 2,320
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
Support indicates it applies to government employees, not the president. It is for the people to decide our president, not courts. There are two Constitutional remedies available already. This silly nonsense of anyone being ineligible is just one more form of liberal whining.
berg80
Diamond Member
- Oct 28, 2017
- 25,288
- 21,277
- 2,320
Ocasio-Cortez slams Republicans for using ‘fabricated image’ in Biden hearing
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) slammed Republicans for using a “fabricated image” in the first impeachment inquiry hearing into President Biden. Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) launched a…
thehill.com
di you really think robt e lee would be allowed to run for president?
and your premise is false. the president gets a pay check and a w-2. he is a government employee.
Rambunctious
Diamond Member
- Jan 19, 2010
- 78,485
- 77,173
- 3,605
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,245
- 99,375
- 3,645
Jesus man, talk to a professional. It's a public record court filing. You're embarrassing yourself.BULLFUCKINGSHIT.....
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,245
- 99,375
- 3,645
"Trump never did what we all saw him do on live television."
Cultists: "That seems right."
Cultists: "That seems right."
eagle1462010
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2013
- 73,488
- 38,486
- 2,605
Yahoo news respewing Truth Out garbageI ran out of adjectives to describe this disaster a long time ago. I know Trump's followers -- and I do mean followers -- will defend this.
From the Colorado case:
In a filing made to the Colorado Supreme Court, lawyers for former President Donald Trump say that he never took an oath “to support the Constitution of the United States’’ and should therefore not be banned from the state’s presidential ballots in 2024 based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Trump legal news brief: Appeals court rules Trump can be sued for inciting Jan. 6 violence
A federal appeals court rules that civil lawsuits seeking damages against former President Donald Trump for his role in inciting the U.S. Capitol riot carried out by his supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, can proceed.
I would ask the Trumpsters what they think of this, but I know they're fine with the idea.
I still can't believe this is happening here. In America. No way.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 110,245
- 99,375
- 3,645
Yahoo News isn't a news source, genius.
And the real source is a public record court filing.
You are embarrassing yourself.
- Jun 22, 2020
- 20,852
- 23,337
- 2,288
Are you Cult 46 drones upset about that?
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 76,348
- 67,179
- 3,615
Nice scoop, Jimmy.I ran out of adjectives to describe this disaster a long time ago. I know Trump's followers -- and I do mean followers -- will defend this.
From the Colorado case:
In a filing made to the Colorado Supreme Court, lawyers for former President Donald Trump say that he never took an oath “to support the Constitution of the United States’’ and should therefore not be banned from the state’s presidential ballots in 2024 based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Trump legal news brief: Appeals court rules Trump can be sued for inciting Jan. 6 violence
A federal appeals court rules that civil lawsuits seeking damages against former President Donald Trump for his role in inciting the U.S. Capitol riot carried out by his supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, can proceed.
I would ask the Trumpsters what they think of this, but I know they're fine with the idea.
I still can't believe this is happening here. In America. No way.
Trump tells court he had no duty to 'support' the Constitution as president
Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime. The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in...
www.usmessageboard.com
Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 76,348
- 67,179
- 3,615
Trollmod is here.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 65,087
- 59,277
- 3,600
We are smart enough to know saying something means next to nothing. Wise up hack.I ran out of adjectives to describe this disaster a long time ago. I know Trump's followers -- and I do mean followers -- will defend this.
From the Colorado case:
In a filing made to the Colorado Supreme Court, lawyers for former President Donald Trump say that he never took an oath “to support the Constitution of the United States’’ and should therefore not be banned from the state’s presidential ballots in 2024 based on Section 3 of the 14th Amendment.
Trump legal news brief: Appeals court rules Trump can be sued for inciting Jan. 6 violence
A federal appeals court rules that civil lawsuits seeking damages against former President Donald Trump for his role in inciting the U.S. Capitol riot carried out by his supporters on Jan. 6, 2021, can proceed.
I would ask the Trumpsters what they think of this, but I know they're fine with the idea.
I still can't believe this is happening here. In America. No way.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Biden Family Desperate for a New Source of Income After ‘the Spigot Is Turned Off’: Report
- Started by Hollie
- Replies: 2
-
DOJ charges man (Not a Columbia student) with hate crimes over Columbia protests- Started by Zincwarrior
- Replies: 1
-
An excellent summary of the events leading up to Judge Boasberg's May 7 hearing...........- Started by berg80
- Replies: 2
-
